*****UPDATE*****
This just came from Insider:
Have a heads up for you. This comes directly from the Old Man. Military intelligence may have tracked location of a guy called “Khattalah” who apparently organized the Benghazi attack. Check media reports for name. Obama to order drone strikes or possible all out bombing operation. Says it appears imminent. Obama will then make claim “perpetrators brought to justice” to squash Benghazi questions and play part of hero. “Bin Laden Version 2 “ If accurate, this scenario would fit with the earlier rescue operation scenario you had sent me earlier. That went to sh-t so now they are recalibrating the same general idea with an updated version of it.
I have not heard anything resembling something this specific. Doing double time trying to confirm. Nobody in Romney camp aware of this. Or if they are, not tipping their hand.
This has me worried. Old Man attempting to get in front of it be he’s got his hands full with other critical Europe related issues. Says he has source in Libya but has been unable to locate. ????? Tone of his message suggests more worried than me. And I’m pretty panicked about this.
Any ideas?
-INSIDER
_______________________
NOTE:
If this scenario is in fact true, and given Insider’s track record I have no reason to believe something along these lines is not being attempted (and the fact it comes from WSI – and likely then MI, makes that assertion even more so) hopefully enough figures in D.C. can be made aware who will then, as Insider put it, “get out in front of it”.
I certainly understand Insider’s concern here – this kind of scenario, if successful, would likely diminish much if not all the current questions surrounding the administration regarding the Benghazi Massacre – at least until after the election. Therefore, it would all but halt the entire build up to make Barack Obama accountable for not only the tragedy in Libya, but the subsequent attempted cover-up form his administration that followed. In the meantime, Obama would be allowed to play the part of Commander in Chief, once again having “made the call” and brought America’s enemies to justice – this time just before Election Day.
Those around Barack Obama would once again have successfully created a political victory out of deception.
-UM
______________________________
WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: Second Debate: Obama Won – But Romney Didn’t Lose (UPDATED)
Wag the dog
Maybe simply finishing the psyop the aim of which all along was to have an excuse to attack the resistance to whatever regime HRC, VALOTUS, and crew replaced Muomar Mad Dog with?
Before UM and “insiders” get all wee-wee’d up again, could the name in question actually be that of retired USAF Lt. Col. Rudy ATTALLAH, former Africa counterterrorism director for George W. Bush’s DoD??
Refer you to “Newsmax” article by Kimberly Dozier: “White House Prepares Retaliation for Ambassador’s Death.”
Fog of Presidency
The desperation among Obama and his acolytes is palpable…and smelly. They will be ramping up their attempts to salvage his four years of failure and it doesn’t matter to them who gets run over by their short bus.
But, Barry, think of your Nobel Prize, you, peacenik, you! What about your friends at the U.N.? What about the future not belonging to these infidels who diss your prophet? You’re going to blast the Moslem faithful? Just bomb ‘em, just to show them who’s the boss?
Tsk, tsk, Barry, how “cowboy” of you.
Louis Farrakhan and your beloved pastor “Ridin’-dirty” Wright won’t like it one bit.
This is probably Intel-driven this time – not the bundling bunglers in the White House who wanted to do a made-for-television movie – (that’s the trouble when you lie so much that no one can possibly believe you, Barry.)
Lame Cherry might say it’s Casey and associates getting back at the betrayers, but could it be a strike on the “missing” missiles? – (someone knows exactly where they are.)
It’s just as likely that this is a mission to clean up evidence and to remove witnesses – the ultimate witness-tampering. Considering how Obama betrayed the good doctor, our friends with eyes should be keeping them open and scheduling transportation arrangements.
Check out Rubin’s site, rubinreports at blogspot.com
Here is his theory:
If he was, as accounts by sources in the U.S. intelligence community suggested, negotiating with a terrorist, anti-American group to obtain the return of U.S. weapons provided during the civil war that would have been a much higher-priority matter. I have been asked by sources not to reveal the specific weapons’ system that was Washington’s highest priority to buy back but the details make sense. The fact that the ambassador was not accompanied by a delegation of foreign aid experts to evaluate these alleged projects shows that the reason for the ambassador’s presence in Benghazi is being covered up. This situation transcends State Department jurisdiction and brings in the CIA and higher-level national security officials. The plan would have been in the presidential briefing and it is quite conceivable he would have been called on to approve of it.
Whenever anyone here mentions CIA, psy-ops, security…I can’t help thinking of the cryptic messages sent by Sean Smith, “an information management officer who also had an online alter-ego legendary in the gaming world.” He knew something was going down and said so. That info has been redacted. And his mother still has no answers. Also of note, Petraeus has not made a public announcement of any sort. Something is certainly smelly in Denmark…and DC.
TTLG, see my reply to ATB below. Smith’s gaming connection was apparently not incidental.
Too little too late . Another bombing or drone strike won’t change what has already happened .
P Walker, I thought the same thing; no matter what happens, there are still three human beings and one Ambassador dead.
Romney only needs to remind the audience that, the WH lied about the video, it took two full weeks to tell the truth, they blamed ineptness from the intel community, and that the Embassy asked for more security back in APRIL! If the WH cannot protect our overseas employees – who will and are they capable of protecting citizens at home, our shores, our freedom?
AND, as if all that is not bad enough, the WH asked google to take down the video, AND they took the dumb film maker into custody. trample on our basic freedoms for their selfish political gain.
lastly, and by far the worst action by this WH, the gun running Iran-Contra style arms deals to our enemies is treason in my book.
Unforunately, with what all we have gleaned about them, my “gut” says it’s probably true. Expect it. If not thwarted though, I don’t think this will help Obama like they think – just like everything else they thought would. It still doesn’t make all the mistakes/lies go away that we have recorded on them. Don’t think this is utmost in most minds – they still consider the economy as their worst worry and this wouldn’t change that. It might make some uninformed undecideds tip over to him, but don’t think there are that many. But just a guess of course.
If this happens, Romney should not drop the criticism of what are still the facts about it when it happened. Don’t let it disappear !!!.
What worries me more is then….what next? Maybe that’s not all. Maybe they also have some staged terror attack on US somewhere in America (as their “retaliation”) which would give them their national security emergency to call martial law, etc.???? Or, even if they don’t, the Muslims that hate Obama/America will indeed do that for revenge. ??? Yes, heating up folks – but we knew that, right?
Ideas? Yes – spread the word as much as possible, etc. and………….PRAY.
This comes as no surprise – Benghazi, the gift that keeps on giving . . . unless the Cowboys have a fix on this move, too?
In the interim EXPOSE this for the duplicity it is.
Americans are fed up with Zero’s corruption, lies and failed policies.
Make this the icing on Zero’s cake.
They’ll blow up some goatherd and call him Khattalah. That should be good enough to see everyone through until after the election, when it will cease to matter.
Rurik: LOL! too funny!
Just like Bin Laden’s body was destroyed to prevent further investigation (i.e., identity, health), Khattalah is being killed to avoid further investigation into Stevens’ murder and the details of Benghazzi.
.
“Ahmed Abu Khattalah—who current Libyan officials and former Islamic militants describe as propagating an al Qaeda-style ideology—was seen during the Sept. 11 attack at the diplomatic mission where two of the four Americans died, said two senior Libyan security officials familiar with the investigation.” He is apparently a militant with Ansar al-Shariah, an al Qaeda group in Lybia.
What I’d like to know is: to whom did the USA provide weapons or other logistical support against Qadafi…did we support Ansar al-Shariah?
Expected cover-up…There are videos….and stills showing the Ambassadorndid not die of smoke inhalation….those need to go viral…The people need to see what Obama’s incompetence caused…and he needs to be pressed …Why was the Ambassador in Benghazi at all alone? Who hired those Seals 11 days before they were murdered? Who sent them to Benghazi?
Why the same connections to the WACO film as this film
General Vallele needs to go viral..
Can you post the links to the videos and stills you referenced?
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=ZuTHmLEy5BE
Watch two video’s.
One shows them bringing Ambassador out of house
The other shows him hanging down over the shoulder of a terrorist with one hand up to his eye, which defies gravity if dead.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=ZuTHmLEy5BE
http://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=0g8K9MyunGQ
These links no longer ‘work’. Seems they have been scrubbed.
Unfortunately, there’s a possibility that the MANPADS are heading in diverse directions – and it’s terribly unfortunate that the administration was busy preparing a PATCON Productions ™ made-for-tv flick in the recent past. None of that stops our Intel folks from having to do their jobs – the enemy hopes to find a weakened administration afraid to make any moves at all. Hopefully, adults are taking the lead role, as in the UBL mission.
It must be hard for our guys – Intel and Special Ops – to serve under a COC who takes their credit from them whenever possible, and who reveals operational details that makes their mission infinitely more deadly. Doubt it’s a mission to deal with the murderers: if it is, then it’s a cleanup job; if it’s weapons-removal, it’s the real deal. This dog may have more than two tails.
Tunesia: always look for choke points – like Abu Musa, Gibraltar – now that Tunesia is going Islamist.
There is a growing revolt inside the government. This has become obvious. A lot of people have to be involved to make a strike like this and some of them might have some very interesting information they let slip. Like how certain is the intel? Are the people hit those at all involved or are they simply sacrifices for political gain? Would this hit be for justice or retribution for betrayal (a la the Lame Cherry hypothesis)?
The thing is, I believe we have an increasingly cynical body politic in the United States. More and more people aren’t looking at either actions or words like they used to. You know, when we used to think that despite policy differences, the president actually loved America and would act in a way he felt was best for her welfare? Instead, we seem to be evolving closer to what Soviet citizens were like. They knew they couldn’t trust what was said by politicians or reported by the media so they learned to read between lines, watch the wording closely, timing and other events. If I’m right, said military strike might not have the kind of political effect it used to.
Also, it remains that only because of the failure to do that which was necessary to protect Amb. Stevens (like not send him there on a regular schedule and provide beefed up security) is the military action necessary.
It is up to Romney to not only point this out, but point out that while Obama uses drones and Navy Seals like video game pieces to make hits on the one hand, on the other, he continues to help (purposefully or not) the Muslim Brotherhood establish a new caliphate, not to mention set the world on fire with his overall foreign and monetary policy.
All of that said, if intel really has identified those that murdered our fellow citizens and we have a chance to get them, then take them out!
Look at the places and events: the places where the “movie” inspired riots – (but not really) – are those places that are involved in both production and deception. Tunesia fits.
The “movie” was set to be part of the big movie for the President, but the Islamists used it as cover for the killing of our Ambassador, who was trying to limit the movement of MANPADS – and now they’ll be heading to all those places where manufactured unrest cover their tracks – (hard to send cruise missiles into crowds of protesters, you know?)
So this thing isn’t over yet: the bunglers’ foolishness makes it more difficult to prevent an exodus of portable death-machines. Forget the movie for a moment and get the damn weapons! Eff you, Obama administration: your eff-up hasn’t stopped effing up; it’s an eff up in progress.
According to Shoebat, the movie maker has a long history with Shoebat’s terrorist cousin. It seems to me the movie was as likely a “go code” (perhaps from Zawahiri since he reportedly ordered the attack) for the attack and probably the worldwide protests.
Something that continues to make me pause is how the movie excuse seemed “at the ready.” The administration seemed to have that excuse locked and loaded. When Benghazi happened that storyline was released (before they could stop it?) despite contrary information. Was the movie the ready excuse for both sides of this story?
Probably as close as it can get: a go-code.
The administration will probably say that they thought the eruption WAS the event, ABOUT the movie, and failed to appreciate the significance.
What is unknown is who sent Stevens back in, and why? The movie – the Raid On Entebbe-type movie – is very likely. Why distract him with a side-job, when he had a real job to do? That’s the bitch. But if they sent him back in to do his job and allowed him to be exposed him to unneccesary danger, that’s utter stupidity or a plot. It’s worse than sending him back in for a photo-op with fake terrorists: that would mean they pulled a Uriah on him.
No matter who killed Stevens, no matter if they send the terrorists to their proper place in hell, the administration is entirely to blame for making it possible.
That’s been the line…about the movie instead of signaled by the movie. Maybe, but way too suspicious. Low rent movie thrown together by a long term terrorist financier?
The time line provided here and elsewhere of events leading up to the attack is obviously an overwhelming indictment of the administration. In addition to that incident, what I wonder is where else might this same scenario be playing out?
The whole Libya situation has stunk from our first involvement. It never made sense in the usual terms of our national interest. I even looked for a possible link to Leo Gerard’s efforts in Africa, but never found any.
Libya and Egypt were the linchpins from the Muslim Brotherhood/al Qaeda standpoint though. The left has ridiculed the Domino Theory ever since Vietnam, yet we’re watching it play out in Africa. Now northern Africa is a MB stronghold from which to project power and influence elsewhere in the region (including Europe) and turn the Mediterranean into a Muslim lake.
Collusion was the first word I though of when that tape surfaced of al-Zawahiri supporting the video excuse, after Hillary changed her story to terrorist attack. It just keeps getting deeper and deeper…
Sorry, “thought of”
Patcairn, Speaking Out 59:
Let’s see if I can get this one out without it being disapproved:
The Islamists wouldn’t be involved in a smear-their-prophet movie trailor, would they? Or perhaps they would – and wouldn’t that be a bonus (for us) if it was shown that they were behind it? Hint hint.
So, a “low rent movie thrown together by a long term terrorist financier?” Maybe.
The adminstration was quick to blame a “Coptic Christian” or an “Israeli national.” Why is that; is it because he’s always ready to blame Christians or Jews for everything? That’s a no-brainer. But why? Obviously to cover their own tracks, or the tracks of their Islamist buddies. They could have just said: “It was 9/11; it’s as significant a date for Islamists as it is for us, for different reasons.” Which means that they’re covering their own tracks.
One of the most disengenious lies the President has told is that he “beefed up security” as soon as this thing went down. His pet stooge, Jay Carney, never mentioned it – and that would be what a real President would tell people, to reassure them. But Carney didn’t do that: he talked about finding out who perped the deal, and prosecuting them (which means proving that they did the deed.) Like a criminal action. Obama’s lies are too stupid to believe; the only person who might believe them is Barack Obama himself.
BREAKING — Terrorist attack planned for NY Federal Reserve building foiled — FBI arrests suspect — but I also heard on Fox that the attempt may also be on Pres. Obama………???? Is this part of the false flag scenario we’ve talked about — getting us ready? Connected to their bombing Libya somehow?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/10/17/feds-arrest-man-who-tried-to-blow-up-federal-reserve-bank-in-nyc-sources-say/
Here comes “By Any Means Necessary”, full stride.
Libya counterstrike seemed a given. When it was said that suspects in the plot were released from Libyan prison, it seemed a sure bet to me that some kind of “Osama 2″ event was going to take place. Talked about this in the comments of a recent UM post.
Also, it seems that the stolen Mitt Romney tax returns are set to come out on October 22nd. They’re not even being cute about this, they are labeling it, for Twitter and the internet, “October Surprise.” Not sure if it is the tax returns, but it is some official document. So that is in the waiting room.
And this Fed “terrorist plot.” Another false flag? Seems it, or it could be, especially if they try to claim it was a plot against Obama as well.
This is it. Obama camp has 1 more debate, a possible Libya counterstrike and these documents “October Surprise” left. Obama camp and the media, including their internet outfits, are going to go extremely hard now to ‘win back’ Libya, turn the narrative and drive the narrative in the last 20 days.
The plan here is to turn all undecideds, often low information voters who tune into the election late, towards Obama. It could work, and everyone should be concerned.
The good news is that Romney is ahead (Gallup has it 51-45 now), and Obama appears to be fading away. But it’s far from over, and the By Any Means Necessary plan can still work. They have at least two cards they may be able to play (Libya counterstrike and October 22nd document drop on Romney), and both could alter things significantly.
Team Romney and their allies need to drop their own data to try to counter this attempt by Team Obama. It’s not going to be easy, I’m sure.
My guess is that today’s busted “terror plot” against the Fed is a set-up, a hoax, in order to drive up anger towards Islamic terrorists so that when the Libya counterstrike is launched, there will be more of a poll bump for Obama. That is, the Fed busted ‘plot’ would be an emotional manipulation to gin up the response to the Libya counterstrike.
The Libya possible revenge strike and the October 22nd document drop are not good news for Team Romney. There is a lot of work to be done, and I hope that it can get done. This is still far from over as “By Any Means Necessary” goes into full operation now.
Yes, think most of us who have come to know the “real” Obama Admin. agree that the “By Any Means Necessary” plots are being implemented as we speak – for before and after election for the Lame Duck. Really feel this Fed. Reserve plot was a set up – timing is way too suspicious. But they are fooling around with very unpredictable terrorist types like those in Benghazi that didn’t go according to plan. Who knows the disasters that may result from all this.
Khattalah is all over the internet news today. While I certainly believe we should not sit back and do nothing about the killings in Libya, I do have a problem with the US just “droning” whoever the h*ll we want. How do we believe the veracity of any supposed “intelligence” the administration espouses on this guy? Even if the info is valid, this administration has lost all credibility by their jumping to cover-up/I mean conclusions regarding the entire Benghazi affair.
This doesn’t worry me. I don’t think it would solve Obama’s Libya problem as much as he thinks.
The story isn’t just the foulup, it’s the coverup.
And Obama’s problem isn’t just taking out the perpetrators, it’s the failure of his foreign policy to discourage attacks like this in the first place.
To be honest, I don’t think it really matters if he orders a strike on Khattalah or not. The attack was a brazen strike against a representative of the United States and four people died. The attack was perpetrated by Al Quaeda on the anniversary of the original 9/11 attacks. There was a terrorist attack and the President of the United States lied to the American people and the world about it for two weeks. The issue here is trust, that trust if any of it remains is misplaced. Obama is very uneasy about this issue, you could see the real anger in his eyes last night when the issue came up. I don’t think it is a large leap to see Romney making the point stick that even if Obama thinks he called it terror on 9/12 the leader of the country then boarded a plane to further his election efforts. That is not leadership.
Let’s hope they display the same stunning level of competence on this that they have done in the past. If so, the goatherd should be safe, as it will take them weeks to get Oblahblah to actually agree to anything. I hope. This scares me.
I have no idea why this would also get my “suspicions” — ?????
WASHINGTON — An officer for the Central Intelligence Agency was among those killed in a suicide bombing at an Afghan intelligence office — the latest so-called “insider attack” in the war, according to one current and one former U.S. official.
The attack Saturday in Kandahar province killed four Afghan intelligence officials and two U.S. intelligence officers. One of the Americans has been identified as a female solider — 24-year-old Spc. Brittany B. Gordon, assigned to a military intelligence company from Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington.
A senior U.S. defense official and a former U.S. intelligence official said the other American was an officer working for the CIA. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release the information on the record. The officer’s name is being withheld.
NATO says the bomber was a member of Afghanistan’s intelligence agency, but the Afghans deny that.
The CIA declined to comment Wednesday.
http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-world/ci_21792531/two-u-s-intelligence-officers-among-dead-insider
If a hit on some obscure small “library” or historical literary society comes to light, I’m really going to wonder what someone found. CIA documents go missing from Benghazi, a hit on a Yemen embassy employee and now an attack on an intelligence post in Afghanistan. Connected? Were the latter two a result of the former? Or something else? Two isn’t a pattern, but maybe a closer watch is appropriate.
Not to worry. Benghazi isn’t the main issue in this election, the economy is. Jobs are. Gas prices are. Taxes are.
Thanks for the update, WHI. Love hearing from you. Romney is going to be in Leesburg, Virginia this evening, which is only over the mountain from me. Thought about going but then I heard that the crowds were already in the thousands this afternoon. Again, I don’t think anything O would do could change the course of destiny.
No doubt in my mind they are planning to throw the kitchen sink at Benghazi. The woman who asked the Lybia question yesterday has said that Obama spent 2 minutes of one on one time (Oh! was she pleased) after the debate and explain to her that he had to limit his answer to protect intelligence. That and his outburst during the debate (you attack America and I will track you down and kill you) are the setup.
I see it coming a mile away: “We pretended to beleive the tape was the reason so that we could gather intelligence in the meantime. But we were in control the whole time. We know who they are and where they are. And now they are dead…”
The “leak” of the readying of the special forces Monday, fits in the narrative.
The are getting ready to blast the region to stone age and to blast “revenge” all over the Media afterwards.
It might work for the base but I do not think it will reverse the trend. For most it will be: so he killed the terrorists, so what? Isn’t that what is expected of him?
And the question will remain: Why were the Ambassador and the 3 other Americans so exposed in the first place?
Of course, if we could have the “proof” via testimony or else that Al Qaeda was supplied American arms because Obama decided to lead from behind and not engage directly, that would be a wonderful counterattack or even the tool to dwarf the whole thing.
Please, let this be another good sign !!!!! Past tense president…….
“President Obama spoke of being president in the past tense during last night’s second presidential debate with Mitt Romney: “The way we’re going to create jobs here is not just changing our tax code, but also to double our exports. And we are on pace to double our exports, one of the commitments I made when I was president. That’s creating tens of thousands of jobs all across the country.”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/10/17/obama_says_when_i_was_president_at_debate.html
“When I was president” Kardashian in action.
Proof Obama had questions in advance and was schooled to the questions …very disturbing proof of cheating
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/17/cnn-and-the-obama-administration-weapons-of-misdirection/
2nd video 1:06 :35
Obama knew who Kerry, the questioner was, where his seat was, walks to him before he is supposed to know who the questioner even is…. starts to say Kerry’s name before he is supposed to know…realizes what he has done…proving Obama had questions in advance and Crowley was in on it!
At 1:05:25….directs Candy to move on
Kerry may or may not know..I’d like to see Kerry watch that clip and comment
Obama without a TelePrompTer had to cheat
@ AmericaTheBeautiful
Thank You for the link!! I advanced the tapeto 1 min. 5 sec & yes I could see Obama walk up to this man Kerry Ladka & say hi Kerry before the man sttod up or was introduced.
I sent this to Rush… I hope he gets to read it!!
also interesting:
On Breitbart.com they mentioned Anita Dunn is one of Obama’s Debate Coaches
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/10/17/Obama-debate-advisor-Anita-Dunn-Mao
UM,
Proof Obama had questions in advance and was schooled to the questions …very disturbing proof of cheating
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2012/10/17/cnn-and-the-obama-administration-weapons-of-misdirection/
2nd video 1:06 :35
Obama knew who Kerry, the questioner was, where his seat was, walks to him before he is supposed to know who the questioner even is…. starts to say Kerry’s name before he is supposed to know…realizes what he has done…proving Obama had questions in advance and Crowley was in on it!
At 1:05:25….directs Candy to move on
Kerry may or may not know..I’d like to see Kerry watch that clip and comment
Obama without a TelePrompTer had to cheat
There is also the incident regarding the Rose Garden statement. Obama asked Crowley to check the transcript. Huh? Why in the world would Crowley just happen to have a transcript of Obama’s Rose Garden presser and how would Obama know she had it? And then Crowley’s expression when Obama asked her to check it – she acted very uncomfortable, like she realized it was a gaffe. She “informed” Romney that Obama did say it was terrorism, but I don’t recall her looking up anything. Incredible memory or prep? Hmmmm…I can’t decide.
That was obviously a setup as a gotcha for Romney. They anticipated Romney’s accusation about the delay in calling it terrorism and created what they thought would be a trap.
The betrayal of the American people by the alphabet soup media continues to be a thing of astounding proportions.
That’s exactly what I immediately thought! Evidence of collution. This is nauseating. Even before I saw the replay. How do you know what she has on her desk Barack?
I cannot stand the man and I am praying to see all these treators to the Nation exposed.
I say treators because this is how I fell now. This is not the regular difference of opinions. This is a completely different bird.
No wonder Romney and Barack did not shake hands at the end. Both men knew what went down.
But let rest assured that President Romney or not, these pieces of crap in the Old Media are not going to get away with it. I’ll vote with my email and my pocketbook and will do my very little part to make sure their employers fells it.
He is desperate. His campaign it is almost over, as many “buffer states” are going for Romney.
Pulling an October surprise” seems to be the only way he could turn the tide.
but it is doubtful.
Too many people want him out.
it was stunning to see the Luntz focus group filled with angry ex-Obama voters.
Angry because they bought his bullshit and he let them down.
I think it’s almost over for the punk.
It is over.
Barry knows and is already reminiscing about his past presidency as evidenced by his saying, “…when I was President…”
It was over long before he himself even knew.
The poor slobs that were fooled four years ago snapped out of it, fell out of love, found each other, and formed a support group.
At first they were all, “I don’t care if my gut tells me he hates the U.S., I love him.”
http://www.cardandcaboodle.com.au/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/375x/17f82f742ffe127f42dca9de82fb58b1/n/y/nyc024_2.jpg Sam Gross – “I don’t care if she’s a tape dispenser. I love her.”
But now, they are four years older, several thousand dollars poorer, much more sad, and by golly they’ve had enough of the abuse and are going to kick him out, hoping he doesn’t call or stalk ‘em.
unless those killers get the same treatment before they die…like being butt_fucked & some…there is no justice…:)…
Doug Ross provides a Libyan/Benghazi-Gate timeline with this interesting bit of information added:
“Update: An alert commenter reminds of this bit of evidence, translated from Arabic by Walid Shoebat: Video from Libya: ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’
Fast forward to the 1:15 mark in this video (if you don’t understand Arabic). Watch as the raw footage of a firefight in Benghazi is taking place. The news report loops the relevant portion of an exchange between gunmen, in which one can be heard, saying, ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’!”
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/benghazi-gate-did-two-heroic-seals-ruin.html
(Dear Huma, can you confirm the translation for us?)
I was just going to post this. Can everyone post the Walid Shoebat article and video everywhere so it can go viral to stiff Obama. Also can Um or someone please contact Shoebat and ask him to make a big thing out of it?
I LOVE Shoebat. That man is some amazing character. I found out about him about a year ago and was amazed not only with his life story, connections, etc., but the information in his book “God’s War on Terror” – one of the most informative, eye opening stuff I’ve ever read. I highly recommend it to all. It’s a must read to really understand Islam, the real history behind it, Muslims, their mind set, strategies, etc.
He’s also very courageous and has been risking his life to get the truth out about what’s really going on – warning us. He gets terrible threats all the time. Thankfully, he’s getting a lot of support now and getting popular – using him for info for their websites, etc. We need people like him who we can trust that translates Arabic for us b/c they will speak one thing to us here in English for the media to spread their lies & PR — then speak Arabic to their fellow Muslims, which is more of the truth of course. Please spread the word as much as possible. (www.shoebat.com)
Another site to get info and act is http://www.actforamerica.com
Just for fun bad lip reading, the first debate:_
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlwilbVYvUg&feature=g-logo-xit
FYI, although on a different subject, this is getting a boatload of re-posts all over the Internet:
http://www.colony14.net/id673.html
I find this interesting http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2012/10/obama-tries-to-con-military-vote-again-2445084.html
Obama did NOT win the debate. I watched it and between Obama and Crowley, I heard lies and lack of substance by Obama with Crowley aiding him. Romney was spot on often. He won without a doubt. I think White House Insider is trapped in DC with all those beltway pundits and is on the wrong side of this because he is not out in the real world of America like the rest of us.
Obama lost the debate due to all the lies and deceit and so he didn’t win on points. That is looney to think he won. That is fact, WHI. Sorry to disappoint you. You should come out into the real world of America more often to become more grounded politically, ok?
Frank Luntz’s Focus Group mostly flipped for Romney after last night’s debate. There again is more proof Obama didn’t win. I’d say voters who flip for Romney is the best proof of who won the debate.
_______________
Some how I do not believe this story of who is to blame for the attacks in Libya. This “Khattalah” is a scapegoat for a good story to build Obama up only. Note that I am not accusing MI nor anyone in the above article of lying. However, where ever they have gotten the story, is where my skepticism is found. I have become very cynical of anything coming from our government and for good reason.
Signing off as–
“Disenchanted With Our Dishonest Government”
Kay – share your skepticism and critical POV. Not sure who can be trusted. We’re witnessing an incredibly high level of gamesmanship from all sides.
***** Is Achmadinejad coming out as a Romney supporter?
“Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad predicted the impending downfall of the “US empire,” blaming the collapse on a combination of the country’s massive debt and its loss of legitimacy within the international community, Iran’s official news agency IRNA reported Thursday.”
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=288322
(And why has Diane Feinstein been so quiet about current events? Finally a piece quoting her appears linked on Drudge.)
Bottom line: if it looks like a duck . . .
Just for fun – bad lip reading, the first debate enjoy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlwilbVYvUg&feature=g-logo-xit
Patcairn , VTX…try this on. …
The Ambassador was meeting the Turkish Ambassador because they were using Turkey to run weapons through to the rebels in Syria…they thought. They are in fact going to AlQaida…
The Muslim Brotherhood and Obama made the film for cover…Those mobs were called out because the weapons were on the move, including the Manpads…No drone would shoot nor see the weapons being moved through huge crowds of mobs….Obama is arming the Muslim Brotherhood…Obama armed AlQaeda in Libya to take down Quaddiffi…
Ambassador Stevens was also CIA and the arms dealer …Men sent in to track arms were doule crossed…Arms going all over the Middle East to the Mulim Brotherhood, whose offshoot AlQaeda is in receipt of the arms…VTX, you said watch for Jordan move…well, it’s here. Jordan threatened to have King strapping down, and is.
Please listen
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9EOSXsSpQpw
Possible. The demonstrations and violence were first and foremost, in my opinion, to provide foundation, threat and cover for pressures to restrict freedom of speech. However, there is nothing to say that the demonstrations didn’t have multiple purposes. The cover for arms movements, if on a substantial scale, would seem to fit.
We know that Stevens and Smith were engaged in weapons tracking and presumably recovery (buy back). Stevens did the negotiations (he spoke French as well as Arabic) while Smith was the electronic intel guy. Apparently weapons traffickers frequent online game sites and use their forums to converse. We know from Smith’s friend that he was an avid gamer. Okay so those bits are established.
Now Dianne Simon’s investigation http://gulagbound.com/33988/weapons-hunting-the-reason-for-the-9-11-murders-in-libya/ (fascinating read, btw) asserts that bin Qumu, who was released from Gitmo to Libya as a political prisoner was actually employed by Hillary to help in her “Civil Societies” project. If I interpret the information correctly, this would be the equivalent of Bush’s democratic nation building.
But with Obama’s affinity for Islam (and apparently being a Muslim), his radical roots and multiple connections with the Muslim Brotherhood, the administration has chosen to work with the radical side of life to transform the Middle East in a “populist” (and incidently anti-semetic) way. This means empowering the Muslim Brotherhood and, as you pointed out, by association, al Qaeda.
Obama supported Magarief in his effort to win his position as the defacto head of state of Libya. Magarief was an exile in the U.S. for almost 30 years. He is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. The location of this institute in Wales is evidently so coincidentally in the same area as Blue Mountain, the security group hired by the State Department for next to nothing to provide mobile security in northern Africa. What happened to them anyway?
The Libyan in put in charge of overall security by the State Department was one Fawzi Bukatef, a member of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood and the 17th Brigade. He reportedly received an urgent call for help the night of the attack but told his troops to stand down. Word on that from the administration or anyone else? Are we going after him too? Oh but justice will be done…
Then there is Obama’s family. His grandmother’s “charity” that supposedly raises funds from international sources, including the U.S., and uses them to support children and women has become a front to sent Kenyans to Wahabbist universities in order to overcome the Christian influence in Kenya from previous years.
So back to the point. There has to be an over-arching plan (starting in north Africa) here that first revealed itself in action with the sudden and baffling attack on Qaddafi after only two years previously increasing his aid because of his cooperation in funneling jihaddist intel.
The idea that Stevens could have been involved not only in weapons tracking and perhaps buy backs, but smuggling as well seems reasonable to me. Turkey is the conduit. That is established too. Maybe in order to get back the most dangerous weapons, the State Dept. agreed to help with arms to Syria. I don’t know. It is getting so convoluted that I almost expect the CIA to order a hit on the State Department to cover up for military shipments to rebels or something. Wait…
Hadn’t seen/heard this one. Thanks. It backs up what I’ve been reading too.
It won’t stop with Syria either. The MB opposing Iran isn’t going to settle well in Tehran and we know the ultimate target of the MB is the destruction of Israel. Once Syria falls, three of the biggest countries near Israel will no longer be constrained from attacking. The Camp David Accord is toast all but officially. Syria was in a stalemate with Israel, but won’t be any longer. Jordan is next, as has been mentioned elsewhere. Next? Yemen? UAB? Kuwait? Iraq? SA?
If WWI could start from a simple assassination, it is pretty simple to envision WWIII erupting from the fuse Obama/Clinton’s policies lit.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t-lbNQtp8iY
I heard that show. Good segment from Beck. And good to have the YouTube IRL. Thanks.
Very interesting theories, time-lines and 6 degrees of separation from Obambam that make Kevin Bacon look like an also ran. What I would like to see is a comparison between the security requests timelines and the guest registry at the White House. If it’s true that the Muslim Brotherhood has been entertained at the White House, then comparing significant events to their visits might be revealing…or at the very least fuel for the conspiracy theorists.
What say you, UM?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/04/05/muslim-brotherhood-envoys-met-with-white-house-officials-in-dc/
http://townhall.com/columnists/michellemalkin/2012/09/26/who_is_white_house_visitor_hisham_altalib/page/full/
BENGHAZI-GATE: Did two heroic SEALs ruin Obama’s
October Surprise? [UPDATED]
Please see critical update below
directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/benghazi-gate-did-two-heroic-seals-ruin.html?m=1 directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/benghazi-gate-did-two-heroic-seals-ruin.html?m=1
We’re to believe that a bombing is supposed to turn disastrous Obama into Patton and magically make millions of voters forget 4 years of an oppressive, bankrupt economy as they somehow thrust military action to the top of their priority list on the eve of the election?
Who honestly believes this makes any remote bit of sense?
COME ON, PEOPLE.
Regarding WHI/WSI’s update: Other information states that a Gitmo releasee named Abu Sufian bin Qumu, who is associated with al Qaeda, was responsible for the Benghazi attack organization. So is Khattalah the right guy? Of course, it seems more than possible that there would be more than one organizer.
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/10/17/feinstein-intelligence-flaw-lax-security-to-blame-for-libyan-terror-attack/
Feinstein has spoken on Libya. Blames attack on lax cecurity and intelligence.
Feinstein backs up the bogus claim that Obama called it a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden – why? She goes on to say director of intelligence released talking points the following day – why is she blaming intelligence?
Isn’t Feinstein supposed to have oversight so this doesn’t happen?
She’s part of the conspiracy?
The security lapses have been questioned going way back in time . . . and no objections to HUMA?
This is smelling worse and worse . . .
One critical difference between this hypothetical situation and the killing of Osama Bin Laden is that Obama wasn’t responsible for 9/11/01 but her sure as hell was responsible for 9/11/12. So Taking out Bin Laden was like a bonus but even if he kills some more muslims so what? This whole thing wouldn’t have happened in the first place if Obama wasn’t so incompetent and that is what he cannot erase even if he kills this muslim. Plus he lied through his teeth about the whole thing and that also cannot be erased. Plus revenge is not going to bring these dead Americans back to life and it is not going to get people jobs and bring the economy back to life so in the end so what?
Remarkable:
Ahmadinejad says things that make sense — to those of us who comprehend that Team Zero is destroying the United States of America, he lays it out with a withering assessment.
Excerpts (my enemy’s enemy is definitely my friend):
. . . Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad predicted the impending downfall of the “US empire,” blaming the collapse on a combination of the country’s massive debt and its loss of legitimacy within the international community, Iran’s official news agency IRNA reported Thursday. . .
. . . “How long can a government with a $16,000 trillion foreign debt remain a world power?” he asked at a press conference with Kuwaiti media personnel. . .
. . . “An empire, or a government, remains in power so long as the people under its power support it, but today the Americans have acted in a way that the world nations do not like them at all, and therefore, their international legitimacy is annihilated.” . . .
. . . Ahmadinejad also predicted that the West would soon drop their alliance with the “Zionist regime,” saying that Westerners and US politicians are increasingly “at a loss” as to why Israel exists. . .
. . . Downplaying the effect of Western sanctions on the Iranian economy, Ahmadinejad said that the Islamic Republic would persevere. . .
http://www.jpost.com/IranianThreat/News/Article.aspx?id=288322
(Is this Romney/Ryan’s contribution to the October Surprises?)
Hmmm . . . film to be released just days before the election and the offended are making violent threats already?
Anyone smell NationalGeographic-Gate?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/10/national-geographic-bombarded-with-threats-over-osama-film-will-obama-apologize/
Enough with the October Surprises . . . Obama’s a lying POS and it’s got to be a landslide.
Just in time for the third debate – on foreign policy.
Mexican attorney general: “Obama more involved in Fast & Furious than admitted!”
” . . . President Barack Obama appears to be getting it from all sides regarding a government snafu dubbed Operation Fast and Furious. Besides both houses of the U.S. Congress and a number of public-interest groups investigating what is being characterized as a rogue federal law enforcement operation, Mexico’s attorney general is infuriated over the allegations that the U.S. was behind the smuggling of weapons into Mexico that ended up killing her countrymen.
In a statement released by Mexican Attorney General Marisela Morales, she called Operation Fast and Furious “an attack on Mexicans’ security.”
Morales told Mexican reporters that she is demanding a full and honest explanation from the United States government especially since evidence is being gathered that reveals the Obama administration was more involved in Operation Fast and Furious than top officials admitted in their sworn statements.
If what is being reported is true, U.S. Attorney General and other government officials may have committed perjury and/or obstruction of justice if it’s proven they lied when testifying before House and Senate committees. . . ”
http://borderissues.us/2011/10/02/mexican-attorney-general-obama-more-involved-in-fast-furious-than-admitted/
Trick or Treat?
Isn’t it more than likely that the Mexicanos knew about FnF? Sure, the AG of Mexico might claim ignorance – maybe he was/is ignorant – but to think that the Mexican gov’t, which works so closely with our own military , was in the dark is a little too much to swallow.
Could very well be that the AG is capitalizing on our own government’s ignorance and ineptitude to deflect scrutiny from a scandal that they almost certain knew about.
Maybe I just follow this topic a little too closely. It’s possible I’m wrong. However, it wouldn’t surprise me if one day we learn that the Mexicans knew exactly what was going on.
Err, excuse me… AG = SHE. Oops.
Wrong. Under a Bush operation, the Mexican knew about it; under the Obimbo administration, the Mexicans were kept out of the loop. It was proven by a position paper by the ATF – that this was intended to be used to limit 2nd Amendment rights by “proving” that weapons were coming from the US.
The administration had egg on it’s face when it falsely made those claims before – and when even the press scoffed, they set out to prove that American weapons were being transported into Mexico.
The Mexican government wouldn’t have been so stupid as to arm the cartels; they are at war with the cartels. Not even a nice try, bud.
Mmmhmm, that is unless it was the Mexicans who leaked it.
I have been thinking that the lax security around the Ambassador was planned.
Since the Ambassador was in negociations to recover or buyback weapons given to locals during the leading from behind move to unseat Gadafi, he had to keep a low and friendly profile and had to be very mobile and discret.
Hence a small and not intimidating detail of foreign merceneries and a handful of trained special forces also acting in other capacities for the mission.
I think that looking at it this way makes sense in the point of view of the WH. Having as few people as possible involved and aware in the mission, and certainly keeping the military at bay.
Requests for more security were made by the military’s head in charge in Lybia for the security of the Embassies and personel at large. This was conflicting with the priority mission of the Ambassador. Hence more security was denied and the security in place was scalled back.
Perhaps, but it was the Ambassador himself who wanted more security; he would know what was required to complete his mission, right? He was surely baffled by the refusal to increase security, from what sources – including his diary – indicate.
And as WHI said, it is unsettling that he was sent back into that particular hornets’ nest. Someone wanted him dead – someone on our side. The question is: what did he know, and who didn’t want him to know it?
Looks like the consensus is that if/when they bomb Libya, it won’t change people’s votes for Obama – which is common sense. Albeit they do tend to be naive and unrealistic about these things & don’t have much common sense, they may be doing it mainly to get rid of of whatever they don’t want found as discussed…just hoping also that it will help Obama w/his foreign policy stuff.
But I’m also wondering …again…what next? Wouldn’t that set off some “revenge” attacks on us by those who aren’t helping Obama? Do they want that too? I would think not, but who knows with these crazed, desperate snakes. It’s like someone else said, it’s soooooo….convoluted…..on purpose? The more convoluted, the harder it is to find out the truth. It’s also probably very dangerous for Romney now that he is pulling ahead so much – actually, for both. They are playing with “fire” and demons.
Expect the unexpected as well as the expected. Pray for everyone’s protection.
If WE know this stuff, think what the ‘big guys’ must know?
We’re mere pawns in this charade – or, kabuki, as so many have already called it.
Can’t help but continually summon Mad Magazine’s Spy vs. Spy –
“The comic strip always features two spies, who are completely identical save for the fact that one is dressed in white and the other black. The pair are constantly warring with each other, using a variety of booby-traps to inflict harm on the other. The spies usually alternate between victory and defeat with each new strip.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spy_vs._Spy
Benghazi gone haywire – and intercepts should be anticipated all the way to election day.
Life imitates art?
Obama ‘won’ the debate because he didn’t bomb out like he did during the first debate.
This was the Obama I was expecting to show up and, boy, did he deliver – big time.
I can see how his side would think that he won, but I think he won with people who were already his supporters.
The only reason why Obama ‘won’ is because the he and the moderator kept shutting Romney down when he was starting to make points that resonate with people. However, I think that response was telling by anyone paying attentions. Obama just doesn’t stand up on his merits and it takes two people to try to shut Romney up. And Romney keeps going……That’s why Romney is going win this.
Americans don’t like bullies and liars. I’m still trying to figure out how Obama could say most of what he said with a straight face because it was just illogical….like the whole gas prices thing. On what planet do you have to live on for $2.00 gas to be a bad thing and a symptom of the economy crashing? That’s why Obama’s going to lose – he’s just so out of touch.
Then, they kept trying to shut Romney down when it came to Libya and F&F. Romney was kicking Obama’s ass and everyone who watched saw that.
Anyway – nothing Obama does surprises me these days. All I know is that every time Obama does things like this, it backfires in his face.
Obama isn’t Bill Clinton and people don’t put up with pictures of Americans being killed and their bodies being brought into the street. The visuals are just too damaging and the fact that they blamed it on a movie…..sorry, that doesn’t fly. The fact that the Ambassador asked for more security and didn’t get it – that doesn’t fly – especially given how dangerous the Middle East/North Africa are these days.
If we can come up with the money to build and maintain the new embassy in Iraq, then why couldn’t we come up with the money to protect our Ambassador?
If we can come up with the money for the freaking TSA scanners, then why can’t we come up with money to protect our people in the Middle East – who live w/more serious threats than we do – every single day?
I also got the impression that Candy was taken aback when Mitt started talking about F&F because she went out of her way to shut that down fast. They know that’s a loser for Obama too. Pushing gun control isn’t what people are interested in, but they are interested in learning why Brian Terry actually died and why the government seems to be covering it up.
That’s not to say crime isn’t a major concern for some people, but a lot of people recognize that there’s an increase in crime because the economy sucks and people do crazy things when they feel desperate and think that they have nothing more to lose.
Most communities aren’t pushing for gun control….it’s jobs, jobs, jobs.
Again, the planted question backfires in their faces.
Obeline and Cobra I post your link and LC, hat tip going back to 9/12
http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2012/10/benghazi-gate-did-two-heroic-seals-ruin.html?m=1
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2012
BENGHAZI-GATE: Did two heroic SEALs ruin Obama’s October Surprise? [UPDATED]
Please see critical update below
To to link …see comments
It’s a conspiracy theory, to be sure, but “Kozy” asserts the Benghazi attack was an “October Surprise” gone awry thanks to two SEALs who weren’t even supposed to be in Benghazi.
The scenario is both simple and plausible:
• In June, Egyptian President Morsipledged to secure the release of ‘The Blind Sheikh’, the extremist cleric responsible for the first World Trade Center attack.
• Eager to accommodate Morsi and strengthen the U.S. relationship with Egypt, Obama’s henchmen formulate a two-step cover story. The first step is a video that no one has seen, which was released in July.
• Next, strip security from the Libyan Ambassador, despite pleas from a variety of quarters for more security, not less. In essence, remove any barriers to using the Ambassador as a hostage.
• Back-channel communications between the White House and the Imam’s legal representatives confirm that a swap can be achieved with a high-level hostage exchange. The Imam’s cronies are informed that Ambassador Stevens has nosecurity in Benghazi. So the Imam can be secured through a trade after capturing Stevens who doesn’t even have a single bodyguard.
• Had all gone according to plan, Stevens would be released just before the election; Obama would take credit for that and a newly strengthened relationship with Egypt and Morsi.
• But what wasn’t planned: two ex-SEALs named Doherty and Woods. They only happened to be in Benghazi because they were on a separate intel mission to locate surface-to-air missiles.
So the terrorists launch their attack believing that there is no security whatsoever. And they are surprised to find that two SEALs are not only fighting back, but killing them left and right. The resulting firefight transforms the terrorists’ assault from a simple kidnapping into a murderous onslaught that cost all four Americans their lives.
Sure, it’s a crazy, right-wing conspiracy theory. But add in the following observations:
• Repeated denials for more security in Benghazi, despite requests from multiple quarters. No credible explanation has been offered for the removal of security by the White House or the State Department.
• Leading up to 9/11 — of all dates — there was no special security posture ordered in diplomatic installations around the Middle East.
• After the attack, a series of conflicting and morphing stories were offered by, among others, Ambassador Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Jay Carney, David Axelrod, Joe Biden, etc.
• Not only did the president go to sleep after getting word of the attack, but it appears he also refused security briefings in the aftermath of the attack, instead simply departing for a fundraiser in Las Vegas.
The theory being: the President didn’t need to stay awake after hearing of the attack. He didn’t need any briefings. He knew exactly what had happened.
Update: An alert commenter reminds of this bit of evidence, translated from Arabic by Walid Shoebat:
Video from Libya: ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’
Fast forward to the 1:15 mark in this video (if you don’t understand Arabic). Watch as the raw footage of a firefight in Benghazi is taking place. The news report loops the relevant portion of an exchange between gunmen, in which one can be heard, saying, ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’!
But, no. This is just some kind of crazy, whacked-out conspiracy theory. There’s got to be a much better explanation for the Obama administration’s removal ofall of Ambassador Stevens’ security, despite multiple pleas for more security. We just don’t know what it is yet.
The illustration for this UM post with Zero as Superhero has been difficult to look at.
But I just noticed something that’s stimulated the gag reflex: the abs aren’t abs at all . . . they’re actually sagging female breasts.
Ick.
Wow. Good eyes. Very clear once we know what to look for. Ditto. Ick.
And, right on schedule:
Exclusive: Libyan Islamist says he was at U.S. consulate during attack
“Abu Khattala denied sanctioning or leading the attack, but said he understood the anger which fuelled it.
A crudely made movie that mocks the Prophet Mohammad, filmed in California and circulated on the Internet, has helped generate violent protests across the Islamic world.
U.S. officials have said they believe militants used the protests as cover to carry out an armed assault on the U.S. diplomatic compound and a building that was supposed to be a safe house.
“The film which insulted the Prophet was a direct attack on our values and if America wants good relations with the Muslim world it needs to do so with respect,” Abu Khattala said. “If they want to do it with force, they will be met with force.”
He said that after he arrived at the consulate, he began to help direct traffic with other militia leaders.”
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/18/us-libya-consulate-attack-idUSBRE89H19P20121018
Notice he is following the administrations line RE: the “offensive video.” He will be sacrificed, and Obama will once again be Prezident Gutsy Call.
He is losing big, folks!
Just read the latest Hillbuzz article about how angry are blacks ALL OVER THE COUNTRY..
I’ve had this for a long time – but it’s past time to release it, considering that Ambassador Stevens was an imitator of T.E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia.) Lawrence, of course, was sympathetic to Arab hegemony in Arab lands, but he was also sympathetic to Zionist ambitions in what we now call the modern state of Israel.
It is also time to put to rest the notion that Arabs have always been against Jews – or more specifically, Zionists; in fact, they were not. The anti-Israel work is a work of the devil – Hitler, for one, who conspired with al Husseini to eliminate Jews in the region as well as elsewhere. These evil seeds have bred toxic plants, poisoning the region with deadly hatreds that are as unneccessary as they are common. It was a fact that many regional Arabs did not endorse al Husseini’s vile intentions, and protected them from the “honorary Aryan’s” depradations.
What is amazing is how educated Arabs – such as Feisal – were more than sympathetic to the Zionist cause. It is therefore a complete surprise that American politician like Obama would turn his back on Israel. Please note that he hasn’t just turned on Israel just recently; he always found himself in the company of pro-Palestinian Mooslums and anti-Zionists, and his employment of pro-Palestinian provocateurs and those pussilanimous pundits who promote the destruction of Israel is not as unexpected as it might seem the hideous visage and screech of Helen Thomas still shrieks like a succubus – she is not yet deceased – in the form of al-Marayati, whom the White house deems fit to render judgements on Human rights.
This link puts the history of the region in a bit different perspective – and it is in accord with other serious biographical efforts of Col. Lawrence.
http://www.aish.com/jw/me/Lawrence_of_Judea.html