Following excerpts from a soon-to-be published book detailing in part the volatile nature of First Lady Michelle Obama’s power struggles within the Obama White House, the First Lady openly complains of the New York Times attempting to portray her as “an angry Black woman.”
It is interesting to note that while Michelle Obama says she has not and will not read New York Times reporter Jodi Kantor’s new book, “I never read these books”, she appears well aware of her own depiction in that never-read publication – and not only aware, but particularly defensive over it:
I guess it’s just more interesting to imagine this conflicted situation here.
…That’s been an image people have tried to paint of me since the day Barack announced, that I’m some kind of angry black woman.
The First Lady went on to dismiss such portrayals of her as those found in Kantor’s book, and indicated the cause of whatever “anxiety” she may express within the White House is out of a need to protect her two daughters. As for the book itself and its depiction of Michelle Obama, CBS said the following:
First Lady Michelle Obama is challenging assertions she’s forcefully imposed her will on White House aides and says people have inaccurately tried to portray her as “some kind of angry black woman.
…The Kantor book portrays a White House where tensions developed between Mrs. Obama and former White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel and former press secretary and presidential adviser Robert Gibbs.
____________________
She seems a little angry to me.
I concur! She should work on improving her attitude then we won’t have this opinion!
This is NOT a portrayal, it is a statement made after considering the facts. She has made hateful statements; she has appeared angry and she shows her anger anger over this book she hasn’t read. If it talks like an angry woman and walks like an angry woman, IT IS an angry woman. Can’t understand the reference to being a “Black” angry woman — what does race have to do with it? The race card references are getting very, very tiresome.
She is black and se is angry. Thus she is an angry black woman. It isn’t race it is fact.
The book doesn’t mention that she is an actual criminal….and aids and abets a usurper. Obama is a British subject and desires total dictatorship and so does his wife Michelle…..
Bravo! You see it clearly with no apologies! Obama committed a criminal act when he took the oath of office. This “constitutional scholar” should be arrested. I voted for him. But when I discovered what “natural born citizen” means and that he was born a British subject and should have known he was ineligible to be POTUS, I lost it. We have become Rome, and are near to a great fall.
He was born with the right to dual citizenship~ American and British citizenships due to his parentage. A dual citizen can NOT be a natural-born citizen! Natural-born citizens are those born solely to American citizens; it matters not if the parents are naturalized or native born Americans. They simply have to be American citizens when their babies were born for the babies to be natural-born citizens.
You’re right!
I would characterize her as “an angry Leftist and screeching pro-abortion witch.” Her race and sex have nothing to do with it.
I would, in a satrical way, suggest that she could be called the “First Chupacabra” or “First Succubus,” but only in fun – unlike the way she characterized post-and-late-term abortion foes. She was quite angry then – and still is.
I cannot think of a single First Lady whom I would have treated with disdain, but Michelle Obama is worthy of many of the ugly characterizations (that aren’t racial nor sexist in nature.) It’s not as if she hasn’t had a few specs of things that were well-intentioned and that made sense. But those aren’t what we’re talking about, are they?
This is a mean person, a bully. And she certainly picked the right man to bully – the one who went along with her Jezebellian scheme to block passage of the Illinois version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act. This person is evil, pure and simple, and angry. And not because she’s a woman, and not because of her race.
No free pass this time, Ms. Chupacabra. Not even a nice try.
Regardless of how I felt before about her which was that she is a marxist and a racist, but the final nail was her “all this for a flag” comment at the 911 ceremony this past November with her moron husband nodding his head and smiling like the courst jester.
Can your recall details of the flag comment? That would be a good one for circulation. It sounds like her for sure.
She sellin woof tickets.
a picture says a thousand words…
leo gerard at dunham white house jan 11, 2012…
http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/11/4180685/usws-gerard-talks-job-creation.html
They are so manipulative especially with their kids.
Her girls have been given the kid glove treatment, unlike the Bush twins, and she knows it.
Her overall persona of “anxiety” comes from that big chip she has to carry around on her shoulders.
Did they botox her permanent scowl lines out btw?
If she doesn’t want to be seen as angry then she should stop the behavior that makes people believe this about her. Either that or she needs to embrace her true angry self.
How I long for the elegant grace of Laura Bush.
No kidding! Elegant grace is a perfect description of Laura Bush.
When she bares her teeth I am literally frightened for all of us.
And please, let’s get her off Disney and Nick! My kids are starting to view her as a joke of an extra……
Moocherella and kenya boy are way far beyond evil. Nefarious…sinister…diabolical…reprehensible…pernicious…wicked…there is no word in the English language imho to describe the depth of the harm that they’re capable of doing to this country and to us. They are both a cosmic evil force that have got to be stopped. If they aren’t, it’s going to be a long civil war and I believe that is right around the corner. I really believe that.
Someone I trust told me that nothing will change until we get rid of the islamofascists in our government and this country. I believe him.
Agree, live oak.
“We need to do a better job of putting ourselves higher on our own ‘to do’ list.” – Michelle Obama
Seems to me they are on the TOP of their “to do” list… one expensive vacation or party after another and spend, spend, spend. Don’t think they can go any higher on their own list.
I would like to see a daily column by her mother in, say, The National Rifleman.
Bullshit…look at her face…that’s an angry black woman if I’ve ever seen one…can’t wait to hear what she says after BO loses the election, and her freebie vacations come to an end.
“angry black woman.” Project much? I never hear others feel the need to advertise their color or sex when commenting on their perceptions of what others think of them, i.e., “angry white woman,” “happy brown man,” etc.
No way the First Linebacker could be perceived as angry:
http://www.michellesmirror.com/
Be sure to scroll the whole way down. There are some of Mooch’s “greatest hits” on here.
Very good silverdust. It made me laugh…it’s a keeper!
I can’t get over the way Moocherella looks at Carla Bruni-Sarkozy. I bet that was a very tense afternoon.
It is clear to any discerning person that she is a hateful , vengeful, duplicitous sociopath who only pretends to show empathy. A First Lady would presumably have a retinue of long time admiring and accomplished friends yet like Obama she has none of that. A bitter evil shrew in a sham marriage.
Patrick Fitzgerald’s Rezko Mole Probation Sentence Terminated Early
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/01/patrick_fitzgeralds_rezko_mole_probation_sentence_terminated_early.html#ixzz1jGal68JO
Well,there you go – she said she’s not an angry black woman, ipse dixit. What further proof need ye?
/sarc
http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2009/06/if-looks-could-kill.html
… a picture worth a 1000 words and more.
She is the Queen. And after her Alice in Wonderland party, she can be known as the Queen of Spades, doubled down when she went out to make a show of shovel activity in her garden patch.