Senator Feinstein’s Very Specific Code Word Regarding Barack Obama

Readers of the Ulsterman Report will understand the significance of what longtime California Senator Diane Feinstein meant when she used the term “Anschluss” in describing the dangers inherent in the Obama administration’s leaking of classified information to further the president’s political standing.  It was a remarkable moment likely understood only by those already in the know…

Here is the exact phrase spoken by Senator Feinstein aimed directly at Barack Obama:

What we’re seeing…is an Anschluss, an avalanche of leaks. And it’s very, very disturbing. You know, it’s dismayed our allies. It puts American lives in jeopardy. It puts our nation’s security in jeopardy.   LINK

The term Anschluss is most often associated with Nazi Germany – namely the reunification of Adolph Hitler’s native Austria with the German state – a move that was forbidden by the post WWI Treaty of Versailles.  Casual observers of the Feinstein interview were likely confused by the Senator’s use of the term, or simply ignored it altogether.

I would ask that UlstermanReport readers take a moment to enlighten those you know as to the actual significance of what Feinstein alluded to in using a very specific term with such significant historical importance.  That enlightenment begins from a White House Insider report several months earlier when no other media reports suggested there was any rift between one of the most powerful and influential Democratic members of the United States Senate and the Obama White House – I ASK THAT YOU NOW TAKE JUST A BIT OF TIME TO RE-READ THIS VERY IMPORTANT INSIDER INTERVIEW:

_____________________

UM:  Focus on the Senator…your friend…that campaign…

Insider:  Right-right…the Senator…they are smacking up…right up against the union vote.  Killing it.  Kinda outta the blue on that…an odd thing.  So you have them doing that…you got that other operative…he’s facing jail time…all this happens at about the same time.  All of this…they are closely linked to my friend.

UM:  The one who later died?

Insider:  Yes…that’s…that’s right.

…and then in 2010 you got my friend going directly against the Obama administration – working against their candidate of choice.  And you need to remember…California…Obama lost the primary out there.  That plays a part in this…the president needed to lock up this position.  That 2010 election was much more important to him than folks realize…and my friend…I’ll repeat it again…he was working against the Obama White House in 2010.

UM:  Did your friend’s candidate win?  The campaign they were working on?

Insider:  Noooo…the Obama candidate won…and my gut says that left my friend…it left them exposed.  Losing that election…if he had won it…like I said…he would have had a very powerful weapon against Barack Obama.  But he lost…and that loss…that’s when he really started talking about what happened in Denver in 2008 – at the convention…that’s when I heard about it, not just from him, but a few others.  So that means he was talking more…I think he was worried…and then it certainly came to the attention of…others.

(Long Pause) …he would be dead within months of losing that election.  Timing…timing is everything huh?  Coincidence?  Maybe.  Maybe not…

…and the Senator…they don’t get out of this unscathed either…their entire…my understanding is their entire campaign fund…gone.  Taken.  And THAT is going down around the same time my friend dies.  Again…you wanna call that coincidence?  How much coincidence can a fella take before they start to question what the f-ck is going on?  That’s where I was at at that point…what the f-ck is going on?

Insider:  What if you had certain groups…unions, foreign donations…whatever…they needed to get money – talking a sh-tload of money to Obama back when he was runnin’.  I say this as somebody who experienced how much cash was floating around that campaign – it was unbelievable.  Money was never an issue.  NEVER.  It was everywhere…and how…no way they raised all that money on the up and up. You just knew people were getting around the donation limits – had to be.  There was…there was so much damn money in that campaign.  Staggering.

UM:  How does that relate to…to the theft from the Senator’s campaign?

Insider:  What if the individual responsible for that theft…what if they were acting as some kind of laundering organization?  And what if she represents a small fraction of the entire fu–ing operation that all ties back to the administration?  Tens…hundreds of millions?  Billions?  Who the f-ck knows?  The entire election system…the funding…what if it’s all corrupted?  All of it?

This is out there stuff…I know.  Sh-t yeah…I know…but what if my friend…he figured it out?  Maybe it was that…maybe I’m way the f-ck off  the mark here.  But…you know the Obama campaign…somethin’ like $300 million…maybe more…probably more…it’s not disclosing those donors?  It hasn’t yet?  They never will.  A ton of donors…laundered in…hidden from view…and that kind of money…you can buy a senator…you can buy a judge…you can buy…

…You’re willing to kill for it.

UM:  How’s that possible?  $300 million?  Undisclosed?

Insider:  Yes it’s possible – it was DONE.  This president – Obama…he did it.  Is doing it…and he’ll do it again…his people…they will do it again.  And maybe this time…maybe they’re up to a billion dollars…more?  Nobody knows.  Money from China?  Pakistan?  Iran?  Libya?  Nobody fu–ing knows.  That’s what I’m trying to lay out here…and I know it’s a convoluted mish…mish-mashing mess…that’s how they get away with it all.  Make it all so damn…messy.  You can’t follow it all…it’s impossible.

UM:  But you think your friend might have been…looking into this stuff?

Insider:  I do.  Or something related to it…they were onto something.  Let me try and summary – summarize it all up here.

You got a guy who is found dead.  Alone.  50-odd years old.  Been missing for a coupla weeks before they are discovered.  No signs of foul play.  The coroner comes out and says natural causes – no investigation.  None.  Now this person…they are kinda high profile…they got links to presidents for f-cks sake…and NO INVESTIGATION into cause of death?  That’s a huge alarm right there.  HUGE.

So this person now dead…you look back the past few years.  They got a story…an awful strange story about the President of the United States.  Soon after that story happened, they have a business associate getting charged – now going to jail.  Good chance this individual was told about that story…and maybe more.  Or maybe…coincidence?

You got a U.S. Senator…powerful Senator…they come out against the administration shortly after the events in Denver.  Not long after.  Why?  Just politics? Or something else?  Then again…maybe just coincidence.

You have my friend in 2010 battling against the Obama approved candidate for a position that could provide the means to take on the administration – full on.  Now this campaign is going down less than a year before my friend is to be found dead.  Coincidence?

Follow that up with the Senator who then has their campaign fund robbed by a person who once headed up a group called Californians for Obama.  Coincidence?

And let’s talk about that time when my friend died.  How the Senator…the words they used to describe that death.  “No one knows HOW.  No one knows WHEN.  No one knows WHY.”  My gut tells me that Senator may not know the answer to the first two…but they know…yes they know the answer to the third.  And that statement…those words were chosen very carefully.   And then they follow it up with speaking out BEFORE the president on the only real achievement the administration can try and claim as a victory – the Bin Laden killing?  This senator is the one to make the first public announcement – not the president?  And they chose to do so at the memorial for my friend?  Coincidence?

No…this senator was sending a message.  They knew the real deal about Bin Laden…or some of it.  They knew enough to challenge…if backed into a corner they would…they would challenge the story the White House was gonna come out with – the story that painted Barack Obama as a hero.  The senator was telling the White House to back off…

…you can snuff us out…people like me.  But to take on a sitting Senator…even a president has to proceed with caution on that…especially if that senator has the goods, and I am pretty certain this one does.

So there’s that story.  You think it’s got some value?  Fine…publish it.  Whatever.  I’m gonna go back to work on Holder…get him out.  He knows all of this sh-t.  All of it.  Get him gone…and it’s gonna be a campaign issue now.  They delayed it…the administration…Issa played along…now it’s a campaign issue.  Murderers.  All of them.  Fu–ing murderers…

____________________

FULL INTERVIEW HERE:    WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: I Hung My Head…

260 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

88 Comments to Senator Feinstein’s Very Specific Code Word Regarding Barack Obama
    • Kat
    • Oh my goodness. Once again I read your reports and sit back in amazement at how well it all falls into place. Gave me the chills.

    • ThroughtheLookingGlass
    • I have a question regarding the ‘chanting’ incident. Did WHI say what language the chanting was in? Was it English? Or some other language that was chanted/sung/audibly meditated?

      Good for Dianne Feinstein. Time she spoke about about more than just the leaks on national security. I have a feeling she knows about more leaks of information that go back a few years.

      • Kay112
      • In the original article, WHI stated it was a chant and UM cross questioned him. He (WHI) could not recall how the chanting was discribed to him for he was passing this story on to UM. WHI said it was a word something like Greg… UM asked if it was Gregorian chanting? WHI replied that is what was told to WHI! It was a Gregorian chant or something like that!

        (I believe I have summed up in paraphrase form what took place in the first posting of that chant in newsflavor. However, I may not be 100% accurate because it has been quite some time ago. There was never mention of what language was spoken. Seems as though there was mention of possibly poppys involved.(I have no clue how poppys would have related to the chanting which was overheard.))

        • ThroughtheLookingGlass
        • You have a great memory. Mine is not so great at times. Did he say poppys or poppers? Poppys are what opiates (heroin) are made from! Someone in the comment section on the original post mentioned that after that weird incident he gave the famous convention speech with the greek columns and blink, blink, blink, blink-ed his way through it. Does the morning call to prayer in Arabic sound like gregorian chanting? –which is in Latin, if memory serves me right.

          Barry is so deep into disconnect that it’s no wonder he can’t ad lib without having to walk back his comments later, or stammer or stutter or aaaaaaaand his way through a press conference.

          Looks like the Obama house of cards is beginning to fall with more momentum than before….

    • Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
    • Not even Hitler encouraged foreign armies to attack his own country.

      Omoslem does so every day.

      If you’re a successful terrorist, you get away scott free. But if Omoslem’s FBI ignores his orders and actually arrests you, you get a show trial near Ground Zero.

      Worst-case scenario, you get detained at Gitmo with your own custom-built “Professional Soccer Field.”

      • ThroughtheLookingGlass
      • I saw that interview live. That has to be an ominous assessment for those at the WH that haven’t learned to STFU. In her attempts to blow Barry up to beyond a life-sized image of a puppet pResident, Valdemort Jarrett just may have severed the tethers and sent him into another orbit. I hope there are enough brass-balled Congressmen to bring articles of Impeachment against Barry. God knows there’s enough acts of treason and malfeasance to charge him with.

        • Juanita
        • She said on CNN that she is waiting for some information that she asked for before she makes a decision appointing a special counsel. I wonder what she asked for.
          She needs to use her powers and get Holder the hell away from this investigation.

      • IS
      • Interestingly enough, Watergate was featured discussion on major news network this morning. They went into detail everything surrounding the investigation into Nixon and his role in that scandal.

        I thought to myself, why would they be bringing that up now? I think I know why.

        • ITYS
        • The corruption of Obama makes Nixon look like an amateur!!!

          Woodward and Bernstein are a disgrace, the corruption and scandals of this administration are overwhelming and their silence is deafening and lacking in all credibility.

          • ThroughtheLookingGlass
          • Both Woodward and Bernstien are editors now, Washington Post and Vanity Fair respectively. At this stage in their careers they are above the fracas of investigative journalism on par with their 1970′s accomplishments. In this day and age of electronic journalism, I imagine that the investigative journalists are the little known writers on internet news sites. Perhaps The Ulsterman is as close as we get these days.

    • SheilaK
    • Okay you guys out there who can put this stuff in plain english better than me: Summarize for me what the heck is being said here. I know there was an operative killed somehow connected to Senator Frankenstein but honestly I am lost.

      • Kat
      • This lays it all out SheilaK, and a lot of it was put together by UM readers who are very smart about this stuff. The WHI left the crumbs and the readers followed the trail. Basically Senator Feinstein has been going at Obama for a while. She had a very close friend and operative who was found dead. He was pretty young. It was called “natural causes” and there was no autopsy. He was the one who ran the 2008 convention in Denver where Obama came out like some Greek God. There was some really weird behind the scenes stuff going on right before he came out. Then this same operative tries to defeat an Obama approved politician in CA. They are found dead a little after that. This lays it all out. It is very scary and what is even more impressive is that all the people being talked about in this have since been mentioned in the news and connected very closely to Obama including the woman who might be the next Supreme Court Justice and the guy who might be the next Attorney General. Whoever UM Insider is, he layed it all out for those of us willing to pay attention. I am paying attention now. Took me a while but I am now. Here is the link. Sorry it took me some blabbing to get there. :)

        http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/22/the-death-of-a-political-operative-the-troubling-timeline/

        • ThroughtheLookingGlass
        • Good re-cap link that pretty much says it all. If Dianne has an axe to grind, she is within her rights and justified. Thing that puts her in a class of her own, she’s going about it legally…as opposed to eliminating the opposition through Chicago Thugocracy methods.

          The dominoes are beginning to fall….

        • ITYS
        • Amazing kudos again to WHI, WSI and UM!!!

          And Feinstein has been retaliated against by having her campaign coffers stripped dry. IMHO this is so incredibly significant that it’s Senator Feinstein taking the lead on these intel issues. She is chair of the powerful Intelligence committee and she is sending a LOUD and CLEAR message to BO. Normally a senator from your own party would have spoken quietly to the WH about this…..she has taken him to the woodshed VERY publicly for the past several weeks and she is demonstrating real alarm and real concern over national security–which is frankly the one true job of the POTUS.

          I’m hopeful she is the statesman we are desperately in need of and have been waiting for……

          • ITYS
          • BTW….the young Dem operative (50y) found dead and the bs line of “natural causes” is exactly why that phrase raised the ire of many of us when it was used about Andrew Breitbart too!! And then repeated again AFTER an autopsy, which is utter nonsense since the determination of a cause is the purpose of an autopsy and that term s not used medically.

            • Kat
            • Totally agree w/you. And remember that at the funeral of her friend Senator Feinstein said two very interesting things. One was spilling the beans about the Bin Laden killing before Obama had even announced it. The other was how she didn’t know HOW or WHY her friend had died. And I agree that when someone that young is just declared dead of natural causes and then there is a rush funeral with no autopsy? Very weird. And maybe no coincidence that him and Breitbart both died in CA and had crossed Obama in a serious way?

    • truthandjustice
    • You commenters here have researched and know more about all this than I do….all I know is something is surely “brewing” and something has to “give” soon. I noted how seriously she said “this has to STOP!” I’m wondering just how many Congress people know the whole sordid, evil story of Obama & regime and their evil plans for revolutionary takeover? If she is warning them, does that mean she actually has what it takes to bring them down? Did she not know before but now has been awakened? WHI involved?
      Seems to be a turning against Obama from many Dems. I was wondering if these leaks would wake up some people to action, even though it might be disastrous for them. How many patriotic Dems do we have exactly?
      I’ve always been worried about them in cahoots with enemy countries and would even allow them to attack us if it benefits them or so they think. Let’s just say I wouldn’t put it past them. Traitors abound like cockroaches and into everything. I pray so much for exposure before it’s too late.

      • Stirrin the B.S.
      • @TaJ – I think you are on target. I have to believe that Feinstein is of the classic liberal-democrat school, not the current socialist-liberal-democrat school. And I pray that she will do the right thing, even if it means taking her party out for the next eight years (or more). Because, some one in the demoncrat party has to step up and acknowledge that the loss of power for eight years is nothing compared to the loss of our country for (how many?) years.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • One wonders did the WH know this was coming? If this chess game includes Patrick Firzgerald we’ll have a better understanding of just how many are in the tank … If PF surprise retirement includes a place in this investigation … Expect holy hell

      The Obamunist is cagey so be prepared. This evil cabal will not go willingly…

    • charlotte
    • There may be a rebellion inside the DemoKKKrap party which may be imploding:
      http://directorblue.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/we-are-now-watching-democrat-party.html


      • Former Clinton Adviser Lanny Davis Goes Off On Obama Aides: “You Have Vicious People Who Are Working For The President”

      • Clinton’s Tax-Cut Position Undercuts Obama Stance

      • Ed Rendell: Obama ‘hurt by being a legislator only’ before presidency – “Former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell… made his latest swipe at the president Thursday morning in an interview on CBS’s “This Morning.”

      • Bill Clinton On Romney’s Bain Ties: ‘This Is Good Work’

      • Booker’s big mouth ruins relationship with Obama, Cabinet hopes
      • Deval Patrick, Democratic Governor, Creates Obama Campaign Headache By Defending Bain

      In short, the Democrat knives are out for Obama. But why is all of this happening now?
      a Tsunami is about to wash across the American landscape like nothing any of us have ever seen before.

      And after the Marxist Left splinters the Democrat Party into tiny little shards, it will be time for we Constitutional Conservatives to take on our next challenge.

      Because our work won’t be done.

      Our next task will be to replace the cowardly, Rockefeller-style leadership of the Republican Party with patriots who are more interested in saving the country than their own pathetic hides. Our next task is to continue to put the United States back on the road of Constitutionalism, the greatest system of government ever devised by man.”

      • Stirrin the B.S.
      • Well stated Charlotte – I am 100% in agreement with your assesment. The crime of the establishment Republicans has been exposed, now it is time to implement the tea party agenda and take back our country.

      • ITYS
      • I think Diane Feinstein’s (I’m actually no fan of hers) actions are different than thevrestnofbthe Dems who appear to be imploding or hell bent on having Obama implode. Feinstein appears genuinely upset and concerned about national security, I’m not saying the others don’t, I’m just saying her approach is completely different based on all the other issues addressed above. The Rendell, Booker, Clinton, Lanny Davis scenarios seem more about democratarty survival!! Clinton, ever the opportunist is likely more about HRC, but all of them are no where as LEFTISTS as Obama and his corrupt cabal!!!

        • E.A.B.
        • Even for a Democrat, I’ve always thought Senator Feinstein was “on the level.”

          She’s one of the “old school” Democrats–though we may often disagree with her views on what’s good for America, she does what she does for America.

    • E.A.B.
    • I think the WSI interviews are even more relevant here. WSI is intently driven by parallels between the Obama administration and the rise of Naziism in Germany.

      I suspect Feinstein didn’t use the word “Anschluss” purely for the sake of historical allusion. I’m betting WSI had something to do with this–another signal to those he’s been trying to reach.

      • Kat
      • That is a great point! And I do remember WSI saying it was time he called in some favors from some Democrats to help go to war against Obama!!! That totally makes sense now. For her to use a term that ties so close to Nazi Germany about Obama was no accident. And yes I think WSI has his influence all over this!!! I really do admire him. Whoever they are.

    • Obeline
    • It is hard to imagine that anyone with half a brain could have a comfort level with an investigation into something of this magnitude – BEING LEAD BY TWO US ATTORNEYS WHO ARE ERIC HOLDER’S DIRECT REPORTS.

      It’s the fox guarding the hen house.

      • Jules
      • No kidding!

        What is it with this moustachioed race-baiter? Why do they all quake in fear around him? Rep. Issa, who, by the way, should just go grey already (that dyed-black heinous stuff he tries to pass off as hair on his head is ghastly), was, in effect, recently saying, “Just sacrifice a few underlings – anything, please give me something, someone, so it can look as though I am making progress here.”

        What in the world…? Eric the Red doesn’t look so scary to me, but boy, oh boy, he must have the goods on pert near all of ‘em.

    • IS
    • Here is my take on it.

      It is indeed very interesting that Diane used the term Anschluss in the context of her interview. I saw it this morning but missed the part where she used that word, so I am not sure if the transcription above is exactly how she meant it to be heard. Or maybe it was, but she was shielding the public from something she really knows is happening.

      She mentions what is going in on “an Anschluss”, which refers to a joining of two political entities. In the transcription above, that term is immediately followed by “an avalanche of leaks.” These two things, Anschluss, and leaks of information are completely different from one and other. It seems as though that if the transcription is correct, she has a specific reason for putting two completely different terms in once sentence unless they have something to do with one and other.

      If what she meant is that if there is an Anschluss going on [a joining or consolidation of two political entities], that it is being expedited as a result of the leaks. An effect followed by the cause of that effect. Or something. lol

      If there is a consolidation, or joining, perhaps even annexing of another political entity [country perhaps, but not necessarily], I put my money on Russia.

      • IS
      • Ok, I watched the video in the link. After the moment she says Anschluss, then immediately follows it by avalanche of leaks, its almost as if she either tried to correct herself [like in someone who made a Freudian slip], or she was carefully and specifically inserting a code word as UM suspects. Giving us a clue that she knows something.

        Also, an Anschluss does not have to refer to a country, it can also join two entities economically.

        I say Russia because of the on mic statement Obama said to Russian President Medvedev stating he would have more flexibility after the election, and also because Obama’s giving of islands off Alaska to Russia recently, among other things.

    • west1890
    • Breitbarttv website has a story that quotes Pat Caddell as saying that Tom Donilon, Obama’s National Security Advisor, is the source of the leaks. Blockbuster of a story if it proves to be true.

      • Kat
      • If that is true, WHI named Pat Caddell as one of the good guys of the Democratic Party. This is all tying together. All of WHI and WSI and what they are doing. And I think it is so amazing we all get to watch it and in our own way be a part of it!!!!

      • AmericaTheBeautiful
      • Blockbuster indeed…please consider that Donilon
        was also the inside guy with Johnson at Fannie
        and Freddie ….that brought the entire House of cards known as our economy —down …through mortgage theft..the CRA …Community Reinvestment Act…also as an attorney at Mcevany and Meyer …Donilon’s law firm sued by the FDIC… You know this scum has been working with his cronies to take our banks down through theft
        Of forced failures of our banks… by theft and fraud using the government
        Insurance FDIC… to steal the wealth of America

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • I know there are those who dismiss such beliefs as happy talk. They claim that our insistence on something larger, something firmer and more honest in our public life is just a Trojan Horse for higher taxes and the abandonment of traditional values. And that’s to be expected. Because if you don’t have any fresh ideas, then you use stale tactics to scare the voters. If you don’t have a record to run on, then you paint your opponent as someone people should run from.

      You make a big election about small things.

      And you know what – it’s worked before. Because it feeds into the cynicism we all have about government. When Washington doesn’t work, all its promises seem empty. If your hopes have been dashed again and again, then it’s best to stop hoping, and settle for what you already know.

      http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-obama-really-bari-shabazz-fugitive.html

      • AmericaTheBeautiful
      • Obama’s acceptance speech seems to be exactly the “tactics” he is using against Romney…Obama is the one with a record to run from…Obama has no fresh ideas…Obama speaks to scare voters, and paint his opponent as something he is not….rather than address the issues and stand for his record… yes we have seen this before.

        But what is to hide? The above link addresses the scare around Mr Shabazz’s head…that UM seem to be directing us to last January. One must ask…who exactly is Barack Obama…and where did he come from…and what exactly are those scars on the back of his head….and is that why he will only let his longtime barber cut his previous hair….odd + odd = very odd indeed

        • ThroughtheLookingGlass
        • Then it isn’t a stretch to say that Donilon is working to bring down the roof on the US security as well as the economy. I think we need to look closely at this guy.

          Thing about Barry’s tactics: That’s exactly the way he ran for senate. He eliminated his opposition, completely discredited them with allegations that may or may not have been true. That was the same thing he did with McCain/Palin. Discredit and eliminate. That way his record doesn’t matter! As if he’s the only game in town! Ha!

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • America the beautiful
      January 22, 2012 at 6:29 am
      Timeline:

      Kam hears what he is not supposed to hear and tells others November 2008

      March 2009 Kam business partner Hank indicted by the Attorney General Cuomo later Governor Cuomo, soon to prison, also an aid of Feinstein

      November 2010 Kam works against Obama choice for Cali AG, someone who could investigate all the illegal
      Donations to Obama’s campaign from overseas. Obama yet to answer for these illegal contributions

      April 2011 Kam missing for two weeks and found dead…murdered?
      Obama announces sympathy for his aid who helped to “capture” the country

      Bin Laden killed and announced on May 4 2011
      Same day as Kam memorial, Feinstein beats Obama out by 1 hour in the announcement stealing his thunder
      Though Feinstein and intelligence knew of Osama whereabouts since Jan 2011

      Feinstein and other Dems reelection booty and possibly million of campaign funds stolen by woman who managed 400 different bank accounts….including Obama’s Cali monies….if she had considered talking she is now clear to shut up

      Feinstein charged with ethics violation…

      Obama’s AG in California threaten FDIC and will not follow the law on failed mortgages. She will set new terms of her choosing further damaging housing values, the standing banking system and perpetuating the housing crisis. All distend to redistribute value and monies as has been legally recognised by law since the beginning of the United States of America. This will lead to the government deciding who should or should not have a house regardless of who earned a house or paid for a house.

      Any Dem at any time and probably and GOP can be taken down if the powers that be decide to
      The raw FBI files and wholesale theft by our politicians has been a game changer

      What politician is also a patriot and will call foul on the capture of our banking system, our greedy politicians, and the subversives in power? If we all stand on the sidelines it is exactly the same as the ovens that awaited those in Nazi Germany …simply a modernised version. How very Soros this entire scheme is. He has managed many by greed both in Wall Street and in the buying of our politicians. Thus far only Ulsterman along with WHI and WSI have the guts
      to speak out and try to rescue our captured country. If there is not more light shed on this, the illegal purchase of our voting system will do as one insider called it…America is over.

      • Kat
      • Great job America. Totally agree w/you. We are in real trouble here. Thank goodness we have the alternative media to at least try and get the message out there to other people. UM, WHI, WSI, and people like you who are so good at putting all the stuff together in a way people like me can understand. Thank you!!!!

      • Obeline
      • DiFi/Kam for Dummies – thanks!

        Some of this stuff gets so confusing – it really gets the point across when the details are linked so cohesively . . . especially to others who may not be following so closely.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Wonder how many consider that Jack Wheeler went missing …and Kam was unaccounted for for 2 weeks before being found dead…and we’re they debriefed before being murdered…how very KGB of them…

    • Name Nancy
    • Which high – ranking traitor gave Nicholas Schmidle the information he printed in his article in The New Yorker Magazine just 3 months after taking down OBL? Many of us seriously believe that the article nailed the coffins shut of the Navy SEALS -Team 6, who were sent on a wild goose chase in a slow-moving helicopter.

      The security breach about the Dr. who helped us find OBL is currently serving a 33 year sentence, & the endangerment of his entire family characterizes & defines the word TRAITOR to that person who leaked the intel on the OBL episode.

      • Nona
      • Agree Charlotte …all that looking down to search for the “right words”..many aaands and errr.etc….long pauses…too many for it to be honest discourse.

      • IS
      • If you notice, at around the 3:30 mark, his eyes and mouth make a slight upturn. Its almost as if he has a slight arrogant smile as he starts his denial of his White House leaking the info. The slight glimmer returns when he starts talking about how the leaks affect the military and the country’s safety. I took it to read like this:

        “I know who leaked the info and why, and I am going to get away with it but I have to seem like I am against it. You are all fools, and look at how good a liar I am. And the stuff about the safety of others such as the military? You should know by now that safety of the military and American citizens is exactly why I leaked this info. I WANT their safety in jeopardy because then things will go to complete chaos. Its all part of the plan you idiots, and I am going to get away with it.”

    • Connie Tea
    • Mommy’s very angry….
      Di-Fi wouldn’t buck the party if they were still in love with the Chicago Jesus, she’s too smart for that. She’s got a lot of power and she’s a lot smarter than Pelosi or Obama. If she’s calling him out publicly, the Dems have got to be behind her.

    • Nona
    • US News Politcal posted from the AP..

      The AP reports, “Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Republican Rep. Mike Rogers suggested on CBS’ Face The Nation that they’re willing to see how prosecutors conduct their investigation before considering whether a department-appointed special counsel should take over.” According to the AP, Rogers “says he’ll be watching for signs of undue political influence,” while Feinstein “says she believes Obama’s assertion that the White House wasn’t involved in the disclosures.” Rogers, also on CBS’ Face The Nation, added. “It was because of the parade of leaks that I think Sen. Feinstein and I both stood up and said, something has got to be done about this. … It shouldn’t be a partisan thing. This should really be about catching the folks who are leaking some very damaging national security information.”

      Be alert to whom next may be appointed. The other two are direct reports to Holder.

    • InTheKnow
    • SheilaK asked ‘what is being said here?’

      Sheila: As others have mentioned, this appears to be about Feinstein’s (DiFi) history with Obama and, as Ulsterman mentioned, her apparent used of coded language to make a point about potential national security leaks.

      As others have said above, Anschluss is something which had to do with the coming together of Germany and Austria before/during the rise of the Third Reich. DiFi could have used any other historic reference she wanted to, but she deliberately chose Anschulss to make a point about leaks. Why is that?

      What many people are speculating about here, and I think they are correct, is that DiFi made sure to use the Anschluss reference as a way to signal people of Wall Street Insider’s (WSI) class as to what she may feel this administration is up to, or who they are similar to. In order to let those people know that it is time to stop this administration before Obama becomes re-elected.

      What this coded message parallels, and someone can please find the correct link for this, is WSI’s discussion with Ulsterman (UM) regarding an interview Obama aide David Axelrod had recently with FOX News’ Chris Wallace in which Wallace made sure to bring up the term ‘Social Darwinism.’ Like the ‘Anschulss’ reference, the Social Darwinism message seemed intended to have listeners remember what other political entity was linked with Social Darwinism. Unsurprisingly, Social Darwinism and Anschluss are both tied, in memory, to the same political entity of the 20th Century.

      In short, then: What DiFi was saying, with her reference, seems to be part of a continuing pattern of word choice meant to stir powerful people to help ally against Barack Obama for this fall’s elections.

      Just to finish off the point, the Anschluss was something which I think the allies came out against before the Treaty of Versailles was singed in 1919. And it was made known that the allies were against the Anschluss through a series of leaks to, I believe, the French press. So, DiFi was correct in her analogy, it’s just not an analogy you are likely to hear for the rest of your lives. As in, yes, it seems very intentional that she chose it.

      As interesting as the DiFi situation is, what I am concerned about now is that the Spain bailout was approved. To me, this seems like some of the Global Elites working to engineer Obama’s re-election. If Europe crashes, the USA market will follow. Thus, any shoring up of the European markets will help the USA market, at least in the short term. And that means less economic problems for Obama before the election.

      WSI has told UM in the past that he is only one Elite, and there are other Elites who are still very much behind Obama’s re-election. There have been whispers of the Elites abandoning Obama, and thoughts that such a decision could be unofficially made at Bilderberg 2012, which recently concluded.

      I hope that is correct, and that the Spain bailout is just the European Elites taking care of Europe. But I’m skeptical of that. What is likely to take place, right up through Election Day, is a kind of Battle Of The Titans between Elites on both sides, ones who want Obama re-elected and ones who want him defeated. And this includes, I think, lesser Elites who are in the Democratic Party who are split on whether Obama should stay or go in 2012.

      If Obama is to be beaten in 2012, it will take, I feel, a coordinated team effort that must include Democratic Party officials, as well as a number of people at the WSI level. It is not going to be easy, and it is by no means over yet, I don’t think. I can’t wait to be able to say it is over, and I will be the happiest person in the world if it comes out later that Bilderberg 2012 did say, basically, that Obama will be voted out in 2012, with their help or approval.

        • Obeline
        • ” . . . Battle Of The Titans between Elites on both sides . . .”

          Politics has always been like this . . . and we saps have the illusion of democracy and choice?

          Nothing shy of a landslide for Romney has a chance to break the lock.

      • bill o'rights
      • Just read this, after posting my own comment.

        Spot on analysis. I’m curious to see whether or not we see an outpouring in the MSM. Either the tide continues turning or Obama’s winning.

      • ThroughtheLookingGlass
      • Agree this is a spot-on analysis. That’s the big picture. Now lets focus on all the little paper cuts that are undermining Barry’s chances: 1. Fast and Furious; 2. Security Leaks; 3. It’s the Economy, stupid! 4. Clinton’s and others walk-back comments 5. Barry’s own walk-back comments and misspeaks.

        I think that if allowed to continue on his speaking path, Barry will put his foot in his mouth and destroy his own chances for re-election.

        I think the one major asset the American people have going for them is that they are not STUPID, like the Demoncrats would like us to believe. Luckily, Romney has an excellent PR team reminding us just how stupid we could be if we re-elect the great pretender.

      • IS
      • INK, when you said:

        “And it was made known that the allies were against the Anschluss through a series of leaks to, I believe, the French press. ”

        That did it for me. I knew what the general term meant, but couldn’t effectively explain why she put that word before the mention of the leaks. This has to be the connection. Its an analogy. Perfect!

        By george I think you’ve got it!

    • bill o'rights
    • Here’s my interpretation of events:

      We have the strange death of Feinstein’s senior assistant and the theft of her campaign finances. Next, we have her comments at the funeral, including the leaking of the Bin Laden raid…

      Keep in mind, also, her role in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. If you read the minutes, you’ll note that it’s Senator Feinstein who insists Americans must be exempted from the provisions of section 1021 (indefinite detention), even though it is the Obama administration who insisted on section 1021′s provisions in the first place.

      Now, we have this interesting comment about Obama’s ‘Anschluss’ moment.

      I think it’s safe to assume that Senator Feinstein has powerful friends in the intelligence community, given her role on the Intelligence committee.

      I see this as evidence of a schism between the intelligence agencies and Obama’s administration and intelligence shadow government. Clearly, Fienstein is aligned with the patriotic elements. I see this as a bonafide threat. Thoughts?

      • bill o'rights
      • One additional thought:

        You may recall that the FBI suddenly stopped providing regional fusion centers with daily terror list profiles, a month or so ago, until the media brought into light. Further evidence of a schism, to be sure, but who are the good guys and who are the bad guys?

        • CHHR, VA
        • Our viligence means WE are the good guys – ambiguous responses to real questions means THEY are the bad guys. Don’t allow fillibustering of reasoned and responsible questioning without calling it out and demanding straight talk.

      • werbaz neutronName
      • When you comment that DiFi has “powerful friends” in the intelligence community, I venture that we must be mindful that community is -by and large- a liberal leaning community, as we define liberal (vs. conservative) so that a powerful democrat Senator might be expected to be privy to their comments in a fashion that a more conservative politician might not be. What else we might be expected to deduce from that I do not know. Certainly, she seems to have been blindsided by death of her political associate, as well as theft of her campaign funds.

    • Paloma
    • @ Bill – In regard to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012, and Senator Feinstein’s insisting that Americans must be exempted from the provisions of Section 1021 (indefinite detention), even though it is the Obama administration who insisted on the provisions in the first place.

      In a key ruling defending the freedoms of Americans, a federal judge has granted a

      • bill o'rights
      • I noticed that latest development (and responded with a joyous yell) yesterday.

        I have grave concerns about the state of the MSM, given what appears to be a tidal wave of dissent, both from the general public and hardcore efforts by a number of the elites. Despite these efforts, we still see only a fraction of this covered.

        Why?

    • Randall
    • Democrat Party is imploding. The quasi-adults (Clinton loyalists) are asserting their power against the Chicago thug wing. The Democrats have lost all major elections since Obama was elected in 2008. Lost NJ and Virginia governorships. Lost Senate seat in MA. Lost 2010 elections in (true) historic landslide. Lost House/Pelosi as Speaker. Just lost two referendums(a) in California. Lost Wisconsin, big. They’ve also lost public sector unions. I doubt they can win the presidency anymore, but larger questions loom.

      How will Romney govern? Will he be able to effectively stem the tide of debt and worldwide economic collapse? Will society escape in tact, or will civil unrest commence here and globally? If Romney fails, then what? The Democrat Party will be in total shambles… The Republican Party establishment – personified by Mitt Romney – will be defunct. The Conservative wing, ever powerful, could very well likely have to confront the neo-libertarian wing of the Party… i.e. the Paulists.

      More importantly, will Romney take consistent principled stands that defend the Constitution? If he does not, he very well may spawn a third – or fourth – party.

    • shakedowncrews
    • WHI failed to mention a very important possible source for $$$: VENEZUELA.
      The congreessional black caucus had been taking trips to Venezuela to meet with Chavez for several years prior to the 2008 election. Need a name? Sheila Jackson Lee. Also, the leaders of TransAfrica including DANNY GLOVER. “TransAfrica analyzes U.S. policy towards Venezuela and develops products, forums for dialogue and delegations to support the Afro-Venezuelan civil society movement. TransAfrica has participated as U.S. electoral accompaniers during February 2009 Constitutional Referendum and September 2010 Legislative Elections; both were observed as overwhelmingly free, fair, transparent and secure.” I was THERE, it was not “free, fair, transparent or secure”.
      But anyway, Chavez illegally smuggled money into many countries to manipulate elections. He was convinced in 2008 that Obama would be another “Bolivarian” candidate. Countries to which he smuggled money include: Argentina, Ecuador, Peru, and Mexico. He was caught red-handed in Argentina.
      How was this done? Money was laundered through non profit organizations which in turn donated money to campaigns.

Leave A Response

* Required

-->