WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: They Got Obamacare – Now They Want the 2nd Amendment

With decades of experience as a political operative within the Democratic Party, including service to both the Clinton and Obama administrations, our ongoing dialogue with the figure simply known to readers as “Insider” continues…

Ulsterman:  It seems the Solyndra scandal is heating up for the White House as –name withheld- predicted.  You still feel Fast and Furious is the scandal to focus on as the means of getting to Obama?

Insider:  To hell with Solyndra.  I told you before – if it helps to weaken the administration, fine.  So be it.  The more the merrier – but NO, Solyndra is not what we are focusing on.  Fast and Furious remains the most pressing concern at this moment for those inside the administration trying to contain the scandal.  I assure you of that.  They were all in on that program you know.  The administration…the party leadership.  It was attached to the arrogance they had after passage of Obamacare – they thought there was nothing they couldn’t accomplish.  Nothing they couldn’t push through.

Ulsterman:  Elaborate on that please.  What do you mean by arrogance?  And what were they trying to accomplish?

Insider:  They got Obamacare – now they want the 2nd Amendment.  There were some who didn’t get it.  Why go for gun control?  Hell, the White House Chief of Staff at the time didn’t want to go for Obamacare – he didn’t understand the push for that.  Knew it would be a political liability – the economy needed to be dealt with.  That alone shows those calling the shots at the White House are removed from the normal…the historical divisions of power within the administration.  All those f—cking czars…the advisers…Jarrett.  These people put in without any Congressional oversight – they are running the program.  The media has danced around that story, but it gets buried. Ignored.

Ulsterman:  Focus on the gun control issue – you’ve mentioned that before.  I recall that.

Insider:  You’re right.  Yeah…controlling healthcare and controlling guns – they were viewed as a package deal at about the same time it seems.  Control how people live, how they die, and how they go about protecting themselves – that about sums it up.

Ulsterman:  You sound like a gun rights advocate.

Insider: I am.  Always have been.  You see, this is…always has been one hell of a confounding contradiction of liberals.  I never got it.  These people say they are suspicious of government, right? They protest it.  They march against it…whatever.  And yet these same people – or a lot of them…they want to go ahead and give the government control over almost every critical aspect of their lives.  Education.  Healthcare.  Personal property rights.  Gun laws…it just…it never made sense to me.  It’s why those people are so damn easy to manipulate.  They are chock full of emotional contradiction.

Ulsterman:  You don’t sound like much of a Democrat right now.

Insider:  I ain’t – not today’s version anyway.  You know that.  I’m wandering in the wilderness kid.  40 fu—ing days and 40 fu—ing nights.  And there ain’t no promised land – not even a hope of that promised land if this country gives Barack Obama a second term.

Ulsterman:  Explain the gun control connection again – the Fast and Furious connection.

Insider:  I mentioned a memo…or a communication…there was, or is – something out there.  Or it was circulating – I don’t have the exact specifics.  But something was being planned – directly connecting this Fast and Furious disaster and the Obama people – some in the party…an entire plan to initiate sweeping gun control legislation throughout the country.  Now I didn’t know this until after the fact.  Didn’t believe it at first.  Seemed to…even for this group – seemed too damn far-reaching.  You step back though – watch what is being done, see how the dots start connecting – then you find religion.

Ulsterman:  What are the dots being connected?

Insider: Just look at what is being reported.  It’s still just under the surface – but it’s there.  You have people right now within the party taking this moment to once again push for gun control and using the scandal – Fast and Furious, using that to do so.  They are saying these things openly.  It’s astonishing to me.  They are very confident – or very afraid.  I think it’s fear that is now motivating them.  When you have Feinstein coming right out and saying we need enhanced gun control because of Fast and Furious  – days away from the Attorney General giving sworn testimony…something is up.  Something big.  She is attempting some serious damage control, trying to get out in front of the story.

Ulsterman: You’re speculating on this?  You don’t know?

Insider: I don’t have specific information…that’s correct.  I told you before – information coming out…it’s in lockdown mode.  From both parties on this.  Both sides have managed to shut off access to information – whatever is going on.  That has always proven before to be the calm before a storm.  A big fu—ing storm.

Ulsterman: What about the story that Hillary Clinton had a hand in Fast and Furious?

Insider: What?

Ulsterman:  There was a story or two out there implicating Hillary as being part of the scandal.  A direct part.

Insider:  Bullsh-t.  Move on.

Ulsterman:  You don’t believe there is a possibility of that?  It’s an international incident.  She heads up the State Department.  She—

Insider:  I said move on.  Hillary will not be implicated in this.  That won’t happen. 

Ulsterman:  What about Rahm Emanuel – could he have had knowledge of this plan?  He was White House Chief of Staff when it was implemented, right?  Wouldn’t that place him in the room when they were laying all of this out?  Including the connection between Obamacare, Fast and Furious, and gun control that you just laid out?

Insider:  (Long pause – no response)

Ulsterman:  Did you hear me?

Insider:  I will say this just once  – so you need to really listen here.  Hillary Clinton will not be implicated.  Rahm Emanuel will not be implicated.  If you’re out there reading something about them being tied in with this mess…those stories are pushbacks – you understand?  They certainly have plenty of knowledge to implicate this administration, right?  So Jarrett and her crew are giving off little warnings to them to stand down – to shut up.  It’s typical bullsh-t.  Don’t fall for it.  Stay focused on Fast and Furious and the danger it poses to this administration.

Ulsterman:  Hillary Clinton is still part of the administration.

Insider:  If you want to continue with this line of questioning you will be doing it by yourself.  Permanently.

Ulsterman:  Is Hillary Clinton assisting in the Fast and Furious investigation. Or Rahm Emanuel? 

Insider: No comment.  Move on. 

Ulsterman:  Are Republicans aware of the Fast and Furious connection to attempted gun control by the Obama administration?  Are they pursuing that – will they be pursuing that during the Congressional hearings coming up?

Insider:  Are they aware of it – yes.  That much I know.  For certain.  Whether they plan to openly make it part of the public hearings…I don’t know.

Ulsterman:  Are you working with the Republicans on this issue – Fast and Furious, or any Republican-related campaign to defeat Barack Obama?

Insider:  I’m not on the payroll if that’s what you mean.

Ulsterman:  But you’re cooperating in some way?  With Republicans?

Insider:  I won’t answer that.

Ulsterman:  You’ve been giving me that answer a lot today.

Insider:  (No response)

Ulsterman:  Back to Fast and Furious…back to the hearings. Will they be the final straw to remove Eric Holder?  Is this thing reaching its conclusion?  You’ve been at this for nearly a year now. Forcing Holder out – “Obama’s firewall” as you call him.

Insider:  I certainly hope so.  It’s been a hard run hasn’t it?  Uphill the whole way it seems.  But the last few months…recently…we’ve been doin’ – doin’ good.  Real good on this.  All of this…this thing.  Holder is in a corner now.  Question is…is Obama right there with him?  They’ve had a while to prepare for Holder’s leaving.  Gotta believe protections have been put in place.  Whether or not they will be enough…too early to know.

Ulsterman:  But Attorney General Eric Holder is gone?  He will be forced out?  You are still certain of that at this point?

Insider:  Yes.  No doubt whatsoever.  And I want to encourage you again to look at the gun control angle in all of this.  It’s bigger than Fast and Furious.  Imagine if Americans were made to know – to understand, how lives were spent in a purely political attempt to enhance federal gun control laws.  And I think immigration is tied into it all as well.  I’m not doing this…I’m not laying it out as well as I need to for you and I’m sorry for that.  The scope of this plan requires a person to almost suspend reality – fu—ing reality for a moment.  We had the feds placing deadly weapons into the hands of dangerous criminals.  That’s the reality as we know it now.  Those are the facts, right?

Ulsterman:  Yes.

Insider:  Ok – so those guns are given to these criminals who then turn around and use them to kill Americans, to kill Mexicans, to cause all kinds of chaos, right?  The shops used to sell those guns – the government forced them to sell those guns, right? 

Ulsterman:  Right.

Insider:  Yeah – the government basically put a gun to those gun sellers’ head and told them to allow those criminals to purchase those weapons.  Then they turn around and are prosecuting those gun sellers, while at the same time you got Democrats…some of the most extreme of Democrats – they are calling for gun control.  It’s the part about nobody in the administration trying to track those guns that were given to the criminals…that’s the key for me in this.  They didn’t care about those guns, right?  It seems pretty damn obvious they could care less where those guns were going…who had them, whatever.  So what was the purpose of Fast and Furious if it wasn’t to track those guns back to the criminals and arrest them?  What the f-ck were they up to?  You ask yourself that?

Ulsterman:  Yeah – and there still doesn’t seem to be an answer.

Insider:  Bullsh-t there isn’t an answer – it’s just that the answer is the most frightening one, so not enough people are willing to look at it.  If the Obama administration wasn’t really concerned about the actual guns – they lost over a thousand or so, right?  Can’t find them.  No idea where they went.  So those guns weren’t the concern.  It was the crime they wanted to trace back to those guns that were sold in the United States.  It was the crimes they wanted to happen – they fu—ing encouraged to happen – that was the purpose of all of this.  Turn around and use those crimes to push through much tougher federal gun controls, and push through some kind of amnesty immigration policy.  WE killed 200 Mexicans – that message…guilt voters into amnesty, right?  And I’m not opposed to some immigration policy – it’s needed, and long overdue.  But for God’s sake – I’m not for killing people to get there.  This White House was willing to do that.  This White House, the Obama administration – they were willing to kill Mexicans.  But they made a mistake…the killing of the border agents – they didn’t prepare to have those killings linked to the weapons.  Or if they did, they didn’t realize it would backfire against them like it did.

Ulsterman:  Will the hearings bring this information out?  Will it hit the mainstream?

Insider:  We are trying to make that happen.  Trying very hard.  We need a Democrat to stand up and point a finger at this administration and call them out for this mess.  All of it.

Ulsterman:  Will that happen?  Do you have a Democrat willing to do that?  To take on that risk?

Insider:  Yes.  It’s a matter of timing – but yes…we do.

Ulsterman:  A question or two on the 2012 election if you don’t mind?

Insider:  Certainly – go ahead.

Ulsterman:  The Herman Cain story – the allegations of sexual harassment…who initiated it?

Insider:  Don’t know…but if it came from any of the GOP campaigns…the Romney people or the Perry camp – a huge mistake.  Huge.

Ulsterman: How so?

Insider:  The story is growing beyond the borders of Herman Cain – it is being used now to paint the GOP field.  That kind of infighting…that simply cannot be allowed to happen.  The stakes are far too high.  Whoever is chosen as the nominee – all of you need to stand behind them.  Every single vote opposed to Barack Obama needs to join together.  I cannot stress that enough.  Millions upon millions are gonna be spent dividing the Republican party against itself.  That is already underway.  Don’t trust one godd-mn word you read on those message things of yours – the Facebook stuff.  I bet the farm you got Obama operatives posting on there.  You know that, right?  I still say you’d be much better off shutting that thing down.  And they are all over the place.  They got a plan in place – probably already underway, thousands of people attempting to form the message in favor of Obama.  An entire online only operation to compliment the mainstream media,Hollywood…everything.  That’s why I am telling anyone I can that once the GOP nominee is chosen – you all gotta put whatever differences you might have now and focus everything on making Barack Obama a one-termer.  They – the Obama machine…they are counting on that not happening.

Ulsterman:  Who – what GOP nominee would pose the greatest threat to Obama? 

Insider:  It’s too early to say for certain.  I maintain that Herman Cain would not win the nomination.  He represents the frustrations of a lot of people – but not the best hopes of the Republican Party.  He won’t be able to withstand the onslaught that is coming from the Obama machine.  I used the term brutal before – sticking with that.  Brutal.

Ulsterman:  So in your opinion – who could withstand that onslaught?

Insider:  Romney remains the frontrunner.  That hasn’t changed.  And for the people who say he’s not conservative enough…he ain’t Barack Obama.  It’s that fu—ing simple.  You hear about anyone saying they won’t vote for Romney if he’s the nominee…that person wants Obama to be given another four years to destroy this country.  People need to grow the f-ck up.  Stop the childish bullsh-t about this GOP candidate over the other.  When the nominee is chosen – they are the one who needs to win against Barack Obama.  Anyone who can say with a straight face that John McCain would have been worse than Barack Obama…c’mon.  Nobody in their right mind thinks that anymore  – except the most extreme Democrats.  And they ain’t Democrats.

Ulsterman: Who else – besides Romney?

Insider:  Look, I don’t buy the media’s spin that the GOP field is a bunch of losers.  And that’s just how they have been trying to portray them.  This is…almost all of them are viable candidates.  If I had to choose a legit underdog – somebody besides Romney who is up and coming, who could take on Barack Obama, it would be Newt Gingrich.  You’ve written on him – I’ve noted that.  There is some money taking an interest in Gingrich these days – which is interesting because he burned a lot of bridges with those people not so long ago.  But with the threat to everything that is Barack Obama, it seems like perhaps all is forgiven these days.  At least for now.  I read the line that Gingrich has baggage.  Really now.  Baggage?  And just what the f-ck you wanna call what Obama has?  So anyone who throws out that baggage BS about Gingrich – it’s just like I said.  Don’t trust them.  They are angling for Obama’s re-election.

Ulsterman:  You don’t sound like you’re with the party – the Democratic Party, anymore.

Insider:  Not true – not true.  I’m…what I’m with, what I’m for, is defeating Barack Obama.  For now – that’s it.  The moderates – those who are left, they are asserting themselves more and more.  You need to watch – do a better job watching for that.  It’s happening.  There’s been blurbs here and there on it. Both Pelosi and Reid have been marginalized.  There’s significant pressure being placed on the Dems who sit on the super-committee thing.  Bi-partisan pressure mind you.  The real deal.  You need to note those things. It’s all connected to what we are doing here.

Ulsterman:  Anything else to look out for in the coming days and weeks?

Insider:  The “Home for the Holidays” campaign I told you about – it’s really moving out there now.  They’ve tied it into the jobs bill for Chr-st  sake.  And it isn’t sitting well with all the military.  I got an earful of that the other day.  Watch for that to keep building momentum.  They – the Obama people, they are really thinking that’s gonna work out well for them.  And it just might.  It sickens me to see the same people this president once accused of carpet bombing villages and killing civilians now doing a complete 180 and using them as props for his re-election campaign.

You ever step back and really take note of just how far gone this White House is?  How damn inconceivable it should all seem but isn’t because they have done it over and over again?  And how they are allowed to get away with it?  At least up to now?  Just how bad it is?  So much of it.  Everywhere.

Ulsterman?  What? 

Insider:  We have an administration directly responsible for the killing of hundreds of civilians in Mexico.  The killing of our own border agents.  The wasting of billions of taxpayer dollars that went back into the hands of Obama campaign donors.  A Justice Department that dismissed a clearly proven voter intimidation case – that was on record declaring its intent to ignore race-based crimes where Whites were the victims.  The shutting down of energy production industries in the Gulf – only to turn around and allow other nations the right to drill our oil.  This president allows Middle East nations that were once at least somewhat cooperative with the interests of the United States to be over-run by Muslim extremists – and they call that kind of thing a fu—ing victory for the administration!  Talk about your “Mission Accomplished” moment!  This president golfs more than he governs.  He doesn’t meet with his own cabinet.  There’s people in that administration who have never spoken to the man!  When he is at the White House he sits up in that second floor room of his watching TV and waiting for the next batch of orders to come to him from Jarrett. A president that embraces radicalized union-backed protesters calling for socialism, who destory property and rape the weak.  He has repeatedly pissed off Democrats and Republicans at every turn.  Every fu—ing turn.  At every fu—ing level.  This guy has sh-t on the office.  Sh-t on the responsibility.  Sh-t on the history and tradition of the office that he, by some tragic accident of which I personally played a part it – now occupies.

 So I ask you – you seem to think I got all the answers – so I ask you…HOW THE FU-K DOES THAT HAPPEN?  HOW DOES IT CONTINUE TO HAPPEN?  Because I don’t know.  I’ve seen it.  I’ve done it – just about all there is to do in this town…and I don’t know how it’s happening.

All I do know is it’s gotta stop.  That man – Barack Obama…he cannot be elected again in 2012. He must be defeated.  All of them. This country cannot be so far gone as to not recognize that fact. 

_____________________

UPDATE:

Within hours of publishing this interview, copies of Attorney General Eric Holder’s prepared testimony to Congress were leaked – testimony giving clear indication of Mr. Holder’s attempts to utilize the Fast and Furious scandal as justification for further federal gun control legislation.

Link to story here:

Holder Calls For Gun Control

 

192 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

67 Comments to WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: They Got Obamacare – Now They Want the 2nd Amendment
    • Ben
    • “HOW THE FU-K DOES THAT HAPPEN? HOW DOES IT CONTINUE TO HAPPEN? Because I don’t know. I’ve seen it. I’ve done it – just about all there is to do in this town…and I don’t know how it’s happening.”
      That’s an easy answer: it takes a century of slow infiltration of a political party and our system of government by socialist people and ideas. Once a critical mass is reached, say about 10%, that’s enough to get it done. What has failed them is their assumption that the citizenry were weak or wouldn’t wake up.

      • Emma
      • Poor Mr. Insider Man. You were blind and now you see. In the beginning, you just saw what you wanted. Now that it’s clear and you can no longer live in denial, you clearly see the sick role you yourself played in putting this monster in office, along with an Army of blind, ideological people being pulled along with the tide of anti-American goals. THAT’s how it happened. There are many more who need to open their eyes, SEE the monster that Obama is and that he is a mere progeny of the sickness infecting our government. Congratulations, Mr. Insider, for choosing well and taking the “Red Pill”. Hope you can turn more of your hideous colleagues before it’s too late.

    • Stan Lippmann
    • Cain just crashed on intrade down below Ron Paul. If Romney is the nominee, Paul will hopefully run as a Libertarian. If either Romney or Obama wins, the banksters will continue to pillage us. Since we would be on the track to Hell, we might as well stick with Obama and get it over with. Republicans are Progressives (Collectivists) too. It it obvious that the Insider fears or favors Hillary, so it makes sense that he is afraid of Ron Paul more than anyone.

    • NameThroughtheLookingGlass
    • AMEN! Why can’t this message play out on the world stage, instead of within the underground media? Why can’t anyone call the play-by-play on this administration publicly? Has our first amendment been circumvented along with the attempt to hijack the 2nd Amendment?

      Has anyone connected the dots and realized that the very people who have received ‘bailouts’ are the very people lining Obama’s re-election coffers? What do they call that? Looks like money-laundering to me! Or maybe a covert way of increasing campaign funds for Barry? Am I wrong?

      • Marlowe
      • Name:
        Like it or not the information, news cycle in this country is still controlled by a relatively small cabal of East coast Liberal Elitists. They will never jump on the bandwagon.We could have a U-Tube video of Mao’Bama killing Biden in the WH press room with a F&F semi-automatic and they would ignore it.

        Regarding connecting the dots. Yes, lots of people have connected the dots. For the very reasons mentioned in the first paragraph it will never become common knowledge. you won’t see the Mao’Bama–>Unions link anywhere except in the fringe media.

    • Essa
    • One can only imagine what the current regime will still be able to accomplish right up to Election Day in 2012 in allowing the countless czars unmitigated power to enact what ever destructive policy that pleases them in order to finish the job of preparing the country for final entry into the global NWO.

      It should not be forgotten as we vote to remove Øbama from office, that there are also communist members of congress whose terms will be expiring in 2012 that must be defeated.

      Social networking sites cannot be trusted; due to the fact they are crawling with government bureaucrats, spies and tattletales, not to mention the privacy policies are virtually non-existent so they can continue to exploit personal data and make it extremely easy for government agencies to troll for and save information in their databases for later use.

      The bureaucrats are already looking at new sweeping gun control legislation, such as singling out certain groups of people from purchasing a firearm, such as military people who are found to be mentally incompetent, and people who are using antidepressants, all under the guise of safety. While this all sounds great, it is plain to see there is a step by step plan in place to completely wipe out the 2nd amendment, for in a socialist/communistic society, no one will be allowed to purchase or possess a firearm.

      We can overcome the destruction of America, if we all gang up on Øbama and his henchmen puppets if we use our vote wisely to vote for the nominee who ever it is, and not waste our vote on a 3rd party candidate out to split the vote.

      It is apparent the government just loves to see everyone frightened into compliance and complacency. We cannot afford to allow this to go on any longer.

      • MJM
      • Adding to what you brought up – as part of the new health care changes, doctors are starting to ask some of their patients if they feel that they are under any stress.

        No doubt that if anyone answers “yes”, some day stress will be listed as a reason not to allow someone to purchase a gun.

        I warned my parents about this a year ago and they thought I was nuts. Sure enough, at their next physical, what question do you think their doctor asked them?

        • Essa
        • The sad truth is the government bureaucrats have taken over healthcare, thus they are now an arm of the federal government. It is disturbing and scary to learn that physicians are now asking probing questions that are out of context with the treatment a patient is receiving.

          Note to all of us, be wary when unusual questions are asked by medical professionals, and watch out for questions that are too personal on any forms you fill out or you may find yourself on the DHS list and not know why.

          We should not even have to be worrying about our constitutional rights, and now our 1st, 2nd and 4th amendment rights trampled on before our very eyes.

    • werbaz neutronName
    • The Insider is sure touchy about getting close to Mrs. Clinton’s involvement in anything that has to do with anything. I suppose the Clintons are the ONLY option left for a democrat party faction trying to separate itself from the majority hard left part of the democrats.

      In my 74 years, I have learned to distinguish between chicken salad and chicken other stuff. I cannot believe Mrs. Clinton did not know about the gun running.

      Insider is RIGHT, however, in that whom ever is the Republican nominee has to be voted for by all in the Republican party.

      At this point, a lot of folks will view a third party run as treason.

      • Marlowe
      • werbaz:
        Hillary knows how to play the game, that is why WHI says, “Hillary will not be implicated in this. That won’t happen.”

        Is he protecting her? Possibly, but WHI knows he doesn’t need to protect her he knows she knows how to do it herself. All he is saying is she won’t be “implicated” which is a long way from saying, “She doesn’t knoow anything about the scandal”. Of course she knows.

        Mao’Bama can’t go to the bathroom without Hillary knowing about it. But that doesn’t mean she is going to do the “paperwork” for him. HRC learned a lot of things between ’92-2000 and one of them is how to duck.

    • NameH. Jones
    • Thanks again Ulsterman, I agree this needs more attention; friends we have to spread it around as much as we can, i agree with Insider, NOTHING is as important as getting Obama out of there, a second term would mean death to America as we know her.

    • Jen Gelman
    • There has been no doubt in my mind for quite some time that the Insider is working for Hillary. The only question is, are she and 0bama working for the same people with the same goals in mind? Of this I have also been convinced for some time: 0bama was Phase I. Hillary is Phase II. It is possible that they are no longer reading from the same script, but they are two identical bags and the shit inside one is indistinguishable from the shit in the other.

      • Marlowe
      • Jen:
        You are correct HRC and Mao’Bama, “are two identical bags”

        Here’s my question of you; WHI is “working for Hillary” on what? He may just like or admire her but she isn’t working on anything. If she wants to “primary”
        him she better get moving quick, but there is no evidence HRC is working on anything of an elective nature for 2012.

    • MJM
    • Insider is either part of the NWO, or still doesn’t realize that he is falling into the same old trap they’ve used for years. Get a complete turd elected President, then for the next election say how important it is that everyone rally around the other party’s candidate – no matter who it is.

      I’m sorry, but half of the Republicans would be just as much of a train wreck as Obama.

          • Kay112
          • Ron Paul is usually right in reference to our economy. I don’t know why he goes off the deep end concerning foreign affairs. I guess he is completely ignorant to the real world. The real world is so very different than America, for those who have never travelled outside the US borders.

            On another note– voting to merely take out Obama to put in a lesser evil liberal progressive such as Romney is blatantly wrong! Don’t ask me why because I will have to get on my soap box about how we’d be throwing our vote away!

    • NameMelanie Fox
    • Crybabies like Stan Lippmann need to grow up and realize that this is not a normal election. Lippmann and others like him make this into a “play it my way or I’ll take my marbles and go home”. This is not that kind of game and to take that position is a big crybaby position.

      The “progressives” have been working their thing for nearly 100 years, more than that if I have my dates wrong, but certainly not LESS. We can’t reverse it, which is what we HAVE to do, in one fell swoop. It would be GREAT if we could accomplish goals faster, but if we can’t, so since we can’t, then slower is better than advancing progressive policies even more.

      Crybabies like Stan Lippmann appear to believe that if they can’t achieve everything all at once then to hell with it. That’s naive (and CRY-BABYISH!) Ronald Reagan said that if you leave a negotiation with 80% of what you wanted, you didn’t LOSE, you got most of what you wanted. Crybabies like Stan Lippmann need to grow up and look at what is possible. Ron Paul is not going to get the nomination. That’s not going to happen no matter how much they might want it to be true. And running as a 3rd party candidate (which Ron Paul says he will not do) will only guarantee the re-election of Obama.

      The Ron Paul supporters need to understand that this election is to save the country from 4 more years of Obama. I am not a Romney supporter, but I’ll vote for him against Obama. I’d vote for almost anyone against Obama. GET A CLUE PEOPLE! Walking back the entitlement mentality will not be done in one day. The progressives have at least 100 years on us. GROW UP people! We CANNOT think that if we don’t get our way then to hell with it. We owe that much to our children and grandchildren.

      There are 2 choices in this election. Obama, and whoever runs against him. We have to vote for whoever opposes Obama, and then we need to continue to work to put this country back on track. That’s the responsible thing to do. It won’t happen all at once.

      • Marlowe
      • Melanie:
        My favorite football team is whoever is playing against Dallas and OUR favorite Republican should be whoever is running against Mao’Bama. Our very country depends upon people getting this message.

      • Kay112
      • Melanie, I may not agree with Stan, but it will be a cold day in hell when I ever cast a vote for liberal, progressive Romney! I believe in casting my vote on principle and both of these men are almost identical! They both will continue the declime of America!

        Let’s not fall for what the elitist Republicans and the US PRAVDA mainstream media is pushing. They both want us to cave and nominate Romney and then vote for him in the general election. I will not budge on that one! I am for Obama taking down America all by himself without Republicans taking a large part in the scheme. With Romney, both parties will then destroy America’s economy.

        I can stand back from this forest and see both the trees and the forest of what is to come and it isnt pretty unless America does something quite different than having Romney or Obama steering this economy and our health care.

        What a disaster either of those two would be…. God help us to think wiser and vote according to our principles.

        • NameMelanie Fox
        • Kay, I understand your concern. I too would have to hold my nose to vote for Romney. I don’t know how this primary will eventually shake out, but I know for sure that I HAVE to vote, eventually, for whoever opposes Obama. I can’t look my children and grandchildren in the eye if I don’t because if Obama has 4 more years, then Obamacare will be implemented and then it really is “game over”.. This is the most important election in our lifetime. I certainly cannot WASTE my vote on a 3rd party candidate, no matter what the excuse.

          In order to vote for Romney, the pro-life forces are going to have to be at least WILLING to vote for a candidate (if it is Romney) that has, at least at one time, supported the pro-abortion agenda. There are a lot of people that may, at some point, have to betray some portion of their principles to vote for Romney. Many people will have to think long and hard about their choice.

          But my point, since I am not a Romney supporter, is obviously not to support Romney. So far, he’s not the nominee, he’s just the “default” and who gave us that idea? The left-wing media. And who gave us the idea that Romney was their worst nightmare? ~ the media who is all about supporting Obama and who has done their best to destroy any alternative.

          GET A CLUE ~ Obama wants us to nominate Romney because they know Obama can (eventually) beat Romney. They know that RINO Republicans lose and Conservative Republicans win. (So why don’t we all know that?) So they are giving Romney a total pass because they want him to win the nomination, just as they were all for John McCain winning years ago.

          Interestingly, the media is going after Herman Cain, at least right now. Cain is an even bigger threat to Obama because he his Black and Conservative. Cain might actually peal off Black support from Obama, which the Dems have counted on.

          I haven’t decided who I support. I just know that we can’t hold the childish ideas expressed previously by Lippmann (above). What I know for sure is that we have to reverse course in this country. The progressives were successful in getting lots of Americans addicted to government programs back in the 1930′s-1940′s. This was only amplified in the 1960′s under Lyndon Johnson. But the progressives (under various labels, not just “progressive”) have been operating since early in the 1900′s if not before. They are nearly 100 years ahead of us! We need to catch up. We’re not going to get back to the original plan for our country all at once, but we have to make a start.

    • cobra
    • It is clear (to me) that the Insider is trying to protect Hitlery.
      But we remember very well how she tried to push the notion that guns in Mexico are coming from the US.
      And since we know she is a life long progressive, i.e. commie, she would not be very different than Obama.
      She is probably much more deviant and cunning than him.
      Anyhow, if we don’t defeat these dirty commies, our country will be lost.
      And I know a commie when I see or hear him/her.

    • fb274
    • Hillary’s obama twin in the Alinsky/Marxist room——don’t forget that! It is imperative, even if Romney is the last standing, to be supportive. The MAIN goal should be to increase conservatives in the House, take over the Senate with a super majority. At that point, the president would only be a figurehead.

      The 45 PLUS czars are the danger lurking behind obama and that is the reason for his removal if indictment does not come first. Vote out the old incumbents who have gotten rich on their insider trading and make certain their staffs are replaced as well. Each bill needs to be read by a Rep or Senator, and yes, it needs to adhere to constitutional limits——-BOEHNER & MCCONNELL both need replacing with someone who has a spine. Paul Ryan has gotten his voice and would be IMO a stronger Majority Leader than Boehner.

    • live oak
    • I will vote for whoever the republican nominee is, and I always intended to. I know none of them are going to be exactly what I (we) want, but they’ll be better than kenya boy any day. If it’s Romney, I’ll have to hold my nose and my breath, and I’ll have no problem whatsoever in making myself a nuisance calling him out and any other politicians just the way I always have, and that includes the Supreme Court. Imho I think Gingrich would be better than Romney; maybe Herman could be VP with Gingrich; I know they have respect for each other. I just don’t know what’s going to happen and a year is still a long way off for any of these polls to really matter.
      Something has got to be done about the kenyan and it better be soon because if he’s re-elected, we’re looking at an honest to God full blown civil war.

    • TeakWoodKite
    • Ulsterman, it is my position that Fast and Furious is the tip of the iceberg. Considering that Hillary found out about Honduras after the fact, it is plauseable that she might not have known directly about the act of war BO has commited never mind premeditated murder of American citizens. Insider makes the valid point that the guns were not the concern. It was racking up a death toll to gin up an assult on the 2nd amendment that is in play. That said, I believe that clandestine arms shipments are not only going to Mexico but elsewhere on the globe. Columbia Honduras and Nicaragua for starters. Never mind that LA Times or Media matters won’t release the tapes they have but look for more distractions the hotter F&F gets.

    • plainolamerican
    • I find most interesting the vitriol as soon as Hillary Clinton is mentioned. Almost as if the insider is afraid of losing his converser. And/ or that is how republicans got the F&F story. HHhhhmmm.

      However I also in all honesty am starting to wonder if this is all a sales pitch for the GOP… Some in-depth readings of from the lamestream media outlets can help one speculate to much of this. Not sure but this Insider sure got spun up and was adamant how we need to band together for Mutt Romney. Things that make you go hhhhmmmm. This is a different one. almost a different “INSIDER”…

      • Marlowe
      • WHI is not pushing for anybody other than for the GOP to elect a candidate and all parties to get behind him to defeat Mao’Bama.

        Here’s the WHI’s own words: “almost all of them are viable candidates. If I had to choose a legit underdog – somebody besides Romney who is up and coming, who could take on Barack Obama, it would be Newt Gingrich.”

        I sure don’t see where he is endorsing Romney here.

    • A_Nonny_Mouse
    • RE: werbaz neutronName November 7, 2011 at 10:04 pm

      “The Insider is sure touchy about getting close to Mrs. Clinton’s involvement in anything that has to do with anything. I suppose the Clintons are the ONLY option left for a democrat party faction trying to separate itself from the majority hard left part of the democrats.”

      And: Jen Gelman November 8, 2011 at 12:15 am

      “There has been no doubt in my mind for quite some time that the Insider is working for Hillary. The only question is, are she and 0bama working for the same people with the same goals in mind?”
      = = = = = =

      Yeah, I think Soros is the puppet master for both of them. My assumption is that she was slated to be the Dem candidate for Pres, but Boy Wonder caught the public’s fancy so she was told to wait. Now he’s turning into a PR disaster, so my bet is that “something” will happen –who knows, maybe he’ll be appointed head of the EU or the UN or something– and Hillary will be the last-minute Dem nominee. Since the GOP candidate will have been drilled in talking points against Obama, he’ll be left flat-footed when it comes to campaigning and debating against her. So with that, and with all the dead people & illegals voting, it’s gonna be “Yay For President Hillary!”. Gack.

      I sure hope I’m wrong.

    • Bob
    • In his testimony, Holder also advocates for new gun-control laws that he says would have halted, or at least prevented, Operation Fast and Furious. Holder echoes California Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s comments from last week, when she argued that stricter gun laws would have stopped law enforcement agents from facilitating the sale of guns to Mexican drug cartels.

      Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/11/07/holder-to-accuse-investigators-of-playing-fast-and-furious-politics-call-for-gun-control/#ixzz1d6tqm6Lj

      The White House Insider called it. They want more gun control leading to the disarming of the civilian population so they can have control from birth to grave. Every single person who is eligible should purchase a fire arm this week even if they do not want it to exercise their right.

    • VTX
    • Always knew – from the first mention of this on Fox news online – that this was an attempt to prove a lie. They were aggravated that the press wouldn’t push their lie about guns – so they sent the guns themselves. The whole claim – from the very beginning – about cartels and American-sold guns was obviously a gun-control scheme.

      If everybody is involved, Holder has some room to negotiate. He can play John Dean if he needs to. This is too big already for them to do a Ron Brown on him. Still, if he can implicate people like Jarrett and Obama, he should consider increasing his security. These dopes would try to use a Loughner or Hinkley to shut Holder up, if he’s inclined to talk. And then use THAT as a pretext to ban guns.

      As far as Romney goes, Insider is surely hoping the Republicans choose someone amenable to his party and beliefs. They really aren’t in a position to demand, though. We told them what Obama was, and they didn’t listen. If we don’t like Mitt, that’s not his business. We’ll take care of our own house soon enough, and the field will be between 3 – and Cain won’t be among them (unfortunately.) Perry, Romney and Newt.

      Insider is right: Newt is a known quantity. Baggage? They’ve already opened up all his trash. And he’s smart enough to admit when he was wrong – like global warming, unlike Romney who can’t apologize for anything (and who ought to be apologizing for Romneycare at every opportunity.)

    • VTX
    • WH Insider has been right about a lot of things – even Fox News is reporting Daley’s dustups in the White House is sending him to the bench even before the end of the inning.

      The article claims that he’s ineffective, gaining no new ground – unlike Rahm. They claim that Reid et al are incensed that Obama has a hard time dealing with them – both parties. This confirms that Insider is right on another issue – the Obama debt ceiling walkout. He walked out on the Dems, not the Republicans. Daley is tipping his hat to that.

      He is said to have someone else carrying out many of his duties, taking a role as more of an overseer. This proves that Jarrett has won. He lost. He has no influence. That also signals that there is no more Democratic party structure in the White House, only a Leftist, Unionista Thugocracy. Both parties better start dealing with this.

      In Virginia, Mark Warner went on an advertisement (with others) saying: Vote Democratic so that we don’t have a one-party Virginia! Please? They’re already hunkering down for a painful whipping, hoping for sympathy.

      I have no sympathy. As I’ve said: we warned them about Obama. They went along, giddily tweeting amongst themselves about the New Era of Obama, and the dismantling of the Republican Party. I say: no quarter. Not unless you line up against the Thugocracy and start dealing with the mess you made.

      • live oak
      • I read that article too early this morning and was going to link it under your other comment. Good post VTX. You said it brother! It IS definitely a Unionista Leftisit Thugocracy but I doubt both parties are going to deal with it. Boehner is the biggest spineless and worst coward and he and McConnell and Cantor should retire in disgrace.

        If Issa and Grassley don’t come through on this F&F, it’s no quarter alright; I’ve said that before. Right now Holder is doing the Mea Culpa and maybe he’ll start singing. We’ll see.

    • Louisiana-lady
    • Ulsterman, thank you for having the connection to “Insider” and being able to share the information he’s willing to provide. (BTW, I’m 99.9% certain I know who he is and I’m proud of him for what he’s doing in putting country over party.)

      This information makes sense in light of Napolitano’s early claims about Mexico’s gun problems being a result of our “loose gun laws”. That was found to be a lie, so the admin had to do whatever it took to make it seem true in order to use it as an excuse to tighten federal gun laws.

      Worse still, remember the Homeland Security document they issued to law enforcement agencies (last year?) that warned about potentially dangerous “right wing extremists” such as “military veterans”? Now we have all sorts of radical elements in the “occupy” movement – just one incident away from exploding- and Obama brings all sort of troups back from Iraq effectively dumping them en masse into an economy which has no jobs for them. Naturally some of them are going to feel betrayed and angry and he’s helped provide rationalle to crack down on gun ownership AND paint conservatives as enemies of the state at the same time.

      Almost a perfect set-up for martial law to be instituted before it’s time to vote and emergency orders that suspend elections?

    • Kay112
    • @ Ulsterman: There’s a link up on Drudge where by Daley has been demoted as of yesterday due to the fact he came out stating he leaving the WH right after the Nov election of 2012. Peter Rouse(?) is assuming some of the Chief of Staff duties. Did White House Insider see this on the radar and I missed this demotion by WHI?

    • Jimbo
    • “The White House Insider called it. They want more gun control leading to the disarming of the civilian population so they can have control from birth to grave.”

      This is also the agenda for the “World Governance” elite Globalists.

      That’s why Globalists support the socialist, Democratic agenda — it centralizes power & control in the federal government that in turn can be controlled by “World Governance” trans-national structures.

      Globalists want the People dependent on the government because then they can be controlled.

      Sadly, the average Republican voter, who supports an unrestrained Military-Industrial Complex, and the empire which it supports, also plays into the Globalist hands. Was the Libya intervention in America’s national interest or was it in the Globalist interest?

      At this point in time, BOTH parties, Democrats and Republicans, alike, support policies that play into the Globalists’ hands (free trade is also a Republican Party policy that Globalists love and support).

      Bottom line, Obama is a Globalist creation — a weak-minded politician that is easily controlled from behind the scenes by Globalists… note that Wall Street trans-national banks were Obama’s biggest contributors in ’08.

      By the way, Globalists also want GUN CONTROL so the People can not rebel against their power & control scheme.

    • The Obama Timeline author
    • Not to toot my own horn, but I have been chronicling the life of the thug-in-chief since early 2008. The result is The Obama Timeline. Part I is in paperback and covers his birth through his first 100 days in office. Part II is a free-read at http://www.colony14.net. Parts I and II combined exceed 4,000 pages and include more than 26,000 references. If it is about Obama and has been reported anywhere, it is in the Timeline – even if the mainstream media ignored it.

      If you need evidence against the usurper, read the Timeline. Part II is updated on a daily basis. Read the Timeline and you won’t have to dig all over to find the truth.

    • ExExZonie
    • ‘The “Home for the Holidays” campaign I told you about – it’s really moving out there now. They’ve tied it into the jobs bill for Chr-st sake. And it isn’t sitting well with all the military. I got an earful of that the other day. Watch for that to keep building momentum. They – the Obama people, they are really thinking that’s gonna work out well for them. And it just might.’

      Ben Bernanke was at a military base for who knows what reason at 3:00 AM this morning. Ben Bernanke!

    • Watcher
    • Ulsterman you have done a hell of a job with this no doubt. I have been a follower for a long time of yours and your reporting is dead on. You have proved your insider’s credibility time after time after time.

      The problem is that you just aren’t getting enough viewer ship – If they really want to sink Obama – even to the hands of another democrat .. say Hillary .. then they need to start pumping the MSM and get someone from ABC – CNN – CBS – to start coverage. When the left sided media starts reporting then Obama will tank.

      If they have the higher up’s in the democratic party to do it, they better get on the stick and do it sooner than later.

      Somehow they need to force the corporate media to report on this and get it into the hands of every American. I bet that half the American population still has no clue about Gunwalker.

Leave A Response

* Required