Media Moving Against Obama Benghazi Lies

As promised, the Mainstream Media stalwarts are joining in the chorus to find out what Obama knew and when regarding the Benghazi Massacre.

ABC News, CBS News, CNN, and even strongly pro-Obama NBC News have or are featuring stories regarding the apparent White House cover-up that now surrounds the Benghazi attack.  Of those news agencies, ABC and CBS are making the more aggressive push on the story as of now, with NBC and CNN appearing far less enthusiastic in providing coverage.

I would urge all of you to make your presence strongly known in the comment sections of ALL political stories on each of those news program websites demanding more information on the the Obama Benghazi Cover-Up.

All of us together can place Obama’s Benghazi lies in their rightful place in the news cycle – right at the top of every page of every news agency in America.

539 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

29 Comments to Media Moving Against Obama Benghazi Lies
    • VTX
    • The media empires run the risk of being proven to be a part-and-parcel of the Obama campaign, and there are rules for running a campaign – disclosure laws and all that. There are too many surrogates of the Obamacamp who are not identifying themselves – (unlike PACs, which must identify themselves, and regular political campaigns, which also must identify themselves.)

    • ITYS
    • Absolutely Despicable this man who calls himself Obama, to know and NOT do anything to assist those Americans for 7hrs!!! Then to continue to perpetrate the lies to the American people for 2wks and worse to indict a private citizen and potentially cause retaliation actions against the US. And finally this corrupt man speaks out against this video and by extension the American people to the corrupt UN!

      I do not think there are words for the despicable actions if this egregious man and his deploranle band of miscreants!!

    • Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
    • Folks, what do you expect from a jihadi?

      The fact that he’s “our jihadi” doesn’t mean he’s not a communist moslem saboteur out to destroy the USA from within.

      There’s a reason we don’t (or didn’t used to) elect communists. This is it.

    • charlotte

      Ed Klein: Bill Clinton ‘Urging’ Hillary to Release Benghazi Documents That Would ‘Exonerate’ Her, Destroy Obama’s Re-Election Hopes

      Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered additional security for the U.S. mission in Benghazi ahead of the terrorist attack but the orders were never carried out, according to “legal counsel” to Clinton who spoke to best-selling author Ed Klein. Those same sources also say former President Bill Clinton has been “urging” his wife to release official State Department documents that prove she called for additional security at the compound in Libya, which would almost certainly result in President Obama losing the election.

      Appearing on TheBlazeTV’s “Wilkow!” on Wednesday night, Klein told host Andrew Wilkow that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been having “big fights” for “two or three weeks” about the issue, according to his two sources on Clinton’s legal counsel. While Bill Clinton wishes his wife would “exonerate” herself by releasing the documents that show she wasn’t at fault for the tragic security failure in Libya, the secretary of state refuses to do so because she doesn’t want to be viewed as a traitor to the Democratic party.

      On Glenn Beck’s radio show earlier on Wednesday, Klein said his information comes from two “very good” sources.

      Wilkow pointed out the obvious, that the Obamas and the Clintons have a “very behind the scenes, tense relationship” — to put it lightly.

      “I said to you last night, and I think I stand corrected, that it seemed like Obama out-Clintoned the Clintons,” Wilkow said. “But Clinton seems to have gone along with all of this because he knew that Hillary would be exonerated in the end.”

      He then asked Klein whether he thought Clinton would resign over the Libya scandal and expose the truth.

      “No,” the author said immediately. “I can’t imagine that she would resign. It would bring down the entire administration. [Obama] would lose the election and she would be essentially blamed by the left-wing base of the party.”

      “She will not be tarred with the blame for bringing down this administration,” Klein added.

      In an exclusive interview with The Blaze, Klein confirmed that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been engaging in “heated discussions” where the former president has urged his wife to “release the documents that would exonerate her.” He reiterated that Clinton has refused to do so because she fears she would look like a “Judas,” or a traitor, in the administration and it might hurt her chances for a presidential nomination in 2016.

      If the claims turn out to be true and Clinton did suggest more security be sent to Benghazi, it is appropriate to ask: why didn’t it happen?

      Klein said Clinton’s request for beefed up security would have to go through CIA special ops and or the Pentagon.

      “But none of that would happen with the National Security advisor to the president of the United States Tom Donnellan going to the president and saying, ‘We want to send reinforcements to Libya because our ambassador is in jeopardy,’” Klein explained.

      Ultimately, he indicated the ultimate authority would have been President Obama.

      Wilkow and Klein also discussed what role Obama’s closest advisor, Valerie Jarrett, played in the Benghazi cover-up.

      By Obama’s own admission, Klein said, the president never makes a big decision without first consulting with Jarrett.

      “We have to assume that Valerie Jarrett, who is also by the way hooked into the Chicago campaign…that she was part of this cover-up in the White House.”

      He continued: “The CIA got cables, the Department of Defense got cables, the NSA got cables during the attack on Benghazi, in addition to the emails that have since been made public. We know that there are cables that we haven’t seen yet, confirming the State Department cables that this was an al-Qaeda linked attack.”

      These new revelations, following Tuesday night’s explosive report that 300 to 400 national security officials received emails detailing the Benghazi terrorist attack as it was happening, raise fresh questions about the truth behind the Benghazi attack.

      The emails revealed that the Libyan radical Islamic group Ansar al-Sharia claimed responsibility for the attack just two hours after it began. White House officials told CBS News that an unmanned Predator drone was sent over the U.S. mission in Libya, providing Washington with a live feed to the chaos that unfolded.

      To read the full emails, click here.


      • E.A.B.
      • I remember WHI talking in an interview about the huge influence WSI had over the Clinton administration.

        Time for one of those phone calls?

      • VTX
      • Charlotte,
        Sounds credible.
        Never figured Hillary was the one trying to kill the Ambassador – but someone in the administration had to be part of what must be considered an assassination.

        Bill is arrenging for “permission” from the Left for Hillary to stop taking the fall for the Bat Faced One and her cronies. The Left knows that their pony is dead, their Trojan Horse exposed – if they and Hillary want any hope of recovering in 2020, they’ll do the same thing Obama did to Chris Stevens: they’ll do a Uriah on him, leaving him out in the open. Not that I hope to see them prosper in the future – I’d like to see them all in jail.

        • Obeline
        • Don’t gush too much over Hillary, please . . . while she and Bubba may owe Zero some serious payback, she has her own agenda — and her own personal Muzzie sympathizer Huma, as well.

          Might be expedient to encourage her NOW — but don’t trust her for a second.

          She’s a Soros puppet (who hosted Chelsea’s wedding?) and has leftist roots that go way back (see her college writing).

          Trust no one.

          • VTX
          • Obeline,
            Sorry I gave that impression – I had included, then deleted, a line about Huma. The main difference between the Clintons and Obama is that he’s a Muslim, and she didn’t order Stevens’ (and the others’) murder. Is it possible that Huma intercepted the order to increase security?

            I wonder, though, if Stevens was the target after all: Gamers have talents – and can expose things not wished to be exposed.

            • Obeline
            • Lesser of momentary evils, of course.

              Who knows what Zero had on the Clintons in ’08 that made Bubba back off then about revealing the Kenyan roots of the lying fraud calling himself the President . . .

              If Hillary had won, where would we be now?
              Virtually same place?

              Hypotheticals are impossibly futile – but, all we know, is that BY ANY MEANS POSSIBLE we must get rid of BARACKHUSSEINOBAMA now.

    • Ace
    • Charlotte, I think Hillary is dripping out this information. She has to be delicate about it. She knows most democrats aren’t very bright and will never figure out she and her husband have been sabotaging “Obama” for quite some time now if she plays it right.

      In the meantime, the dems have been busted in three swing states attempting voter fraud, proving that they already know they’ve lost this thing.

      Romney is tied in blue Michigan tonight for crying out loud. The dems are screwed, and they know it.

    • CitizenWatcher
    • I am still not understanding what the goal was in this operation. Lets brainstorm for a second. Was the end game?

      1. Obama blamed the attack on a youtube video. We now know the Muslim Brotherhood Project outlines a goal of dismantling free speech in the United States through targeted campaigns of Islamophobia mirroring the gay rights agenda. No slander against Islam. This youtube story went on for weeks.

      2. Obama declared at the UN declared leaders of the world will not slander Islam. Obama is now islams hector the ho protector. Continues to attack free speech

      3. Glenn Beck reveals (along with others, including yahoo) Amb. Stevens is running guns during the Libya overthrow.

      4. Stevens is ordered back to libya – to recover weapons? Not in my opinion. He was a commi traitor working with the sharia islamists

      5. We then find out Amb. Stevens meets with a Colonel of the Turkish Army the day he is killed. Stevens sends warnings his group is in danger. Other US libya operatives repeat warnings – showcase worry

      6. Obama is BFF with the prime minister of turkey and known islamists from turkey are working with libya militia. PM of Turkey has to know about libya partnership?

      7. Live feed of the attack was piped to the Pentagon, White House and other security officials

      8. Amb. Stevens and military officials left to die on live feed.

      I have left some stuff out but wanted to put out some key facts.

      I speculate Obama was setting up the US military by roguely supplying arab spring countries with US weapons, could China and Russia vote a UN resolution to disarm America for these rogue operations? Disband military? Turn control over to the UN?

      It seems now Obama is openly working with Sharia law islamists by funding and supplying weapons even using US corporations to help overthrow arab countries

      Why is Obama so brazen?
      What is he setting up?
      Who is the kill list targeted after?

      What was the role of this operation?

    • E.A.B.
    • For UM:

      It tells an old story from another century, but I think a song that perfectly captures the overriding feel of the Benghazi debacle is an old folk song called “Granite Mills,” about a mill that burned down in Massachusetts with 23 people inside, thanks to the sloppiness and willful disregard of the management.

      “They might all have been saved, had the truth been told…”

    • AmericaTheBeautiful

      Obama’s Apology Tour Was Crafted By Handful Of Radical Advisors

      President Obama denies his foreign policy amounts to an “apology tour,” but he follows a “doctrine of mea culpa” crafted by a handful of advisers… View Enlarged Image

      President Obama indignantly denied Mitt Romney’s charge in Monday’s final debate that his foreign policy amounts to “an apology tour” around the world.

      “This has been probably the biggest whopper that’s been told during the course of this campaign,” Obama protested. “And every fact-checker and every reporter who’s looked at it, governor, has said this is not true.”

      In fact, the president has followed a “doctrine of mea culpa” crafted by a handful of radical advisers who have urged him to, in so many words, apologize for America’s war on terror and nuclear superiority.

      • Samantha Power. “U.S. foreign policy has to be rethought,” according to Obama’s national security adviser for multilateral affairs and human rights. “Instituting a doctrine of mea culpa would enhance our credibility by showing that American decision-makers do not endorse the sins of their predecessors.”

      Power has suggested the president literally bow to foreign leaders, as atonement for Americans’ “sins” — and that’s exactly what he’s done.

      A former New Republic journalist, Power is also a 9/11 apologist who thinks Islamic fanatics hate America because it backs governments that repress them — such as the Mubarak regime in Cairo.

      “It’s not a coincidence that all but one of the 9/11 hijackers came not from axis of evil countries but from American allies, from Egypt to Saudi Arabia,” she says. Power thinks the 9/11 massacre helped “Americans empathize with the victims of genocide.”

      She redefines U.S. vital interests to include genocide, poverty and disease, and was the main White House aide agitating for removal of Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi on “humanitarian grounds.”

      • Anne-Marie Slaughter. The former State Department policy chief, who last year returned to Princeton University, also has advised the president to apologize for the war on terror.

      “The president must ask Americans to acknowledge to ourselves and to the world that we have made serious, even tragic, mistakes in the aftermath of Sept. 11 — in invading Iraq, in condoning torture and flouting international law, and in denying the very existence of global warming,” Slaughter said.

      • Rashad Hussain. The White House adviser-turned Mideast envoy helped Obama kick off his apology tour in 2009 with a remorseful speech to Muslims in Cairo that he helped draft.

      In the 6,000-word speech, which never denounced “terrorism,” Obama apologized for the war on terror, lamenting “it led us to act contrary to our ideals.” He vowed to close Gitmo, the detention camp at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba, and take other “concrete actions to change course.”

      Hussain also helped engineer the Muslim Brotherhood’s rise to power in Egypt as Obama’s envoy to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, a powerful bloc of 57 Muslim governments that some say is a caliphate in the making.

      As a Muslim activist, Hussain regularly spoke to Brotherhood front groups and defended convicted terrorists.

      “Naturally, you have to worry that he will be the OIC’s representative to the U.S. rather than the other way around,” said former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy.

      Since Hussain has advised the president, the Mideast has turned more anti-American and more committed to Israel’s destruction. Egypt is buying submarines, remilitarizing the Sinai in violation of the Israeli peace treaty and forming a new alliance with nuclear Iran and Turkey.

      Mubarak turned down a nuke deal with Russia. Will the new Muslim Brotherhood regime? It’s teaming up with Tehran, which has threatened to wipe Tel Aviv off the map with nuclear missiles.

      Meantime, Obama’s top nuclear arms negotiator is trying to undermine Israel’s nuclear deterrent — along with America’s.

      • Rose Gottemoeller. Echoing the president, the top State official thinks America is a global “bully” and that its nuclear superiority has created a global arms race.

      She argues the U.S. must show humility by signing nuclear disarmament treaties and become strategically equal with Russia and China.

      Gottemoeller, a longtime Democrat activist, justifies the radical goal of slashing America’s nuclear weapons arsenal to “zero” — unilaterally, if necessary — on a Biblical passage: “They shall beat their swords into plowshares.” The verse happens to be the same one anti-nuclear protestors recently scrawled on a U.S. nuclear weapons research facility in Tennessee.

      Gottemoeller in 2010 told a “social justice” group that it inspired her to work harder to cut both strategic and tactical warheads, along with nuclear attack targets in Russia and China.

      She also wants to ban testing of all remaining warheads followed by a ban on fuel production. At the same time, she wants to scrap U.S. missile defense.

      Most Cold war babies grew up hating the Soviet Union. Not “Rosie” Gottemoeller. She admired the former communist superpower. Her father told her the Soviets were better at science, so she studied Russian and immersed herself in Soviet propaganda. She’s visited Moscow so many times she now considers it her “second home.”

      “She loves to shmooze the Russians,” said national security expert Bill Gertz — and the Chinese, who she’s invited back to the nuclear weapons labs. After Gottemoeller kicked open Los Alamos as head of the Clinton Energy Department’s national security office, Chinese espionage exploded

Leave A Response

* Required