Barack Obama’s White House Of Lies – In Their Own Words

Please take just a moment to review the following quotes and then tell everyone you know that Barack Obama’s White House has engaged in an all out campaign of lies and deceptions following the tragic deaths of four American citizens at the hands of a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9-11.  If the Mainstream Media refuses to let Americans know – it is up to all of YOU to do so…

First a quote from Obama White House Press Secretary Jay Carney.  Please understand – Carney’s statement had to have been given FULL APPROVAL at the highest levels within the Obama administration (Valerie Jarrett) prior to his giving this statement to the White House press – a statement meant to denounce comments from Libyan leaders indicating the attacks on the American consulate had NOTHING to do with a largely unknown YouTube video but were instead, an organized terrorist attack against the United States:


“I have seen that report, and the story is absolutely wrong. We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent.  That report is false.”  -Jay Carney, September 14th.  THREE DAYS after Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in Libya.


Here now are the words of Barack Obama’s Ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, speaking on September 16th – FIVE DAYS after the embassy attacks:

“Based on the best information we have to date … it began spontaneously in Benghazi as a reaction to what had transpired some hours earlier in Cairo, where, of course, as you know, there was a violent protest outside of our embassy sparked by this hateful video.

Make no mistake, Ambassador Rice was TOLD to make those prepared remarks to the media.  She was sent out by the Obama White House to do so.  And note her comments start out with the very strong declaration – “BASED ON THE BEST INFORMATION WE HAVE TO DATE…”

SIX DAYS LATER we have this quote from Obama White House Press Secretary Jay Carney – the same individual who aggressively denounced reports of Benghazi being a terrorist attack as “ABSOLUTELY WRONG” less than a week earlier:

“It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials.”

Ok,  then – now look at this headline from today PROVING the Obama White House actually KNEW that attacks in Benghazi was in fact an act of TERRORISM that had NOTHING to do with the silly anti-Islam video.  Barack Obama and his administration knew within 24 hours that terrorists were to blame:

US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm

And this quote from that same story:

U.S. intelligence officials knew within 24 hours of the assault on the U.S. Consulate in Libya that it was a terrorist attack and suspected Al Qaeda-tied elements were involved…Two senior U.S. officials said that the Obama administration internally labeled the attack terrorism from the first day in order to unlock and mobilize certain resources to respond, and that officials were looking for one specific suspect. The officials said the intelligence community knew by Sept. 12 that the militant Ansar al-Shariah and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb were likely behind the strike. 

Further, an official said, “No one … believed that the mortars, indirect and direct fire, and the RPGs were just the work of a mob — no one.”





US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm


574 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

25 Comments to Barack Obama’s White House Of Lies – In Their Own Words
    • VTX
    • I’m in sympathy with many who say that if Americans aren’t up-to-speed on Obama, then perhaps they deserve him. The example that fits: Israel wants a king, and G0D warns them through Samuel. Still, they want a king. And so they get Saul – who at first appearance is king-like, majestic, tall and regal.

      For those of you who wished for the man called Obama and got something strange, indifferent, un-American, lazy and uncomprehending – for those of you who now recognize this – you need to repent. Not to the USA, not to the government, not to your fellow citizens, not to any group of people or nations. Repent – to G0D.

      Did you get what you voted for? You voted for a god-replacement, and you got this? You voted for a man, not his ideals – which you didn’t understand when you voted for him – and you voted for a messiah, and messiahs are not elected by men. Repent – and then vote as if your life depended upon it. Because it might.

      • truthandjustice
      • Yes, an apt analogy. A lot of the Old Testament stories are analogous to today’s situations. People are still people. And God keeps trying to warn and show us by examples and history but people still are swayed too much by our stubborn, prideful, selfish, human thinking natures…the fallen human condition. Always takes some disastrous event to wake us up enough – but even that doesn’t work many times. Always think and want to do it by ourselves, without God and not trusting or believing in the power of prayer, God’s intervention in lives, etc.
        All I can do is live the best I can to what I believe God desires (with His help, none can do it by “ourselves”), give my own testimony, pray and then leave it up to God (Holy Spirit) to take care of what people decide to do, what happens in their lives and believe – that’s not my “job”..that is the Holy Spirit’s job. I don’t know how all that “works” but I’m not supposed to – I just pray for it to happen.
        And I can honestly say I’ve seen many “real” obvious answers to prayers, miracles. So yes, I agree – without God’s Divine intervention, we will not win. And that depends on how many really “see the light”, repent and come humbly to Him for the help. That’s what our Founders realized and did and why we won the Revolutionary War and were blessed for all these years.
        Now we have another Revolutionary War for this era that will determine what happens to America in what I believe are the “real” end times. But first we must go through whatever just “judgements” God deems for us for all our rebellion and horrific sins for so many years. He is able to intervene in men’s thoughts, circumstances – anything – using His angels to help us if He decides to restore us. Re voter fraud – He can intervene where it will not work as it did in the past and which they are so confident in this time. Anything is possible with God.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Obama knew…Obama had three days advanced.warning from the President of Libya…Obama had advanced
      Warning on September 3rd from the President of Egypt…Obama gave Our US Ambassador no protection…Ambassador Chris Stevens was savagely raped, tortured and murdered…these savages had Cris Stevens for 8-12 horrific hours….
      Obama have him no protection, NO security detail, …he sent the two ex-Seals to be slaughtered …Two CIA heroes who were cleaning up the Obammunists mess..collecting the weaponry cache Obama had given to AlQaeda to take down Kadaffi..,and then haphazardly left behind…

      If this is how Obama protects his government officials, his men who put themselves on the line??? His personal workers and team??
      Imagine what he’ll do for you!!!

      • Publius
      • The real story they want to suppress is that Obama’s infantile need to bask in the spotlight of the May, 2011, Bin Laden killing is directly responsible for the deaths in Benghazi this month.

        During the SEAL raid at Abbottabad, they didn’t just kill Bin Laden, they collected all computer hard drives, thumb drives, laptops, cd’s, notebooks – anything that looked like it might yield intel on Al Qaeda’s worldwide network.

        A real president would have waited a sufficient amount of time to allow for CIA and others to comb through that intel, identify, locate and “neutralize” Al Qaeda operatives all around the world. Instead, Obama ran to the tv cameras only moments after the SEAL team had returned to their base in Afghanistan with the body and all of that exploitable data, to tell the world how he had ordered the mission that killed OBL and congratulate the SEALs for scooping up all kinds of computer data about his Al Qaeda network.

        Any Al Qaeda operative with a working brain who heard about Obama’s speech would have packed up and fled long before CIA/SEAL teams or drones could have taken him out. Just as with Obama’s response to the attack on our Libyan consulate and the assassination of our ambassador (the first since Jimmy Carter’s presidency), one has to wonder whether his actions in 2011 were a result of his stupidity, his incompetence, or something much more sinister. Why would a US President send such a signal to our enemies, giving them plenty of time to slip away from us?

        I believe the Benghazi attack is a direct result of Obama’s self-congratulatory behavior dating back to May of 2011. It is ironic to think that if he had just attended enough daily intel briefings to get a sense of how this system works, he might have listened to those who undoubtedly tried to stop him from running to the cameras, and he might have been able to claim, legitimately and for campaign purposes, that he had struck a death blow to Al Qaeda. But, alas, AQ is alive and recovering well from the death of its leader last year. And we can all thank Barack Hussein Obama for that.

      • truthandjustice
      • Good article, comments interesting too. I knew some but not all. Yes – Muslims/Communists united…been busy for many decades and now we are at the very end where they make their big push to seal it. Here is a good one on background of what the Commies have been doing in our schools: (excerpts)


        “Conforming the masses to their way of thinking requires all the sophisticated tools and tactics developed at the various “behavioral science research” institutes and “education laboratories” established first in England, then in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, and finally in the United States. If these psycho-social engineers win their battle against an unsuspecting public, they would “wash” away individual thinking, free speech and all the other “rights” that have made America unique. The vacuum would be filled with lofty ideals, enticing images and deceptive promises designed to mold minds that match their global vision. Group thinking and other controls and “incentives” would enforce compliance.

        A new mental “framework” is vital to this paradigm shift .. But to launch the new system, the old patterns must be blurred and broken. The educational establishment knows that children who are fed a daily diet of biblical truth will resist their plans for change. They also know that students bombarded with strategic suggestions and idealized pagan images will probably reject Christianity. If schools can build the “right” kind of framework or filter in the minds of children early enough, the new global beliefs will fit right in. In other words, the battle for the hearts and minds of America’s children will be won by the side that first trains children to see reality from its point of view.

        This shift from factual education to feeling and experience-based learning began over SEVENTY YEARS AGO. Through the decades, the strategies used to manipulate minds in the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany were developed, first at the Tavistock Clinic near London and later at Germany’s Frankfurt School (originally called Frankfurt Institute for Social Research). Their mind-bending methods soon spread to a rising number of psycho-social research centers in America. They were fine-tuned at Columbia, Harvard, Stanford and other American universities, at our regional educational laboratories [7] and at the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies where Elian Gonzales was remediated in preparation for his return to a Communist system….

    • charlotte

      Bombshell: Obama Administration Deleted State Dept. Memo From Internet After Discovering Al-Qaeda Was Behind Benghazi Attack

      Yesterday there were reports that the Obama Administration found out that Al-Qaeda was behind the Benghazi consulate attacks within 24 hours of the assault that killed four Americans.

      So what was their first action?
      Did they secure the compound? – No, that took over a week to get FBI agents to the consulate
      Did they acknowledge it was an Al-Qaeda attack? No, Obama this week blamed the terror attack on a YouTube protest.

      Here’s what they did – They scrubbed a damning State Department memo from the internet–
      On Wednesday September 12, 2012 blogger Speak With Authority discovered that five days before 9-11, the US State Department sent out a memo announcing no credible security threats against the United States on the anniversary of 9-11.

      The Overseas Security Advisory Council, who posted the memo, is part of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security under the U.S. Department of State.

      Here is a screengrab of the memo at the OSAC website:read the rest

      • Publius
      • It is my understanding that FBI still has not arrived on-scene in Benghazi to begin forensic investigation. FBI thinks it’s too dangerous for their people. So, 16 days after the attack, the consulate and “safehouse” compound remain unprotected and any evidence that might have been relevant to their investigation is probably long gone, or so degraded that it would be useless at this stage.

        Of course, only Obama and Holder would pursue this bloody terrorist attack as a criminal matter to begin with. If we learned nothing from the 9/11/01 attack, we should have learned that such attacks are acts of war.

    • VTX
    • I’d dissected Ms. Rice’s commentary – in her interview, comparing her to an amateur poker player, and suggesting that she might not be up to being an assistant to an assistant to an assistant to a food vender for the State Department. Her mannerisms, her emotional displays – she would have been reprimanded on Judge Judy.

      Carney – Jay Carney – is beyond a bubbling, babbling idiot. It is one thing to spin the President’s positions; this man is a psychopath.

      Hillary Clinton is probably going to have a health emergency. I had thought this a few years ago, but the pressure on her to toe the line to this Idiot in Chief has to be more humiliating that the prospect of Monica telling Bill’s love secrets. That was a joke – the affair – even though it was painful personally to her. This is real humiliation. I expect to see something from her that will make Obama’s wee parts shrivel.

      Obama is probably the “strategian” who came up with both Fast and Furious and this latest operation. Jarrett may have contributed – a little – and perhaps Holder? Not likely: Obama is a famous plagiarizer. He hasn’t had an original thought in his feeble little brain – but Holder isn’t dumb enough to take a second dip into that kind of hot stupidity.

      They have left no room for doubt: incompetent, lying, butt-covering, incompetent agenda-pushing FnF manipulation or…treason? I needn’t make the case for treason; it is there by exclusion. If it’s not incompetence or agenda pushing, it’s the latter. Documents were not guarded – perhaps by design.

    • Concerned_American
    • This whole mess perfectly fits Oblamo’s mod-us operandi. When things go wrong, Nothing is EVER his fault. And on those rare occasions, when things go right, he steps up and brags about how he was personally responsible. I think he is emulating Kim Jong Un the little boy king.

    • Ace
    • Romney’s running a worse campaign than McCain right now. I hear people saying to wait, he’s waiting for the right moment to strike. That moment has long passed. We’re still waiting for him to begin his campaign. He sure did a great job of destroying Gingrich though, didn’t he? As you know, Gingrich would have been hammering “Obama” 24/7. According to Romney, “Obama” is a swell guy. He got good and dirty against his fellow republican though.


    • Obeline
    • High time – and hopefully not just some statistical anomaly.
      Romney’s got to decimate Zero in the debates:

      New poll: Romney overtakes Obama on terrorism

      The foreign-policy results of the new Bloomberg National Poll haven’t gotten much attention yet, but the survey contains some bad news for the Obama campaign. According to the poll, Mitt Romney has a 48-42 advantage over Barack Obama on the question of which candidate would be tougher on terrorism. Romney, in other words, has encroached on one of Obama’s signature strengths.

      What makes this result so surprising is that the president has consistently trounced Romney when it comes to counterterrorism. A Fox News poll earlier this month found that 49 percent of respondents trusted Obama to do a better job than Romney in protecting the United States from terrorist attacks, compared with 41 percent who put their faith in the Republican candidate. The president had a 51-40 advantage on handling terrorism in an ABC News/Washington Post poll around the same time, and a 50-35 edge on carrying out the war on terror in an Ipsos/Reuters poll in August. The Democrats’ rare national-security muscle was on full display at their convention, where speakers boasted about the administration’s successful raid against Osama bin Laden and targeted killings of al Qaeda leaders.

      The Bloomberg poll contains other grim findings for Obama — such as declining approval of the president’s diplomacy and a neck-and-neck battle between Obama and Romney on flashpoint campaign issues such as energy independence, Chinese trade practices, relations with Israel, and Iran’s nuclear program (61 percent of respondents were skeptical about Obama’s pledge to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon). There are also bright spots for the president, like healthy skepticism about Romney’s promise to designate China a currency manipulator and Obama’s continued advantage over Romney on the question of which candidate would be better suited to handle a Mideast crisis.

      Significantly, Bloomberg’s survey, which was conducted from Sept. 21-24, is one of the first polls to come out since the wave of anti-American protests in the Middle East. The key question: Is Romney’s terrorism advantage an anomaly, or a sign that Obama is more vulnerable on national security after the unrest in the Middle East and the administration’s shifting account of the deadly attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi?

      Given that a separate poll this weeks shows Obama besting Romney on national security among likely voters in swing states, it may be too early to answer that question.

    • Obeline
    • GREAT piece . . . hopefully, ACCURATE, too:

      It’s Over

      By William L. Gensert
      Give up — Barack Obama has won. With the election only weeks away, it is clear from recent swing state polling that Mitt Romney has lost this election. According to the Quinnipiac numbers, in the battleground states of Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania, the president is ahead by 10%, 9% and 12%, respectively.

      Romney can’t win. Just ask any journalist or newscasters. He is toast — stick a fork in him.


      If anything, the closer we get to Election Day, the more apparent it is that Obama is not only losing, but losing big. The Obama campaign, and by “campaign” I mean members of the media and polling organizations, is trying to convince prospective Romney voters to believe that all is lost — in which case, they hope, we will stay home.

      But just because they say so, that doesn’t make it true.

      Everyone knew from the outset that Obama, with his sad record of continuous failure on almost every front, was going to air out his inner bitterness and envy, and campaign negatively. But did anyone suspect that his sole hope for victory would rest on trying to suppress the vote of his opponent with naked media bias and polling — most of which assumes a higher Democrat turnout than in 2008, when the electorate, many Republicans included, swallowed whole Obama’s vision of “hope and change”?

      Well, three and a half years later, the digestion of that particular meal has given America and Americans an ulcer — a bleeding ulcer. I can attest to that — every time I see the man or hear him speak, it makes me sick to my stomach.

      It is ludicrous to maintain that Obama, a curiously small giant of humanity, is ahead anywhere in this nation by 10%. The recent meme of the inevitability of Barack Obama is merely the delusional desperation of sycophantic minions. What else do they have? What else can they say?

      The polls allege Obama is ahead by 10% in Ohio (or should I use the Hawaiian spelling, “Oiho”) — a mining state — where part of the economy depends on King Coal and the money it brings in. This is the man who, through his agents at the EPA, has singlehandedly destroyed the coal industry in America.

      He is said to be ahead by 12% in Pennsylvania — also a mining state, and home of the Marcellus Shale natural gas field. Yet even the uninformed know that under Barack Obama there will be no drilling for oil, mining coal, or building nuclear power plants. And probably in a second term, the EPA will shut down fracking, which means no natural gas either.

      Yeah…he’s way ahead.

      In Florida, he is leading by 9%. It is beyond belief that the state, with its large population of seniors and Jews, is going to vote overwhelmingly for the man whose signature legislation, ObamaCare, decimates Medicare and who has marginalized and insulted Israel repeatedly during his entire term. Remember, he had time for Whoopi, but not for Netanyahu.

      And let’s not forget that Florida is a state with no state income tax. In fact, many people move there for that reason — how do you think they got Lebron? Yet we are supposed to believe they will vote for the man who gave us 20 new taxes through Obamacare and plans to raise taxes all around? And if you don’t think his proposed one-year extension for most of the Bush tax cuts, set to expire January 1, 2013, is not a plan to let all tax rates rise a year later, you haven’t been paying attention.

      Yeah…he’s going to win big there.

      The truth is plain to see. Obama is not going to pick up any new voters with his record of economic destruction and the misery he has foisted upon the electorate. He will bleed support as his base withers away in the harsh glare of the Obama reality.

      Take his vote total from 2008 and subtract out some portion of the voters who bought the dream but lived the nightmare.

      Then, subtract out some portion of the youth vote, who have discovered that hope means no jobs and student loans they can’t pay, while change means whatever coins they can find underneath the cushions of their mother’s sofa — in whose house they are relegated to live because of poor prospects and lack of opportunity.

      Remove the women who don’t agree with abortion on demand and contraceptives for all — free and clear.

      Remove the Catholics and other religious “folks” (a favorite Obama term) for the same reason, in addition to his assault on religious freedom, support of same-sex marriage, and antipathy for insulting the prophet of Islam, while accepting any slight on the Judeo-Christian American tradition.

      …Oh my goodness, did I just hurt the feelings of Muslims by not capitalizing “prophet”? I anxiously await the knock on the door from the Obama secret police.

      Remove the Jews who are appalled at his treatment of Israel and his obvious sympathy for Islamists.

      Remove the sensible, who recognize Obama’s impotence in the face of Iran’s steady march toward acquiring a nuclear weapon. After all, we have nothing to fear from Iran, a nation whose leaders continuously call for the destruction of Israel and America.

      Take out all those people who can no longer afford the drive to work, now that Obama has allowed the price of gasoline to double during his tenure.

      In addition, many blacks, who have suffered most under this man’s policies, will not be there for him this time around. They may not vote against him — racial solidarity, and all that — but many will certainly stay home.

      Remove the voters who do not like the fact that for Barack, the buck always stops at Bush.

      Simply put, people will not go out of their way to support someone who has tortured them into submission for three and a half years. Even though they may not tell pollsters that.

      With that in mind, can anyone say there is the same level of electoral enthusiasm for the president as there was in 2008?

      For many supporters, who still believe in the myth of Obama but are not so far gone they cannot see what he hath wrought lo these last few years, a second term for the president is like a colonoscopy — they have to say yes. But really, who looks forward to it?

      The once unstoppable Obama movement has constipated to a halt. He was once a god, and now he is man — a nasty, unsuccessful man, who blames everyone and everything for his serial failures.

      After all is said and done, what is he left with? The same hardcore group of delusional ideologues who would vote for him even if they came home from work and caught him beating their grandmothers to death with his Nobel Prize — but these voters were never in play anyway.

      Obama is going to lose in a landslide. And Barack Obama, the media, and the polling organizations will be appropriately shocked.

      Shocked, I say!

      Round up the usual suspects.

      September 28, 2012

    • liveforliberty
    • Please look up Walid Shoebat recent posts about movie maker. One of these is his cousin and the name that media is saying is not his real name and he is a known terrorist. I think it’s entirely plausible that operatives set this whole thing up. They arrange the movie which is only a trailer. They supplied Libyans with weapons to make an attack which they would use to put us under sharia law by banning criticism of Islam. Call it fast and furious for middle east only it backfired and some of our people were killed.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • What won’t Obama LIE about?? When you Lie about your parentage…When you hide that your father is a man classified as “an enemy of the state” by the FBI and Congress…how could any expect he would be anything but a communist bent on th e destruction of the USA…when ones father was his sexual partner…his mother a porn model….How could he be anything but a raging communist lunatic???

      From the Daily Caller

      Now it’s getting REALLY dirty: Outrageous film claiming Obama’s mother once posed for pornographic pictures is sent to a MILLION swing voters
      The film claims that Mr Obama’s real father is left wing poet and Communist party activist, Frank Marshall Davis
      100,000 copies of the DVD, containing extraordinary claims, have already been mailed to voters in Ohio with up to three million more planned to go out
      As Mitt Romney lags in the polls the material could be potentially damaging for the Obama campaign
      It has already won the support of Alabama’s Republican Party chairman Bill Armistead

      More than a million voters in swing states are being sent an anti-Obama documentary that claims the President’s mother once posed for pornographic photos wearing bondage gear.
      The shocking – and totally unfounded – claims made in the DVD represent a new low in the election dirty tricks war and are likely to trigger outrage in the White House.
      ‘Dreams From My Real Father’, made by a right-wing film-maker who is a long-time critic of Obama, includes images of a woman it claims is the President’s mother Ann Dunham clad in leather gloves, boots and a corset posing seductively on a couch.
      The film also alleges that Mr Obama’s real father is left wing poet poet and Communist party activist Frank Marshall Davis, and that Ms Dunham’s marriage was a ‘sham’ to cover this up.

      Accusations: An outrageous video is alleging that President Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, starred in pornographic photo shoots and that his real father is really Communist activist Frank Marshall Davis (right)

      Porn star: ‘Dreams From My Real Father’ the DVD includes images of a woman its maker says is Ann Dunham, clad in leather gloves, boots and a corset posing seductively on a couch
      The extraordinary claims are the latest twist in the debunked ‘birther’ conspiracy which has raised questions over Mr Obama’s past.
      But they could have serious consequences as more than one million copies have been mailed to voters in Ohio, a key swing state where Mitt Romney is lagging in the polls.

      ‘Are you better off than you were four years ago’? SNL mocks President with comic line-up featuring victims of struggling economy
      Election day? More like election month! Voting kicks off in key swing states as up to 40% of Americans could cast ballots early
      Some 100,000 copies have also been sent to voters in Nevada and the same number to New Hampshire – with up to three million more still to come.
      It has even won the support of Alabama’s Republican Party chairman Bill Armistead who has said: ‘That (the film) is absolutely frightening. I’ve seen it. I verified that it is factual, all of it. People can determine.’

      Argument: Tea Party members are suspected to be behind the funding of the DVD made by Joel Gilbert and research that went into the website
      ‘Dreams From My Real Father’ claims that the President’s family history is an elaborate lie
      The real story is that his mother’s marriage to Barack Obama Sr was a sham to cover up her affair with Mr Davis, who Mr Obama has referred to as his ‘mentor’.
      Mr Davis supposedly photographed Ms Dunham whilst she was pregnant with Mr Obama and sold the photos to 1950s magazines with titles like ‘Bizarre Life’, ‘Exotique’, and ‘Secret Pleasures’.
      In one the woman – there is no proof offered that she is Ms Dunham – is posing wearing the corset, gaudy earrings and a large necklace with her hair cut short.

      Claims: A website for the DVD entitled, Dreams from My Real Father, compares photographs of a young Mr Davis with Barack Obama’s high school photographs presenting them as similar

      Like father like son? Mr Gilbert’s DVD claims that Ann Dunham’s marriage to Barack Obama Sr is a ‘sham’ to cover up her affair with Mr Davis (right)
      In another photo she sits on a couch staring into the camera and in the other she is putting on an elbow length black leather glove.
      In a third she is reclining on the couch with her buttocks clearly visible and in others she is naked apart from a pair of high heels.
      In the film, a narrator who is supposed to be Mr Obama says: ‘These photos were taken a few weeks before 1960, when mom was about five weeks pregnant with me.
      ‘Frank then sold the photos to men’s mail-order catalogues.’

      Obama’s real mother: 100,000 copies of the video directed by Joe Gilbert were mailed to voters in Ohio claiming that Ann Dunham (front, right)) is not the virtuous woman Mr Obama purports her to be
      The film also claims that Mr Obama’s grandfather was not a furniture salesman but actually a CIA agent.
      The ‘Barack Obama’ narrator says: ‘My election was not a sudden political phenomenon.
      ‘It was the culmination of an American socialist movement that my real father, Frank Marshall Davis, nurtured in Chicago and Hawaii, and has been quietly infiltrating the US economy, universities, and media for decades.’
      According to the film Mr Obama made regular visits to Mr Davis from the age of 10 where he was ‘indoctrinated in Marxism during his formative years’.

      The case: Mr Gilbert has not revealed who funded the video Dreams from My Real Father
      The movie’s director Joel Gilbert said the documentary was the result of two years of research but he is already facing allegations it is a dirty tricks campaign.
      He has refused to reveal who has given him the funding to do so but it there is already speculation that Tea Party groups may have been behind it.
      Mr Gilbert has been unapologetic about his film and said that he investigated the President because he thought he had a ‘passion for class struggle that did not fit with his background’.
      He has said that he turned up ‘convincing evidence that Ann Dunham had an intimate relationship with Mr Davis’ including ’30 photos of her in various compromising states of nudity’.
      Mr Gilbert said: ‘Right away I could see that Davis has a striking resemblance to Obama while the Kenyan Obama looked nothing like him.
      ‘Davis was not only the biological father of Barack Obama but also the ideological father.
      ‘I’ve concluded that the people who were asking: “Where’s the birth certificate?” were asking the wrong question. The real question: “Who’s the father?”‘
      In his memoirs Mr Obama has written how his mother, who was from Wichita, Kansas, met his Kenyan-born father whilst they were both studying Russian at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.
      They married in February 1961 but in August of that year she moved to Seattle to study at the University of Washington.
      Mr Obama was born on August 4 in Honolulu before she left.
      His long form birth certificate lists a 25-year-old student called ‘Barack Hussein Obama’ as his dad, referring to his father.

      Target: Since he took office in 2008, Mr Obama has been at the centre of many right wing theories about his background and nationality including one that suggested he might be an alien
      Mr Obama Sr is said to have finished his economics degree in Hawaii then studied at Harvard before moving back to Kenya in 1964, the year he and Ms Dunham divorced.
      In a separate development the director of the anti-Obama film 2016, which has become a surprise box office hit, has made lurid claims similar to Mr Gilbert’s about Ms Dunham in his book: ‘Obama’s America’.
      In the book, which reached no.1 on the New York Times bestseller list, Dinesh D’Souza alleges that she sent her son to Hawaii just so she could cheat on his father with Indonesian men.
      According to extracts of the book on the Daily Beast: ‘Ann’s sexual adventuring may seem a little surprising in view of the fact that she was a large woman who kept getting larger.
      ‘Learning about Ann’s sexual adventures in Indonesia, I realized how wrong I had been to consider Barack Obama Sr. the playboy … Ann … was the real playgirl, and despite all her reservations about power, she was using her American background and economic and social power to purchase the romantic attention of third-world men.’

      Bold: Joel Gilbert has accused ‘all major American television networks and most Cable News networks of gross violations of the Journalists Creed’ according to a statement on
      Since taking office Mr Obama has been the subject of a number of bizarre claims about his past.
      Right wing bloggers have claimed that the ‘scar’ on his head was evidence he had undergone some kind of secret surgery.
      They suggested it could be anything from a routine procedure to the work of extra-terrestrials.
      The birther movement, which was championed by real estate mogul Donald Trump, said that as the President was not from Hawaii it meant he was not eligible to be in the White House.
      When Mr Obama released the long form of his birth certificate the issue finally went away.
      The issue of Mr Obama’s religion is another point of attack and despite publicly proclaiming his Christian beliefs, some still believe he is a Muslim.

Leave A Response

* Required