Home -> News -> WALL STREET INSIDER: “Obama Is Pulling The Mask Away For All The World To See”

WALL STREET INSIDER: “Obama Is Pulling The Mask Away For All The World To See”

by Ulsterman on April 17, 2012 with 217 Comments in News

“Obama is pulling the mask away for all the world to see…” -Wall Street Insider

WSI: You look almost surprised to see me young man. (winks)

UM: I…your letter…….I didn’t think we would be having these conversations anymore.

WSI: Oh, well…I was told to…to…to overcome my pride. Pride is not to be a part of this process anymore. Too close to…the…to the inevitable. But I’m not there yet. And I do feel better. I know I don’t look better to you…I can see it on your face there…but I really do feel better. I am blessed to die an old man. So many of us….so many did not have that………………..that blessing. I do get tired easily though, so please be patient with me – you always have been. I may…wander a bit. But don’t……………..there is no need to-to…….to change…..to not express those moments as they are. Does that make sense?

UM: You don’t want me to edit the lapses? The times you may “wander”? I’ve done that before for you – it’s no trouble. You don’t want me to do that?

About the Ulsterman

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

Website more of this author

217 Comments to WALL STREET INSIDER: “Obama Is Pulling The Mask Away For All The World To See”

- Reader
  April 17, 2012 at 6:26 pm
- This was an amazing interview UM. Hang in there. WSI is clearly having a tough time staying focused. Hope he pulls through at least until November 2012 when we vote out the Obama disaster. When this is all over you really need to think about putting all of this together into book form. No joke. Its that good.
Reply
- - Kay112
    April 17, 2012 at 7:32 pm
  - Yes! I concur– another very interesting interview.
    
    However, in watching the Axelrod video, I have to ask a rather crude question.
    
    Was Axelrod trying to hold back some belches or what was that going on with him? It was also very clear to me Axelrod was stressful during the Chris Wallace interviews. Perhaps, Axelrod’s nerves were merely on edge during the interview and that explains his odd behavior?
    
    @ Wall Street Insider… Yes! This administration is fostering divisiveness resulting in mayhem and pandamonium in America. WSI, get yourself well. We’re praying for you!
  Reply
  - lanurse1
    April 18, 2012 at 2:09 am
    
    Valerie Jarret was under the desk squeezing Axelrod’s nether regions to keep him telling the “Big Lies”
    Reply
  - doctorate
    April 19, 2012 at 8:34 am
    
    Heartburn.
    Reply
  - ThroughTheLookingGlass
    April 26, 2012 at 10:29 pm
    
    Axelrod was trying to swallow his own bullsh!t. It doesn’t go down well for him… or us, as we can readily see. It’s also a mechanism for ‘collecting’ his thoughts. Either that, or he’s trying not to throw it all up! It being the truth which he’s suppressing.
    Reply
- - Seeker
    April 17, 2012 at 10:46 pm
  - Someday, if we win, this will make a helluva movie. God speed, WSI. Stay safe, UM!
  Reply
  - Kay112
    April 18, 2012 at 4:54 am
    
    We’re definitely going to win!
    Reply
- - Worried American
    April 17, 2012 at 11:01 pm
  - UM: WHI is suffering. His soul is burdened with the information he knows and wants to share but perhaps is afraid to.
    
    Go to him quietly. Help him end his sadness by encouraging him to tell you the information that can change America’s course.
    
    Remind him that the Good Lord blessed him with old age so he can share his wisdom with us — those who are in desperate need of his help.
    
    He’s where he is for a reason. Divine intervention, perhaps.
    
    Thank him for me for all he has done for our country.
    
    Tell him he has been given another opportunity to help America.
    
    Keep him well. Give him a hug — he so needs one.
    
    Worry and sadness can wear a soul out.
    
    He must stay healthy and rested to help us turn it around in November. We need him.
    
    Blessings and prayers for you WHI. You remind me of my Father. Like you, a man of integrity exposed to the ugly underbelly of ‘politics’ (my Dad on a local level but nonetheless, ugly).
    
    Thank you WHI for caring for us. We are grateful.
  Reply
  - ITYS
    April 18, 2012 at 1:16 am
    
    Just let him spill the facts and we can connect the dots as your readers have been successfully done especially with the previous CA hints. this info is so important and it has to get out. IMHO I’m not surprised about the NewsCorp attacks. All these chaotic events serve to obfuscate.
    Reply
    - Jules
      April 18, 2012 at 2:33 am
      
      The attack on Murdock has WSI pretty shaken too. Boy, UM, I hope WSI is not prophesying here:
      
      “Rupert’s company. And see what they are doing to him! The global monsters of socialism! They come for him! For his family! A lifetime of work! And some might ask why I don’t reveal myself! So easy for them to say such a thing! His life threatened. The lives of his children threatened. His very freedom threatened. That is what is happening in the shadows you know. Just under the surface. They are….they are…America is the prize. So goes America……………so goes the world. If they can get to Murdoch………….
      
      You need protection! You are next!”
      
      If you haven’t already, take him up on the offer for protection, can’t hoit, right? Like chicken soup, good for you, bad for the chicken. Take the soup. There are very bad baddies in those “shadows,” you know.
      
      Reply
      - bill o'rights
        April 18, 2012 at 3:59 pm
        
        Absolutely!!!
        
        UM, I would have thought that you had the good sense to take WSI up on his offer! My god, man, get it together!!!
        
        There’s nowhere else anyone can find this kind of vital information!!! We cannot fight an enemy we don’t fully understand! And, speaking for myself at least, those of us who have been fortunate enough to find your blog have taken what we have learned and armed ourselves with this knowledge. Again, speaking for myself, I have shared this information with others who have the means to use this information in a very broad sense.
        
        The fact that you have yet to make good on WSI’s offer is just downright irritating and irresponsible!
- Lynda Fox
  April 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm
- Dear GOD in Heaven…it’s true…all the “conspiracies”, all the “speculation”…it’s all true!!!!
  WS1 is so right….the voting public is so STUPID!!!!!!!
  Instead of trying to fix all this, they want to go and fraud another INELIGIBLE down our throats. Another AKA to carry on with the extermination of anything AMERICAN.
  I know where this is heading, and, I can suppose the outcome, but, if you think for one second that I am going without the battle of my lifetime…think a thousand times more before anybody comes anywhere near me or mine!!!!!
Reply
- - bill o'rights
    April 17, 2012 at 7:16 pm
  - Very good! Keep exercising those 2nd amendment rights!
  Reply
- - Kitty
    April 18, 2012 at 2:13 pm
  - Is WSI avoiding saying the words concentration camps, Holocaust and final solution? He would save himself a lot of stress if he would simply spit it out.
  Reply
- Gary
  April 17, 2012 at 6:27 pm
- This HAS to disemminated to the general public. Exposure is our only chance other than armed response after the fact!
Reply
- red923
  April 17, 2012 at 6:28 pm
- The central idea of social Darwinism is that of the struggle for existence being used to justify social policies which make no distinction between those able to support themselves and those unable to support themselves. The most prominent form of such views stressed competition between individuals in laissez-faire capitalism; but it is also connected to the ideas of eugenics, scientific racism, imperialism,[3] fascism, Nazism and struggle between national or racial groups.[4][5]
  
  In sociology social Darwinism has been defined as a theory of social evolution which asserts that “There are underlying, and largely irresistible, forces acting in societies which are like the natural forces that operate in animal and plant communities. One can therefore formulate social laws similar to natural ones. These social forces are of such a kind as to produce evolutionary progress through the natural conflicts between social groups. The best-adapted and most successful social groups survive these conflicts, raising the evolutionary level of society generally (the ‘survival of the fittest’).”[6]
  
  Because of the negative connotations of the theory of social Darwinism, especially after the atrocities of the Second World War (including the Holocaust) the term is generally seen as pejorative, and few people would describe themselves as social Darwinists.[7] Opponents of Darwinian evolution have often maintained that social Darwinism is a logical entailment of a belief in evolutionary theory, while defenders of evolutionary theory generally maintain that it is rather a perversion of Darwin’s ideas. While most scholars recognize the historical link between Darwin’s theory and forms of social Darwinism, they also maintain that social Darwinism is not a necessary consequence of the principles of biological evolution,[8] and that using biological evolution as a justification for policies of inequality amounts to committing the naturalistic fallacy.
Reply
- - gena
    April 17, 2012 at 7:25 pm
  - Red, you have explained it about as well as can be done in such a short explanation. And you see every aspect of this occuring in the Obama administration. Race warfare, class warfare, eugenics (strangely enough it is black babies being killed off in a genocidal movement with most support being among leaders of the black community), Obamacare, if enacted will cull off a lot of what hthese people consider deadwood, disablied, mentally and physicaly handicapped, the elderly, children who will never attain the ability to be self suppportive and the elderly who are beyond contributing further to society will be culled, in an attempt to achieve a master race led by people who consider themselves intellectuals and able to lead the helpless masses to the life the elites deem in their best interests. Look at Nazi Germany and you see how that ends up.
    I cannot believe you were unable to see that Mr. Ultersman, or if you were just trying to drag it out of this man’s mouth. I am not a genius but I was able to see where the man was going and what he was talking about immediately, so I do not understand why you either couldn’t see it or made him believe you did not see the connections.
    And I agree with him that Obama is merely a pawn of those actually running the show of which we all know by one George Soros is a major player. There are others but Soros has allowed himself, because of the exposure by Glenn Beck to be the most visible puppet master. And if Obama should become a hinderance they will throw him under the bus as quickly as they have thrown others under the bus, in fact, I would not be surprised if they staged an assasination on Obama to cause riots such as would tear this country apart. He probably knows he has to toe the line for his superiors.
    This is really frightening how deeply the country has allowed itself to step into it and it is going to be hard to stop this without considerable bloodshed being spilt.
  Reply
  - E.A.B.
    April 17, 2012 at 8:35 pm
    
    I think most of us see the parallels (and add environmentalism to your list of eugenics movements).
    
    But what does that have to do with the Obama administration denouncing its political opponents as “social Darwinists”?
    Reply
    - lanurse1
      April 18, 2012 at 1:49 am
      
      Obama pulled the social darwinsim card on us before we could pull it on him~~deflection
      
      Mainstream Media is complicit in this scheme by continuing Obama/Hitler’s “Big Lie”
      
      “All this was inspired by the principle – which is quite true in itself – that in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes.
      
      “From time immemorial. however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. Schopenhauer called the Jew “The Great Master of Lies.” Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth to prevail.” Adolph Hitler “Mein Kamph”
      
      Reply
    - ThroughTheLookingGlass
      April 26, 2012 at 10:43 pm
      
      What Obama speaks of against his opposition is usually what he and his buddies are guilty of. If he is accusing others, it’s because he’s guilty of the same thing himself. Its not Republican Social Darwinism. It is HIS administration’s Social Darwinism.
      
      verstehen Sie?
      
      Reply
  - E.A.B.
    April 17, 2012 at 8:38 pm
    
    Most of us understand that much. But I think what was throwing UM (as well as a few others among us) through a loop is the question of how any of that is implied, let alone proved, by the Obama administration denouncing its political opponents as “social Darwinists.”
    Reply
    - Rebel Yell
      April 17, 2012 at 11:37 pm
      
      EAB, it is projection, ie., blaming the other side for what you are doing. It is an Alinsky tactic. How fiercely do the Marxist regime support abortion… Planned Parenthood? You can connect the dots.
      
      Reply
    - Namecookiegramma
      April 18, 2012 at 3:53 am
      
      The confusion about this brings my thoughts back to the advertisement that was run by the Democrats against the republicans over Obamacare, remember granny in the wheel chair? The administration has painted a pretty picture for those who walk through life not looking any further than the next step of how the opposition will refuse to help them and will in effect throw them off a cliff. How hard is it to remember the people who claimed that if elected Obama would pay for the houses they lived in and get them big screen televisions to boot? Sad to say but there really are poeple in this country who have not learned the basics of caring for themselves. They barely know how to boil water, leave alone plant and grow food to sustain themselves. Sadly these same people do not see just how dependent they are on others for everything and even sadder they would not see just how much it has harmed them.
      
      Reply
  - megapotamus
    April 17, 2012 at 8:45 pm
    
    Well said indeed, on all fronts. What the totalitarians denounce as the law of the jungle they intend to make the law of the land! It’s all for the children but only certain children; the fit. But it is a political fitness above all. UM was not grokking the specific accusation I think but it is eugenics at its core. Mated to anti-semetism and socialism, what do you have? Nothing but the swastika.
    Reply
    - CBDenver
      April 18, 2012 at 4:11 am
      
      “But it is a political fitness above all.” — Ah, there is the point! I have often thought that those who know how to work the system and who have no compunction about it are much more “fit” that I am. When you live in a system that is corrupt, where a few have power to confiscate the wealth of others and redistribute it to whom they please, the honest man or women doesn’t have a chance.
      
      I believe that Hayek said this in his “Road to Serfdom”. see excerpts here http://jim.com/hayek.htm
      
      Reply
      - Nan G
        April 18, 2012 at 6:27 pm
        
        Another point about social Darwinism.
        It presupposes that ”progress” equals ”improvement,” ignoring the law of unintended consequences completely.
        It presupposes that no standards higher than human need to be brought to bear on social issues.
        In the UK where health care was supposed to be from ”cradle-to-grave,” we learn that over 80% of all abortions are after parents are told something is ”wrong” with their baby.
        It might be a club foot or cleft palate which could easily have been repaired.
        But the baby is trashed.
        How many great poets, scientists and others are we losing because of doctor pressure on young parents-to-be?
- - VAPatriot
    April 18, 2012 at 1:15 am
  - Great article this month on “social Darwinism” in ” The Weekly Standard”. Interesting timing.
  Reply
  - CBDenver
    April 18, 2012 at 3:44 am
    
    I agree that everyone should read the article on Social Darwinism by Jonah Goldberg available here http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/fantasies-social-darwinism_637016.html.
    
    Goldberg points out that the term “social darwinism” was coined by liberals who used it to caricature conservatives. Progressives smeared conservatives by claiming that conservatives wanted a “law of the jungle” approach to politics and society. In reality:
    
    “One reason the term “Social Darwinism” caught on with progressives was that it served to divert attention from the sins of “reform Darwinism”—i.e., the progressive passion for eugenics. The progressives advocated aggressive statist intervention to improve the genetic stock of the country, while the alleged Social Darwinists championed laissez-faire and private charity and—gasp—reproductive freedom. Moreover, the term Social Darwinism, which in Europe was used to justify nationalist and racist theories of the Hitlerian variety, was the perfect label for playing guilt-by-association in America. Ever since Hofstadter’s book, liberals have used the term to accuse conservatives of desperately wanting to return to a past that never was.”
    
    So “social darwinism” is used by progressives as perjorative against conservatives. But it is the progressive social planners who want to actively influence the evolution of society towards their ends — to play God, as it were. Who should we fear more? Those who believe in limited government and private, face-to-face charity, or those who believe the State and the “godlings” who run it can dictate the future and fate of mankind?
    Reply
- Lynda Fox
  April 17, 2012 at 6:28 pm
- WS1, please stay well. DW, PLEASE…take that protection!!!!!
Reply
- Obeline
  April 17, 2012 at 6:31 pm
- Read an article yesterday about this. Seems some amongst us walk a fine line between paranoia and wisdom?
  
  Goebbel’s Principles of Propaganda
  
  1. Propagandist must have access to intelligence concerning events and public opinion.
  
  2. Propaganda must be planned and executed by only one authority.
  
  a. It must issue all the propaganda directives
  
  b. It must explain propaganda directives to important officials and maintain their morale
  
  c. It must oversee other agencies’ activities which have propaganda consequences
  
  3. The propaganda consequences of an action must be considered in planning that action.
  
  4. Propaganda must affect the enemy’s policy and action.
  
  a. By suppressing propagandistically desirable material which can provide the enemy with useful intelligence
  
  b. By openly disseminating propaganda whose content or tone causes the enemy to draw the desired conclusions
  
  c. By goading the enemy into revealing vital information about himself
  
  d. By making no reference to a desired enemy activity when any reference would discredit that activity
  
  5. Declassified, operational information must be available to implement a propaganda campaign
  
  6. To be perceived, propaganda must evoke the interest of an audience and must be transmitted through an attention-getting communications medium.
  
  7. Credibility alone must determine whether propaganda output should be true or false.
  
  8. The purpose, content and effectiveness of enemy propaganda; the strength and effects of an expose; and the nature of current propaganda campaigns determine whether enemy propaganda should be ignored or refuted.
  
  9. Credibility, intelligence, and the possible effects of communicating determine whether propaganda materials should be censored.
  
  10. Material from enemy propaganda may be utilized in operations when it helps diminish that enemy’s prestige or lends support to the propagandist’s own objective.
  
  11. Black rather than white propaganda may be employed when the latter is less credible or produces undesirable effects.
  
  12. Propaganda may be facilitated by leaders with prestige.
  
  13. Propaganda must be carefully timed.
  
  a. The communication must reach the audience ahead of competing propaganda.
  
  b. A propaganda campaign must begin at the optimum moment
  
  c. A propaganda theme must be repeated, but not beyond some point of diminishing effectiveness
  
  14. Propaganda must label events and people with distinctive phrases or slogans.
  
  a. They must evoke desired responses which the audience previously possesses
  
  b. They must be capable of being easily learned
  
  c. They must be utilized again and again, but only in appropriate situations
  
  d. They must be boomerang-proof
  
  15. Propaganda to the home front must prevent the raising of false hopes which can be blasted by future events.
  
  16. Propaganda to the home front must create an optimum anxiety level.
  
  a. Propaganda must reinforce anxiety concerning the consequences of defeat
  
  b. Propaganda must diminish anxiety (other than concerning the consequences of defeat) which is too high and which cannot be reduced by people themselves
  
  17. Propaganda to the home front must diminish the impact of frustration.
  
  a. Inevitable frustrations must be anticipated
  
  b. Inevitable frustrations must be placed in perspective
  
  18. Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred.
  
  19. Propaganda cannot immediately affect strong counter-tendencies; instead it must offer some form of action or diversion, or both.
  
  Based upon “Goebbels’ Principles of Propaganda” by Leonard W. Doob published in “Public Opinion and Propaganda; A Book of Readings edited for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.”
Reply
- red923
  April 17, 2012 at 6:36 pm
- This is a better definition of Social Darwinism from Conservapedia.
  
  Social Darwinism is a belief, popular in the late Victorian era in England, America, and elsewhere, which states that the strongest or fittest should survive and flourish in society, while the weak and unfit should be allowed to die. The theory was chiefly expounded by Herbert Spencer, whose ethical philosophies always held an elitist view and received a boost from the application of Darwinian ideas such as adaptation and natural selection.[1] Its leading proponents opine atheism.[2][3][4]
  Beginning in 1887, social scientists were using the term “social Darwinism” to apply the survival of the fittest theory to social situations. Under this theory, the wealthiest or most powerful in society must be biologically superior, and less “fit” persons should die.
  Proponents of this particular form of ‘social Darwinism’, such as Herbert Spencer, taught that the powerful and wealthy were this way because they were biologically and evolutionally superior to the struggling masses. They believed that we should therefore do nothing to help improve the working and living conditions of the lesser evolved masses. Charities were clearly evil in helping sustain the lives of those who otherwise would and should die in the natural selection process. In other words, the weak were to do their duty and die while the fittest survived, which would one day lead to an evolutionarily super society and race. [2]
  Soon many began to view racial struggles, and war itself, as a perfectly natural example of survival-of-the-fittest in the human race. The horrific wars of the 20th century, employing shockingly brutal tactics, were encouraged by a belief in survival-of-the-fittest among humans. While social Darwinism itself was applied to social and economic situations rather than military ones, it is easy how extreme versions of social Darwinism could justify physical struggles among races.
  Social Darwinism has been linked with racism, nationalism, imperialism, and atheism.[5][6][2][3][4] To elitists, strong nations were composed of white people who successful at expanding their empires, and as such, these strong nations would survive in the struggle for dominance.[6] With this attitude, Europeans, except for Christian missionaries, seldom adopted the customs and lanugages of local people under their empires.[6] Christian missionaries, on the other hand, were the very first individuals to meet new peoples and develop writing systems for local inhabitants’ languages that lacked one.[6] Being critics of Darwinism, they ardently opposed slavery and provided an education and religious instruction to the new peoples they interacted with since they felt that this was their duty as Christians.[6]
  Social Darwinism Today
  Most of Social Darwinism’s appeal left it in the early part of the 20th century. There were a number of reasons for this including:
  • Mixed economies became more widely accepted, and often-violent philosophies such as socialism, communism, fascism and anarchism were rising in popularity. Theodore Roosevelt’s progressivism and his cousin’s Keynesian economics co-opted these movements, ending the previous laissez-faire economy.
  • It was seen as contributing to German militarism and Nazism during World War II.
  • Humanity came to be seen as socially more aware than animals.
  • Revulsion at Hitler’s attempt to build a “master race,” as well as the civil rights movement during the 1960s and 1970s, removed popular support for eugenics over time.
  • Social Darwinists often promoted laissez-faire economics as a means of “weeding out” the unwanted of society.
  Finally an improved understanding of ethology removed the basis of this “dog-eat-dog” philosophy.
  Consequently, with the fall of the fascist states Social Darwinism entered a period of disrepute and few societies, if any, now embrace its ideas that the weak should be disregarded; that there are “superior” and “inferior” races; or that war is an appropriate way to show a country’s “virility”.
  American Liberals and Recent Behavior in Accordance with Social Darwinism
  Liberals are more likely to believe in evolution[8]. Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published “Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism.”[9] Professor Brooks found that American liberals are significantly less charitable than American conservatives despite earning more.[10] American Conservatives also donate more time and donate more blood than American liberals. [11] The results are not entirely surprising given that liberals are more likely to believe in evolution and that Darwinists historically have often displayed behavior in accordance with Social Darwinism.
Reply
- - lanurse1
    April 18, 2012 at 2:05 am
  - Does Axelrod realize that with Social Darwinism his epileptic daughter will be one of those who will have to “go away”?
  Reply
  - doctorate
    April 19, 2012 at 9:07 am
    
    Why does he sport that creepy little mustache?
    Reply
- Joe Ynot
  April 17, 2012 at 6:42 pm
- WSI is clearly terrified. What he is referring to is the artificial re-creation of the preliminary events on post-Wordl War I Germany that lead to the rise of Naziism, which to understand WSI better should be referred to by its full name, the German National Socialist Workers party.
  
  People convenient forget how dependent the the Nazi’s were on the workers, that they were very much a workers’ party, and of course, very much a socialist party. People tend to think of the Nazis as the opposite of the Communists and the Left in general, because they such brutal enemies, but their war against each other was very much a civil war, the socialist civil war. What WSI is getting at, I believe, is that the Leftists of the Obama administration are perfectly content to use the tactics of the Nazis, because these tactics and the belief system from which they spring are comfortable and familiar to the American Left.
  
  Besides monetary inflation, centralized control, labor union thugs, the servile, fanatical support of academia (the universities were among Hitler’s–and Lenin’s–biggest supporters),is the sowing of division, of political hatred, the blaming of “the Other,” as academia puts it. The big thing to look for, that hasn’t been seen yet, that will be the key thing to look for is WSI is as right as he is convinced he is, is some sort of reincarnation of “The Stab in the Back” trope that pervaded Germany after WW!. “The Stab in the Back” was the idea that Germany only lost WWI because they were betrayed, mainly by the Jews. The logical updating of this would, it seems to me, that the modern AMerican “Stab in the Back” will either involve the failure of the Stimulus package to revive the economy, or Israel and American Jews responsible for some sort of failure of Mideast diplomacy, or maybe as the cause of terrorism attacks against the US.
Reply
- - helps
    April 17, 2012 at 9:56 pm
  - “the sowing of division, of political hatred, the blaming of “the Other,” as academia puts it. The big thing to look for, that hasn’t been seen yet,… is some sort of reincarnation of “The Stab in the Back” trope that pervaded Germany after WW!. “The Stab in the Back” was the idea that Germany only lost WWI because they were betrayed, mainly by the Jews.”
    
    Could be Jews again they are still under 10 million world wide, but when Mitt Romney, Glen Beck, and Harry Reid belong to the same religion, and the left has no-one to blame but themselves…IMO Mormons should be on extra high alert right for the next few years.
  Reply
  - CBDenver
    April 19, 2012 at 12:22 am
    
    Unfortunately I have read many ramblings on the web that put the blame for our economic woes on the Jews. The Rothschilds figure prominently in their rants, as well as other Jewish political and media figures. Some of the 911 “truthers” blame the Israeli Mossad for the destruction of the twin towers. It won’t take long for these “stab in the back” conspiracy theories to become mainstream
    Reply
- - Marlowe
    April 17, 2012 at 10:25 pm
  - Joe:
    This was actually talked about in a WHI interview in late March. Basically the Mao’Bama WH will blame Israel for anything that happens on the international scene.
    
    “The Obama people have come up with what they call a “win-win” scenario. If prices continue to go up blame Israel even if no bombing of Iran nuclear plants takes place. Blame Israel for contributing to unrest. -WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: March 22nd, 2012″
  Reply
  - Rebel Yell
    April 17, 2012 at 11:39 pm
    
    The Marxist regime has thrown Bibi under the bus. WSI knows that and so do a lot of other Jews. That is the essence of the WSI’s change of view.
    Reply
- - Edward Teach
    April 18, 2012 at 9:36 pm
  - I think you hit the nail on the head.
    
    And note that WSI didn’t say anything about Obama directing the term SD againstt anyone…simply that the term was on his lips, which reflect what others here have said re Alinskyism – accuse your opponent of being what you are (paraphrase).
    
    Add it all up to something that terrifies WSI – a man whose parents fled Nazi Germany for America. What would terrify a man like WSI more than a Nazi America?
    
    And you are especially right in reminding people that Nazi is really the “German National Socialist Workers party.” You have the “Nationalism” (Democrats claim their dissent is patriotic and they simply want to fix America), “Progressive/Socialist” (this one is self evident) and Workers – everything the WH has done has been in coordination with labor unions.
    
    More so than coordination with labor unions, it’s an increasing trend toward supporting the more militant divisions of groups like unions or ethnic divisions.
    
    Look at the increasing militancy of unions.
    
    Nation’s Second-Largest Teachers’ Union Hires Militant Communist And 9/11 Truther…
    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/04/14/nations-second-largest-teachers-union-hires-militant-communist-and-911-truther/
    
    Sabotage Strikes As Union Militants Target Verizon Execs At Home
    http://www.laborunionreport.com/portal/2011/08/sabotage-strikes-as-union-militants-target-verizon-executives-at-their-homes/
    
    Consider Trumpka, who has always been nuts, is an Obama guest of honor. Hoffa says lets “take these sons of bitches out”
    http://www.rightsidesd.com/?p=5534
    
    Meanwhile OWS has been co-opted by the unions.
    Occupy movement holds training near Detroit, Ann Arbor
    http://www.toledoblade.com/Nation/2012/04/15/Occupy-movement-holds-training-near-Detroit-Ann-Arbor.html
    
    The Black panthers are another leg in the militant stool – anyone remember the tirade their new “leader” Michelle Williams went on a week ago?
    http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/article/252115/4/New-Black-Panther-Party-Chief-of-Staff-Apologizes-After-Outburst
    
    These lunatics are increasingly running the asylum:
    Look at Boeing. Look at the purple shirts during the summer of discontent. This white house is all in with unions
    
    Case in point – I know a high rise contractor, the kind of guy who builds multimillion dollar highrises. He does so without union work. So he got a big job in a major city and soon the union protests. They deploy the giant inflatable rat.
    
    Shortly thereafter, the strength of the federal government descends upon this guy. The EPA starts investigating. OSHA inspectors start coming around in force. Department of Labor investigating… Tell me that the governments’ sudden interest is not linked to union influence. In a just society, government force would not be used to effect gain for a private group.
    
    So is it all leading up to the disaster WSI forsees…is this the same disaster that WHI predicted when he talked about coming racial strife?
    
    What my real question is…is who is pulling the strings? Is it a consortium of labor leaders? Casus belli…who benefits?
  Reply
- - BG
    April 19, 2012 at 3:54 pm
  - You are right, Joe. Not only is WSI terrified, I believe he is terrified because he is old enough, and possibly even has experienced to some degree, these things he sees this administration setting our government up to do again. As it was done to the UNwitting people of Europe during the early years of WWII.
    
    I find your theory of “The Stab in the Back” to be most intriguing. I will be watching to see what will serve as that impetus. I suspect it will be something like an assassination attempt (as hinted by WHI), or race riots (BAD ones, in the vein of LA), or Iran bombing (by Isreal or some other entity – although I have heard on other “insider” web sites that Iran really isn’t THAT close to having an N-bomb and Isreal knows it, and does not want to be goaded into a fight with them), or something else dire.
  Reply
- Diane Wright
  April 17, 2012 at 6:45 pm
- All of you whom do not understand what WHI is speaking of,please study some World History of the Dictators.Their plans,their actions and what they would have done had they (such as Hitler )been allowed to remain in Power.(no disrespect meant,to what he had already accomplished)
  
  You can also look up,,,”The Greatest Cover-up in the History of the World”.
  
  @WHI,Thank You for all your efforts.
Reply
- - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 7:21 pm
  - I need to add this that it truly SURPRISES me that WHI had no idea how DANGEROUS Axelrod is,(“or what a Liar he is”)one has only to look.He is a HARD RADICAL/SOCIALIST.He has been Groomed his whole life for it.
    
    @Ulsterman, your dear friend might be sicker than you think.Put your pen down and go spend time with him.
  Reply
  - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 7:25 pm
    
    My apologies, i meant “WSI”.On both counts.
    Reply
    - megapotamus
      April 17, 2012 at 8:48 pm
      
      Axe is a filthy commie from a family of America-hating traitors. He has blood on his hands an inch thick.
      
      Reply
      - Diane Wright
        April 17, 2012 at 9:01 pm
        
        Couldn’t AGREE MORE Mega!!How i truly feel bout AXELROD, i know Ulsterman will not post…There are no Bleeps in written words.
- carol powell
  April 17, 2012 at 6:53 pm
- WOW.. JUST WOW
Reply
- Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
  April 17, 2012 at 6:59 pm
- I’m confused.
  
  President Omoslem denounces “Social Darwinism” as the GOP approach. The filthy Usurper claims the GOP wants to “cut entitlements leaving people to fend for themselves” aka Darwinism.
  
  Thus, Omoslem’s “solution” to that supposedly bad scenario is the Welfare State, administered by the National Socialists aka Obama/Axelrod. In Obama’s Utopia, the federal gov’t takes care of everybody, cradle to grave.
  
  In other words, I don’t see Obama/Axelrod openly allying themselves with the concept of Social Darwinism, ALTHOUGH behind the scenes, that’s exactly what they’re doing.
  
  For example, ObamaCare rations medical treatment, leaving the sick/elderly to die, just like the Nazis did.
  
  Is WSI suggesting that Omoslem/Axelrod are OPENLY, publicly, announcing their Nazi intentions to deprive the sick/elderly of care?
  
  On the contrary, Omoslem publicly denies that sick/elderly people will suffer at all, and denies that ObamaCare’s 15-member IPAB Death Panel will ration care…. even though that’s the whole point of the IPAB.
  
  Maybe I’m missing something here…. can anybody clarify this WSI interview for me?
Reply
- - Rebel Yell
    April 17, 2012 at 11:42 pm
  - It is all an Alinsky tactic. Get used to it, it will be the only thing they have. It is impossible to run on Obamao’s record.
  Reply
- - Jules
    April 17, 2012 at 11:50 pm
  - Projection. They accuse (project onto) the other guy of thinking or doing what they themselves are in fact thinking or doing. You can think of it as a kind of tattling on oneself, the way kids sometimes do.
    
    Who wiped out the physically and mentally vulnerable/handicapped “for their own good?” The Nazis. Who would, in effect, do the same thing with relish given half a chance and a few well-oiled death panels? Barry’s regime.
  Reply
  - ConservativeMama
    April 18, 2012 at 1:56 am
    
    Projection is an excellent term. Think of it as the man who is cheating on his girlfriend. Because he is cheating, he looks at her through suspicious eyes. He’ll accuse her of acting badly, because it keeps her from looking too closely at what HE is doing. The Obama Admin is cheating on America–and I think his mistress is far too Fatal Attraction for my taste.
    Reply
- - Publius
    April 18, 2012 at 12:57 am
  - For Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM:
    
    Suggest you read and re-read Obeline’s post above listing Goebbels principles of propaganda, especially from #14 on. Accusing Republicans of promoting “social Darwinism” is propaganda aimed at the home front. It is designed to deflect the uneducated American voter’s attention from Obama/Axelrod’s ultimate goal. They must think first use of the term against the GOP enemy pre-empts the enemy from turning it back on them, even though the subject of Obamacare death panels has been out there for years. WSI is telling us that Axelrod is Goebbels. Thus, everything he says must be viewed in that light.
    
    As someone else here noted, UM appears to view WSI’s comments through a “literalist” prism. WSI is painting a somewhat impressionistic picture which has deep meaning for anyone who is steeped in world/European history of the 20th century. UM and some others commenting here seem to focus on his brush strokes and painting technique instead of on the subject and meaning of the painting itself.
    
    For UM:
    
    UM, you have already done a phenomenal job bringing both WHI and WSI’s thoughts to this site, and I thank you for all you continue to do to enlighten us. With time possibly growing short, might I suggest, UM, that you just give WSI a recording device so that he can talk into it and lay out all of his thoughts as he feels up to it? That way, he can explain things in his own way without you being there to interrupt him, and you can pick up the tape or disc a few days later to share with your readers. I understand that it might be a herculean task to sort through hours of audio recordings, but it might be your best chance to learn everything that WSI is trying to communicate on a range of subjects that he may be too tired to go through in one sitting.
  Reply
- Reader
  April 17, 2012 at 7:12 pm
- Think Joe Knot has it right.
  
  “Besides monetary inflation, centralized control, labor union thugs, the servile, fanatical support of academia (the universities were among Hitler’s–and Lenin’s–biggest supporters),is the sowing of division, of political hatred, the blaming of “the Other,” as academia puts it. The big thing to look for, that hasn’t been seen yet, that will be the key thing to look for is WSI is as right as he is convinced he is, is some sort of reincarnation of “The Stab in the Back” trope that pervaded Germany after WW!. “The Stab in the Back” was the idea that Germany only lost WWI because they were betrayed, mainly by the Jews. The logical updating of this would, it seems to me, that the modern AMerican “Stab in the Back” will either involve the failure of the Stimulus package to revive the economy, or Israel and American Jews responsible for some sort of failure of Mideast diplomacy, or maybe as the cause of terrorism attacks against the US.”
  
  I would add I see Obamacare being a huge part of the plan. Remember Obama saying there comes a time when you just have to give Grandma a pill and not any more medical procedures in order to save money? That is right in line with Nazi Germany. If you cant provide something to the state then its lights out. See ya. The scaring the old and the handicapped and the races and the printing of money until it isn’t worthy anything its all in line with history post WWI Nazi Germany. I didn’t put that part together until I read this interview. WSI is really pointing it out but they might be right. America is now too dumb to see what is right in front of us.
Reply
- - lovelypeace
    April 17, 2012 at 7:32 pm
  - The unions are using this type of rhetoric already. They are pissed that Indiana just became Right-to-Work and they have targets on the backs of a lot of legislators/governors in the Midwest.
    
    Living in a union area gives me a front-row seat to this crap. Also, like Reader says below – Occupy is a major part of this too. Sadly, the kiddos don’t know how to view things critically anymore and want to pretend that it’s the 1960′s so they can fight the “man,” not knowing that their ally – BHO – should be the real target of their rage (and some of the people who claimed to give them an education!)
  Reply
- - Namedeg426
    April 18, 2012 at 12:32 am
  - obamacare holds within the structure that will replace our constitution when the country goes off the cliff. this is why it was so vital that it be passed. it is already being implemented – every day I become more convinced that the election will be stopped, for the good of the people, you know. I fear blood will flow before all is done. May God damn them all.
  Reply
  - lovelypeace
    April 18, 2012 at 10:31 pm
    
    I have the same fear. If the election looks like it’s going too badly for Obama, then I’m not sure what’s going to happen to the rest of us. These guys care more about their power than they do the people and that’s what makes them so scary to me.
    Reply
- - Libertylady
    April 19, 2012 at 5:43 am
  - Reader, this i what i have been saying about the target of Obummer’s tax “rebates”… Social Security. I kept asking myself, “Why THIS tax, and not another?”…Here is my answer:
    
    As you said, “If you can’t provide something to the state, then it’s lights out. See ya.”… So, since 2010 was the first year that SS saw a deficit, and will from now on, Obama made the calculation that if he is to totally eliminate financial responsibility for the oldsters like me, and not pay us any SS, he must strip SS of its status as a “paid-in program”.
    
    People strongly feel (and rightfully so) that they have claims on its benefits, not ONLY because of age, but also because all their lives they have PAID IN (And, I might add, without a deduction on income taxes for those funds paid).
    
    If he can convert SS to just another entitlement program, with no sequestered contributions from taxpayers into a “trust fund” (oxymoron), he can make it a “general fund” program, subject to all the increasingly-restrictive budget issues, and just make it worth nothing over time, and if he can link that to Medicare, people will then starve, and not even use Medicare!! Two for the price of one!
    
    I could be wrong, but I don’t think so. And BTW, I have to say that I REALLY love all the very thoughtful and erudite commentary on this site. You are all people of intelligence, wisdom, class, character, and integrity. It’s a pleasure being in your company!
  Reply
- Jim Daly
  April 17, 2012 at 7:15 pm
- Interestingly, the political scientist Robert Axelrod studied Social Darwinism and Game Theory and concluded the following were the best strategies: 1) be nice. Cooperate, never be the first to defect 2) be provocable. Return defection for defection, cooperation for cooperation 3) don’t be envious. Be fair with your partner. 4) don’t be too clever or don’t try to be too tricky.
  
  A message to fellow Wall Streeters? A call to arms in unified fashion?
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_cooperation
Reply
- - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 8:44 pm
  - Excellent Page.
  Reply
- 4theBoys
  April 17, 2012 at 7:15 pm
- Another good article on Alelrod’s Wallace interview.
  
  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/04/axelrod_gets_axed_on_fox_news.html
Reply
- Reader
  April 17, 2012 at 7:17 pm
- the stab in the back moment that Joe Ynot is talking about seems to be the war on the so called rich that you see with the Occupy movement and also Obamas blaming of Israel for high gas prices etc. Again it really is all being connected right in front of us. Fucking scary is what it really is. WAKE UP IDIOTS! OBAMA IS TOTALLY DESTROYING THE COUNTRY AS WE KNOW IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
- lovelypeace
  April 17, 2012 at 7:17 pm
- Honestly it scared the s-t out me when I heard the phrase “social darwinism” being talked about in the mass media. A lot of people don’t know what it is, so they probably just said “huh?”, but after learning about it in college – huge red flags started popping up when I heard the discussion. I never thought that I’d hear THAT phrase being said with any credibility in our political system – EVER!
  
  Also, just a FYI for everyone, the Occupy crowd is encouraging a general strike on May 1st in our major cities. I haven’t seen it talked about anywhere, except on the extreme Leftist blogs that are supporting it, but we can’t let these thugs speak for the rest of us.
Reply
- - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 9:14 pm
  - Lovely ,could you please Post some of those here for the readers?A direct line,so to speak.
  Reply
  - lovelypeace
    April 19, 2012 at 3:23 pm
    
    I did, but they got deleted. People will need to google the search terms and do their own research. (Unless they got posted farther down on the thread).
    Reply
- Mike
  April 17, 2012 at 7:19 pm
- This may help everyone with their homework:
  
  “Some pre-twentieth century doctrines subsequently described as social Darwinism appear to anticipate state imposed eugenics [3] and the race doctrines of Nazism. Critics have frequently linked evolution, Charles Darwin and social Darwinism with racialism, nationalism, imperialism and eugenics, contending that social Darwinism became one of the pillars of fascism and Nazi ideology, and that the consequences of the application of policies of “survival of the fittest” by Nazi Germany eventually created a very strong backlash against the theory.[33][34]
  
  As mentioned above, Social Darwinism has often been linked to nationalism and imperialism.[35] During the age of New Imperialism, the concepts of evolution justified the exploitation of “lesser breeds without the law” by “superior races.”[35] To elitists, strong nations were composed of white people who were successful at expanding their empires, and as such, these strong nations would survive in the struggle for dominance.[35] With this attitude, Europeans, except for Christian missionaries, seldom adopted the customs and languages of local people under their empires.[35]”
  
  credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism;“Criticism and controversy”/”Laissez-faire individualism, Nazism, eugenics, fascism, imperialism”; (par. 2,3).
Reply
- M. Simon
  April 17, 2012 at 7:26 pm
- I have just started reading. I’m an old man. I get it. And it makes me cry. Thank you WSI.
Reply
- bill o'rights
  April 17, 2012 at 7:34 pm
- There are three things we ALL must focus on right now:
  
  1) Preserve and defend the right to keep and bear arms
  2) Do everything in our power to rally the states to pass anti-federalist legislation, ASAP!!!!!
  3) Do everything in our power to rally the states to create or build up their state militias
Reply
- - gena
    April 17, 2012 at 7:51 pm
  - bill o’rights agree with all three. We must work toward those ends NOW, not tomorrow or there might be no tomorrow for many in our country.
  Reply
- - Jen Gelman
    April 17, 2012 at 8:10 pm
  - THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IS UNDER FULL ASSAULT.
    
    BILL COSBY IS NOW SHILLING FOR THE *^%#^) IN CHIEF.
    
    EVERY NEWS STORY HAS AN AGENDA.
  Reply
- - ReadyorNot
    April 17, 2012 at 8:34 pm
  - Already putting a “bug” in Perry’s ear…
  Reply
- SpeakingOut59
  April 17, 2012 at 7:38 pm
- It’s all here: http://www.dsausa.org/
  That’s the website for the Democratic Socialists of America.
  The things that are happening all around us can be found in their “Manual,” in their Nov. 2011 Convention report, on their Q & A page where they state that they’re not in competition with the Democratic party, they work with them through the Congressional Progressive Caucus. (At 75 members, they comprise 39% of the U.S. House of Representatives. Thank you Rep. Allen West for exposing this!) “Occupy” “Union Activism” “Community Organizing” and “Redistribution of Wealth” can all be found in the DSAUSA documents.
  Is Obama a communist?
  Judge for yourself…
  http://keywiki.org/index.php/Barack_Obama_and_the_Communist_Party
Reply
- - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 9:02 pm
  - Truly 2 words NEVER MEANT to go in same sentence,,,Socialism,,and AMERICA.
  Reply
- SpeakingOut59
  April 17, 2012 at 7:41 pm
- Edit….39% of ALL DEMOCRATS in the House of Representatives…mis “typed”..sorry.
Reply
- VAPatriot
  April 17, 2012 at 8:00 pm
- WSI–While Ulsterman may not understand the implications of what you have said, many of his readers do. And we will tell others, and use your words to help convince them. You are not wasting your time. Thank you for what you are doing. Perhaps God will give us the battle. Stay safe.
Reply
- VAPatriot
  April 17, 2012 at 8:03 pm
- Also–awesome discussion here in comments. Thank you all for excellent input!
Reply
- Jen Gelman
  April 17, 2012 at 8:07 pm
- DOES THE NAME DOMINIQUE STRAUSS-KAHN MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU???
  
  IN LIGHT IF THE SECRET SERVICE PROSTITUTION SCANDAL???
  
  ARE YOU CONNECTING THE DOTS YET???
Reply
- - Rebel Yell
    April 17, 2012 at 11:45 pm
  - Some of us know it was the “Chicago” connection. We are paying attention.
  Reply
  - lovelypeace
    April 18, 2012 at 10:56 pm
    
    I’ve heard that some white house staffers were involved too; however, there’s no mention of this in the press.
    Reply
- E.A.B.
  April 17, 2012 at 8:09 pm
- Yeah, I’m not getting it either. WSI is tying Obama to Hitler (a social Darwinist) because Obama is calling his political enemies social Darwinists? Call me confused.
  
  WSI also seems to be in the mid-stages of Alzheimer’s or something similar. UM, are you at liberty to indicate the nature of WSI’s condition and his prospects for recovery?
Reply
- - Jen Gelman
    April 17, 2012 at 8:12 pm
  - I bet he is on heavy duty pain meds – it’s probably cancer.
  Reply
  - E.A.B.
    April 17, 2012 at 8:28 pm
    
    After his recent letter to UM, cancer (terminal cancer to be more precise) did come to mind. I didn’t think of pain medication, though–thanks for pointing that out.
    
    It was the forgetfulness of recent events/names/etc., combined with vivid memories of things long past, that made me think of Alzheimer’s.
    Reply
    - Diane Wright
      April 17, 2012 at 9:08 pm
      
      I have worked with both types of patients(Alzheimer’s & Cancer).Both very SAD and DEBILITATING. In either case,the actions( & words,getting upset at Ulsterman) of WSI ,would qualify. 1 thing is for certain, you can all bet WSI,,, is a VERY SICK MAN
      
      Reply
  - Enough is enough
    April 17, 2012 at 9:05 pm
    
    WSI gets what is happening and he is about out of his mind. He sees what is going on and its easy if you connect the dots of everything that is going on. The same pattern used in Germany only worst because other countries are involved. He is trying to convince others but they can’t believe that would happen here. YES IT CAN.
    
    Everything they tell you are lies from this regime. They are now trying to play the good guys for you to believe BUT THEY ARE NOT. You can consider this a trap. PEOPLE WAKE UP.
    READ HISTORY IN GERMANY THE 1940′S.
    Reply
    - lovelypeace
      April 18, 2012 at 10:59 pm
      
      Actually, I’d recommend a good histroy of the rise of Hitler in the 1930′s.
      
      Reply
      - ThroughTheLookingGlass
        April 26, 2012 at 11:30 pm
        
        The Rise and Fall of the Third Reicht is an excellent, though lengthy, source.
- - SteveM
    April 17, 2012 at 11:22 pm
  - Could it be that hardcore leftists ALWAYS accuse conservatives of doing the things that they themselves are doing?
  Reply
  - bill o'rights
    April 18, 2012 at 12:10 am
    
    Right on!
    
    I call it Psych. 101 as it applies to politics…particularly ominous when you’re accusing someone of racism.
    Reply
- werbaz neutronName
  April 17, 2012 at 8:15 pm
- I wonder whether WSI has not fallen prey to some enemy “disablement.” Not as sudden as that visited upon Breitbart, but disabling.
  
  And WHI seems to have been scared entirely into silence.
  
  The Barfack regime HAS to get four more years….by any means at their disposal. The first four years were a push for them and the rest is ready for them to accomplish.
  
  Ulsterman, it IS still Ulsterman isn’t it?
  
  Stay safe.
Reply
- - ITYS
    April 18, 2012 at 1:28 am
  - Notice it as been in excess of 6 weeks and NO report of Breitbart’s death, the same LA county was able to release info on Whitney Houston in a very timely manner. The timeline alone does not add up for a young man entering UCLA MC, due to his age alone they would have had many sophisticated life saving options to try that would have taken more than 45mins from the time of the so-called collapse at 12MN.
  Reply
- werbaz neutronName
  April 17, 2012 at 8:16 pm
- It is ironic, referencing Axlerod’s TV interview, that his appearance suggests that of Adolph Hitler so strongly.
Reply
- - Rebel Yell
    April 17, 2012 at 11:46 pm
  - He is one evil bastard, but look at his boss.
  Reply
- Greg
  April 17, 2012 at 8:33 pm
- WSI totally linking Obama to how Hitler took over. People need to learn history to see this. It is scary how similar the tactics are. As in almost exactly the same. The only thing left just about is the death camps. Obamacare will be the updated version of death camps. I’m not joking.
Reply
- - E.A.B.
    April 17, 2012 at 8:39 pm
  - Most of us understand that much. But I think what was throwing UM (as well as a few others among us) through a loop is the question of how any of that is implied, let alone proved, by the Obama administration denouncing its political opponents as “social Darwinists.”
  Reply
  - cthulhu
    April 18, 2012 at 1:02 am
    
    I believe that WSI had planted a seed and saw it sprout. There are many names for the evil that is totalitarianism — Nazism, Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Social Darwinism — and the one least likely to come up in casual conversation is “Social Darwinism”.
    
    So, if WSI had “Social Darwinism” plugged into someone’s ear (Soros?) somewhere, and the next thing you know Axelrod is using the term, that would demonstrate a link.
    Reply
- - Patriot
    April 17, 2012 at 8:56 pm
  - We have FEMA camps. Empty FEMA camps waiting to be filled up, with people like us. It is incredibly scary, and both WSI and WHI have been accurate in what they have said. I only hope they can pull enough strings to get rid of Nobama.
  Reply
  - ConservativeMama
    April 18, 2012 at 2:06 am
    
    Yes, we do and there have been recent orders in the last few years to ensure those camps are outfitted. Here’s an article on that:
    http://beforeitsnews.com/story/1472/109/FEMA_Camps_Across_US_Being_Activated:_Infowars_Exclusive.html
    
    Combined with the other information about the millions of rounds of ammo being ordered, it definitely appears the pieces are being put in place.
    
    I imagine many are like me, like I’ve been for a long time — unable to believe that could ever happen in America. But I think the time has come for us all to realize it can happen. It is happening. It will happen if we don’t stop it.
    Reply
- - Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
    April 17, 2012 at 8:59 pm
  - People kept yelling, “You can’t compare Obama to Hitler!”
    
    So a couple years ago, I wrote this essay comparing Obama to Hitler:
    
    http://bravenewcommie.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/adolf-vs-barry/
  Reply
  - Enough is enough
    April 18, 2012 at 12:16 am
    
    Great site you have, Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM. I see you got WHAT WAS GOING ON back in Nov.2009. The signs were there and the dots are leading us to disaster.
    Reply
  - Diane Wright
    April 18, 2012 at 2:42 pm
    
    @Barry,,,EXCELLENT WRITE!!!
    Reply
- Marie
  April 17, 2012 at 8:48 pm
- “You’re gonna hang on. You’re gonna see Barack Obama defeated in 2012.”
  Thank you WSI, you made my day!
Reply
- viking
  April 17, 2012 at 8:51 pm
- Look at the graphic accompanying this installment. WSI’s open admission that he is seeking redemption before he dies. WSI’s admission of failing to have remained vigilant, having been distracted by worldly success, and the need to do all he can to defeat Obama’s re-election. Look at WSI’s references to the rise of Nazis in Germany and their goals through WWII. Others in this comment section have accurately described the social darwinism-eugenics-nazi nexus. Watch Ben Stein’s “No Intelligence Allowed” for a decent primer on that nexus.
  
  I take WSI to be saying that the same evil is reasserting itself in our time on a global scale. We are up against the same foe that was behind the Axis in WWII, only here at home, internally. If the USA falls to these minions, the world falls because there is no one else who can stop it.
  
  I think God is skimming over the nation, looking for our upturned faces, listening for our voices seeking forgiveness. I have complete faith we’ll prevail in this, with the grace of God. I’m fairly new to prayer myself but diligent now on a daily basis.
Reply
- Redwine
  April 17, 2012 at 8:52 pm
- Superb interview. I heard the code words “Social Darwinism” and understood that my view of the regime and its direction have been confirmed (unfortunately).
  
  UM – Perhaps you can have WSI’s input on a few things of utmost importance:
  1. What is Russia’s (well, Putin’s) role in this wholesale destruction of America? Its role in the class war now underway? There is the distinct hand of the old Soviet in this. RT – Russia Today – the popular propaganda arm of Putin just hired master propagandist of WikiLeaks fame, Julian Assange, to host a program. Tie it all together – Russia, RT, WikiLeaks, the OWS movement, the unions (esp. SEIU and AFL-CIO), the US media, and the WH.
  
  2. What are the roles of Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam (NOI) and Shabazz and his New Black Panther Party (NBPP) and their ties to the growing race war? Their connection to the concocted race case against “white Hispanic” Zimmerman? Screwy Louie has been quite outspoken lately, threatening cowed, PC-drugged majority white Americans and, of course, Jews. He, Shabazz, Hussein, Jarrett, Holder, among others are the main proponents of the manufactured race war against whites. Remember he and Shabazz met privately with Ahmadinejad in NYC in 2011 (or 2010). Farrakhan is a vocal (an financial?) supporter of the OWS movement. I believe that the NOI and the NBPP are in deep with Jarrett,Hussein and “My People” Holder. I suspect that the majority of the Secret Service people who were caught in Colombia were NOI replacements for the real Secret Service agents. The Occupiers in our WH hate and distrust the “white” Secret Service.
  
  3. I have a hunch that WSI has been watching Glenn Beck internet TV program. That would be very good. Beck has been wisely and consistently pulling these strings of information together – that is, connecting the dots. He’s fantastic at that. I would love to hear WSI’s assessment of Beck’s presentations, which are very much worth watching. Alas, I don’t think we’ll be getting that.
Reply
- - Rebel Yell
    April 17, 2012 at 11:48 pm
  - I think you can assume “all of the above” and more… developing.
  Reply
- Dr. Ron Polland
  April 17, 2012 at 8:56 pm
- OBAMACARE = EUGENICS. Abortions. Care Rationing. Euthenasia. That’s how it started.
  
  Obama began his campaign by surrounding himself with eugenicists, on one side, and Marxists/Islamics on the other. Social Darwinism from Obama’s perspective is what HIS ASSOCIATES have been planning since the 1950′s – exterminating capitalists, Zionists, and Christians, whether it is one at a time or by the boat load. I have been saying it for four years that Obama wants to destroy Israel first and then America.
  
  The leftwing media and the mindless leftwing lemmings who buy everything they tell them have been the enablers in the destruction of this country.
  
  There are people who are waking up to the reality that they were sold a bill of goods with Obama, that they people backing Obama is not your father’s Democratic Party. These are all-in, America-hating anarchists who are guided by the philosophy of Mao, Che, and Marx. The means justifies the ends,
  
  Obama is the focus of the campaign, but do not take your eyes off of his army – remember that civilian security force? He’s been assembling it under our very noses. Those government that are supposed to help people and protect us are preparing to do the opposite.
  
  We are looking down the barrel of a takeover, yet people refuse to believe that a coup can happen here, let alone has been taking place already.
  
  We know that OWS is coming back as the Arab Spring on Steroids. This time around, however, they will not get to occupy private property so easily.
  
  Look around and put a check mark next to his helpers. You’ll need to keep them in mind as the Summer approaches:
  
  CASS SUNSTEIN
  JOHN HOLDREN
  RAHM EMMANUEL (ZEKE’S BROTHER)
  JIM YONG KIM
  BILL GATES
  GEORGE SOROS
  HILLARY CLINTON
  
  and all the folks pushing the UN’s agendas:
  GLOBAL HEALTH INITIATIVE
  AGENDA 21
  SMALL ARMS TREATY
  GLOBAL TAX
  
  My advice is to devise a plan to disrupt the planned disruptions. Break down the communication with diversions. We know what they are planning to do. We need to keep one step ahead of them.
  
  Obama is not an American. He was not born here. He grew up to hate America and everything that America represents. That should make his current ideological prism a lot easier to understand.
Reply
- megapotamus
  April 17, 2012 at 8:58 pm
- Quite a change in WSIs demeanor from when we started this ride. I’m glad he is seeing more clearly, that sort of thing is contagious. While I certainly understand and echo the cautions, this is not Germany and sure as hell ain’t Weimar nor ever will be. There have been something like 4 million guns sold every month for some time now. We are not a private army but an armed citizenry, well able to rely on ourselves and our neighbors at least for a time. If they do indeed send these crapulent, cowardly “Peacemakers” for our weapons every block will erupt like the Warsaw ghetto. And who will be performing these craven tasks? The Panthers? Don’t make me laugh. Even with a hyper-inflationary collapse we just don’t have the antipathy for each other as existed between Germans of different descriptions, nor is our culture the monolith Hitler enjoyed. Sorry, would-be fascists. If you are set on history repeating you will suffer farce and fratricide rather than your ambition of the noble struggle. Try it though. We wait for you in every alley, field and hallway. Yep, every damn one.
Reply
- - Diane Wright
    April 17, 2012 at 9:12 pm
  - Mega, did you know Ruger’s numbers are up so high,they STOPPED taking orders until they are caught up.More people know,maybe FEEL,,(is the right word here)something is coming our way.
  Reply
  - Air Force Brat
    April 18, 2012 at 12:08 am
    
    Guns and ammo started flying off the shelves in my state beginning November 5, 2008.
    Reply
- Steve
  April 17, 2012 at 9:07 pm
- This is the first time I have commented, although I have read every single Insider article.
  
  Years ago, I visited my grandfather. He was around 87, a few months away from dying. The morning I left, he said to me, “Goodbye, young man.” I warmly said, “Goodbye, old man.” I wanted to compliment him. He had done a great deal in his life, many wonderful things for many people. I wanted him to know that I felt he had earned his wrinkles. Unfortunately, it knocked him back noticeably. I didn’t know how to bridge that gap, because I was too young to know then at a deep enough emotional level what it can cost a man to realize he is old.
  
  Wall Street Insider, you are obviously trying to get across to younger people something that means an enormous amount to you, something so deep, so emotional it drives your life to its conclusion. But Ulsterman and I cannot ever go where you want us to go. We simply do not have the personal, gut-deep *experience* of the banality of murderous evil. If you make evidence of such understanding a prerequisite for your further help, then you are asking for something you cannot receive.
  
  When you hear or see the term Social Darwinism, you *remember* it. You remember what it cost, how it *felt*. When I hear the term, I have to hold it in my mind. Despite having read books about the Holocaust, I can never have it be anything but an inherently mental process. I see articles like this one:
  http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007457
  or read about Treblinka, or visit Dachau, but I don’t *feel* it the way you do. I cannot, no matter how much you wish I could.
  
  It is not your job to make me feel what you feel. It’s your job now to do everything you can to make sure that I never have to.
  
  I think that what you are saying here is that the elite group(s) behind Obama are attempting to take power, especially here in the USA, so that they can impose themselves on the rest of us. I believe you are saying that this elite views themselves as innately superior to the rest of us, and that they are entirely willing to kill millions of us vermin to assure control.
  
  It is said that extraordinary claims require extraordinary proofs. To claim that an elite group is engaging in a soft coup d’etat of the US as a springboard to controlling the population of the entire planet, and that they will stop at nothing, including mass murder, to achieve their goal, is an extraordinary claim.
  
  Stop trying to make me (or any reader of this site) feel what you feel in these circumstances. We know things are bad. To the extent we are able to, we understand that our situation could get very bad, that there are people who are prepared to kill others to get what they want.
  
  What we lack are the tools to do much about it.
  
  Tools you could give us but so far have not, because you’re first trying to get us to feel what you feel.
  
  None of us have your assets, connections, organizational support, or knowledge of how the world works at your level.
  
  Use your security people and your secretaries and researchers and writers to prepare a PDF file of absolutely everything you and your people know. Vet Obama and all his documentation. Draw the networks. Name the people. Link to their writings so we can see what they think and say. Pull *all* the masks off. Give us *everything* you know. Everything. *Everything.*
  
  Put it all together for us, take the metadata out of the file to protect yourself and your family and your aides, and then release it to the web so that it goes viral. Give it to Ulsterman, give it to Beck, give it to the people at your level whom you are trying to persuade, give it to Fox, give it to Breitbart, give it to Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo, give it to all the media people who have been threatened into silence, post it on Facebook. Make it go viral.
  
  Earn your wrinkles. Do what only you can do for us: Break the dam of knowledge protecting these people and their plans.
  
  Do this *yesterday*.
  
  Freedom-lovers everywhere will do the rest.
Reply
- - werbaz neutronName
    April 17, 2012 at 9:55 pm
  - YES! WHI, it would be a real service – in addition to making things happen behind the scenes to promote our common goals – if you were to prepare now a document to leave behind for the rest of us to read and to know. Of course it would be discredited by some and vilified by others but – hopefully – its publication could not be prevented.
  Reply
- - cobra
    April 17, 2012 at 11:14 pm
  - I do have the “gut-feel” experience and the intellectual education, WSI has, him as a survivor Jew from France, I as a political refugee from Eastern Europe.
    He is ABSOLUTELY right.
    We are on the cusp of a full blown bolshevik revolution here, in the USA.
    The commies raised the temperature relatively slowly until 2008, faster from 2008, and they are now prepared to boil the water.
    Why do you think the sudden “call to arms” of blacks, “paupers” and other “oppressed” people?
    Why do you think our debt has been brought almost to the point of default?
    What happens WHEN, not if, the FED raises the interest to the levels we saw in 1990s?
    Do you remember the Cloward–Piven strategy of overloading the system?
    Unfortunately, our people are so ignorant (thanks to the Statist education) that they do not realize that what is happening now is not the typical Red Sox-Yankees, i.e., republics-dems, game.
    No, the democrats have become the DEMSHEVIKS, ready to pounce on US.
    What do you think will happen when the agitated by “community organizers” ones are let loose on the “rich”, to find the “fairness” long denied to them, like the “brown shirts” in Germany or the masses in Russia?
    Just look at the old Soviet Union, commie Eastern Europe or Cuba, to understand what could very well happen here, in the good old USA…
  Reply
  - BG
    April 19, 2012 at 5:34 pm
    
    Thanks, Cobra, for bringing all this into abundant focus with your analysis.
    
    Personally, I think they have attempted to do this just a little TOO soon! Had they waited another 3-7 years, many, many more of those who lived through this reign of terror in Eurpoe would be gone, and those younger would have believed the LIE now circulating that these things never really happened.
    
    As it is, I think there are still enough alive to speak out against this “plan” and – wishful thinking, maybe (?) – prevent it from happening again.
    Reply
- Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
  April 17, 2012 at 9:10 pm
- Barry vs. Adolf
  
  http://bravenewcommie.wordpress.com/2009/11/14/adolf-vs-barry/
  
  The first stages of Obama match the first stages of Hitler.
Reply
- ginghamturtle
  April 17, 2012 at 9:22 pm
- Is this a matter of ghetto inner city politics or is it a global organizational problem?
  I have seen ghetto{inner city Detroit,Chicago etc..} any way these ghetto politicians use free stuff to get elected then the leave the suckers to rot in bad housing and poverty.
  After a while the more worldly politicians come in and under the guise of caring for the little people they jump on the band wagon and try to destroy the more common sense politicians…
  However, there are things that turn the tide on big city type of politics.
  Mother nature throws a natural disaster at us or our enemies attack.
  
  Then people turn to the more conservative politicians to keep us safe.
  
  I think the socialist politicians greatly underestimate the regular middle class folks. And I don’t mean the white folks living in Kansas. I mean middle class people of all colors.
  
  Any thoughts on my view?? Maybe I am too naive…
Reply
- - lovelypeace
    April 19, 2012 at 3:40 pm
  - I can’t speak to other cities, but living near Detroit has certainly been an education. While what you say has been true in the past, Detroit is in the process of trying to clean house. It’s really a fight between those who want to clean house and those who want to keep the same-old system in place (because they are benefititng from it).
    
    It will be interesting to see who gets elected this fall for Congress in the Detroit Disticts because the districts have been redrawn and at least one of the Dems is going to be out of a job. From what I hear is that John Conyers is going to have a primary as well. He’s a communist and is one of those guys who you’d swear never realized that the calendar went past 1969 because he’s just stuck there.
    
    You are right, though, the Socialists really don’t get who the Middle Class are. Some of them might be Liberal, but they aren’t THAT Liberal. Deer season is almost a holiday in my State, so lots of folks with guns – even in the Metro area. The rest of the State isn’t like Detroit – at all.
  Reply
- - BG
    April 19, 2012 at 5:38 pm
  - Turtle,
    
    Your argument has merit, but here’s the rub: If you are talking about voting them out of office, these Socialists have figured out how to work the system (anger their base to prove how important it is that they DO NOT allow a Repub. to win an election, overload the voting system with dead voters, etc), and barring that, they simply RIG the machines!
    
    There is NO other explanation as to HOW the heck Dingy Harry got re-elected this past term!
  Reply
- CHHR, VA
  April 17, 2012 at 9:33 pm
- Try researching Darwin, not that you should need much research time. Interestingly though, every page with his name and Obama’s on it comes up as “dangerous material.” The only sites that I can pull are the propaganda sites supporting Obama and denouncing republicans as the Darwinists… like I said, interesting
  
  If you haven’t seen Ben Stein’s movie, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, might I suggest you do… He explains the WSI point of view extremely well. Also, Jonah Goldberg has an excellent article on this very topic: http://www.weeklystandard.com/author/jonah-goldberg
  
  If you agree with the theory of Darwinism, then you very likely also agree that humanity, like animals and plants compete in a struggle for existence in which the competition drives social evolution in societies.
  
  If you weaken the US then you weaken the world. Obama said that during his last campaign when he said that the world needed a fair playing field and that the US was preventing that from happening. Since becoming president, he’s done everything that would promise to ensure that a weaker US becomes reality. The US largely invents and creates everything the world has used and depended on to advance their own cultures. Without a doubt, the US is responsible for increasing the wealth of most of the world and her destruction means certain destruction of the world’s economy. But think about it, if you remove the wheel that creates wealth, then you have all you need to reshape the world into a global government with centralized power. To affect this end, the middle class must be destroyed, inarguably, it’s the middle class that is the engine of all economies. Here in the US, the middle class has been most brutally harmed by this administration – now the final slam with the “fairness doctrine.” The truly wealthy will not be hurt – but the upper middle class and the rest of us will be irrevocably hurt even permanently destroyed.
  
  Think about it, the U.S. pursues a path with her economy increasingly ensnared under the growing nexus of government control. Resources are redistributed for vote-buying welfare schemes, patronage style earmarks, and graft by unelected bureaucrats, quid pro quo with unions, issue groups and legions of lobbyists. It’s hard not to acknowledge that fascism, state capitalism, corporatism – whatever – reflects very leftwing ideology. President Obama’s Fabian policies (Keynesian economics) promise similar ends. His proposed infrastructure bank is just the latest gyration of corporatism. First he slams big corporations then signs into law policies that ensure bigger, more powerful corporations that have literally swallowed up their smaller competitors. You got it, he continues to decry continued government controls to keep these giant corporations in check.
  
  Yes, then this begs the question of why fascists are consistently portrayed as conservatives. In the Thirties, intellectuals smitten by progressivism considered limited, constitutional governance anachronistic. The Great Depression had apparently proven capitalism defunct. The remaining choice had narrowed between communism and fascism. Hitler was about an inch to the right of Stalin. Western intellectuals infatuated with Marxism thus associated fascism with the Right. Later, Marxists from the Frankfurt School popularized this prevailing sentiment. Theodor Adorno in The Authoritarian Personality devised the “F” scale to demean conservatives as latent fascists. The label “fascist” has subsequently meant anyone liberals seek to ostracize or discredit.
  
  One fundamental error, under Obama, the “favors” of the world are distributed entirely according to supposed need (collectivism) where a few determine the true needs of the many. Social Darwinism means distribution entirely according to merit. Both collectivism and Darwinism ignore sentiment, emotion, and individual self-reliance etc. Human intelligence enables the individual to alter their own environment to continually improve personal conditions thus rendering the analogy of “survival of the fittest” or a nature focus in Darwinism pointless just as equally as Collectivism is usurped by the same principles where a select few control and the many are subjected to ones judgment of who deserves favour. The pendulum continues to swing and this battle is raged at least every 100 or so years. Kind of like that movie: Generation Zero and it’s descriptions of the “turnings.” This time, however, we are very close to collectivist victory (Socialism).
Reply
- NameBM
  April 17, 2012 at 9:33 pm
- I can see it. The pieces of the puzzle. The idea of using race wars to advance control over people.
  
  The Socialists won a big coup with Obama’s election because it was mainly based on leveraging the White Guilt. Proud of this victory they want to used the Black sense of revenge to play the Fear card amongst the Whites. The Trevon Martin case was all about that. But they miss the mark slightly because they prejudged on the surname.
  
  Yet they got the Republican gov to cave in and got an arrest.
  
  It’s all about Black’s sense of empowerment. It either degenerates into riots and body bags filled with Blacks, and they get their White Guilt replenished, or with body bags filled with Whites, and they get their White fear.
  
  Social Darwinism in their mind is about the fittest being the “oppressed masses” ie: anybody but the “Imperialist” Whites.
  
  Only the “Good” whites are fit to survive, ie: the Liberals Educated Whites.
  
  Of course in the end, it is NOT about race, but about control of the people and the global wealth.
  
  There are so many aspects to this war: the Green Movement, the right-to-work battle and the Unions, the dirtying of our institutions (Supreme Court and legal system, FBI, Army) and more.
  
  It is all about collapsing the identity hence the morale of the US people.
  
  But I am asking, if the Beacon on the Hill goes dark, where will the tired, poor huddled masses yearnig to be free go???
Reply
- - AlongtheWatchtower
    April 18, 2012 at 3:49 am
  - First off, I would like to thank Ulsterman for his service to our country. I have been reading religiously for about 4 months now. I was first exposed to your writings from a cross post of WSI’s concerns (I think from ZH) about the OWS movement in the fall, but somehow did not find the standalone site until quite recently. I went back and read everything and was floored about the machinations behind the NY pay-to-play pension scandal. And those tears on teevee @ the sentencing, were they tears of contrition or terror? Seems to me that was not “Gregorian chanting” overheard, but the incantation followed to conjure spirits! I have read that the protocol is to call out the names in some order, and it is written down and followed almost like a formulae.
    
    Secondly, WSI I am here for you. I can be a great foot soldier. You can trust me as I have impeccable references Please hang in there gaining strength from the many of us you are inspiring. All is not lost. Have faith. Good triumphs over evil. In 2008, I saw that the whole Finance community was swept up by him. I just did not get it. I had him pegged as a Manchurian candidate from Day 1. When I was waiting outside my polling station NY Mag was half-heartedly asking if there were any McCain supporters in the crowd, but Obama supporters were blocking me from being seen. I was not voting for McCain as much as I was voting against Obama. Since then, I have read Tragedy and Hope by Quigley and as he states there may appear to be opposing wings of the eagle (a distraction) but the real power is the head. I would assume the small wizened donor WHI discussed @ the Clinton inauguration. So for 2012, I have lingering doubts that my vote will not matter. Nevertheless, I will go into my polling station and MAKE THEM CHECK MY ID before I obtain my ballot. Interesting enough, my polling station is not a school so they make you show ID to enter the building…..
    
    I have seen the May 1 OWS call to strike stickers around town on mailboxes (bright pink), etc. I think the Occupiers are becoming unhinged. I avoid the Wall Street area now. I have warned others in lower Manhattan that there is some serious fomenting going on and that the situation will heat up — in part due to WSI’s concerns. I have also read some disturbing responses in posts implying that OWS activists were going to infiltrate certain establishments that cater to the Wall Street lunch crowd and potentially tamper with food and that sickened me. Maybe it was just bluster. Saw what looked like a regular school bus a few blocks from Union Square this evening w/someone (male adult)hanging out a window yelling obscenities @ those on the street. Imagine how diverse pedestrian traffic is on a NYC city block so to whom exactly was he directing his tirade?
    
    w/r/t the onslaught coming from the Green Movement mentioned by NameBM, and putting Agenda 21 aside, I note the following: There is a big GREEN FESTIVAL in NYC @ the Javits Center Apr 21-22. greenfestivals.org. I went a few years ago and it was heavy on the venture capitalists/wall street crowd gaining a foothold with concepts like “green” car service, etc. this year it is heavy in the community organizer front with calls for “justice” every where. It appears that it is less about business concepts, and more about attempting to mobilise people en masse cross fertilising with the OWS crowd. For those interested in attending, Sat @ 4PM Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn will host “Occupy this, Occupy that, Occupy the Future: Releasing Our Radical Imaginations.” Earlier in the day @ NOON, Van Jones will discuss rebuilding the DREAM (MLK’s)and on Sunday there is more OWS influenced tie in to MLK’s dream. The tickets are $15/day or $25/weekend if anyone interested in performing recon.
    
    I am trying to get the word out, but people just appear to be so shell shocked and resigned to the fact that they cannot change anything. CREATOR, can you please give us a sign that you have not forgotten us?
  Reply
  - Kay112
    April 19, 2012 at 2:23 pm
    
    Creator God is real and He is at work, as you know. Unfortunately, we (as a nation) turned our backs on HIM by allowing radicals to “Lord” over us in D.C. while we toiled the land, managed Main Streets, USA and tended to our own lives. This wilderness we’re in may not be exactly as the Israelites in the wilderness, but we are suffering and I imagine if we dont change quickly, life will only become worse.
    
    What do we do to change? Speak out BOLDLY of our opposition to the corruption in DC and of big government. Influence family and friends! Make a difference because this “Hope and Change” can’t continue onward. Never back down from any radical within the family or the radical friend~~ even if it means losing a friend! Dont be ashamed of our conservative politics because we are RIGHT! Liberalism is killing this great nation. Look at the bankrupt states due to liberal progressive politics as proof~~~ NY, CA, IL, etc…
    
    “Give me liberty or give me death.” Liberty hangs in the balance, November of 2012.
    Reply
    - BG
      April 19, 2012 at 5:52 pm
      
      One of the reasons many of our freedoms, INCLUDING our religious freedoms, are being taken away is because Christians have been taught – SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE – and therefore that we are UNABLE to speak up about wrongs in our government. That religion and politics don’t mix. That Christians need to STAY OUT of political debates. That is patently FALSE!
      
      If Christians don’t start speaking up, praying – LOUDLY and OFTEN – and telling others how important it is to have men of FAITH in office, I fear it WILL BE TOO LATE for our country, and it will be our own undoing.
      
      Peaceful as doves, YES! But the scripture also says, “Wise as serpents.”
      
      Reply
  - lovelypeace
    April 19, 2012 at 3:51 pm
    
    Keep in mind that others are praying along with you. This isn’t the time to lose hope. Remember that our light shines brightest when it is dark and we need to be light for the world right now. And, I totally see the Left becoming unhinged. Detroit has an active OWS organization as well and it’s really scary how much influence they have over things. Their anger is creating a lot of negative energy and it’s scary that some people want there to be this anger in the land. Live the most peaceful life you can. Turn your frustration into action to defeat the Evil one. Welcome. The people here are awesome and it’s always nice to “meet” another member of “the team”.
    Reply
- Obeline
  April 17, 2012 at 9:36 pm
- Isn’t it high time George Soros choked on a chicken bone or something?
Reply
- - silverdust
    April 18, 2012 at 5:36 pm
  - Unfortunately, he has kids set to inherit that are as much of a whackjob as he is.
  Reply
- RyanMN
  April 17, 2012 at 9:46 pm
- Ulsterman, I love what you do and what you have done. You’re a patriot. I’ve read your writings ever since the very beginning. But dammit man, it can be frustrating reading your interviews.
  
  You have a very literal method of examining data. This is not a criticism. I suspect it aids you greatly in research. But I might respectfully suggest that you focus on not just the purely quantitative and qualitative elements to information, but also the allegorical elements as well.
  
  WSI clearly uses an allegorical method of speaking when trying to illustrate important points. There’s obviously a very long, dare I say ancient, tradition in conveying critical information in this manner. It’s critical that you come up to speed on this quickly.
  
  Based on WSI’s change in diction it’s obvious the man is not well. I’m glad to hear that he’s recovering but at this point, every minute you get to communicate with him is critical.
Reply
- - DDalton
    April 18, 2012 at 10:21 am
  - Allegory is an important point. WSI is your Rabbi, Ulsterman, and his style of conveying knowledge is similar. He prompts you and expects you to “connect the dots” (what you already know and what he thinks you should already know) in real time. You don’t seem to have a category to learn this way, though. As you speak with him (and re-read his words), trust your gut and the epiphanies that you may have and then work backward (using data) to confirm the leaps that you are expected to make.
    
    The problem with this style of teaching (apart from the frustration of the neophyte student) is that it can be damnably slow and WSI, you, and the rest of us know that time is short. It does not appear that WSI is willing or able to drop the Rabbinical and be more direct, so you’re going to have to meet him more than halfway. If it’s a matter of pride, drop the pride. Hypothesize wildly with him and let him shoot you down. He will, I believe, respect the attempts more than he’ll respect what he perceives to be ignorance or intellectual dullness.If you show intellectual agility and a willingness to be led (rather than need to have it spelled out), he will take you where you need to go.
    
    This is what I think he’s saying (in a nutshell): Were the U.S. pre-WWII Germany, it would be 1939 or so. The enabling acts have already been passed. The rule of law is dead. Opponents and dissidents are being quietly marginalized and silenced. The public is generally asleep yet looking for scapegoats. So…identify the similarities – the current players in historical roles. Find the analogues. Expose it for what it is. There are patterns in history that are playing out in similar ways currently.
    
    Finally, the idea of Social Darwinism is rather peripheral to the greater conversation. While important conceptually as plank in the platform, it is important in this conversation as a semiotic datum or marker: its use a sign to confirm Axelrod’s (and the administration’s) role in the machinations (probably more to others than WSI). Metaphorically, the term was merely dye injected into a system to gauge and prove connection and influence.
  Reply
- Guest #7
  April 17, 2012 at 9:49 pm
- When Obama used the term “social Darwinism” to describe Ryan’s budget plan, it just didn’t sit right with me. I had never heard that term used before to describe a budget, something Obama is obviously opposed to.
  
  This interview confirmed everything I have been feeling and thinking. The regime created OWS as a counter to the Tea Party and as cover to foster a divide between the “haves” and the “have nots.”
  
  My father was born in the Soviet in the 1930′s, he lived in Nazi Germany during WWII. This doesn’t make me an expert, it just makes me more aware that we are not immune just because “it’s never happened here.”
  
  Will they seize power by military force? My guess is no. I assume what they will try is to collapse the currency then appropriate the energy and banking sector.
Reply
- Chalmers
  April 17, 2012 at 10:07 pm
- This guy talks just like my dad did about a month before he passed. Lose track of the conversation and get real tired then would usually get pretty irritated if you didn’t get what they were trying to say right away. He went on like this for a couple months before really fading away fast in the last couple weeks when he hardly said a word. Then was pretty much just sleeping for the last few days. I hope you get another chance to talk with WSI but how he sounds in this interview, it don’t seem all that likely.
Reply
- TheObamaError
  April 17, 2012 at 10:07 pm
- The best response I have seen to this article yet is that from CHHR, VA.
  
  I have some homework, also, for the readers of this article. Go and buy Jonah Goldberg’s book “Liberal Fascism.” Or find it online. However you get your hands on it, do so now. It is a long book, and will take some time to go through.
  
  The theory of Social Darwinism has been laid out clearly by some kind commenters above.
  
  There is more, though. And Barry Soetoro The Moslem alludes to it when he says “wait, Axelrod said that the Republicans were the Social Darwinists.”
  
  That is correct. What you will see in “Liberal Fascism” — and what I’m sure WSI knows — is that the term “Social Darwinism” was used as a PUT DOWN of conservatives. Why was it a put down? Because Progressives, Communists, Nazis thought that Social Darwinism was not enough. They wanted straight Eugenics, which means or implies that the government — their government — was ‘guiding’ the evolutionary process. It was not left to mere ‘social’ forces to enact the evolutionary changes. It would be the chosen technocrats and the elites who would, instead, decide who lives and dies (ObamaCare, anyone?)
  
  There is more to say, but this is a beginning. Jonah Goldberg discusses all of this in “Liberal Fascism.” You need to read it, if you don’t understand these matters. That is my suggestion. Glenn Beck also understands these things, or many of them, which is why he has worked with Goldberg in his programs.
Reply
- - TheObamaError
    April 17, 2012 at 10:40 pm
  - Apologies for the double post below. It seemed as though my first attempt to comment did not work, so I repeated the material below.
  Reply
- InTheKnow
  April 17, 2012 at 10:10 pm
- The best response I have seen to this article yet is that from CHHR, VA.
  
  I have some homework, also, for the readers of this article. Go and buy Jonah Goldberg’s book “Liberal Fascism.” Or find it online. However you get your hands on it, do so now. It is a long book, and will take some time to go through.
  
  The theory of Social Darwinism has been laid out clearly by some kind commenters above.
  
  There is more, though. And Barry Soetoro The Moslem alludes to it when he says “wait, Axelrod said that the Republicans were the Social Darwinists.”
  
  That is correct. What you will see in “Liberal Fascism” — and what I’m sure WSI knows — is that the term “Social Darwinism” was used as a PUT DOWN of conservatives. Why was it a put down? Because Progressives, Communists, Nazis thought that Social Darwinism was not enough. They wanted straight Eugenics, which means or implies that the government — their government — was ‘guiding’ the evolutionary process. It was not left to mere ‘social’ forces to enact the evolutionary changes. It would be the chosen technocrats and the elites who would, instead, decide who lives and dies (ObamaCare, anyone?)
  
  There is more to say, but this is a beginning. Jonah Goldberg discusses all of this in “Liberal Fascism.” You need to read it, if you don’t understand these matters. That is my suggestion. Glenn Beck also understands these things, or many of them, which is why he has worked with Goldberg in his programs.
Reply
- truthandjustice
  April 17, 2012 at 10:16 pm
- WSI – thank you so much — yes, you are of great help. You may be very pleased to know that Glenn Beck has been pointing these things out for a long time and he is very popular and followed by millions. That’s how I was enlightened – from watching him on Fox a couple of years ago. He is highly passionate about this and is his goal in his life — to make this info known to the public & been very successful. He OFTEN talks about Hitler & how it’s the same as what Obama & Admin. are doing.
  We also have Breitbart who is very good and there is a website: http://www.commieblaster.com
  that has some very interesting info on Obama. All of us also need to be involved in preventing VOTER FRAUD and passing Voter I.D. – support Gov. Walker in Wis. as he fights the unions — whatever. I, too am wondering about an “attempted assasination” of Obama. We also must try to convince all who say they aren’t going to vote for our nominee if it’s not one they like how dangerous this regime is. Yes, indeed, God may very well let us win this if we have much repentance and get back to Him like the Founders intended. Fight the good fight everyone !!!!
Reply
- - ThroughTheLookingGlass
    April 27, 2012 at 12:25 am
  - Hitler also had a photographic memory. He could spout facts and figures to support his ‘arguement.’ Note the ‘facts and figures’ that Obeyme spouts. I’m especially fond of the gas/oil numbers he spouts, albeit erroneously! Though Barry relies heavily on the teleprompter (photographic ‘memory’???), his speaking styles are very similar. So are his props. Remember the iconic columns at the DNC Convention coronation?
  Reply
- Pat
  April 17, 2012 at 11:29 pm
- Hitler’s Guide to Propaganda – The Psychology of Coercion
  By Sajid Surve, DO
  Adolf Hitler was a monster. The revolution he spawned changed the world landscape forever. But have you ever wondered how he did it? How did Hitler convince 70 million rational people to engage in horrible atrocities and wage war against the world? Although his agenda was decidedly negative, Hitler was a master of the science of coercion. Through the use of his speeches and propaganda, he was able to bend the will of ordinary people into submission and create an obedient army ready to carry out his orders, no matter how absurd they might be. Hitler’s formula for coercion of a group of people was very simple. He discussed it at length in his book Mein Kampf:
  
  1. Keep the dogma simple. Make only 1 or 2 points.
  2. Be forthright and powerfully direct. Speak only in the telling or ordering mode.
  3. As much as possible, reduce concepts down into stereotypes which are black and white.
  4. Speak to people’s emotions and stir them constantly.
  5. Use lots of repetition; repeat your points over and over again.
  6. Forget literary beauty, scientific reasoning, balance, or novelty.
  7. Focus solely on convincing people and creating zealots.
  8. Find slogans which can be used to drive the movement forward.
  
  Most of Hitler’s inspiration came from a social psychologist by the name of Gustave Le Bon, who published several works and was considered an authority on the psychology of crowds. Le Bon posited that once individuals came together to form a group, the individual’s will was surrendered to what was perceived to be the will of the group. Their faculties of reasoning were impaired or destroyed, and they entered into a more suggestible state. The larger the group, the easier it was to coerce.
  
  Aside from the general pointers above regarding how to engage in coercion, Hitler also had a very specific structure which he used for all of his speeches in order to capitalize on the susceptibility of the crowd. The first thing he would do is point out the commonality of the people gathered in the crowd so that he could instantly unify the group. The next step would be to identify a threat to that commonality to put the group on edge, and stir up the emotions of fear and anger. The third and most important step was to invoke a higher power, and appoint himself as an agent of that higher power. If the crowd was able to believe this, then the last two steps were easy: give the higher power’s “solution” to that threat to the commonality, and proclaim that carrying out the solution would be a victory for both the commonality and the higher power.
  
  This speech structure was obviously successful to disastrous consequences. Since Hitler’s time, others have utilized the same structure to accomplish coercion for different ends. One of the most notable examples would be Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. His I Have a Dreamspeech follows this pattern almost perfectly, but to serve a very different purpose. So where can we benefit from this knowledge?
  
  The first application is to identify when others are attempting to engage in coercion. A political campaign is essentially a huge, protracted exercise in coercion, as is advertising and marketing. Being aware of the tools utilized can be helpful to rise above the influence and encourage others to do the same.
  
  Secondly, as in the case of Dr. King, sometimes coercion can serve a positive purpose. Wielding these tools can help to improve abilities in public speaking and persuasive argument. Simple ideas like unifying a group before proceeding are excellent ways to communicate more effectively.
  In short, Adolf Hitler was a monstrous figure. By deconstructing his tools we can learn not to fall prey to them again, and apply the useful aspects of his craft towards the greater good.
  
  Credit:http://brainblogger.com/2008/11/04/hitlers-guide-to-propaganda-the-psychology-of-coercion/
Reply
- Rebel Yell
  April 17, 2012 at 11:52 pm
- Obamao needs to be defeated at any cost. Period.
Reply
- jane
  April 17, 2012 at 11:54 pm
- Guys, what you should be Googling is not “Social Darwinism” in relation to the Nazis so much as how DARWINISM is tied to MARXISM.
  
  I am not anti-Darwinist, actually, but a lot of critics of Darwin and evolution feel that Darwin’s theories led to Marx’s:
  
  http://antidarwinism.com/socialdarwinism_darwinismcommunism.html
Reply
- - AmericaTheBeautiful
    April 20, 2012 at 4:16 am
  - Thanks Jane. Excellent posts here. I cut and paste your link. Chilling and correct
    
    Main Page – Social Darwinism – History of Ruthlessness – Favoured Races Mtyh – Darwinism and Racism – Darwinism and Fascism – Darwinism and Communism – Darwinism Belittles Women
    
    Darwinism and Communism
    
    In order to understand Communism’s birth, we must examine European culture in the 18th and 19th centuries. Beginning in the second century A.D. under the Emperor Constantine, Europe gradually accepted Christianity. Christian culture held sway until the Enlightenment of the 18th century, when a number of artists and thinkers began embracing the influence of pagan Greek and Roman culture and consequently, rejecting the dictates of religion. The Enlightenment’s most important political result was the French Revolution, which was not only an uprising against the ancient regime, but at the same time, a revolt against religion.
    
    The foundation of the French Revolution was established by the influence of such anti-religious thinkers as Voltaire, Diderot and Montesquieu. From 1789 on, the Enlightenment’s pagan, anti-religious tendencies of became obvious. After an intense propaganda campaign, the Jacobins came to lead the revolution, established a movement against orthodox Catholicism, and even managed to create a new religion. Revolutionary worship, seen first during the national Feast of the Federation on July 14, 1790, spread quickly. Robespierre, one of the leaders of the bloody revolution, explained its rules and principles in a report, wherein he called it “The Worship of Supreme Being.”‘Paris’s famous Nôtre Dame cathedral was changed into what he called the “Temple of Reason.” Statues of Christian saints were removed from the cathedral walls, replaced by the statue of an allegorical woman called the “Goddess of Reason.” In the course of the French Revolution, many priests and nuns were killed; churches and monasteries were plundered and destroyed.
    
    At the same time, the philosophy of materialism reawakened and began to spread throughout Europe. Certain ancient Greek philosophers had first proposed this philosophy, which believes that only matter exists, that living things-indeed, human consciousness itself-are only “matter in motion.” In the 18th century, two important names in the French Revolution, Denis Diderot and his close friend Baron d’Holbach, adopted this philosophy and imposed it on the people. In his book called Système de la Nature (The System of Nature) published in 1770, Baron d’Holbach used a few so-called “scientific” suppositions to propose that only matter and energy existed. A fanatical atheist, D’Holbach was opposed to the concept of morality advocating that human beings should take all the pleasure they can and do everything they can to get it.
    
    In the 18th century, a few thinkers adopted materialism, but it became much more widespread in the 19th, overflowing the borders of France to take root in other European countries. At the beginning of the 20th century, two important Materialist thinkers appeared in Germany: Ludwig Büchner and Karl Vogt. Vogt tried to explain human rationality in terms of a simile: “the brain secretes thought just as the liver secretes bile.” Not even the Materialists of his time accepted that nonsensical analogy.
    
    Despite the proffering of such idiotic proposals, materialism was adopted by anti-religious forces, who started to impose it on European societies. Propaganda insisted that materialism was the foundation of reason and science-a deception that quickly spread among the enlightened, moving first from France to Germany and then, gradually, throughout the rest of Europe. In this respect, Freemasonry was an important ally. Masons adopted materialism as a religion and, in the 19th century, many enlightened Europeans became its members.
    
    As this ancient dogma spread, there were attempts to adapt materialism to several branches of science:
    
    1. To natural science, by the English naturalist Charles Darwin.
    
    2. To social science, by the German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.
    
    Darwin’s adaptation is called the theory of evolution, while Marx and Engel’s is known as Communism.
    
    Marx and Darwin
    
    It’s possible to say that Darwin’s theory includes that of Marx and Engels, because Communism is also a theory of “evolution” adapted to history and sociology. Anton Pannekoek, a renowned Darwinist-Marxist thinker, sums this up in his book Marxism and Darwinism published at the beginning of the 20th century:
    
    The scientific importance of Marxism as well as of Darwinism consists in their following out the theory of evolution, the one upon the domain of the organic world, of things animate; the other, upon the domain of society… Thus, both teachings, the teachings of Darwin and of Marx, the one in the domain of the organic world and the other upon the field of human society, raised the theory of evolution to a positive science. In doing this they made the theory of evolution acceptable to the masses as the basic conception of social and biological development.
    
    Darwinism and Marxism are fully compatible in two basic arguments:
    
    1. Darwinism proposed that all existing things consist of “matter in motion.” This alleges that God neither created nor ordered matter and that therefore, all life arose by chance. Human beings are a species of animal, evolved from other, lesser animals. But these claims rest on no scientific proof and have been proven false be subsequent scientific discoveries. But Darwin’s theory harmonizes with the views of Marx and Engels, who believed that only matter existed, and that the whole of human history can be explained in material terms. (For more information, please refer to Darwinism Refuted:How the Theory of Evolution Breaks Down in the Light of Modern Science by Harun Yahya, Goodword Books, 2002 and The Evolution Deceit by Harun Yahya, Ta-Ha Publishers, 2002)
    
    2. Darwinism proposed that “conflict” is the motivating force that brought about development in living creatures. His basic supposition was that the natural world’s resources weren’t sufficient to support living things; that therefore, organisms had to fight a constant struggle that drove evolution. The dialectical method adopted by Marx and Engels is the same as Darwin’s. According to dialectics, the single motive force underlying development in the universe is the conflict between opposites. Human history has progressed by means of this conflict. Humanity itself has advanced in the same way.
    
    When examined closely, the theories of Marx-Engels and Darwin appear to be in total harmony, as if they have arisen from a single source. Darwin applied materialist philosophy to nature, while Marx-Engels applied it to history.
    
    In fact, Karl Marx was the first to realize Darwin’s important contribution to materialism. Reading Darwin’s The Origin of Species after its publication in 1859, Marx found in it great support for his own theory. A letter he wrote to Engels on December 19, 1860, says that Darwin’s book “contains the basis in natural history for our view.” In a letter to Lassalle in January 16, 1861, he says, “Darwin’s book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history.”
    
    Marx’s dedication to Darwin of his greatest work, Das Kapital, shows the common mind that they shared. In the German edition of his book that he sent Darwin, Marx wrote with his own hand, “To Charles Darwin from a true admirer, from Karl Marx.”
    
    Engels also admired Darwin: “Nature is the test of dialectics, and it must be said . . . that in the last resort, nature works dialectically and not metaphysically . . . In this connection, Darwin must be named before all others.” Elsewhere, he said that, “Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history.”
    In denying creation, Darwin gave Communism a supposedly scientific foundation. Therefore Trotsky, one of the bloody leaders of the Bolshevik Revolution regarded Darwin as the proponent of dialectic materialism in the field of the natural sciences.
    
    Georgy Valentinovich Plekhanov, one of the leaders of Russian Communism whom Lenin praised for his command of all international Marxist literature, summed it up succinctly when he said that Marxism is “Darwinism in its application to social sciences.”
    
    Professor Malachi Martin, of the Vatican’s Pontifical Bible Institute explains the relation between Marx and Darwin in these words:
    
    . . . when Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, Marx regarded it as far more than theory. He seized upon it as his “scientific” proof that there was no kingdom of Heaven, only the kingdom of Matter. Darwin had vindicated Marx in his rejection of Hegel’s [idealism]. Ignoring the fact that Darwin’s theory of evolution was just that a theory. . . Marx adapted Darwin’s ideas to the social classes of his day. . . Darwin’s theory of evolution being what it was, Marx reasoned that the social classes, like all matter, must always be in struggle with each other for survival and dominance.
    
    Contemporary evolutionists also note the strong bond between Darwinism and Marxism. One of today’s most famous proponents of the theory of evolution is the biologist Douglas Futuyma. In the preface to his Evolutionary Biology, he says, “Together with Marx’s materialist theory of history and society… Darwin hewed the final planks of the platform of mechanism and materialism.” Another famous evolutionary paleontologist Stephen J. Gould, said that “Darwin applied a consistent philosophy of materialism to his interpretation of nature.” Leon Trotsky who, together with Lenin, was one of the architects of the Russian Revolution, described the discovery of Darwin as “the highest triumph of the dialectic in the whole field of organic matter .”
    
    All this shows the great affinity between Darwinism and Marxism, that without Darwin’s influence, there would have been no Marxist theory. And if Darwinism is invalid, we will understand that Marxism is invalid too. But the converse is true as well: In any society where Darwinism is widely accepted, the growth of Marxism is inevitable.
    
    For this reason, it is very important to understand why Darwinism has no validity in the fields of either science or sociology. This understanding will prevent the revitalization of Marxism which stems from it, and which is lying in wait today-as well as forestalling any return to the agonies that humanity has suffered over the previous century. History shows that without Darwinism, there can be no Marxism.
    
    Darwinism’s Spread and The Relationship Between Communism and Capitalism
    
    When we investigate Darwinism’s political influence, keep in mind that this theory is related not to one single ideology, but to many seemingly different ones. Apart from Communism, the wide spectrum of ideologies relying on Darwinism includes racism, imperialism, capitalism, and fascism. The common point that all these apparently independent, even contrary, ideologies share is their opposition to monotheistic religions and whatever moral values that these religions inculcate.
    
    These ideologies’ leaders see religious beliefs and values as impediments, and use Darwinism as a weapon to destroy them. Ironically, by opening a “breathing room” for their own ideologies in this way, they only strengthen competing ideologies. For example, capitalists claim that a Darwinist outlook is needed to legitimate the ruthless “struggle to survive” evident in the free market. In this way, they support the very Communism that they oppose.
    
    Anton Pannekoek’s book Marxism and Darwinism refers to this interesting paradox. He describes the support given to Darwinism by the bourgeoisie (Europe’s wealthy capitalist class) in these words:
    
    That Marxism owes its importance and position only to the role it takes in the proletarian class struggle, is known to all…Yet it is not hard to see that in reality Darwinism had to undergo the same experiences as Marxism. Darwinism is not a mere abstract theory which was adopted by the scientific world after discussing and testing it in a mere objective manner. No, immediately after Darwinism made its appearance, it had its enthusiastic advocates and passionate opponents… Darwinism, too, played a role in the class-struggle, and it is owing to this role that it spread so rapidly and had enthusiastic advocates and venomous opponents.
    
    Darwinism served as a tool to the bourgeoisie in their struggle against the feudal class, against the nobility, clergy-rights and feudal lords. …What the bourgeoisie wanted was to get rid of the old ruling powers standing in their way… With the aid of religion the priests held the great mass in subjection and ready to oppose the demands of the bourgeoisie…Natural science became a weapon in the opposition to belief and tradition; science and the newly discovered natural laws were put forward; it was with these weapons that the bourgeoisie fought…
    
    Darwinism came at the desired time; Darwin’s theory that man is the descendant of a lower animal destroyed the entire foundation of Christian dogma. It is for this reason that as soon as Darwinism made its appearance, the bourgeoisie grasped it with great zeal…Under these circumstances, even the scientific discussions were carried on with the zeal and passion of a class struggle. The writings that appeared pro and con on Darwin have therefore the character of social polemics, despite the fact that they bear the names of scientific authors.
    
    The spread of Darwinism actually happened this way. The forces that held sway in Europe saw Darwinism as a rare opportunity to legitimate the capitalist order they had established in their own countries, and their imperialist colonial systems throughout the world. (For details, refer to Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity, Harun Yahya, Attique Publishers, 2000.) Darwinism’s scientific inconsistency, its imaginary suppositions and nonsensical claims have totally been ignored. Those who regard it as a weapon against religion and morality have disseminated it for ideological purposes.
    
    But the bourgeoisie-that is, the capitalist class responsible for Darwinism’s dissemination-have supported both this theory and its rival. Why? Because Darwinism’s spread and the concomitant destruction of religious belief have benefited Marxism as much they have capitalism. Religion teaches such values as moderation, modesty, brotherhood, self-sacrifice and compassion. With these removed, society becomes a savage arena in which the “struggle for survival” among capitalists goes on, much as does the class struggle between capitalists and Communists.
    
    In the fall of 1871, European naturalists gathered at an international congress. One of the speakers, the German statesman and naturalist Rudolf Virchow, said, “Be careful of this theory, for this theory is very nearly related to the theory that caused so much dread in our neighboring country.” The country he meant was France, and the theory was French Communism, which created the bloody Paris Commune of that year. (The Commune was a citywide revolt led by the Communists, at a time when France was weakened after losing the Franco-Prussian War. For months, directors of the Commune administered the city. Widespread assaults were organized against religious centers and the clergy.)
    
    Finally, despite their differences, both capitalists and Communists found common ground in their opposition to religion, and for that opposition, they found great support in Darwinism. For this reason, Communists believe that before the revolution can occur, a society must first become capitalist.. According to this idea, along with the general adoption of capitalist morality (where Darwinist propaganda plays a vital role), a society must first discard religion before Communism can grow. In Vladimir Lenin’s 1909 article titled “The Attitude of the Workers’ Party to Religion,” the Communist leader describes the role played by the capitalist bourgeoisie in opposing religion:
    
    . . . the task of combating religion is historically the task of the revolutionary bourgeoisie. In the West, this task was to a large extent performed by bourgeois democracy, in the epoch of its revolutions against feudalism and medievalism… Both France and Germany have a tradition of bourgeois war on religion, which began long before socialism (the Encyclopaedists and Feuerbach). In Russia, because of the conditions of our bourgeois-democratic revolution, this task too falls almost entirely on the shoulders of the working class.
    
    Lenin is saying that capitalists have the obligation to wage war against religion, as they have in Europe; that because the capitalist class does not exist in Russia, he and his party will undertake this war against religion. His words show that in essence, the opposition between capitalism and Communism is an “inner conflict” only. Actually, these two forces’ common enemy is religion.
    
    Communists are clearly attempting to erode societies, alienate people from the truth, and weaken their moral values and humanity, so as to make them accept their own irreligious system. But none of their attacks against religion can succeed at all. Don’t forget, many have tried to destroy true religion in the past, disobeying God’s apostles and turning away from His holy Books. But their fate is the same: God afflicts some of those who fight against His religion with troubles in this world, while others must wait for the Last Day to receive their painful torment. As the Qur’an (40:4-6) announces,
    
    No one disputes God’s Signs except those who disbelieve. Do not let their free movement about the earth deceive you. The people of Noah denied the truth before them, and the Confederates after them. Every nation planned to seize its Messenger and used false arguments to rebut the truth. So I seized them, and how [awful] was My punishment! So your Lord’s Words about those who disbelieve proved true, that they are indeed the Companions of the Fire.
    
    Communism’s Hostility to Religion
    
    In the Qur’an, it is revealed that throughout history, cruel and tyrannical leaders have arisen who have denied God and religion. In one verse (28: 41), God calls them “leaders summoning to the fire.” This kind of character typified by the person of Pharaoh in various accounts about Moses in the Qur’an. There have been other cruel rulers who opposed Prophet Abraham and the Companions of the Cave (a group of believers recounted in the Qur’an) and who, just like Pharaoh, killed people simply for having faith in God. It’s possible to find these tyrannical characters in every era of history. These leaders of irreligion have committed similar acts of cruelty against their societies, used the same methods in trying to alienate people from religion, and led the unwary to destruction in this world and the hereafter.
    
    Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Tse-tung and the fathers of their ideas, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Charles Darwin exercised leadership in irreligion in yet another way by his theory of evolution.
    
    Communism’s hostility to religion is beyond dispute. Look at the writings of any Communist ideologue, and you will find this expressed openly. Marx himself called religion the “opium of the people,” described it as created by the ruling class to narcotize the poor, and proposed that religious belief must be destroyed if Communism were to advance. Engels wrote that human beings are descended from monkeys, claiming that religion developed as merely a stage in the process of evolution.
    
    To destroy religion, what kind of policies do Communists implement? Lenin gave the first comprehensive answer.. In 1900, as leader of the Russian Social-Democratic Workers’ Party (later to become the Communist Party), he wrote an article titled “The Attitude of the Worker’s Party to Religion,” published in the Proletary magazine. In that article he wrote:
    
    Social-Democracy bases its whole world-outlook on scientific socialism, i.e., Marxism. The philosophical basis of Marxism, as Marx and Engels repeatedly declared, is dialectical materialism, which has fully taken over the historical traditions of eighteenth-century materialism in France and of Feuerbach (first half of the nineteenth century) in Germany — a materialism which is absolutely atheistic and positively hostile to all religion. Let us recall that the whole of Engels’s Anti-Dühring, which Marx read in manuscript, is an indictment of the materialist and atheist Dühring for not being a consistent materialist and for leaving loopholes for religion and religious philosophy. Let us recall that in his essay on Ludwig Feuerbach, Engels reproaches Feuerbach for combating religion not in order to destroy it, but in order to renovate it, to invent a new, “exalted” religion, and so forth. “Religion is the opium of the people” — this dictum by Marx is the corner-stone of the whole Marxist outlook on religion.
    
    In 1905, he published an article entitled “Socialism and Religion” in the magazine Nozvaya Zhizn in which he called religion a “fog” that must be dispersed. In that article, he also described the atheist propaganda that Communists must spread against religion:
    
    Our Programme is based entirely on the scientific, and moreover the materialist, world-outlook. . . . Our propaganda necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism; the publication of the appropriate scientific literature, which the autocratic feudal government has hitherto strictly forbidden and persecuted, must now form one of the fields of our Party work. We shall now probably have to follow the advice Engels once gave to the German Socialists: to translate and widely disseminate the literature of the eighteenth-century French Enlighteners and atheists.
    
    Note that Lenin said the battle Marxists much wage against religion has to start by disseminating “scientific literature” and the writings of the 18th-century Enlightenment atheists. “Scientific literature” means theories that impose materialism in the guise of science (such as Darwinism); and these “French Enlighteners” include Diderot and D’Holbach, who wrote materialist propaganda against religion long before Marx.
    
    Among Communists, this method Lenin taught is still in use. If we examine certain publishing houses, scientific magazines and media institutions throughout the world, we clearly see that Marxists are behind publications that espouse Darwinist and Enlightenment philosophy.
    
    Communism’s Hidden Hostility to Religion
    
    While Marxists are not in power, their currents of thought don’t usually follow a definite aggressive policy against religion. It’s even possible for some Communists to seem to show respect for religion and its adherents. What is the purpose for this moderation?
    
    The answer to this question can be found among the writings of Lenin. In “The Attitude of the Worker’s Party to Religion,” he wrote that, starting with the interpretations and practices of experts like Marx and Engels, war must never be openly declared against religion. This was an unnecessary “gamble of a political war.” Other materialists (for example, the anarchists or “bourgeois atheists”) had voiced hostility to religion and initiated anti-religious campaigns. Lenin found their activities simple and naïve. He rejected the accusations of “moderation” and “inconsistency” these people leveled against Marxists and stated that the “Marxist tactics in regard to religion are thoroughly consistent, and were carefully thought out by Marx and Engels.”
    
    Lenin continued this moderate stance until the Communists came to power in 1917. But after this, his moderation disappeared and replaced it with widespread oppression of religion and religious people throughout the Soviet territory. Earlier, Lenin had stated thatCommunists must not openly declare themselves to be atheists and must even accept believers in religion into their ranks. But once he came to power, he followed a much different path. In The Harvest of Sorrow, the American historian Robert Conquest describes some of the main points of Bolshevik religious policy:
    
    Priests and clerics were declared, under another article of the 1918 Constitution, to be ‘servants of the bourgeoisie’ and disfranchised. This involved their receiving no ration cards, or those of the lowest category; their children were barred from school above the elementary grade; and so on.
    
    A decree of 28 January 1918 forbade religious instruction in schools, though it was permitted to ‘study or teach religious subjects privately.’ This last was further restricted by a decree of 13 June 1921 which forbade the religious instruction anywhere of groups of persons below the age of eighteen. . . .
    
    . . . A law of 8 April 1929 forbade religious organizations to establish mutual assistance funds; to extend material aid to their members; ‘to organize special prayer or other meetings for children, youths or women, or to organize general bible, literary, handicraft, working, religious study or other meetings, groups, circles or branches, to organize excursions or children’s playgrounds, or to open libraries or reading rooms, or to organize sanatoria or medical aid.’ In fact, as an official comment put it, church activity was reduced to the performance of religious services.
    
    On 22 May 1929, Article 18 of the Constitution was amended; instead of ‘freedom of religious and anti-religious propaganda’ it now read ‘freedom of religious worship and anti-religious propaganda’; at the same time the Commissariat of Education replaced a policy of non-religious teaching in schools by orders for definitely anti-religious instruction. . . .
    
    . . . Collectivization ‘usually involved the closure of the local church as well’. Icons were confiscated as a matter of routine and burned along with other objects of religious worship. A confidential letter from the Western Provincial Committee on 20 February 1930 speaks of drunken soldiers and Komsomols [members of the Communist youth organization] who ‘without mass preparation’ were ‘arbitrarily closing village churches, breaking ikons, and threatening the peasants’.
    
    The closures applied to all religions. . . .
    
    . . . Moreover when churches were closed, this did not mean that religious work was permitted outside them. The closure of nine major churches in Kharkov was accompanied by a decision ‘to take proper steps to prevent prayer meetings in private homes now that the churches are closed’.
    
    The Kazan Cathedral in Leningrad was turned into an anti-religious museum. . . .
    
    . . . The St Sophia Cathedral and other churches in Kiev were turned into museums or anti-religious centres. In Kharkov, St. Andrey’s was turned into a cinema; another into a radio station; another into a machine-parts store. In Poltava, two were turned into granaries, another into a machine repair shop. . . .
    
    . . . These measures applied to all religions. ‘Churches and synagogues’ is often the phrasing in official decrees in the European part of the USSR. Elsewhere Islam was equally persecuted. . .
    
    . . . In the collectivization evangelical leaders in the villages were excluded from the kolkhozes and denounced as kulaks; and most of them were deported.
    
    After the Bolshevik revolution, Lenin’s tactic of “being moderate towards religion” turned into fanatical hostility. As we saw earlier, to Lenin, the famine of 1920-21 that cost millions of lives would weaken people’s faith in God.
    
    Lenin, with his rebellious spirit against God and religion, lost his mental balance and suffered great pain. God returned to Lenin in this world some of the cruelty he inflicted on people with his hostility to religion. The Qur’an (58:5-6) speaks of the terrible recompense that such cruel people will receive on the Last Day:
    
    Those who oppose God and His Messenger will be subdued and overcome as those before them were also subdued and overcome. We have sent down Clear Signs. The disbelievers will have a humiliating punishment. On the Day God raises up all of them together, He will inform them of what they did. God has recorded it while they have forgotten it. God is a Witness of all things.
    
    When Stalin rose to power, he was just as anti-religious as his predecessor. He displayed his hostility by killing millions of believers, destroying religious institutions and places of worship, and by initiating endless atheist propaganda. One of the most important weapons in Stalin’s propaganda attack was the theory of evolution. In his autobiography, he wrote:
    
    In order to disabuse the minds of our seminary students of the myth that the world was created in six days, we had to acquaint ourselves with the geological origin and age of the earth, and be able to prove them in argument; we had to familiarize ourselves with Darwin’s teachings.
    
    In the book Anarchism or Socialism?, Stalin pits Darwin against Cuvier, a creationist scientist and founder of the science of fossils. He writes, “Marxism rests on Darwinism and treats it uncritically, i.e., the Marxists repudiate Cuvier’s cataclysms.”
    
    COMMUNISM AND THE IRRELIGIOUS SYSTEMS REVEALED IN THE QUR’AN
    
    At the root of the characteristics of the Communist system is its anti-religious ideology. The reason for its brutality and dullness is this same crazed hostility toward religion.
    
    Religion is part of the way of living and thinking that God has given the human beings He created. The best life for Man is one based on religious belief; because the One Who knows the human spirit best is our Lord Who created it. Only a system founded on religion can give peace, while systems rejecting religion will inevitably bring pain, sorrow, fear and insecurity. Above all, these systems opposing all religious truth, trying to force people live in contradiction to it, constitute an even greater danger. Historically, Communism has been one of the most striking examples of just such a system.
    
    Interestingly, Communism shows important similarities to the godless systems that God has described in the Qur’an. Comparing the godless system of Pharaoh given in the Qur’an with some other systems of our age, we see a great similarity.
    
    Passion for Big Buildings
    
    One common characteristic of all irreligious administrations is their seeking to captivate onlookers with grandeur. Their haughtiness and humiliation of other people are expressed in various ways.
    
    As an example, God tells in the Qur’an about Pharaoh’s administration in Egypt in the time of Prophet Moses. In his pride, Pharaoh opposed both God and His apostle Moses, while subjecting his own people to oppression. An example of Pharaoh’s arrogance was his command to have a “high tower” built. The Qur’an (28:38) reveals Pharaoh’s command to Haman, one of his closest man:
    
    Pharaoh said, “Councilmen, I do not know of any other god for you apart from Me. Haman, kindle a fire for me over the clay and build me a lofty tower, so that perhaps I may be able to climb up to Moses’s god! I consider him [Moses] a blatant liar.”
    
    This desire for a “high tower,” an expression of Pharaoh’s pride, is also reflected in Communist dictatorships’ passion for “big buildings.” Beginning with the Soviet Union, all Communist states constructed excessively large state buildings as symbols of the regime’s strength and endurance. For a long time, the palace built by Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu in Bucharest retained the title of the world’s largest building. Yet this palace has a very cold and joyless appearance; size was its most important consideration and it remains an expression of the “superiority complex” of Communist ideology.
    
    Forced Migration
    
    In the Qur’an, God reveals some actions that brought destruction upon their perpetrators, including the removal of people from their homelands. For example, those who denied God threatened the prophets that were sent to them: ”We will drive you from our land unless you return to our religion…” (Qur’an, 14:13) As is told in verse 22:40, they tried especially to remove Muslims; ”those who were expelled from their homes without any right, merely for saying, ‘Our Lord is God’.”
    
    Communist regimes have engineered the greatest forced migrations, and Muslims have been the target of most of them. In Stalin’s time, first the Crimean Turks and later, many other Muslim peoples were forced to leave their lands overnight and were dispatched, hungry and miserable to the most barren regions of Russia. Hundreds of thousands of innocents died on the way, and those who survived to reach their destinations died of hunger, infectious diseases, and freezing cold.
    
    The Destruction of Freedom of Belief
    
    As told in the Qur’an, one characteristic feature of Pharaoh’s administration was its outlawing freedom of belief. The system determined what kind of beliefs people could hold. Pharaoh’s question to the magicians who believed in Moses shows this clearly; ”Have you believed in Him before I authorized you to do so?” (Qur’an, 7:123) Again, while speaking to his people, Pharaoh said that he taught the people the truth they needed to know, and that they shouldn’t search for any other truth besides what he taught them: ”I only show you what I see myself and I only guide you to the path of rectitude.” (Qur’an, 40:29)
    
    Pharaoh’s modern representatives are the Soviet Union and all the other Communist regimes of the 20th century that attempted to establish totalitarian regimes. In any totalitarianism system, society is totally shaped by the State. People are physically governed by State oppression and mentally by propaganda. The model of Pharaoh’s totalitarian system, as described in the Qur’an, was revived in the 20th century by dictators like Lenin, Stalin, and Mao. The Albanian dictator Enver Hoxha, as we mentioned earlier, forbade his countrymen from practicing any religious faith. He closed all places of worship and advertised the government he’d founded as the “world’s first atheist State.”
    
    The Idolization of Leaders
    
    In the Qur’an (28:38), God tells us that Pharaoh tried to make himself a god in the eyes of the people, as can plainly be seen in Pharaoh’s words to those around him: ”Councilmen, I do not know of any other god for you apart from me.” Egyptian history shows us how its pharaohs described themselves as “gods in this world.”
    
    Communist regimes wielded the same kind of psychology. Dictators such as Lenin, Stalin, Mao and North Korea’s Kim Il Sung initiated programs of mass brainwashing to make themselves seem as gods in the eyes of their peoples. This “cult of personality” was an expression of the policy of “idolizing the leaders.”
    
    This tendency towards idolization started first with Lenin, leader of the first Communist revolution in Russia. Indeed, some of the writings Lenin left behind show a noticeable “aura of religion”-but a religion of idols. Lenin organized the Communist Party as a kind of non-religious sect. Upon his death, Party members held a huge ceremony in which they addressed Lenin’s corpse with liturgical words such as: “Comrad Lenin, we swear we will carry out your orders.” Lenin’s body was mummified, like an ancient Egyptian pharaoh’s, and placed in an elaborate tomb.
    
    Stalin and Mao followed Lenin’s example. Both leaders had giant statues of themselves erected in every city of their countries, trying to produce a portrait of their people’s “god-leader.” Mao wrote The Little Red Book, and every Chinese citizen was responsible for reading this “holy” book and implementing its precepts in his life. Many Chinese still visit the statues of the “Great Helmsman” erected in every part of the country, and on Mao’s birthday there are mass suicides.
    
    In North Korea, Kim Il Sung was also idolized after he came to power. He was known as the “Sun of the People,” who believed he could lead them along the right path without ever making a mistake. The same thing happened with Ho Chi Minh, North Vietnam’s Communist dictator.
    
    Oligarchic Structure
    
    The system of oligarchy is “minority rule,” in which political power rests in the hands of a limited group. A look into the Qur’an shows that godless systems have a basically oligarchic structure. When we examine the many verses that speak of “the chiefs of the nations,” we see that these people have taken all political power into their own hands, governing society according to their own ideas. When we look at the verses relating to Pharaoh, we see that his administration was an oligarchic class, composed of advisors, magicians and soldiers. In order to keep the people bound to Pharaoh’s administration, the magicians controlled their thinking. The soldiers ensured the same control by brute force.
    
    Communist regimes are the modern counterpart of the godless oligarchic system mentioned in the Qur’an. Communists started out by offering “power of the people,” but in every country where they came to power, they established minority power relying on domination. All political power in the country passed into the hands of a party that bore the name of the “proletarian party” or Workers’ Party, but had no relationship with the workers. The decision-making mechanisms-known as the Communist Party Central Committee and the Politburo, together with the General Secretary over them-retained all the power and used it mercilessly. In Communist regimes, all the supposedly “democratic” mechanisms, such as elections and party congresses, were only a show.
    
    The “Destruction of Crops and Breeding Stock”
    
    When describing the quality of godless administrations in the Qur’an (2:205-206), God draws our attention to something very important:
    
    When he holds the upper hand, he goes about the earth corrupting it, destroying (people’s) crops and breeding stock. God does not love corruption. When he is told to heed God, he is seized by pride which drives him to wrongdoing. Hell will be enough for him! What an evil resting-place!
    
    Notice that “going about the earth corrupting it” and “destroying crops and breeding stock” in these verses precisely describe the slaughters and collectivizations implemented by Communist regimes of the Soviet Union, Red China, and Cambodia. Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot forced an atmosphere of chaos and terror on their countries. By implementing Lysenko’s evolutionist nonsense, they destroyed all the products of agriculture, killed countless numbers, and nearly erased a whole generation. Later, this same verse reveals that the people who perpetrated this were arrogant and irreligious. This description perfectly fits these dictators, who regarded themselves as gods.
    
    Conclusion
    
    Communism is still alive, and in our very midst. Communist or Socialist parties will not find it difficult to rise to power in most of Eastern Europe or even in some Western European countries. If they find appropriate social conditions (as when the Nazis came to power in Germany’s elections of 1933), they may establish a lasting Communist regime. Russia experienced a development from Communism to Fascism and then towards savage capitalism, but since the boundary isn’t clear-cut between these ideologies, Russia can return to Communism as the result of a social movement. China still regards Maoism’s ideas as the only truth, and Communism’s influence is still strongly evident in Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam.
    
    Today’ s Communism, implementing the “one step forward two steps back” tactic, has taken a step back. It continues its activities in various countries under different names, while giving the impression that it presents no threat to the world. But by supporting the “conflict” argument of dialectical materialism, Communism is an endless fountain of bloodshed. Under whatever appearance or name, still it regards the dialectical conflict as an inevitable law of history and can bring humanity nothing but bring cruelty and misery.
    
    The precaution that must be taken is to dry up the Communist swamp that produces this danger. Otherwise, struggling with the mosquitoes (that is, with Communist supporters) one by one will be of no avail. So long as the swamp is not dried up, the mosquitoes will continue to hatch at an increasing rate.
    
    Following this analogy, how is the “swamp” to be dried up?
    
    The common support for Marxists, Marxist-Leninists, Maoists or any other version of Communism (even Fascism) is Darwin’s theory of evolution. As we have seen, Marx called this theory the “basis in natural science for the class struggle in history.” Engels considered Darwin the equal of Marx, from the point of view of his dialectical materialist doctrine. Lenin and Trotsky were each influenced by Darwin and after reading him, the young Stalin-studying to be a clergyman-became an atheist. Maoism’s and Chinese Communism’s intellectual foundations are rooted in Darwinism.
    
    The Marxist student movement that shook the world in 1968 was inspired by Herbert Marcuse, an ideologue influenced by Darwinism and particularly by Darwin’s idea of the “struggle for existence.”122 The list of Socialists who accepted Darwin as a guide would include a wide spectrum of names, including the revisionist Marxists Karl Kautsky and Eduard Bernstein, and the founder of the famous Fabian Society that is regarded as the source of the English left.
    
    Without Darwinism, Communism would not exist. Therefore, the only antidote for the Communism that cost the lives of more than 100 million in the 20th century alone, and which is now reorganizing and strengthening in secret, is to refute Darwinism’s scientific and philosophical ideas. Once it is established that Darwinian theory is completely bankrupt in terms of science-that living things did not come to be through evolution, but that God created them perfectly-then neither Marx, Lenin, nor Mao, nor the militants who attach posters to their walls and who execute acts of bloodshed, can remain.
    
    By eradicating the deceit of Darwinism, wells of bloodshed like Communism will be destroyed. People will return to God, our true Creator and Lord, and live according to the moral values He has taught. Then, as is commanded in Verse 2:208 of the Qur’an, people will enjoy peace and security:
    
    You who believe! Submit all of you to God and do not follow in the footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy to you.
  Reply
- silverdust
  April 17, 2012 at 11:54 pm
- In a nutshell, I took ChillAxe’s “social Darwinism” jab at Ryan’s budget to be the usual M.O. for the proglodytes: projection. They always accuse the other side of exactly what they themselves are doing. If social Darwinism is to be the order of the day, some conservative black preachers and pundits need to get the word out to the on-the-fence black community. The illegals, far from voting for Zero, ought to RUN FOR THEIR LIVES back to the lands from whence they came.
  
  I’ll admit, I was losing patience with WSI referring to Ogabe as “America’s Satan.” There’s nothing American about him. Nothing.
  
  Ann Barnhardt is our version of Joan of Arc. She minces no words and provides the sobering reality of where we find ourselves. Quite unlike Beck’s “Restoring Love” and calls for peaceful revolution, Ann is convinced that the only way we can restore any semblance of America is quite the opposite.
  
  http://bit.ly/IQY9rt
  
  Watch it. She is fearless.
Reply
- R. J.
  April 18, 2012 at 12:49 am
- I’ll take a stab at this.
  
  I believe what WSI is trying to say is there are parallels between the rise of the Nazis and ultimately Hitler’s rise to absolute power and today. What he is calling “Social Darwinism” was actually the “science” of eugenics where people were deemed to be genetic inferiors particularly Slavs and Jews. Also on the extermination list were the mentally ill, mentally retarded, homosexuals etc.
  
  He talks about the “devaluation”. I believe he means the hyper inflationary period known as the Wiemar Republic. The actions of the federal reserve are going to lead to hyperinflation. You cannot inject trillions of dollars of liquidity into the economy without creating massive inflation. This is going to create massive social upheaval as people watch prices spiral completely out of control and that is going to create the crisis where we shred our constitution and install our own “Furer” to set things right. Or so that is the plan.
  
  Once our constitution is out of the way, they can nationalize everything and exert extraordinarily powers of control over our people and industry. We will no longer be free to do or say anything against our ruler/s or free to determine our own destinies. This is death of freedom and installation of a totalitarian government.
  
  In essence, he’s saying a proven blueprint to take over society is being followed…one we’ve seen before and the scapegoats of the past, the Jews, are being wet up again.
Reply
- - ConservativeMama
    April 18, 2012 at 4:40 am
  - Something that people also tend to forget, or didn’t realize in the first place, is that Hitler achieved great popularity from his factions early on. He became “Hilter” through history, but at the beginning of his rise, he gave the Germans what they wanted to hear: Someone else was to blame for their lot in life and should be hated.
    
    Sound familiar?
    
    After WWI, Germany was in financial ruin. They’d hit a depression, they were paying large sums of money to the allies for WWI and the Jewish were often the money lenders, the bankers. They had too much power, they had too much money and they were the cause of Germany’s downfall. Hitler was a great orator, he had passion and hatred masked as belief, and most of all, he gave the defeated people someone to blame their problems on. Many referred to him as a “the new Messiah.”
    
    Sound familiar?
    
    By 1932, 30% of Germany was unemployed. Hitler, who once had seemed extremist, now seemed like a savior when he promised to get rid of unemployment.
    
    When he was in power, he began to change the unemployment rate, but that was done by taking more control away from the employers. The lives of those employed were not any better because they had jobs – the Nazis controlled the trade unions, so wages did not increase with productivity.
    
    Sounds a bit familiar, doesn’t it?
    
    Hilter created the “Brown Shirts” — the army of youth whose job it was in part to disrupt meetings of his political opponents and to protect him against attacks. They marched in the streets and the speeches given by Hilter were meant to encourage their violence against Jews.
    
    OWS?
    
    The pieces are there, sort of like the edges of a puzzle starting to form the frame that encases the full picture. Again, even as I write this, there is a part of me that screams this couldn’t be happening here. It’s hard to digest. Harder to believe.
    
    Hilter created the Act that made him Dictator. And a lot of the things he did on his way there are very, very familiar.
  Reply
- R. J.
  April 18, 2012 at 12:55 am
- Oh, and the “occupy” movement and unions are the new ” brownshirts”, the muscle, if you will, Rabble rousing and trouble making to force the change along.
Reply
- - silverdust
    April 18, 2012 at 5:39 pm
  - OWS and the unions are going to be joined by the Black Pampers and Nation of Islam (50,000 followers).
  Reply
- Enough is enough
  April 18, 2012 at 1:00 am
- One of our employees… She’s German… when she was about sixteen years old she said to her grandmother, “How come nobody stopped what was happening with Hitler. How come they didn’t stop them from taking the Jews away?”
  
  And the grandmother said to her, “You don’t understand. It wasn’t one day that we woke up and all of our rights were taken away from us. They took them away from us slowly. And then one day you couldn’t speak out, because if you spoke out you were dead.”
  
  And that’s what’s going on in this country. It’s like the frog in boiling water.
  
  How much more do people need to have?
  
  First it was the Patriot Act. Now it’s the National Defense Authorization Act. And then it was Obama’s Executive Order giving El Presidente Los Estados Unidos the supreme right to call Martial Law at a potential threat – a potential threat.
  
  Then there’s Big Bro over there, Attorney General Eric Holder, who just passed these guidelines that could let them listen in to what we’re saying right now, listen to you on your cell phone, watch every stroke of your keyboard, and they at the White House could then determine whether or not the algorythms add up to you being a terrorist or a potential terrorist.
  
  Big Brother never had it so good.
  
  …all aboard the Auschwitz Express…
  
  …That’s what’s going on here… and the people don’t see it, and they’re afraid to speak up… People don’t want to believe it.
  
  TAKEN FROM
  All Aboard the Auschwitz Express: “People Don’t Want to Believe It”
  
  http://www.shtfplan.com/gerald-celente/all-aboard-the-auschwitz-express-people-dont-want-to-believe-it_04172012
Reply
- Francesca
  April 18, 2012 at 1:52 am
- I haven’t read all the very interesting and educational comments yet, but I am so concerned about the WSI. He sounds so unwell physically and so distressed emotionally. I do wish we could find a way to help him., to encourage him. We can at least let him know how very much we appreciate him and what he is doing for our dear country. He is a true hero.
  
  The idea of giving him a recording device so he can speak his mind whenever he is able is a good one.
  
  WSI: please take care of yourself. You have our prayers. We need you to hang in there so you can celebrate our victory in November. You will deserve much of the credit.
  
  Thank you so much for what you are doing.
Reply
- USA4ever
  April 18, 2012 at 1:53 am
- Stunning words from WSI. I believe he’ll pull through and see Obama get tossed out in November.
  
  WSI, we’ve seen the results of the work you’ve done and continue to do. Please call in every favor and pull every string you have at your disposal to rid the White House of Obama and his minions.
  
  And if you can, please find a way to spike gas prices at just the right time this late summer and into fall. I think a $1 per gallon raise should do the trick. We’ll feel the pain at the pump but it’s worth it so Obama feels the pain at the ballot box.
  
  Thanks WSI and Ulsterman once more. Ulsterman, take all precautions and protection that WSI is offering. And please see if you can get WHI to stop by for an update on where we’re at in all this and what we on the ground can do at this stage of the fight. Thanks.
Reply
- CitizenWatcher
  April 18, 2012 at 2:15 am
- Remember….
  
  The FBI agent larry grathwohl…Infiltrated the weather underground and they (WU) wanted to kill at least 25 million Americans. They wanted revolution, they wanted Russia and China to invade, bring down capitalism and the US constitution. Thats what this administration wants to do, follow in the foot steps of Hitler for the greater good of humanity. Death camps, worker camps, mass murder by military and black panthers.
  
  Our military has been infiltrated with foreign spies, muslim brotherhood, ms13 gang members. The FBI has no balls, Russia and pakistan bringing down the secret service, agents being oustered to bring in KGB/FSB agents to protect obama, state dept setting up there own army to replace the military.
  
  Exciting times, scary times but it always ends the same way.
  
  America lives and these bastards rot.
Reply
- Obeline
  April 18, 2012 at 2:31 am
- The collective thinking, research, and commentary above are extremely important.
  
  Try to link this discussion to other sites.
Reply
- InOurLifetime
  April 18, 2012 at 2:38 am
- I think theirs also deeper spiritual component this. There were deep occult ties with the Nazis. This may cause fear also for WSI, and make him want to cleanse his soul so to speak.
Reply
- - E.A.B.
    April 18, 2012 at 4:07 am
  - Obama does have some creepy spiritual issues.
    
    Various actions he has taken (ordering the covering of crosses) and things he and his inner circle have said (temple-like setting for the 2008 convention, “Obamanation” reference at the convention, naming his armored limo “The Beast”) have led me to suspect that the Obama has an antichrist complex.
  Reply
  - cobra
    April 18, 2012 at 4:39 am
    
    Remember his hindu god in his pocket during the 2008 campaign?
    Very strange…
    Reply
    - Pat
      April 18, 2012 at 10:03 am
      
      The hindu god….just reminding me of WHI’s story about the chanting.
      
      Reply
      - jane
        April 18, 2012 at 5:21 pm
        
        Sorry, Hinduism has *nothing* to do with Satanism. Paranoia by fundamentalist Christians aside, Hinduism is *not* evil…all mantras (chants) in Hinduism are prayers to the various manifestations of God. We’d be really lucky if all Obama was doing was a little bit of yoga and some Hindu mantras. If he was doing that regularly, he might actually have a change of heart.
        
        PS For more info: This organization was founded by a yogi who found parallels between the teachings of Jesus and Hinduism: http://www.yogananda-srf.org/
      - cobra
        April 18, 2012 at 7:22 pm
        
        Jane,
        You are right, Hinduism is very interesting and Buddhism even more so.
        But the point is that it is strange for O ta have a hindu god in his pants…
      - E.A.B.
        April 18, 2012 at 8:51 pm
        
        Jane, with due respect, I suggest that you are missing something here.
        
        What matters in this case is not what Hinduism really is, but rather what warped form it has taken on in Obama’s own mind.
        
        The Hindu figure Obama carries in his pocket is Hanuman, a devotee of Rama. Rama, like Krishna, was an avatar of Vishnu. In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna reveals his true form–”the great destroyer of the worlds,” an infinite entity in the process of devouring countless human beings. In the BG, this image is dwelled upon merely because the destruction of both sides of the war in which the story takes place had been divinely predetermined.
        
        Yet this alone is the picture of Vishnu that Barack Obama respects–a god of equilibrium, if you will, preserving the natural balance through the destruction of human life.
        
        In his own mind, Obama has turned Vishnu into the god of…Social Darwinism.
- Francesca
  April 18, 2012 at 2:39 am
- To WSI: Perhaps you have come to the kingdom (country) for such a time as this.
Reply
- CReyner
  April 18, 2012 at 2:39 am
- I’m afraid there is much more to this story. It doesn’t matter who ‘wins’ the ‘election.’ The Plan covers both parties, and others in the world. It’s been going on for centuries. This country has already experienced a silent coup at the highest levels. We are near the end. The only thing that matters now is your relationship to Jesus Christ.
  
  http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/05/24/gordon-duff-caught-in-the-act-is-the-murder-of-president-obama-being-planned/
Reply
- - R. J.
    April 18, 2012 at 3:05 am
  - God helps those that help themselves. This country was founded against very long odds. Indeed pray. But you must also fight! God may smile again on the nation he blessed with so much only to have it’s people turn away from him.
    
    I am not particularly religious but I know I’ve gotten “help” when I thought things were hopeless. It’s happened too many times for me to discount any more as just mere coincidence. God won’t give you the winning lottery number but like the song says: you can’t always get what you want but, if you try sometimes, you get what you need…that’s how god has worked for me.
    
    You can follow a religion or you can find your own path to god but find one. It helps a lot!
    
    P.S. I was once almost an atheist and could never imagine a time when I would write something like this to anyone.
  Reply
  - USA4ever
    April 18, 2012 at 6:43 am
    
    The most important step is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior. After that, it is key to step out in faith to do what the Lord leads you to do – what He knows you’re capable of doing – and then with firm reliance and trust in Him, He will do what we cannot.
    
    That’s God’s grace and that’s what we all need now. The circumstances of the world testify to our dire need to seek Him with our whole heart.
    Reply
- - bill o'rights
    April 18, 2012 at 1:53 pm
  - I, too, am not a religious person.
    
    But I do recognise that this nation, when founded, was firmly anchored upon Judeo-Christian values. Few could logically argue (in my opinion) that the breakdown of these values has coincided with the destruction of our Constitutional principles, and led us to where we stand now.
    
    If you are religious, I can think of no better time to seek solace through God. I also strongly agree with R.J.–that God provides us with the ways and means to do what we must do.
    
    There is a story I have heard several times, and forgive me if you’ve already heard it:
    
    A man is watching the news when a local weather alert warns of flash flooding in his area. So the man runs up to the attic, climbs out the attic window and climbs out on the roof.
    
    As the flood waters begin rising, a man in a rowboat approaches the house, and yells to the first man on the roof, offering his help. The man on the roof thinks about it, but as he’s watching the water slowly rise he beta nervous and yells back ‘Thank you, but you go on. I’m waiting for the Lord to save me. I have faith he will come and deliver me from the flood.’
    
    The waters continue rising and eventually a police rescue boat makes its way to the man’s house. Again, the man tells the police to go on, since he has faith that the Lord will save him.
    
    A couple hours pass, all the while the water rising. By the time the rescue helicopter has arrived, the flood waters have nearly reached the roof. Again, and much to the consternation of the rescuers, the man declines, because he is waiting for the Lord to deliver him.
    
    An hour later, the waters swept over the roof of the house and the man drowned. The next thing the man knewx he was standing at the gates of heaven.
    
    As the man stepped up to the gates, Gabriel was waiting for him. The man’s first question for Gabriel was, ‘Why didn’t God come and deliver me from that flood?’
    
    Gabriel responded, ‘What do you mean? We sent you a weather bulletin, two boats and a helicopter!!!’.
    
    Let’s use the tools God and the founding fathers gave us. Namely:
    
    Our freedom of speech
    Our right to keep and bear arms
    Our right to oppose tyrannical leaders
    The rights of states to sovereignty without federal overreach
    Our right to repel foreign armies on our soil
    Our right to maintain civilian police forces NOT controlled by the military
    Our right to habeus corpus
    Our right to due process of law
  Reply
  - bill o'rights
    April 18, 2012 at 1:55 pm
    
    Should be “HASN’T coincided”
    Reply
  - R. J.
    April 19, 2012 at 2:58 am
    
    I love your story and it maks the point perfectly. It is up to you to act upon the “lifelines” that are thrown to you (and they are thrown and they may be very subtle indeed but they are there if you look. I concider myself more of a diest in the sam vien as Benjamin Franklin or Einstein at this point. I believe God has given us many paths to know him and that no one religion has all the answers.
    
    Be you a Jew, Christian, Hindu, Buhdist, or whatever does not really matter in the end IMHO god has revealed himself in many different ways to many different cultures. Follow your own path to your own peace and let others do the same. Know that god is there for you and you will be stronger for knowing it.
    
    Pray for your country and it’s future but be ready to fight to hold on to what is yours as well. We are going to be tested mightily this time around and, as the saying goes, there are no atheists in foxholes.
    
    Job one, kick Obama to the curb in November and be ready to be civilly disobedient if he thinks he’s going to usurp our constitution and install himself as dictator. We cannot let that notion to even have a toehold or all is lost.
    
    Job two, clean all the totalitarian statists and “masterminds” out of congress on both sides of the aisle and re establish a limited federal government as laid out by our constitution. And begin reversing the disaster that has been going on in Washington since Woodrow Wilson’s presidency.
    Reply
- Bulldog
  April 18, 2012 at 2:44 am
- Others have already defined it fairly well.
  
  Hitler had a thing for Darwinism. “Survival of the fittest” was given a helping hand by the scientists and doctors, who were greatly influenced by Darwin. Remember that the Nazis weren’t just killing Jews. They were killing the old and infirm. Anyone who did not meet their definition of “perfect” and “useful” were to be eliminated. Think about that the next time you look at a group of delightful octogenarians.
  
  From an article I found:
  
  “Nonetheless, even stupid men reach their conclusions because they have been influenced in certain ways. At Hitler’s death in May of 1945, the point was clear enough to the editorial writers of the New York Times. ‘Long before he had dreamed of achieving power,’ they wrote, [Hitler] had developed the principles that nations were destined to hate, oppose and destroy one another; [and] that the law of history was the struggle for survival between peoples … ‘.”
  
  http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26092
  
  Fight. Fight hard and pray even harder. We’re up against a Beast.
Reply
- R. J.
  April 18, 2012 at 2:47 am
- This is the greatest existential threat this country has seen since it’s founding. We are approaching a fork in the road where we either retake this country from the scoundrels who are hell-bent on it’s destruction or we surrender our freedom forever. If we lose, the world will descend into darkness for hundreds of years…maybe more.
  
  The pigs have risen to power, they rewrite the rules daily. They’ve dumbed down society by replacing history with “social studies” and flooding the country with people who have no understanding of our country’s founding or it’s constitution.
  
  Instead of a giant “melting pot” where all cultures and races are alloyed into Americans, we now have “multicultural” mumbo jumbo where no one is encouraged to assimilate and join OUR TRIBE. They are instead coddled in their own culture, taught nonsense about how the western United States was stolen from Mexico when, in fact, we bought it, or how “the man” has stacked the deck against you and you can never succeed. Thus we are all at each other’s throats; old against young, blacks against whites, men against women, rich against poor, etc. This is a divide and conquer strategy and while we are focused on bs, they are schemeing and plotting our enslavement. Wake up the people around you while there is still time left!
Reply
- Adam
  April 18, 2012 at 3:55 am
- I don’t care to read all of the replies but I will connect the dots for you very easily. Here is what they are preparing for as far as the occupy movement. http://the99spring.com/ That is the website of what is to come.
  
  A very good analysis is done by Webster Tarpley and his guest Eric. Download the April 7 episode and start listening from the 20 minute mark here: http://tarpley.net/world-crisis-radio/
  
  WSI is only telling the truth what anyone who has an interest in 20th history already knows, that we are turning into the 4th Reich of the Nazi. Obama Care, NDAA, Executive Orders, all of the political maneuvering are straight out of the Nationalist Socialist Party of Germany (Nazis). Many times the laws being passed such as Obama Care are written almost word for word as the Nazi laws passed.
  
  A good analysis can be summarized in Naomi Wolf’s movie End of America on Youtube here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYvg4mP0XUc You can start at the 5 minute mark on there to get a brief comparison of the current US political landscape and the remarkable identical history of the rise of the Nazis.
Reply
- sartana
  April 18, 2012 at 7:03 am
- The Big Lie
  
  I believe this is what WSI was alluding to. Namely, accusing your enemy of doing that which you yourself are planning to do. Masking your intentions by ascribing them to your opponent, or target.
  
  I’ve been saying to friends for a few years now- you know what the Left is secretly planning as they the Right of it.
  
  By accusing the Right of Social Darwinism, they are tipping their hand- intentionally.
Reply
- - bill o'rights
    April 18, 2012 at 4:38 pm
  - Amen.
    
    The transparency of the concept is pretty evident, when one considers the many distractions created by the regime:
    
    1) Their oppposition is racist
    2) The opposition wishes to wage a war on women
    3) The opposition wishes to wage war on taxpayers/the middle class
    4) The opposition wishes to block legislation that would heal the economy and create jobs
  Reply
- - cobra
    April 18, 2012 at 7:24 pm
  - This is called “projection”.
    The left is doing it for ages..
  Reply
  - bill o'rights
    April 20, 2012 at 4:38 pm
    
    Agree.
    
    Pure Marx, V.I. Lenin, Stalin, Alinsky.
    Reply
- - Kay112
    April 19, 2012 at 2:34 pm
  - @ Santana~~ It’s not what the left says that counts. It’s what they do.
  Reply
- Xeno
  April 18, 2012 at 11:04 am
- While I don’t doubt there are some elements – very powerful ones – with, in particular cases, very close influence to the President, who would just love a literal extermination/purging policy (Ayers’ famous quote most certainly comes to mind, to name just one), it’s not something which could, by any measure, be pulled off easily within the system of the USA.
  
  ‘Insider’, should he/she exist, needs to be careful of veering too closely to Alex Jones territory. Giving fair warning of dangers is one thing, but being sensationalist and alarmist is quite another. You need some decent evidence if you’re going to claim things like that or you run a risk of making not only yourself seem unbelievable, but your interviewer, too. If not personally, then with specific names/dates/locations/quotes and so on, which others can then check.
  
  However, with that said, the TV film, ‘Conspiracy’, is an EXCELLENT primer for those who wish to see the kind of language used by, shall we say, the more destructively subversive elements in a relatively civilised government. Some beautiful quotes in it. I especially like the one about how “laws are like ice cream… Easily melted.”
  
  While I don’t think the whole extermination-of-the-Jews thing is likely on behalf of this administration (regardless of whether some within it would rather like it), that isn’t to say they don’t regard Israel with hostile intent.
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksp35yVEmZk
Reply
- - cobra
    April 18, 2012 at 7:26 pm
  - I think more than the Jews need to fear.
    Every American, even the lefties, need to be afraid of what is happening.
    The problem is that the media is protecting this guy very well.
    In a normal society he would have been removed from office (by impeachment) long ago.
  Reply
  - bill o'rights
    April 19, 2012 at 8:04 pm
    
    Absolutely!!!
    
    Therein lies the irony of these halfwits continuing to support Obama.
    We’re facing mass murder, pogroms and slavery for everyone else.
    Reply
  - R. J.
    April 20, 2012 at 11:29 pm
    
    I read “Gulag Archipeligo”. There was no ryme nor reason to what could make someone “disappear” thus everyone lived in absolute fear of the state. I agree, everyone should be very afraid of what these maniacs want to do here. Right-wingers are certainly targets but also writers, poets, playwrights, singers, etc. Anyone with the potential to motivate the “masses” against the state is dangerous to the powers that be and will be destroyed…
    Reply
    - Holly
      April 21, 2012 at 6:32 pm
      
      Have you seen the new film, “Farmageddon?” The USDA and FDA are carrying out terroristic raids against small family farmers.
      
      Reply
  - Jules
    April 21, 2012 at 12:12 am
    
    Don’t want to go all mystical here, but has anyone else had dreams about all of this?
    
    Without going into detail, I’ll just say I’ve had dreams along these lines periodically, some recurring, but all revolving around a totalitarian regime in this country, or a repressive, murderous regime motif, since 1979. I pray about it, shrug it off for the most part, yet end inevitably remember such dreams at times like this.
    Reply
    - Holly
      April 21, 2012 at 6:30 pm
      
      I had a dream about 1999 that the White House was already under the secret power of Islamists and their tentacles were reaching out to entrap Christian pastors (mine, specifically).
      
      Reply
- M. Simon
  April 18, 2012 at 12:45 pm
- Dr. Ron Polland April 17, 2012 at 8:56 pm,
  
  You might want to add Drug Prohibition to the UN agenda. The Right falls for that one every single time.
Reply
- M. Simon
  April 18, 2012 at 12:50 pm
- The most important step is to accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior.
  
  Time to get back to the old time religion. If it was good enough for Jesus it is good enough for me.
Reply
- n8
  April 18, 2012 at 4:27 pm
- With so many well-thought responses above, I will simply add that the forces that created Nazi Germany and Marxist Russia did not stop there. The depth and scope of treachery is so impossibly hard to fathom, one gets a headache even trying. Then there are all of the conflicting conspiracy theories that overlap but contradict at the same time…such as the Freemasons, Priory of Zion, etc. Then there is the fact that the likes of Rockefeller and JP Morgan financed both the allies and German weaponry in both WWI and WWII. Then there are the stories of Tesla and free energy. Where does accuracy in one “story” end and another begin? Is there really hope for our perceived way of life? Was it always a sham and a false paradigm to begin with? Are we all trying to unplug from the Matrix simultaneously?
  
  I don’t have the answers but am I the only one who noticed WSI call Valerie Jarrett a reptilian???
Reply
- - redneck
    April 18, 2012 at 4:40 pm
  - I caught the reptile reference also. Not sure if it was talking about the whole reptile people conspiracy because if you look at Jarett she really does look like a snake. No joke. What I find really interesting is that it was the Ulstermans White House Insider who was always talking about Jarett being the real power and that was long before anyone else was mentioning her. I had no clue who she was. And then now you see she is about the only one left there from when Obama first came to office. And she is always around. WHI brought her name up first from the start and he was 100% right. Now WSI, the guy is real sick. That’s easy to read from this. It was hard to follow at times and I think UM tried his best to keep it on track w/o being disrespectful to the guy who seems to be on his way out. I noticed the ad campaigns against Obama, the Jewish groups against Obama, the CEOs against Obama, the NY Times even writing some stuff up against Obama and was pretty sure this old guy was behind some of it or maybe all of it and now its confirmed. WHI is more my kind of people though, so I really do hope he makes a return to these interviews. Anyone catch Bob Beckels F-BOMB on HannityZ??? Made me wonder if you know what I mean. Hannity has used a lot of UM’s stuff on his radio and tv shows. Hmmmmm??????????
  Reply
  - cobra
    April 18, 2012 at 7:29 pm
    
    Hannity is Irish, like our best blogger, UM…
    Just wondering…
    Reply
- - J_D
    April 18, 2012 at 6:23 pm
  - Yeah, that jumped out at me too. Apologies to reptiles everywhere.
    
    The citizens of this forum are without a doubt the best. I should know. I’m here 3-5 times a day. The issues raised, topics discussed and the calm manner of the debate defines the term civil. You are truly, a “Crowd-sourced” consensus.
    
    Yes, I know UM sweeps up the trolls and what not regularly, (all of my previous posts (attached to others) went out in that bath water; no worries though) and provides the reasoned environment. I see no competition between you folks for whom is most correct, just ideas presented and usually reinforced by follow-on posters.
    
    Warm days and God’s grace to each and all.
  Reply
- - lovelypeace
    April 19, 2012 at 4:04 pm
  - No! You aren’t the only one who caught that. I totally flipped out!
    
    I don’t have all the answers either, but we are unplugging from the Matrix and too many people are still caught up in the Left-Right paradigm. We are undergoing a radical transformation and a lot of what we have been told about history and the world is just what you called it – “a sham”.
  Reply
- Vortogon
  April 18, 2012 at 5:23 pm
- Found this interesting today. Echos much of what Wall Street Insider is pointing out.
  
  Robin Leach: Obama Is a ‘Socialist’ – He Is ‘Whipping Up This Racial War and This Economic Divide’ http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/04/18/robin-leach-obama-socialist-he-whipping-racial-war-and-economic-divid
  
  “Appearing on the Fox Business Network, Leach told host Neal Cavuto the current White House resident is “whipping up this racial war and this economic divide” (video follows with transcript and commentary):”
Reply
- Vortogon
  April 18, 2012 at 5:37 pm
- Did anyone catch the Urban Warfare Training the other day in Chicago no less. Symbolic don’t you think?
  
  I can very easily see this scene play out before the fall election. Occupy Wall Street. The minion street pawns of the left doing massive demonstrations in the streets this Summer. Agent provactors added to this Zimmermen walks free since the second degree charge simply can’t stick (so say many prosecutors already commenting on the case) Massive racial riots break out adding to Occupy Wall Streets outrage riots.
  
  Chaos in the streets the people call for immediate security and action to stop the unrest. Obama pulls an emergency powers act, might even activate NDAA and all those new powers. In short Democracy is suspended during the unrest. Election delayed giving hum more time to assure an win.
Reply
- - cobra
    April 18, 2012 at 7:30 pm
  - Beck was saying that for over three years.
  Reply
- - Rich
    April 18, 2012 at 7:42 pm
  - Excellent analysis, but you didn’t follow it to the end. Riots, martial law, THEN the purges WSI is talking about. That’s the entire point of generating a fake mob, generating fake violence, activating a martial law that shouldn’t even be activated: TO GET THOSE POWERS.
    
    Then, in the confusion that follows, using those newly activated powers, purge your opponents. I’ve always thought before the election is too soon to do it for the Global Communists, but maybe their hand is forced.
  Reply
- Bunny
  April 18, 2012 at 5:52 pm
- I started re-reading a little book I’ve had for years by Paul Tournier entitled ‘To Resist or to Surrender’ which was written in 1962. I had no idea of the relevance to today. A few excerpts if I may:
  
  During the war, a young, German theologian “foresaw the catastrophe to which the mad adventure of the Third Reich was heading. But what after that? Who could rise up from the ruins? What could he himself do for his country? He was not so much concerned with the political or military aspect of his people’s destiny as with the moral. His nation had been poisoned by Nazi” (read Progressive/Socialist)”ideology. It had penetrated into all the areas of professional and social life, especially among the younger people. *TEACHERS HAD TO INCULCATE IT; JURISTS AND PHYSICIANS HAD TO APPLY ITS LAWS, directly destroying the dignity of men…” *caps my emphasis.
  
  He then singled out the church for not being involved in God’s revelation in order to make it the “basis of social life…Had she not, for centuries already, withdrawn from the concrete problems of the world? What had she done to help solve the tragedy and shame of German UNEMPLOYMENT, for example, which had SERVED THE NAZIS AS A SPRINGBOARD TO POWER? Was it so strange that a FALSE PROPHET SHOULD ARISE, CLAIMING TO HOLD THE ANSWER?”
  
  At this point I put down the book. So familiar, so chilling. The United States of America was indeed given God’s revelation in order to make it the “basis of social life”… and I would add morality. Ayers et al have been formulating this plan since the 50′s & 60′s. If Hussein somehow is re-elected, they will indeed celebrate. Get on your knees and not ask, but beg God for forgiveness and divine intervention.
  
  WSI, you and UM and WHI may just be at least part of that divine intervention…ponder that and help in anyway you are able.
Reply
- 57th State
  April 18, 2012 at 6:10 pm
- I have listened to the interview very closely. I can’t be the only one to notice that Axelrod never utters the words Social Darwinism. Wallace is the one who mentions it (twice). It is also in an audio clip when said by Obama. That being said, I think the words that do hit the mark, was when Axelrod said, “it is not about bake sales, it is not about VOLUNTEERISM…”
  
  Ding ding ding, those are the magic words. By December 1936, Hitler Youth membership (Hitler-Jugend, aka HJ) stood at just over five million. That same month, HJ membership became mandatory for Aryans, under the Gesetz über die Hitlerjugend law. This legal obligation was re-affirmed in 1939 with the Jugenddienstpflicht and HJ membership was required even when it was opposed by the member’s parents.
  
  It is clear to me that the Occupy movement is the 21st century version of the HJ.
Reply
- E.A.B.
  April 18, 2012 at 9:17 pm
- You want to see Social Darwinism? Look at Obama’s connection with Zero Population Growth (now known as Population Connection).
  
  ZPG was founded by Paul R. Ehrlich, author of “The Population Bomb.” John Holdren, Obama’s Science Advisor, is an ally of Ehrlich and ZPG. Holdren, Ehrlich, and two other scientists had made a (losing) wager with Julian Simon, in which they bet on a prediction based on the principles outlined in “The Population Bomb.” Holdren has coauthored papers with Ehrlich. They’ve even written a textbook together, in which they describe solutions to overpopulation, from contraception and abortion all the way to forced sterlization.
  
  Obama believes in the “population bomb.” He believes there are too many humans. Mandatory contraception coverage, unlimited abortion, and Obamacare’s health care rationing are all part of his plan to save the Earth from humanity.
Reply
- - Jules
    April 18, 2012 at 10:57 pm
  - All a part of what John Paul II called The Culture of Death.
    
    “The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy.”* The Left aligns itself with The thief, The Enemy.
    
    But, the Lord says, “I am come that they may have life, and may have it more abundantly.”*
    
    It is good vs. evil.
    
    *John 10: 10
  Reply
  - R. J.
    April 19, 2012 at 3:10 am
    
    Agenda 21…look it up. Very Scary
    Reply
    - Jules
      April 19, 2012 at 12:04 pm
      
      Oh, I know, R.J.
      
      Reply
    - AmericatheBeautiful
      April 20, 2012 at 10:34 pm
      
      Look up Soros buddy. Maurice Strong….and puke.
      
      Reply
      - R. J.
        April 20, 2012 at 11:38 pm
        
        I detest that piece of human debris like no other. He is truly the face of evil and a more perfect ” Bond villain” never existed. George Soros is Dr. Evil and a complete sociopathic megalomaniac.
- - bill o'rights
    April 20, 2012 at 11:49 pm
  - If these S.O.B.s want to decrease the surface population, declaring war on civilians would certainly achieve that goal.
    
    I would like to remind EVERYONE that, should such an action be directed against citizens embracing their 2nd amendment rights, it might not be the portion of the population the instigators intended.
  Reply
- Dan
  April 19, 2012 at 6:02 am
- The creation of the economic emergency in Germany both allowed the rise of Hitler, but also elicited such a rise.
  
  And that rise of Hitler, and Hitlerism, also saw the fingering of the scapegoat for who was responsible for the economic emergency.
  
  They created the economic emergency, they identified the scapegoat, and they also advanced the emergence of Hitler.
  
  Remember, Germany DELIBERATELY INFLATED their currency, so as to devalue it beyond any worth whatsoever. And then they used that devalued currency to make their Versailles payments. The devaluation led to the utter eradication of the German Middle Class, which left them vulnerable to the prescriptions of Hitler.
  
  It wasn’t just the poor or the bitter that swelled the ranks of those supporting Hitler, but the crucial MIDDLE CLASS that sided for him over the German Communists.
  
  The center in Germany collapsed, so the populace had two choices, right or left. BOTH the Fascists and the Marxists were of the Left really, so the choice was something of a charade, because whether they chose the National Socialists or the International Socialists, the German people were going to get stuck with socialism either way.
  
  So, remembering all of that and understanding it, —- what’s happening in the USA?
  
  Obama and the Fed are WILDLY inflating our currency.
  
  They’re creating a false floor of our currency, of our entire economy.
  
  And they’re going to rip it away.
  
  This is going to wipe out, as in Germany, the livelihood and the savings of the Middle Class, which means the WHITE middle class.
  
  That’s the racial war part of what the Wall Street Insider describes, in addition to things we’re seeing like in the Zimmerman case.
  
  Once the false floor is ripped away, they’re going to seek to force the American people of the need to do away with the dollar. They’ll say the dollar can’t be saved, so the only remaining option is to go with a new currency that’s backed up by economic forces beyond that of the United States and the Fed.
  
  It’s all a plan.
  
  You can’t establish the kind of global governance without reducing American power, without reducing American economic predominance.
  
  So long as a country, any country, retains control of their currency, then that country is still sovereign.
  
  The Left intends to eradicate American sovereignty, and they’re doing that not just by idiotic treaties, idiotic agreements like the Law of the Sea Treaty, but also by setting the foundations for that fundamental disintegration of the economy itself, by destroying the dollar.
  
  Wall Street Insider has understood the war against the dollar, and has understood the reasons behind the war against the dollar.
  
  And he knows the forces, the creatures, the agenda behind that war, and exactly what they hope to achieve.
  
  Furthermore, to destroy the dollar, requires allies beyond the Fed participating in its destruction, participating in the creation of that false floor.
  
  Wall Street Insider obviously has a very good understanding of exactly who those creatures are too.
  
  Soros is one of ‘em.
  
  But Soros can’t do it on his own.
  
  There are others.
Reply
- - bill o'rights
    April 21, 2012 at 12:07 am
  - WOW!!!
    
    Given a thousand years, I could not come up with a better way to articulate this! Absolutely 150% dead-on!
  Reply
- Dan
  April 19, 2012 at 6:16 am
- One more thing.
  
  There are wider supporting trends, which scholars such as Judge Robert Bork have noted.
  
  In the law we’re already seeing suggestions that American jurists be allowed to reach BEYOND the Constitution for guidance on how to rule, even on cases where the issue isn’t international law, but American law, at first they’re nothing but suggestions, give it another twenty years and it will become accepted practice, after that, it’ll become COMPUSLSORY!}.
  
  We’re seeing suggestions that, as in Great Britain, shariaa courts be established for those who choose not to subscribe to American customs and standards, id est, LAWS!
  
  Economically, there is being fashioned an endless web of regulations, laws, treaties, international forums and boards, all of which are designed to first constrain, them ultimately undermine American sovereignty.
  
  Recall BAT YEOR’s writings on the ongoing EURABIA project. Something roughly similar is in store for us.
  
  Already too we’re seeing demands that America’s immigration laws be responsive to international “concerns.”
  
  The UN recently chimed in on attempts to make sure that American voters present picture identification, so as to limit the incidence of voter fraud.
  
  This is ALL PART of this wider agenda, which is intended to cut America down to size.
  
  Those who desire to see America so humbled, also have plans for Israel.
  
  This is why the Insider become so depressed when UM didn’t immediately pick up on ALL of what’s going on.
Reply
- Dan
  April 19, 2012 at 6:26 am
- Re Social Darwinism:
  
  It’s about the essential rationing of care that MUST be part of obamacare.
  
  It’s Death Panels!
  
  It’s going to be compulsory abortion for any fetus with Down’s Syndrome.
  
  And it will all be done superficially for cost, but really, it will be done for purposes of CONTROL.
  
  The Left wants control.
  
  Recall your Tolkien people! Why did Sauron and Melkor rebel, what was it that guided them? Tolkien answered: THE WILL TO DOMINATE.
  
  Take a good look at the pat down procedures at the airports, which serve nothing so much as conditioning a free people to accept even the most intrusive of searches all because the governs insists on it.
  
  We are being conditioned, as C.S. Lewis would say.
  
  The infirm, the mentally challenged, {such as Governor Palin’s child}, and yes, the AGED, {which is why this issue strikes home for the Insider!} are ALL uniquely at risk of a society that privileges their budget over the lives of their citizenry.
  
  ONLY a secular humanistic mindset could aspire to such control, such limiting of health care.
  
  This is serious shit!
  
  This prelude to Antichrist kind of shit!
  
  This is the type of confluence of trends, thoughts and proposals that really belong more in a sci-fi mini series than going down before our eyes in the United States!
  
  The Insider sees it all, with the remaining light left to him, and it’s all too much to convey in a conversation.
Reply
- - Dart
    April 19, 2012 at 5:23 pm
  - Totally agree Dan. We are in big trouble unless we can turn this thing around.
  Reply
- Dan
  April 19, 2012 at 6:32 am
- Lastly,
  
  Look where the populations are dwindling to the point where they’re not even at replacement levels, such as Italy, Spain, and areas of Western Europe.
  
  Look now where the populations are EXPLODING, ————- areas dominated by islam!
  
  Take a look at Europe’s immigration policy, which assures the disintegration of the whole idea of Europe, of what it is to be European. Take a look at how the city of London has been forever changed, and now changed into Londonistan!
  
  Again, recall the many efforts made in the United States to control the border and immigration policy, ALL SHOT DOWN by either the courts of Washington determined NOT to gain control of our borders.
  
  Again, as I mentioned before, we’re seeing a complete confluence of events, trends, economic forces, monetary forces, policies in Washington and throughout the West.
Reply
- - ThroughTheLookingGlass
    April 27, 2012 at 2:28 am
  - Outstanding commentary and observations, Dan. You are way beyond the usual babel.
  Reply
- doctorate
  April 19, 2012 at 10:04 am
- http://ca.news.yahoo.com/switzerland-criticized-immigrant-curbs-184652638.html
Reply
- - cobra
    April 19, 2012 at 7:35 pm
  - Yep. The PTB do not like nationalism.
    
    Why do you think the Western European were so eager to recognize all the separating provinces from the old Yugoslavia, thus triggering the civil war?
    
    Why do you think we intervened in Serbia to help the muslim albanians, against the serbs, friends with us, having fought with us in the WWII, who were defending their historical land (Kosovo)?
  Reply
- Jules
  April 19, 2012 at 1:50 pm
- As for TPTB plans for our currency, I don’t quite get all the plans and minutiae of their schemes, but the NWO/UN/Globalist- types have broadcast in various ways their “We are the World” lunacy for over 40 years.
  
  Scroll down to “Make a Move and the Bunny Gets it”
  http://www.tradewithdave.com
Reply
- - Bunny
    April 19, 2012 at 9:49 pm
  - Most certainly the Bunny gets it!
  Reply
- Dart
  April 19, 2012 at 5:19 pm
- Axelrod has been a friend of Jarrett since 1991 (or perhaps longer) that was about the time that the Iranian born Jarrett asked Axelrod to mentor Obama.
  
  I knew we were in deep trouble in 2007 when Obama ran. I sold my home and moved out to a rural area before the crash. I didn’t want to be near the city anymore, I knew with this guy in the WH we were in deep trouble as a nation. Even back then I could see the parallels to Nazism with Obama…I keep waiting for these people to have their ‘Night of Long Knives.’ If Obama gets in again, we are sure to see it…and then the killing of all who do not comply will start in earnest.
  
  Indeed Nazism has come under new management…
Reply
- - ThroughTheLookingGlass
    April 27, 2012 at 2:40 am
  - Maybe not a “Night of Long Knives”, but Barry & Co. have certainly begun eliminating those who could oppose or call attention, ie: Bill Gwatney, Kam Kuwata, Andrew Breitbart…
  Reply
- Dart
  April 19, 2012 at 7:06 pm
- Also…the thing that seems to be happening is this, and it seems even clearer now that I have been reading WSI’s interviews (God bless him)… all the Democrats, Obama, Jarrett, the whole Occupy mob, the NBP’s and all the other race baiters, are simply tools for bringing down the USA as fast as possible. To be sure, there are even more malevolent hands at work behind the scenes. The goal… a one-world governmental system, one that includes the total destruction of capitalism, Israel and all traces of Christianity….and though we have only a slim chance of stopping this demonic juggernaut, in the short run…it will not be held back for long. The devil is in the details… literally.
Reply
- Crystal
  April 19, 2012 at 9:11 pm
- History is re-written by the victors to secure their continued power.
  
  As a former teacher, it became increasingly apparent over the years that many historical periods we were required to teach had facts that were misinterpreted, made into an outright lie or purposely omitted. (Or completely destroyed – witness the Library at Alexandria and the holes it left in collective knowledge.) Certain time periods are never touched and others continually repeated ad nauseum to the point students mentally check out it’s such mind-numbing repetition. Repeat the lie long enough, wear them down with boredom, and people will accept whatever you say as truth.
  
  Ulsterman, you have provided a beautiful new venue for those who have those missing pieces of history to bring it back into the light for all to see. My deepest thanks to you, your insiders, and to all who share their piece of the puzzle here.
  
  WE are rewriting history here with the truth. WE are the ones who are victorious because they can’t stop this flood of knowledge. The pressure is about to break the dam on the truth embargo.
  
  WSI: Every day is a gift. That’s why they call it ‘the present.’ Thank you for what you’ve gifted us already…… Blessings Be!
Reply
- - bill o'rights
    April 20, 2012 at 4:35 pm
  - Crystal,
    
    You bring up an incredibly important point.
    
    With that in mind, I would like to point out one of my biggest pet peeves, with regard to the revisionist history taught in our schools.
    
    If you ask most kids these days why we fought the civil war, most will tell you, ‘Well, it was fought over slavery.’
    
    This is a lie!!!!
    
    Far and away, the central issue that triggered the Civil War was the issue of states’ rights, and the assertion that states have sovereign rights that protect them from a federal government seeking to usurp additional powers for which they are not entitled. It could be argued that the federalist actions of Lincoln were in defiance of Constitutional law.
    
    To this, I would ask if it is any wonder that Obama has often tried to channel his ‘inner Lincoln’, for the propaganda purposes. The Obama administration has been waging a war against states’ rights, in an effort to usurp powers they aren’t entitled to.
    
    A perfect example of this is the DOJ’s blocking of voter ID laws when, in fact, the Supreme Court of the United States has already UPHELD voter ID laws.
    
    This is tyranny!!!!
  Reply
  - cobra
    April 20, 2012 at 7:49 pm
    
    Not to mention the constant effort of the “City” bankers in London to “submarine” the USA, since the successful revolution.
    East India Company lost a fortune due to our revolution.
    Reply
- Aussie
  April 20, 2012 at 11:56 am
- I will have to read this in detail at a later date, but flicking through the first part of the interview I was struck by the mention of Rupert Murdoch and how he is being treated around the world. This is spot on.
  
  I live in Australia and you might not have heard about the media inquiry (more like a Star Chamber than anything else). The thing was run by Finkelstein a leftist. The witnesses were left-wing nut jobs. News Limited has some of the biggest circulation of newspapers in Australia, especially the Melbourne Sun-Herald, and the Sydney Daily Telegraph. The opposition is owned by the Fairfax Group and we refer to them as Fauxfax for obvious reasons. The whole inquiry was a witch hunt against some of the journalists at the Sun and the Telegraph, in particular Andrew Bolt, Piers Ackerman, and a couple of others got specific mention.
  
  The true hate mongers accused Bolt etc of being hate mongers, and News Ltd is referred to as the hate media. The problem is that it is not true. Since Julia(r) Gillard aka Juliar Dullard has been Prime Minister it is a crime to take an anti-globull warming position. The Fauxfax press continue with the alarmism despite the deluges that we are having at the present time…. anyway the whole thing has been an attack on our right to Freedom of Speech. It was specifically an attack on Rupert Murdoch.
  
  In other words WSI has captured what took place here in Australia as well as the inquiry in the UK where the News Ltd people did in fact do the wrong thing… but not in Australia.
  
  BTW…. one person who demanded that the Government must have that inquiry was leader of the Watermelon aka Green Party, Senator Bob Brown (of fellow Earthians fame) and his deputy, but now leader the extremely dull and boring Christine Milne (a know-nothing). The point here is the role of the Green Party (the Communists in disguise).
Reply
- 57th State
  April 20, 2012 at 2:03 pm
- I haven’t seen this commented about here yet, but it seems that there is an ill wind “blowing” over at the State Department…..
  
  http://www.buzzfeed.com/mhastings/whistleblower-alleges-top-us-official-got-blowjo
Reply
- - Obeline
    April 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm
  - Read Peggy Noonan on “America’s Crisis of Character” –
    
    ” . . . People in politics talk about the right track/wrong track numbers as an indicator of public mood. This week Gallup had a poll showing only 24% of Americans feel we’re on the right track as a nation. That’s a historic low. Political professionals tend, understandably, to think it’s all about the economy—unemployment, foreclosures, we’re going in the wrong direction. I’ve long thought that public dissatisfaction is about more than the economy, that it’s also about our culture, or rather the flat, brute, highly sexualized thing we call our culture. . . ”
    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303513404577354221282508372.html
  Reply
- - Jules
    April 20, 2012 at 7:21 pm
  - Today just happens to be Brett McGurk’s birthday. Will he blow out the candles on his cake, or have someone else do that?
  Reply
- PerpWalkThemThruTheRoseGarden
  April 21, 2012 at 3:35 am
- Let’s give credit where credit is due. Long before Ulsterman (& WHI/WSI) appeared, Glenn Beck was warning us about Valerie Jarrett, et al. Here is a report (see link below for complete article & backup links) from Sept. 2009 on the topic:
  
  “Glenn Beck Exposes Valerie Jarrett’s Radicalism
  By Ben Johnson
  POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 16 2009 11:44 PM
  
  Thanks to Glenn Beck, the nation is beginning to see how high up the Obama administration’s chain-of-command radicalism is embedded. The problem doesn’t originate with Van Jones or some low-level staffer with ties to ACORN, but where the buck stops: the president, his wife, and their closest mutual friend and adviser Valerie Jarrett. On his radio show Tuesday, Beck interviewed Scott Baker, now of Breitbart TV, a self-described “news junkie” who clearly did his research on Jarrett.[1]
  
  Jarrett’s relationship with the Obamas, incoming administration radicals, and a socialist revolutionary who says she “probably” rejects violence (and allegedly offered Rod Blagojevich access to Obama’s fundraisers if he appointed Jarrett to Obama’s senate seat) filled up 4,000 words in my article for Monday’s FrontPage Magazine. Jarrett is, by all accounts, the closest friend and adviser to the first family. Obama says he doesn’t make a decision without her, and Jarrett described her relationship with the president by saying, “We have kind of a mind meld.” That’s scary, since she recruited Van Jones, Regulation Czar Cass Sunstein, and FCC Chief Diversity Officer Mark Lloyd.[2] Administration staff said without her intervention, white advisers may have rejected “the often-legitimate concerns voiced by black leaders like [Al] Sharpton.” It’s more disturbing yet to explore the claustrophobic social circle of extremists she is facilitating into the White House.
  
  Michelle Obama owes her career at Chicago’s city hall to Valerie Jarrett. In turn, Jarrett owes her secular career in real estate (at a firm called Habitat) to Marilyn Katz, an SDS radical who showed Days of Rage protesters how to fuse nails together to throw at oncoming police officers in 1968 Chicago. She is now a high-powered PR exec for Chi-town government agencies, a 40-year associate of former Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers, and according to Michelle Obama’s biographer, a vibrant part of the Obamas’ social circle. She spent the next 20 years fighting for a socialist “revolution” and promoting groups like the ACLU, Mother Jones, and UAW Local 719…”
  
  LINK: http://www.newsrealblog.com/2009/09/16/glenn-beck-exposes-valerie-jarretts-radicalism/
Reply
- Obeline
  April 21, 2012 at 4:42 pm
- It’s astounding how much information vetting Zero & Co. was available in 2008 prior to the election – but no one paid attention. Further revelations posted in 2009 gathered some steam, but still remained virtually buried.
  
  Given where we are today, this is nothing short of a travesty. The Lame McCain Campaign in 2008 set this country back decades as Zero was allowed to win based on a platform of white guilt.
  
  “In 2008, there’s no way in hell the MSM ever would’ve ever allowed the news that Obama ate a dog to kill the richness of their beloved Seamus narrative, and no one would’ve been able to force them to.
  But it’s not 2008 anymore.
  It’s 2012: The Era of New Media and Citizen Journalists.
  Get on Twitter.
  Start a blog.
  Fight the power.”
  http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/04/18/Power-new-Media-Obama-Ate-Dog
  
  Fool America once, shame on you, Zero.
  Fool America twice, shame on us.
Reply

WALL STREET INSIDER: “Obama Is Pulling The Mask Away For All The World To See”

About the Ulsterman

217 Comments to WALL STREET INSIDER: “Obama Is Pulling The Mask Away For All The World To See”

Leave A Response Cancel reply

Recent Comments