Really Watch For Over The Next 72 Hrs…

A little heads up for all of you.

The Benghazi Massacre scandal is really taking root within even the Mainstream Media now – due in great part to Vice President Joe Biden’s oddly phrased throw-the-State Department-under-the-bus remarks during Thursday’s debate.  It is my understanding some Senate DEMOCRATS pushed for more timely hearings on the issue (as in BEFORE the November election) but Reid has, for now, pushed any chance of that happening until after the election.  His doing so may cost him the Majority position even if the Dems maintain control of the Senate.

There is a coordinated effort now underway over the next 72 hrs to continue to place this issue on the forefront of discussion among Americans so as to have it in its rightful place for Tuesday’s presidential debate.

Am hopeful they will succeed in doing so.

 

-UM

553 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

61 Comments to Really Watch For Over The Next 72 Hrs…
    • lovelypeace
    • There’s a part of me that kind of enjoys watching the Dems try to set up these traps, only to watch them fall into the hole themselves.

      Sadly, though, our country is at a point where this kind of behavior is beyond reckless and I hope that the Dems pay for their behavior in a few weeks when we go votes.

      • IS
      • I saw that this morning. The whole thing sounded suspicious. It almost looks like it was a planned release to shore up Obama’s claim Benghazi happened because of the anti muslim video.

      • Lindandy
      • Wasn’t it Zawahiri that made a video statement on 9/10, something about revenge for the drone death of his brother? I can’t recall the exact facts about this because very little has been mentioned about it… but it was on 9/10 and then on 9/11 there were the protests over the anti-Moham*** video that actually came out a few months earlier.

        Also, wasn’t this somehow linked to demands for release of the 1993 WTC bomber?

        I’m sure the Cairo events are all tied together but the Benghazi massacre has overshadowed Zawahiri’s video and the protests in Cairo. I don’t believe the Benghazi massacre and the Cairo protests are directly connected but Zawahiri has decided to jump on the video bandwagon… evidently he forgot about his deceased brother since it didn’t get much attention.

        If anyone can clear up or confirm my facts about Zawahiri, please do so.

        BTW, I agree with IS that this whole thing sounds suspicious. Why would Obama push the video issue 2 weeks later in his speech at the UN unless he had a “Plan B” to support his lie? Sometimes it feels like we’re living in the “Twilight Zone.”

        • Perceptible Future
        • Zawahiri’s 9/10 video was in response to his morning Abu Yahya al-Libi who was sent to Allah-Land. Ambassador Stevens was trying to procure heavy weapons back from CIA-backed Al-Qaeda, hence, the unprotected Stevens in Bengazhi working covertly to secure those weapons back into our custody (think of it as a Middle-East “Fast and Furious” also with tragic results) but the end-game was to insight a crippling blow to our First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech instead of the Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms.

          This Administration is a lawless bunch, actually in the classic sense, a terrorist bunch determined to destroy our Constitution, or at the very least, dismantle it sufficiently to render it ineffective. Either way, their whole agenda is focused on dividing us and destroying us from within.

          Fortunately, many more Americans are waking up and questioning what the hell is going on? And forcing these Communist/Progressives to scurry about trying to find cover to hide under. I’m sure most of you have noticed the subtle change from the Press-titute Media switching their narrative and NOW questioning this Administration?

          I’m sorry folks, they have been “so-in-the-bag-for-Barack” these past four years that it was SO obvious that memories will not so easily fade.

          Our NUMBER ONE Job is to vote these traitors out, in both parties, and replace them with “Common-Sense Conservatives” both Republicans and Democrats, and return to our “First-Principles” to try and restore our Republic. Let us all pray for a restoration and to lead by example by coming together to reasonably argue our positions in the arena of ideas to “Build-up” each other rather than to tear-down our beliefs as such has been the case these past four years.

          There are so many wounds that need binding and hopefully it will start by removing the scourge of “Progressive-ism” out of our Parties and returning to our founding documents.

      • SpeakingOut59
      • I think Hillary was thrown under the bus the day she accepted Secy. of State. (Keep you friends close and your enemies-in this case he got Bill as well-closer.) When Obama made her Secy. of State he also cut her off at the knees from the get-go by naming all those “special envoys” in all the trouble spots. Then, when it mattered the most, she threw herself under the bus with her ineptness.

        • Jules
        • Speaking, “…she threw herself…” Yes, yes she did.

          Hillary is her own nemesis, if that is possible. She has always been on that futile quest for, “… a more immediate, ecstatic, and penetrating mode” of being.

          It was, is, ineptitude, to some extent, but ultimately, I think, it is her own inability to trust anyone else much. She figures that given enough information and power, she can run the show. But nobody, and most certainly not she in this chain of fools, ever has enough information to pull all the strings and keep a grip/control. She set herself up in a way.

          Remember when, as a newly minted Sec. of State, she was sent abroad then upstaged by her own husband on his false-flagish “diplomatic rescue” of actresses from N. Korea?

    • VTX
    • This isn’t a political issue; it’s a national security issue.

      That having been said, it’s outrageous how frequently Obama has tried to benefit from other people’s sacrifices: it’s time he was held accountable for other people’s unneccessary sacrifices – such as the murdered Ambassador and everyone else who paid for Obama’s endzone butt-wiggle.

    • Essa
    • This all brings to mind Obama’s UN speech phrase. ‘The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam’.

      I don’t ever want to hear another sitting President say Islam is a religion of peace, when it has been used for war and tyranny against their own people and now our people.

    • ShainS
    • Why the 2010-elected Republican-controlled House of Representatives didn’t immediately impeach Harry Reid, albeit strictly for political theater, is beyond me … and yes, the House can impeach a Senator (it’s only been done once, in 1798 to Senator William Blount).

      [Of course, it was obvious by their so-called "leadership" that they were too cowardly to properly indict both Obama and Holder.]

      Anyway, they could have impeached Reid for any number of reasons, like say: flagrantly and irresponsibly not passing a budget as required by federal law; and/or the shady land deals in NV, AZ, and who knows where else that netted him over $1 million.

      But then, that would be asking them to uphold their oaths of office, and we wouldn’t want to do that … /sarc

    • VTX
    • Notice how quiet it’s gotten? Some folks are pulling back, unwilling to be a part of a political campaign – but there is still anger.

      I continue to feel sorry for James Clapper; it’s pretty obvious that they have something on him, or he wouldn’t have let himself be the fall-guy for the acting Intel Director, you-know-who. When the Three Stooges protested that they were misled by Intel, it wasn’t Clapper: it was someone who helped plan the movie.

      Perhaps Hillary Clinton was misled – and if she was, you can count on payback. She is one person who does not accept or tolerate humiliation, and that is what they’ve done to her. It appears that she is being kept out of the loop on certain issues that are important to various people – and the security issue is one of them. I’m not defending her, but she WAS in on the UBL operation, while BHO was not.

      I’d like to see the exchange between Jarrett and Clinton in private, I really would, particularly with the revelation in the media – WND – of what WHI had indicated. Hillary came out looking good; Jarrett looked like a washed-up vampire queen.

      But the real ogre in the scene is the counter intel advisor, who called Obama’s “decision” to get UBL “one of the most bravest decisions.” This claim alone makes him a liar and someone who is willing to get even – and probably with Hillary herself. I doubt she’ll do a Clapper; I doubt Bill would let her.

      The salvos should be coming from multiple directions, but not from the professional Intel community, which has been so badly burned by letting BHO have anything to do with anything; it is probably wished that he’d attended 0% of his Intel briefings, and it is probably deeply angered that BHO was allowed to personally carry out assassinations via drone. It appears that they’ve taken away his toys, for now.

      • VTX
      • I don’t think Hillary is going to go under the wheels if she can throw someone else there first: human sacrifice is an accepted ritual in her circles.

      • truthandjustice
      • Very interesting – sort of our Insider for the State Dept. Hmmm…yes, like I said, I hope this highly unexpected fiasco throws a big enough wrench into their evil plans. Also should be interesting in the debate on Tuesday…..

    • Obeline
    • Doug Ross has excepted Kevin DuJan’s insights on the Hillary/Zero/Dem mess . . .

      “Evidence that Democrats are in “Last Days of Pompeii” mode

      …Democrats [were certain they had solved the demographic challenge in] 2008, with Howard Dean and Donna Brazile convincing them that they could dominate the country demographically by streamlining the party into one of “blacks, urban elite, college voters, Jews, Muslims, gays, and women who want to kill their babies”. The Clintons’ Democrat Leadership Council (a “DLC”, but not the one that Barack Obama belonged to) would be purged from the party and anyone Obama saw as “bitter, clinging” would be shown the door because Donna Brazile, in particular, felt these people were no longer wanted or needed for Democrats to win. Brazile, it should be noted, is also the rocket scientist who advised Al Gore not to use the Clintons in the 2000 election when Bill wanted to be deployed to bring home Arkansas and Tennessee for Gore (two states Gore lost… which would have landed him in the White House if the Clintons had campaigned aggressively in just those TWO STATES).

      …Democrats were absolute fools to believe Donna Brazile and Howard Dean back in 2008. Deciding to push Barack Obama to the presidency and give the Left absolute control over the country was a fatal error that’s going to be corrected on November 6th. [The Ministry of Truth] Minitru insists this is not happening, and continues to pretend that Democrats will hold power for many years to come. The volcano is rumbling, and these people are still lounging on couches and eating their grapes, completely oblivious to what’s going to happen in just three weeks now…

      …If they’d have run Hillary Clinton in 2008, then Democrats would have cruised to her re-election this year; Obama would have most likely been her VP and he’d have spent 8 years in the Naval Observatory (most likely observing his own naval) and would have been setup to be president himself in 2016. Democrats would have likely had 12 years in the Oval Office, with Obama destined to be president no matter what (sadly). The Left wanted everything all at once, and it got just four years before the country woke up and booted them out of office (hopefully for generations).

      …As bad as things are, and as much damage as Barack Obama has done as president, just imagine how much worse things could have been if Democrats had moved slowly and done things under the radar over 12 years instead of trying to cram it all into four years of Obama. Democrats got greedy and wanted Obama to do all the crazy things upfront, thinking they could overpower Americans and force radical change on the country quickly before anyone could resist them. Donna Brazile, in particular, believed that a black president was key to pushing the Left’s agenda because all criticism of him would be countered with charges of — let’s see if you can guess — RACISM so his skin color would give cover for the craziest things Democrats wanted to do.

      …When the books are written on the last four years, I think it will be clear that most of what Democrats tried to shove through couldn’t have been done if the President was white…because racialist demagoguery was key to making a lot of these things happen. From 2008 through 2010 or so, it was nonstop screams of “If you don’t support Obama, you are a racist!”. Democrats who weren’t leftists (and there used to be some of these in the party) had to go along with whatever Obama wanted because they, too, would have been declared racists for not supporting him. Hence, that Christmas Eve 2009 vote for Obamacare in the Senate where not a single Democrat read the bill or understood what it would do to the country…but they all voted for it anyway. Democrats needed a black president to make that happen, because only the threat of being called racists could make all Democrats in the Senate abandon their constituents and their duties as elected officials and vote for something they never read and didn’t understand.

      At the time, Democrats danced around laughing and cheering at what they had done.
      They weren’t cheering when the Midterm elections happened in 2010, however.

      And they won’t be cheering in three weeks either.

      The days of wine, roses, and using false accusations of racism to get whatever they want are coming to an abrupt end when voters’ anger at the party erupts on November 6th.”

      http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/kevin-dujan-these-are-last-days-of.html

      • silverdust
      • Obeline — While this piece is positive overall, there are more and more conservative pundits mentioning the “time bombs” we’re going to be dealing with from the Obamunist for the next 20 years — at least.

        • Obeline
        • No illusions – Zero’s done a tremendous amount of damage in 4 years and agree that it could take decades to regain lost ground and repair the devastation.

          But, imagine what 8 or 12 years of Zero/Hillary would possibly yield . . .

          He/she/it must be stopped.

          • VTX
          • No illusions – but the Communists/Islamists are mostly exposed, chiefly because of sheer arrogance; they thought their “changes” were permanent. That’s why they’re fighting so hard – tooth and nail: because they know that they’re vulnerable to a housecleaning that could resemble a house-burning.

            Look at these, and see if I’m observing properly: Kevin Jennings; Dan Savage; the counter-intel advisor; Van Jones; Napolitano; Holder…I could be up for three days just listing the highlights! Don’t you know that most of the administration’s hires had to be vetted, to have security checks?

            They’re effed, and they know it. Which is why it’s more important than ever to stay awake and keep the lights turned on. There are certain things that even the devil himself can’t do.

        • VTX
        • Why the publicity? Maps – tunnels, installations perhaps – and a warning that maybe Israel has some secrets? Go ahead, Hezbollah, Israel may be saying: you don’t know what we know – and here’s a nugget that should give you serious pause before you start raining missiles down again.

          I think Hezbollah/Iran should be very concerned. Or perhaps they haven’t learned from the recent past.

          It would be intersting if this was a message to Obama, too – plans and betrayals, perhaps? Considering the disinformation about the drone that was shot down by the Israelis, this could be big. If it was an Iranian drone, it was likely copied from the one Barack Hussein failed to order destroyed.

          Could be. Could be lots of things, including none-of-the-above – speculation. Will Hezbollah/Iran/Obama risk it?

      • VTX
      • The article pointedly says “others in the administration” pushed the faux story. We can guess who the “others” are – and Hillary could be forced to take a leave of absence over this or resign. On the other hand, she can stay put and scatter a trail of carnage that the President will be helpless to do anything about. Jarrett is helpless, too. She isn’t the man Hillary is, and never will be.

    • NameBM
    • I bet some dems are pushing for hearings before the elections!

      As of now Hillary is set to be the fall guy. The narrative is that the WH was kept out of the loop and that the buck should stop with the Head of the Department of State, i.e. the person directly responsible for the Embassies managment.

      Yet, we all know that in reality Hillary is a bonified messanger marching on direct orders from the WH. She is propbably one of the least powerful Secretary of State ever.

      If the hearings take place after the elections, she will never be vindicated. Romney and the repubs will make sure of that. She will stay under the bus and will loose all prospects of further political career, not to speak of running for the Presidency in 2016. She will be effectively taken out for good. The Clitons: THE END.

      If indeed dems are pushing for hearings before the elections, it has nothing to do with taking down O. It has to do with saving the Clinton Brand. Wounding O even more is just a side benefit smelling revenge from this group.

    • truthandjustice
    • Re the topic of Petraeus on previous thread – saying I was now very suspicious of HIM and his role in all this (I had heard on Fox that he had come out agreeing that the video was the cause) — saw this — uh oh…….

      “Two weeks ago, I wondered whether CIA Director Petraeus was politicizing the intelligence after a source told Fox News on September 27 that three days after the Benghazi assault, Petraeus briefed the House Intelligence Committee that “Benghazi was an out-of-control demonstration prompted by the YouTube video. According to the source, this was `shocking’ to some members who were present and saw the same intelligence pointing toward a terrorist attack.”

      Knowing Petraeus’ sensitivities to the faux-stimulus of what he has called in Senate testimony “Arab anger,” such politicization, or, perhaps better, such Arabizing of the intelligence would likely come naturally to him. No stranger to politicking, Petraeus as CENTCOM commander engaged in what was described as an “unprecedented” political push in early 2010 on behalf of Islam’s Israel-centered demonology in order to enhance Americas’s military standing in Iraq and Afghanistan. This dovetailed neatly with his perhaps surprising take on Gitmo — close it, its “existence has been used by the enemy against us” – and his really shocking take on Hezbollah: “Hezbollah’s justifications for existence will become void,” Petraeus told the Al Hayat as reported in the Lebanese Daily Star, “if the Palestinian cause is resolved.” Given this Arabist sensibility (and don’t forget one of his thesis directors at Princeton was Stephen Walt of Walt & Mearsheimer), it’s no stretch to imagine the man taking up cry of Islamic video-rage as well.

      Now, with so many of the adminstration’s bald lies about Benghazi being exposed, PJ Tatler’s Bryan Preston is asking not whether Petraeus was politicizing the intell, but whether he is “among the sources of the Benghazi deception.”

      In a post called “You Know Who Still Hasn’t Called Benghazi a Terrorist Attack?” Preston reprises some of Petraeus’ appeasement of Koran Rage back in Afghanistan. Preston also notes that several senators sent a letter on October 9 to Petraeus, DNI Clapper and White House CT advisor John Brennan asking for a specific timeline on the Benghazi intelligence They haven’t received an answer.”

      http://counterjihadreport.com/tag/cia-director-petraeus/

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Yes it is quiet…Gun runner has become Missile Runner and it’s become exponentially more dangerous…and is a much more serious national security threat…think of that WH bunker…as you read this

      There are 20,000 to 30,000 missing air to surface missiles…
      The video is more than a distraction…it is the clarion call …against the USA

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2775522/posts

      Shoulder fired heat seeking missiles missing from multiple Libyan stockpiles
      Flopping Aces ^ | 09-08-11 | Mataharley
      Posted on September 8, 2011, 2:53:06 PM CDT by Starman417

      It can’t come as a big surprise to find that multiple Libyan munitions stockpiles have been looted, and shoulder fired heat seeking missiles, such as the SA-7b Grail, are unaccounted for. While one concern would be that bad-guy-in-hiding, Gaddafi, may have absconded a few for personal revenge, analysists tend to think the weaponry is not in the hands of Gaddafi or his loyalists.

      Western governments and nongovernment organizations have repeatedly asked and prodded the rebel government, the Transitional National Council, to take steps to secure the vast stockpiles of arms that it has inherited, apparently to little avail.
      “Claims that depots holding Manpads and other dangerous weapons are still not being properly secured are very worrisome and should be thoroughly investigated,” Mr. Schroeder said. “In cases where stockpile security is found to be lacking, immediate steps should be taken to correct any deficiencies.”

      In Washington, President Obama’s top counterterrorism official, John O. Brennan, said that the spread of shoulder-fired missiles and other weapons from Libya’s arsenal posed “a lot of concerns,” and that the United States had pressed the rebel government to secure weapons stockpiles. “Obviously, there are a lot of parts of that country right now that are ungoverned,” he said at a security conference.

      A senior American military officer who follows Libya closely said it was puzzling that there had been so few documented instances in which Libyan loyalist troops launched shoulder-fired missiles at NATO aircraft. “I’m not sure what that means,” the officer said. “Fewer systems than we thought? Systems are inoperable? Few in Libya know how to operate them?”

      Instead, military analysts are assuming they are in the hands of AQ or other extremist groups… either directly looted, or perhaps sold by rogue rebels.

      Twenty crates from Russia were also found, with one of the crates labeled as containing “9M342,” the Russian designation for the SA-24 heat-seeking missile…. a powerful weapon that Venezuela has also been busy acquiring.

      The Igla-S (SA-24) is Russia’s most advanced MANPADS and considered one of the most lethal portable air defense systems ever made. Starting in 2005 the US Government raised its concerns with the Government of Russia (GOR) about the Government of Venezuela’s (GOV) possible acquisition of MANPADS and other conventional weapons. In particular, the US highlighted the risk these could be diverted to the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) or other regional terrorists and non-state actors.
      SA-24s were spotted by NATO as far back as March. While Libya is in possession of two-missile Strelets system (designed for mounting on platforms like armored vehicles, helicopters and ships, the missiles themselves cannot be used as MANPADS, according to an Aviation Week defense blog. The company who admitted selling the truck mounted SA-24 Grinch to both Libya and Syria stated the weapons required separate trigger mechanisms for use as MANPADS, and these were not supplied to Libya.

      This post beneath the article from 10/82010….foreshadows what’s coming:

      “Just in time for the post Ramadan 9-11 Mid eastern celebration. (Meaning 9/11/12)

      I’ll bet Europe and Israel air travelers are real happy, let alone the Israeli Air Force. All that skippy promised his brethren.

      I am sure that Skippy will be sitting watching Al Kajeera as they kick off their 9-11 parties throughout the mid east. The “democratic” mid east.

      fellow UM readers…Western civilization is under attack from OUR White House.”…PRAY…IN GOD IS OUR TRUST

    • Kitty
    • I think this may be part of that effort.

      “WHAT HAPPENED IN BENGHAZI”
      “The State Department has released a transcript of a briefing that two high-ranking department officials gave to a number of reporters via conference call on October 9 (Tuesday). I am not certain about this, but I believe the transcript was only made public today. You should read it in its entirety; it is the most detailed description I have seen of the events in Benghazi on September 11.

      While this is by no means clear, it appears that the State Department may have released the transcript as part of the escalating conflict between Barack Obama and Joe Biden and the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. In their desperation to avoid responsibility for the Benghazi debacle, Obama and Biden have pointed fingers in two directions: at the intelligence community for reporting incorrectly that the incident was a protest over a YouTube video clip, and at the State Department for not providing adequate security for the Ambassador.”

      http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/10/what-happened-in-benghazi.php

      Lucianne has it posted in her Must Reads today.

    • bill o'rights
    • Just a reminder…

      Don’t forget to donate to the Romney campaign!!! I made three more donations to them this weekend, plus bought t-shirts and buttons to give to everyone I can think of.

      Think of it as an investment…an investment that offers a chance of keeping what you already have. If Obama wins, we all lose EVERYTHING, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and, I daresay, possibly life.

      • VTX
      • The article points to something that hasn’t been explored: who sent Susan Rice to so many talk shows? Jarrett? Obama can’t tie his own shoes, and Biden is in the Old VP’s Home, brought out to entertain the masses with his silly demeanor and demented claims.

        So who sent Rice out – she was the face of the story, unbelievable as she was;’ she sounded like a contestant in a beauty pageant who memorizes her lines and tries to make herself sound credible.

        Truth is, Panetta could have gone out and not been believable – and he damn sure knew that; they didn’t send Hillary out until later, and she wasn’t believable, either. They kept trying, as if they couldn’t believe that the media wouldn’t give their story cover. The media did try, maybe as hard as they could, but it had to be as humiliating for them as for Hillary Clinton.

        Once again, the author of the story needs to be exposed – (and we think it’s clear who authored the story and probably helped get the movie made.) The movie – ah, they arrested the maker. Where is he now? In a safehouse somewhere? The “charges” against him? What happened to them? The invented “parole violation” or some other similar nonsense – a cover story for them to put him in protective custody.

        He was a PATCON stooge; they put him up to the movie the same way they induce unwitting (potential) Islamostooges to explore their inner-Jihad – planning to blow shit up. This was a PATCON operation.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Add it up:

      Fast and Furious II , Missile Runner

      Obama sends the Ambassador without security…with plans to then have him kidnapped …

      So the the great negotiator (filthy IslamoCommunist) negotiates the well loved Ambassadors freedom, with a caveat….

      Obama trades the ( as we’ve been hearing, almost dead) Blind Sheikh ….for the Ambassador and a couple hero exSeals….using the same conduit through Libya where he sent the on-his-last-breaths TWA bomber back home to supposedly die (which happened several years later)

      Wag the Dog, islamoBammunist style…the secret Muslim cannot help but save his fellow Muslims and Jihadi’s…and he arms the enemy with 20,000-30,000 Air to Surface Missiles with launchers

      • truthandjustice
      • Probably even more — killing three birds with “one stone”: Helping Muslim co-conspirators, both with weapons and using video/Christian extremists as excuses to call for ban on any anti-Islam speech, creating more hatred toward Christians and seen more as dangerous extremists to be “dealt with” more strongly and
        helping Obama with re-election as being the macho hero again by gaining release of a kidnapped ambassador.

    • Obeline
    • During Tuesday’s debate it is incumbent upon MItt Romney to articulate that the buck stops at the desk of the President on ALL matters. That is what leadership is about. That is what taking responsibility means. That’s what upholding the Constitution entails.

      The Libya/Benghazi cover-up ultimately belongs to the President. Zero can throw Intelligence and State under the bus – can blame right, left and center . . . but the bottom line is that the President is in charge and the people making decisions are his appointees and his responsibility. The spinning has to stop at his desk. BarackHUSSEINObama owns this entire cover-up, scandal, foreign policy debacle, mess . . . call it whatever you want.

      Kathleen Sebelius, HHS, has defied the Hatch Act with no repercussions – and the list of incompetent and law-breaking czars and appointees is enormous: all falling on Zero’s plate.

      ***** Eric Holder, DOJ, and Fast & Furious are the most egregious examples of a government gone wild – and the Executive Privileges issued by Zero to protect the truth from Americans lay this, too, squarely on his wilting shoulders.

      THIS IS WHAT MITT ROMNEY MUST DRIVE HOME – the man presently calling himself the President of the United States of America is the one, at the day’s end, who is responsible to keep us safe and uphold the laws of the land.

      Period.

      The eyes and ears of the world will be on this second debate and MItt Romney can make this case on virtually any and all subjects that come up: BarackHUSSEINObama has not fulfilled his Constitutional duties and his presidency is a failure.

      (the failures of Congress can be dealt with in January)

      • bill o'rights
      • I think it has everything to do with it, along with the new executive order Obama is apparently drawing up, granting him 100% control over all electronic telecommunications.

        • VTX
        • Bill O,

          Could be – and Obama would blame it on someone else.

          By the way, non-nuclear EMPs can be mounted on drones; they have battlefield effect, not wideranging. But a couple of cars on a bridge stalled? And more?

          • bill o'rights
          • You might have something there.

            Remember Obama’s executive order/state of national emergency several months ago, with regard to Russian nuclear materials?

            I also noticed another recent executive order allotting money for ‘studying’ the ecological consequences of the dome on Bikini atoll. I also seem to recall a large S. Carolina port taken over by DHS recently.

            Not suggesting anything specific, however it would be an effective way to ship nuclear materials over here for dirty bombs/emp.

    • VTX
    • PATCON Productionstm made the infamous David Koresh film – it was in the can even before his body was extracted from the ashes; all they had to do was to film the place burning for their final credits.

      Now ask yourself this: if they expected him to live, why would they have smeared his reputation to the point where he could sue them for harrassment, libel, slander and a whole lot of other stuff? Answer: they knew he was gonna die; if Vernon Wayne Howell had ventured out of the compound with a white flag, they would have shot him to pieces and claimed his flag was a rocket launcher!

      The PATCON Productionstm made this “heinous” film (Rice called it that) so that it could be an excuse: whether it was specially intended for this purpose, or was merely being held as an excuse for another policy failure is not proven – but the fact that it was put up repeatedly suggests that they had studied the gameplan a long time before it was set into motion.

    • VTX
    • PATCON Productions ™
      The first film was a made-for-television docudrama film, In the Line of Duty: Ambush at Waco, which was made during the siege before the April 19 assault on the church. It essentially promoted the government’s view of the initial ambush of February 28, 1993. The scriptwriter, Phil Penningroth, has since disowned his screenplay.[citation needed]

      • VTX
      • Note that the movie was made DURING the seige. It was not just pro-government – it was a serious libel.

        Fact is, the ATF – according to a supervisory agent I spoke with – had been “screaming for months for the FBI to get involved.” That was before they sent their own men into a known ambush. Four good ATF agents – and there are some – died in order to send this up the ladder.

        When the FBI got involved, so did others: the movie would have taken months to write and produce; the depiction of Koresh was physically accurate, for a movie that was being made about an event that hadn’t even been concluded; the details had been studied, the government having made a mock-compound before the seizure: this was clearly an assassination.

        Now look at the “offensive” movie: the maker is likely a Jihadist himself – they tried a number of other caricatures, including “Christian” and “Zionist” but none of them stuck. The movie and the moviemaker need to be examined – just as “In the Line of Duty: Ambush at Waco” needs to be revisited.

        • VTX
        • This is a comment from IMDb:

          The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms also commissioned a movie deal, to be shown on NBC during prime-time television viewing. Ambush in Waco premiered in early May, just weeks after the fire that consumed Mt. Carmel, and was the perfect compliment for the government’s sensational stories about the Davidians. In the movie Koresh was shown torturing a young child, having sex with a young follower, and not allowing people to leave if they so chose. The Davidians were depicted as gun-sporting Rambo-type militants, who wanted to kill anyone and everyone who challenged their leader. The film was obviously sympathetic to the BATF, and showed the February 28 raid in a highly fictionalized manner. The Davidians, dressed in black military fatigues, stood at battle position, poised with their machine guns aimed at the front door, waiting to the BATF agents to get close enough before they opened fire. The BATF commanding officer in the film was shown calling into Mount Carmel, reaching the Steve Schneider character, wanting to negotiate a cease-fire. Character Schneider refused the offer to negotiate, demanding the BATF agents “get off our land!” Eventually he acquiesced, so the BATF could remove their casualties. The movie’s final scene portrayed David Koresh on the phone, surrounded by his followers, telling the BATF that they “have no right to be [there], but it’s prophecy…the Lamb of God knew the end was coming, and [they] have been preparing for this armed conflict for a long time. This won’t be over until [Koresh is] crucified and dead!” Obviously, the calls to 911 by several Davidians during the February 28 raid would hinder government assertions that the Davidians were gun-crazy, and the tapes of these calls were not released until several years after the raid. Many years after the film came out, Phil Penningroth, writer of Ambush in Waco apologized to the surviving Davidians for his role in the helping the government destroy their families and friends.
          See Phil Penningroth. “Righting Waco: Confessions of a Hollywood Propagandist.”
          http://www.killingthebuddha.com/dogma/righting_waco.htm.

          This is why they called Holder in to “investigate” the Benghazi affair; he was a part of Reno’s circus. He knows how to “fix” things – but he can’t work without a closed set: the foreign press wouldn’t let him make the administration’s case, and they exposed the truth before he could really get going, to cover the eff-up.

          Even if surveillance tape is routinely recorded, the videos from the compounds were possibly (or even likely) movie-material, to be used in the Heeroic Reenactment of President Obama in his second faked movie (the first being the propaganda movie about UBL’s removal.) This was to be his “PT 109″ account.

          The planned protests were too late for the movie, the attackers having beaten them to the compound. And we have four more dead men as a result and an unbeleivable foreign policy/Intel nightmare.

    • VTX
    • My point: investigate the origins of the movie, and there’s a link to the original plan.

      Theory: someone inside the administration leaked the plan in order to remove the Ambassador – who was making inconvenient things known. As others have pointed out, this likely is connected with the missiles he was trying to recover. Ambassador Stevens’ closest friends might want to look for a safehouse of their own.

    • VTX
    • One more thing: there is no “movie,” only a trailor. They also conned the actors, not using the word “Muhammed,” as that was dubbed in later – in other languages.

      The movie’s director was a convicted meth-maker. He wasn’t sophisticated, and he wasn’t, as claimed, an Israeli citizen. In fact, he is not a “Coptic Christian,” either. How many “Coptic Christians” run meth labs that you know of?

      As some have written, this was to be a “Raid on Entebbe” movie, with the Caliph in Chief again demonstrating “one of the most gutsiest calls of any president” in order to compete with Bibi, whose brother died in the event (which was NOT staged for political reasons.)

      Brennan can go suck eggs; he’s exposed himself in a way that can only be called “indecent.” Someone should be investigating the links to the movie; Meth dealers with criminal records usually only do things like this under duress.

      • VTX
      • Intel should be all over this – it’s one thing for someone to make a movie about a bunch of Davidians for their own sordid purposes, but it’s quite another to see our guys endangered, exposed and murdered in order to make a movie that would help re-elect a dirty politician.

        Real Intel people are emphatically NOT behind the movie, nor are they participants in the planned made-for-election movie; this should head in some very interesting directions. You won’t see what happens, but the shadows will be whirling – multiple vortices.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/10/what-happened-in-benghazi.php

      Hume nailed Wallace, a Dem….on Fox News Sunday…asking who schedules guests on television? Only the WH schedules who goes on those news shows said Wallace..As.such they scheduled and had prepped Rice…to LIE for them.

      That the newly recovered FBI video from the safe house compound….is not released in full…yet gives rise to suspicions….as it should when dealing with a group of prevaricators.

      Sean Smith’s body was the only one in the safe room after they repeatedly searched for the Ambassador crawling I back inside…Sean Smith had died… of smoke inhalation they say? That gives the third man not identified, suspicion..
      Was that third man part of Libyan security detail? Did he turn the Ambassador over?? Why didnt he get in the armoured vehicle when the exSeals left with Seal Smith’s body in that armoured vehicle?

      There are images of the Ambassador across the net showing him in escalating views of undress…shirt comes off, pants unbuckled, then off…One shows his hand up to his eye …which is not possible to rub ones eye if dead and hanging over someone’s shoulder.

      Show the FBI recovered compound video in full..I believe it will show the savages removing the Ambassador… as they well know and have from day 1 ….as the satellites were watching it all unfold in real time.

      This administration is traitorous. God help us….it took Obama six days to order the lowering of our flags..

      Obama said at the UN after the Benghazi attack.. “The future does not belong to those who slander the prophet”…That phrase, That proselytising threat should have caused one heck of an uproar in the USA…While our Ambassador was murdered by Muslim-prophet-loving-savages…Our president tells us the future does not belong to us, a Judeo-Christian nation but rather to the Muslim savages…

      Where is the outrage???!!!! Where is the wall to wall media coverage?!?!..Is everyone in this country on drugs?!

Leave A Response

* Required

-->