They have much to say – indicated approval of my use of our first interview some weeks ago and feeling more comfortable this time around.
Initial sit down completed this morning.
Hoping to conclude interview tomorrow afternoon or Saturday morning at the latest - should be ready to publish within a day or two after.
Cheers,
-UM
Looking forward to another interview.
This is very exciting!
Would not be much speculation to see F&F weapons coming out if the OBnon planned and Union paid for protestors on Wall Street does not convince congress to give in on OBnon’s Bailout part deux also marketed as jobsbill.
From your last interview with this person: I sure hope you pursue a comment I remember being made then that alluded to certain democrats affiliated with Wall Street firms manipulating things to produce a financial meltdown and so elect obama. Recall the other side was ahead in the polls till that happened.
I am sure I read something to that effect. I KNOW I read that membership in the democrat party – or pulling the democrat con level in the voting booth – was confessed to by your guest.
Also, will this person not admit that the problem was caused by democrat govt. policies relating to forcing home loans of poor quality on the banks, will he not admit that both Greenspan and Bush 2 are on record as warning congress repeatedly about this problem begun under Carter, strengthened by Clinton and pushed by candidate obama?
Be interesting to see what he has to say about 0bama and Soros’ barking dogs out in the street the last three weeks at Van Jones’ direction. 0bama’s reelection strategy has two prongs now- racism and Wall St. Does the Insider see himself burned in effigy yet?
I gathered that Wall Street Insider is a Democrat, right?
Will W S Insider have any more to say about the Obama Administration’s intent to unionize the Armed Forces? That possibility took me by complete surprise. I wonder why W S Insider thinks the Democrats are intent on unionizing the Armed Forces?
It will give a new meaning to the term “Missile Strike”, “Stryker Brigade” etc.
Haha hehe! Yeah, you’re so right!!
Why would the obama cabal want to unionize the armed forces? Maybe to get the rank and file voting democrat and to remove potential kickback on their part to political changes in the culture they fight for. The officer corps is probably interested enough in their career path to do whatever they are told by whom ever. The rank and file enlisted person, not so much. Thinkaboudit.
If you are going to have a communist revolution, at some point you will need the military’s support. The notion of the standing armed forces being brought to bear against the domestic population is unthinkable given the military culture of honor that exists. Therefore it becomes necessary to change that culture. Union goons being brought to bear on the populace is far more conceivable.
Yeah, Jen, but it would take quite some time to get the military in that type of mind frame.
I know this much— This is a country which is most unique! My house is full of guns and I know many who people who have guns. I am a female who was taken out to the countryside at the young age of 13 to target practice. If those people are this naive in the Obama Administration, so be it. Many of us know how to use our rifles and pistols. This is the wrong country to impose communism on the people for I am not alone out here. There are entirely too many people with too many guns and ammo so laws won’t count if it ever came down to the picture you paint. People won’t allow to go that far. The country is about as far gone as people want it to go presently. The people of this country were brought up a certain way. Obama is right to a certain extent. We’re soft to a degree, but most of us believe in what this country stands for…. The land of the free and the home of the brave! We will not be overruled by a government run amuck!
The union goons will quickly be killed when they leave the Yankee states that disallow gun ownership. We await…
Sounds like Insider or someone hearing similar things is talking to Rush. He mentioned Thursday a contact has been saying the same things – encouraged him months ago to talk about Obama using protests and unrest to get re-elected. Mentioned ‘that’s all he has’. Rush says he just couldn’t go out and say that about a sitting POTUS.
4/10 WH-Insider mention a meeting with Biden on a contingency plan for 2012 in case the president does not wish to run or cannot run.
There are strong Rep. motions for Obamas impeachment underway, what does Insider think about using the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to remove Obama from office?. If the dems face up to the fact that Obamas insane, get Biden to use A25 to throw the bum out now, then the dems can still save their ass in 2012 – is he pushing for that
He was not qualified to be the President in the first place. He was put in there precisely because he would act as a puppet, and they knew he would be a puppet for Wall Street, for the London financiers and for the British.
Robert, Obama is destroying the Democrat Party. I would say– “Allow him to continue, but he is destroying our U.S. economy along with his party too.”
I’d say that it was the non-decission of the democratic party of not impeaching Cheney and Bush that paved the way to ruin. Obama merely epitomizes that compromise, like the symptome of a disease, that could have been cured in earlier stages. Therefore cut the cancercell out now, A25 is the scalpel – Biden must be the surgent. Then we can have Glass Steagall and an economy, only then can dems gain selfrespect – don’t allow that creep to continue another inch.
Is Krauthammer reading Ulsterman? Sure looks like it.
@ Elspeth— Why do you think Krauthammer is reading Ulsterman? What exactly has ‘The Hammer’ stated to give you that impression? (I guess I have not noticed anything so that is why I ask.)
http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/06/krauthammer-obama-incredibly-dull-almost-disinterested-in-jobs-presser/
Ulsterman, you are such a tease. lol
Ulsterman — I have heard from several places now that the U.S. dollar is going to crash in 2012 and this will allow “the elites” to usher in a new global currency that will have some sort of gold standard attached to it. Returning to a gold-back currency seems like a good idea to me, but a new global currency just seems like a big step toward powerful bankers running a one-world economy that benefits them at the expense of the rest of us and our freedoms. I would love to know the Wall Street Insider’s thoughts on this topic.
This has been predicted for years…it would seem O’Commie is the puppet they employed to finish the job with his runaway profligate spending.