NEW WALL STREET INSIDER NEXT WEEK

Very pleased to announce a soon-to-be published sit down interview with Wall Street Insider next week.

733 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

21 Comments to NEW WALL STREET INSIDER NEXT WEEK
      • AmericaTheBeautiful
      • Is the GSA and the Secret Service a purposeful distraction? Panetta’s apology to the people was odd….

        Obama now taking over fracking bin light of choking off our own oil production…does this point to a set up for an attack or the globalisation of the USA or both?

        Are our soldiers being set up in Afganstan? I do not believe the yarn of the one soldier taking out so many on those two seperate forays, undetected leaving or returning twice on a secure base…This stinks….Also, in light of the two seperate but bizarre incidents on commercial flights… I am wondering about pilots and soldiers being drugged…bio-warfare brings to mind the murder of Jack Wheeler…the much ignored murder of the top secret soldier who was our point man on bio and chemical warfare as well as privy to banking and SEC terrorism

        IS Putin behind a good deal of our troubles? Considering Obama’s comments to Medvedev it seems we are looking at a communist agent in the WH?

        What say you insider?

        • cobra
        • Even if the guy is not a KGB, which he may very well be, given his life and associations, he most certainly is a communist, which, by definition is anti-American.
          So, bowing to the Saudi King, selling us down the river to the Chinese, selling us down the river to the Russians, anti-Israel, anti-Great Britain, pro Iran, pro Islam….
          Isn’t that obvious?

    • bill o'rights
    • Yes!

      I won’t get any sleep this weekend, in anticipation!

      By the way, the image is much like the image I’ve always had in my head, concerning Obama. Namely, that Obama has always reminded me of the Martin Sheen character in ‘The Dead Zone’.

    • silverdust
    • It sounds like the interview has already taken place. If not, could you please ask mention the following to WSI and WHI?

      How does the inner circle — who didn’t sign up for this degree of radicalism — plan to take on the Soros Machine, i.e., unlimited money?

      Please comment on the Soros vote-counting scheme that has been offshored to Spain.

      Besides Holder and ValJar, is anyone looking at Cass Sunstein?

      Does either insider have any doubt that Hillary Clinton would be any different than Zero if she should get the nod now or in the future having been shown her willingness and complicity thus far?

      Thanks!

      • Jen Gelman
      • I hate to say it, but Hillary would be even scarier. She won’t unset the applecart like 0bama appears poised to do. She’ll just move America forward into a higher level of socialism that won’t be rejected by the public and politicians.

    • west 1890
    • Have to second the concern Silverdust expressed about the vote counting issue. Soros has already said that the most important thing is who counts the votes. I fear that even if the actual vote was overwhelmingly Republican, the fix is already in on the count-otherwise why would obama be so freely angering so many Americans. The hate level against this guy is so high and widespread it’s
      almost making steam come up off the sidewalks.

      • Kansas Patriot
      • Funny how many times Snopes has been proven wrong, biased or outright inventing excuses for this administration but how do you expect Soros money to be spent…

        • Obeline
        • Pity that no one can be trusted any more:

          ” . . . Because snopes.com is all about rumors, it was only a matter of time before rumors began to circulate about it and its operators, such as the following:

          Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.

          The snopes.com web site is (and always has been) a completely independent, self-sufficient entity wholly owned by its operators, Barbara and David Mikkelson, and funded through advertising revenues. Neither the site nor its operators has ever received monies from (or been engaged in any business or editorial relationship with), any sponsor, investor, partner, political party, religious group, business organization, government agency, or any other outside group or organization.

          Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections, register an affiliation with a U.S. political party, or donate to any U.S. political campaign or candidate. David Mikkelson is an American citizen whose participation in U.S. politics has never extended beyond periodically exercising his civic duty at the ballot box. As FactCheck confirmed in April 2009, David is a registered independent who has never donated to, or worked on behalf of, any political campaign or party. The Mikkelsons are wholly apolitical, vastly preferring their quiet scholarly lives in the company of their five cats to any political considerations . . . ”

          http://www.snopes.com/info/aboutus.asp

    • Kay112
    • I am looking forward to hearing what Wall Street Insider has to say these days. He is always refreshingly insightful and interesting, in my opinion.

Leave A Response

* Required

-->