As the post-election news cycle heats up with issues ranging from the sudden resignation of CIA Director Petraeus, to the scheduled hearings this week on the still growing Benghazi scandal, as well as the Obama administration overhaul that appears underway, we are honored to bring you this week the first of many interviews with a well connected and determined Republican Insider who views the 2012 election outcome as a very real opportunity for conservative values to wage a serious and needed comeback within the American electorate.

As promised, this individual has already proven in our first interview to be incredibly insightful, honest, and ultimately optimistic for the future of the United States.  They made it very clear the Republican Party has a great deal of work to do – but that work is already underway, and the battle against progressive socialism in the United States must never end.


“Politically speaking, I am,  above everything else, an American first.  A Conservative second.  A Republican third.”  -REPUBLICAN INSIDER

This initial interview is to be published in its entirety this week.




The Man Who Calls Himself Obama


A collection of insights and warnings from various Insiders during the first term of President Barack Obama. 

Here now is Volume One of some of that truth from those we simply know as The Insiders, including portions of interviews never before published…


521 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

    • ebysan
    • UM

      Please ask Republican Insider what they are going to do about Obama Administration possibly

      “Rigging” the voting machines in important key states to come out in Obama’s favor!

      The Computer Programmer testified (in 2004) about the ability to Rig elections……He wrote a program to allow this to happen…. Maxine Waters was questioning this man in 2004 about how this is possible!!

      There was a huge “Disparity” in the number of people who turned out for Obama on the campaign trail & the number of people who turned out for Romney!!

      Even Bruce Springstein could not pack the venue for Obama day before election.

      At “11pm” the night before the election 11,000 people turned out for Romney.

      This should have been a “RED FLAG” to question of election rigging!!


    • VTX
    • Dear Ulsterman,

      If this Insider thinks about referring to those of us who recognize the problem of an illegally/unethically conducted election, and if he/she thinks those of us who question Obama’s background are “birthers,” then perhaps he/she is not worth listening to or commenting upon. Fair warning.

      No one who has paid any attention to Sheriff Joe’s deliberations and refuses to acknowledge the myriad problems with the eligibility of the man in the whitehouse is worthy of our attention.

      Remember that WSI had grave doubts about Obama – referring to him as “the man who calls himself Obama.”

      Just sayin’.

      • Sallyal
      • Exactly. But remember, it is the fact that jugears was born a DUAL citizen, by his own admission and the State Department, that makes him constitutionally ineligible. The terms dual citizen and natural born citizen are mutually exclusive.

        That being said, Sheriff Joe’s investigation proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that whatever “evidence” jugears has “provided” is fake. Debbie Schossel ( was the first to prove it with the forged selective service registration but nobody cared to pay any attention. For our congridiots to ignore all this evidence proves their complicity.

        OT, I was glad to hear Sheriff Joe was re-elected. Wonder why?

      • Rosie
      • I am soooo tired of hearing all the whining Repubs, post election, refusing to acknowledge all of the evidence of voter fraud and instead making statements of caving in to liberal arguments. What they refuse to do is fight for the good that makes them different from the opposition. This is exactly what the regime has for a goal all along….only one recognized part by the masses via goodies. And I’m also tired of hearing so called conservative talk show hosts make a living off wringing their hands about the horrors and illegalities of the regime while they ignore the evidence at hand to expose Zero’s felonies and crimes against the American people that has been labeled as “probable cause” for felonies committed. Kristol is very typical of this kind of caving when he stated that he didn’t see anything all that wrong about asking millionaires, i.e. the job creators, to pay more taxes. Just when does he think THAT will end???

      • Rurik
      • A War On some Americans seems to have worked pretty well for the Halfrican Prince. I have always had small l libertarian tendencies with my conservatism. But I also have serious reservations about those Capital L Libertarians, who so often seem to be mainly obsessed with mainstreaming drug use and militant homosexuality. Too often they seem to want an anarchistic society in which all personal choices are free of consequences with the costs passed along to the rest of society.
        There are a lot of activities I am prepared to tolerate, so long as Libertarians do not, in turn try to use state power to to compel me to go the last step to full approval and embrace of what I scorn. That seems something of a doctrinal contradiction. And that is what I have found to be the essential difference between Large and small l libertarianism.

        • M. Simon
        • “A War On some Americans seems to have worked pretty well for the Halfrican Prince.”

          Yes. But he is clever. He CLAIMS to only be making war on 1%.

          Any one who has ever sparked up (50% of the population) or ever had an abortion (20 to 30 million) feels they are in the cross hairs of the Rs. That is a LOT of subtraction.

          It would be nice if we had a party that stuck to economics and left the morals to the private sector. Except for the universals. Robbery, legitimate rape, theft, fraud, etc.

    • PerpWalkThemThruTheRoseGarden
    • VTX, Great post. Agree 100%. This is a continuation of an excercise in babysitting the potential rabble-rousers. No one here who claims to have an inside track actually does or it would have been a you-had-me-at-my-father-was-a-British-citizen-at-the-time-of-my-birth moment. (Remember Obama said it himself on page 26 of his autobiography Dreams From My Father)

      If the Repubs wanted to right the ship now, why not make Sen. Paul Ryan the new Speaker of the House. Then impeach Obama & Biden. Force their resignation (take your pick from fraud-ineligibility to Benghazi & anything in between) Then thru Constitutional line of succession, we have President Paul Ryan & he picks Romney as Vice President. Problem, meet solution.

      P.S. I wrote here & elsewhere about Soros owning shares of Diebold voting machines with links to cached pages of when & how many shares he sold (with links) I also posted here & elsewhere LAST YEAR (with links) about how easily vote tallies could be flipped as well as about SCYTL. People are acting like it’s something new are full of crapola. There’s no excuse for this fraud-in-chief to have been elected the 1st time if there were TWO opposing parties doing their jobs.

      • VTX
      • Perpwalkem,

        Great post – the only amendment to your suggestion would be to make Peter King Majority Leader; he doesn’t back down – and he’s not a moozie collaborator like so many Repugs are. On the other hand, I would prefer the line of succession to be exactly as you indicated – so I’m torn on that.

        It looks like Beaner (that’s the way I prefer to spell his name) has skeletons; I appreciate some of what he’s tried to do, but he’s been attenuated. You can tell when someone has been turned; there’s a sick feeling – (same way some of us Churchers can tell when a worship leader’s prayers fall like a punch to the stomach, and we don’t feel like praying with them because their prayers are just so many empty words – I’ve seen two of those in recent years, and the latter of the two probably doesn’t think anyone knows…but we know.)

        The gut says we’re being led to the slaughter. I say that we had better prepare to bring out the knives – the quiet way of getting things done, before we’re tied up and put in Islamic dungeons or burnt alive in our Churches and Synagogues like they do in our enemy Pakistan’s unholy land. Uhhh, was I ranting? I’ll leave it.

      • luxuryoption
      • @PERP:
        The congress only presents the evidence for impeachment. THE SENATE MUST IMPEACH AND REMOVE THE PRESIDENT.

        Nice idea. Won’t happen with this collective group of wimps.

      • Rurik
      • Very goood, I agree with your general thrust. But we really cannot make a Senator a Speaker of the House. Different greasy poles to climb.

      • Libertylady
      • The House impeaches, the Senate tries and convicts. Therefore, the loss of the Senate was a double/triple-whammy: 1) Only the Senate can approve treaties, 2) Only the Senate can approve Supreme Court nominees, and 3(only the Senate can convict in case of impeachment.

        Because the House has no way to MAKE the Senate convict, we are screwed.

    • charlotte
    • If this person is sincere, he HAS TO REALIZE that BOEHNER HAS TO GO. Boehner has been a DISASTER for the GOP. A total DISASTER.For heaven’s sake, Trey Gowdy has more balls in his pinkie than Boehner has in his pants. How can the GOP fight back with a pussy face like BOEHNER?

    • silverdust
    • Frankly, there’s no difference between a D and an R. They’re all progs underneath. The Repub party has been spineless as long as the Demonrats have been corrupt. So, in other words, forever.

      If the Repubs don’t want TEA Party reps to spoil their greedfest, fine. I’ll take a Palin Conservative any day of the week.

      I am sick to death of lily-livered, linguine-spined Republicans like Boehner and the brilliant Mitt Romney — who folded like a cheap suit. I wonder if the well-off Mr. Romney feels any guilt about what his RINO campaign has wrought on America and her citizens. Then again, he won’t have to worry. It’s only the middle class that Communists gut, ’cause THAT’s where the money’s at. My hunch is we’ll never hear another peep out of Mitt Romney.

      • NameMing the Merciless
      • Well, that was pretty obvious four years ago, when McPain trounced the Latter Day Mutton…Romney had just the same set of beliefs than Obama! Hell he had been the Governor of Taxachusett, wasn’t he? And McCain only had Sarah Palin going for him, not Mitten’s billion…still he gathered more votes!

        As for O’Bummer being a foreigner, a close look at the record show that his mother could not even afford a trip to Hawaii to give birth…even less go to Kenya…but, hey…Vancouver, CANADA? It was free, it was close and a phone call to mummy had this newspaper ad in Hawaii papers…easy then to fake a birth there instead of Canada and it explain the great expenses Hussein went to hiding everything.

        It it had been close, O’Bummer would have REALLY destroyed mitten…The real Latter Day “Saints”, the FLDS, from day one where a bunch of mountebanks, thieves and degenerate perverts just like Warren Jeff…moreover they where ruthless assassins…check the Mountain Meadow massacre ordered by Brigham Young himself!

    • Carmen Amaretto del Fuego
    • Perp, Site kept hanging up when I tried to reply to your post.

      I think it’s long past time to consider that the Republican “campaign advisors” are working for the enemy. What else explains why they keep advising R candidates to keep shooting themselves in the foot? After all, the communist agenda for the USA published back in the ’60s did say they would take over “one or both of the political parties.” Looks like they’re on the verge of accomplishing that.

    • Kat
    • As heartbroken I am after the election I really would welcome some common sense discussions about how the Republicans rebuild. Like a lot of people I started to get turned off by all the conspiracy stuff. The rudeness. How aggressive people got. It reminded me of what the crazy libs would do when Bush was in office. Everything was a conspiracy and now some people are doing the same to Obama. Not saying that none of it couldn’t be true just that I don’t think its a way we win elections. So if this Republican insider can give us some hope on how we can rebuild then I am all ears. Looking forward to hearing what they have to say.

      • MEL
      • I SAW THAT THERE WERE ABOUT 5 MILLION REPUBLICANS WHO DID NOT VOTE THIS TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF??????????????????? THEY LET OBAMA WIN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! CONSPIRACY STUFF IS BULLSHIT. REPUBLICANS GOT LAZY AND SAT HOME. WTF??????????????????????????????????? MAKES ME SICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        • ebysan
        • @ MEL

          As the Computer Programmer stated in a sworn testimony before congress in 2004 …He wrote a program to “Rig” elections…….. Votes are flipped for the pre-selected person to win….. He said the only way to prove this rigging is to have paper ballots to cross check.

          Many Republican votes could have been flipped to Obama!!

          Massive Voter Fraud has occurred in US!!

          It has also been suggested that we ask Republican Secretaries of State “NOT” to certify the election until all questions about voter fraud are abated.

          Some people think this may provoke a crisis, but it can’t be worse than the one we are looking at for the next four years and the impact on generations to come!

          America NEEDS Mitt, and Mitt won fair and square. This was not a ballot stuffing competition but an election. Let’s make sure it’s counted that way!

      • truthandjustice
      • It seems to me you can’t have common sense discussions about how you can rebuild without knowing the reasons you are in this predicament. Unfortunately, the reasons are BEYOND sinister, evil and deep. You have to be able to face any and all “inconvenient truths” pertinent. Those have been shown here with all our research links, etc. There ARE conspiracies involved – for both parties. I don’t understand why so many don’t believe in “conspiracies” & immediately “against” saying it. As long as there are people, there will be evil conspiracies – to obtain power, wealth, etc. Old as time (well, the fall of satan, Adam & Eve).
        You need to be “aggressive” in order to cut through it and gain victory – no, you don’t have to be rude – you can be respectful and just give the facts. The only thing I hate is when they are rude, aggressively telling LIES and/or things that have nothing to do with the issues just to malign. So, I must agree with VTX. And, common sense? I’m afraid that is very UNCOMMON.

        MEL — If I were you, I wouldn’t believe all the numbers about all that.

      • CHHR, VA
      • Did anyone also happen to notice that the only voice out there about the obvious questions in both turn out and vote flipping at the precint level are those of us with absolutely no political power? Why is that?

        I always believed, and still do, that McCain was ushered in as the establishment candidate to lose the election. Bringing in Palin was a double benefit. The GOP hated that she actually worked to curb corruption in her own state… unfortunately it worked. A Governor with over 80% approval before the campaign in 2008 was forced to leave her position and, for intents and purposes, her career ended.

        Romney mysteriously ended his campaign on the eve of the VA Primary in 2008… polls had him skewering McCain… so why the sudden departure?
        Then enter Romney for a second time. In this campaign, all indication pointed to a highly analytical person of character yet he missed a key component of offensive campaigning? If Romney was the “establishment” candidate, can anyone explain why there wasn’t a concerted effort to debase Obama’s negative BS? For that matter, how was Newt allowed to continue his BS during the primaries… cause we all know he’s as much about party politics as anyone and one would have thought he, above all on that stage, would have been in the know about establishment selections.

        Then enter the big “L” libertarian movement… anyone happen to notice how many self-evowed socialists actually endorsed Ron Paul?

        The TEA Party is a grownd swell of Americans asking qustions for the first time in years… yet BOTH parties did nothing but attack. For what? Because a well known “off balance sheet” form of revenue is finally saying no to both big government and reckless spending?

        IMHO, all of this simply proves that the so called “two party system” is a ficticious fairy tail in the US… it’s a game to the ONE political establishment and we, the little people, are nothing but pawns in a very sick game. WE The People have a lot of work to do, IF there’s any ability to still recover.

    • Barry Soetoro THE MOSLEM
    • I’m curious why Barry Soetoro has been using a (stolen) CT social security number for ___ decades, but no politician has called him on this.

      Let’s address that.

      How complicated can this issue be? Either Omoslem is USING a stolen social security number, or he isn’t.

    • VTX
    • Kat,
      You may be heartbroken, Kathleen, but you are seriously wrong. Did you even listen to Sheriff Joe’s news conferences? Did you look at the evidence? Can you explain why all of Barry’s records are sealed – even after the election? And Benghazi – is that not a coverup, or do you believe that the movie trailor excuse was a legitimate explanation? Wanna tell us about Fast and Furious? The Black Panther thuggery? The waylaying of military ballots, sent to the wrong places, and with a plane full of them crashing? The rules of engagement causing so many of our SEALS to go down in flames in Assghanistan? The claims that “al Qaeda is on the run,” when our Intel is being forced to work with them? That’s a short list.

      Maybe you should go back to writing your column. Why men aren’t men and so forth.

      • ebysan
      • @ VTX

        Excellent comments!!

        The person in our WH works for us & we can’t question him on all of the important issues you brought up!!

        When are our Congressmen going to ask these questions??….. They are well compensated & we should demand more from them!!

    • VTX
    • UM, ask RI what he/she plans to do about the fiscal cliff? I figured Romney had two ways of getting us out: stimulating job growth and cutting programs. Now that jobs growth is an impossibility with Obamafraud, what’s the solution?

      At best, I figured we had a 30% chance of national survival under Romney, 0% chance (well, actually negative numbers) under Comrade Barry.

      Put it another way: a new government under the Constitution, same as the Chinese did after they went Commie – except this won’t be Commie; write off the debts – and close down all but essential government services and do something with the Federal Reserve that makes it accountable to accounting. Jailing those who falsified the election – treason is the charge – and use all means and methods against SCYTL and their “American” collaborators.

      I believe that this is where we’re headed, or have be heading to if we are to have anything left.

      How about it, RI? Are you gonna just tell us how we should relax and let them steak the next election – if they have one? That we should just let things go quietly, stiff upper lip and all that? To re-quote Pink Floyd (with different nationalities):

      “Hanging on in quiet desperation is the US way.”

    • VTX
    • Some of us have put more than our opinions on the line; some of us have stuck our necks out in ways that can get us killed. I accept that. But I can’t stand for elected officials in suits and dresses tell us to be patient little puppies – or they’ll take the paper to our angry little bottoms until we whimper. To them, I raise my defiant middle finger.

      Some of us have a great deal more at stake than even our bank accounts and livelihoods.

      My wife says: “listen to Batman; keep your mask on.” To keep harm from coming to loved ones. Listen, if we don’t man-the-eff-up, our loved ones are going to be sold off as slaves to Muslims and Communists in about 5 years or less.

    • Holly
    • What is going to be accomplished in chats with RI? It’s obvious what is going on. Our country is under attack from within.

      And yet nothing is done and the destruction continues. What is wrong with the Republican Party? Is their inaction an attempt to divide and makes us weaker?

      • VTX
      • Holly,

        With Beaner sitting where he is, not presenting a credible threat to Barry or his minions, you’d better get out your burqa, your Bible or your bullets.

        I would recommend the latter two of the three.

      • truthandjustice
      • The Repub. party is mostly corrupt and not “constitutionalists”…they are Progressives also. They “highly dislike”, if not “hate” Conservatives b/c they are nuisances and just cause them more trouble by getting in their way to get unconstitutional bills passed that would benefit them personally & fulfill their ideology for globalism, etc. Blackmail, threats, unholy “deals” are their way of life there. Yes, I think the Obama Admin. is by far worse, radical but that’s why nothing gets done to help us. They also think that the only way to get re-elected is to be a wishy washy “moderate”. That’s why we got Romney – plus I think they thought he could be manipulated easily by the “powers that be”. That’s why we here are beyond distraught. We are “down for the count” in my opinion. I truly think short of supernatural interventions from God and His angels – we’re sunk. But I’ll fight and pray until “the end”………

        • M. Simon
        • The Republican masses are easily distracted. All you need to do is mention the “Abortion Abomination” or “Hippie Dopers” and the economy fades into the sunset.

          Because protecting the unborn is a higher calling than protecting the already born. And Hippies? Well you have to put your two minutes of hate into something. And besides most of them are Democrats. And besides returning the country to what it was pre-1914 re: dope will mean the end of civilization. Really.

    • truthandjustice
    • If I didn’t misunderstand, it seems UM has already had this first interview – just not published here yet. Questions go to the next one.
      What bothers me is the statement that he is very optimistic about our future —?????? How is that????? Does this not indicate more naivete, ignorance, idealism ? Does that mean “he” doesn’t know or accept all this evil stuff about Obama and his Evil Empire – what they are intent on doing? It seems to me, if you truly know these things, how can you be optimistic?
      We have become very jaded here – and for good reason. We are sick and tired of the same ‘ol, same ‘ol runaround and political games to keep the masses from revolting and to participate in yet another rigged election with false hope – helping to further the false notion that things can/will get better, etc.
      We used to be that way – but no more. I don’t know how much the RI knows of this. But the numbers are large that “know too much”. Which will probably make all our “enemies” even more desperate to get their agenda done asap.
      If we don’t get these “rigged” elections, corrupt software from flipping votes to the “enemies” desires, forget it. HAS to come FIRST on priority list (besides exposing Obama Admin. true agenda). Like VTX, what good is it if he doesn’t believe in the BC issue, their true agenda, rigged elections and/or unwilling to reveal it and really work at getting that exposed and turned around?
      It’ll take a lot of George Washington types who are willing to lose their lives for it – and have an abiding trust and belief in God to protect and help them in my view. Just like our Founders. Is he one? I guess we shall see…..

      • CHHR, VA
      • yea, and notice she mentions a “tremendous” debt and deficit problem… of course “investments” can’t end. But hey, we can’t mention anyting other than those selected groups we chose to exploit in the discussion of why they are actually stealing from one to continue the spending…

        Interesting isn’t it? Failed “investments” like Solyndra never happen to come up, but those persecuted teachers, first responders, and of course, veterans who will be the victims to this sick game of fear mongering to keep the “electorate” in line… just saying

    • VTX
    • Here’s the Dumbest Woman in America, the bin Laden apologist:

      See how easy it is to connect the dots? See how much danger we’re in? I say we should start by redistributing Murray’s wealth, and make her live in a Wahabbi/Salafist country for the next few years – somewhere that UBL would find acceptable.

    • e. scott
    • (Don’t think I got adamant enough (I don’t know how cognitive Mr. Boehner is) but here’s my first try: )

      Dear Speaker Boehner, Would you please consider backing Rep. Paul Ryan for the Speakership of the U.S. House of Representatives? This would lay solid ground for the impeachment/resignation of Obama/Biden with a line of succession to the Presidency being someone who has a strong financial background, which I’m sure that you recognize that we need, before we crowd, cowardly, nearer the fiscal cliff that the Washington Establishment, with you included, are want to do. I have been a strong Republican, all of my long life, and I am appalled and very disturbed by the self-interested and greedy shinanigans going on in D.C. (and around the country) The Democrats don’t need any help with corruption and thievery, whether it is with our money or our “rights.” I hold all of the House of Representatives accountable for the initial installing of Mr. Obama (or whatever his legal name is) in 2009. It would have been so easy for ONE REPRESENTATIVE to vote against his entering office but EVERY one chose, instead, to let the ineligible, illegal Obama, Soetoro, or whatever, to denigrate OUR White House and Country that he has no love for. I know that ALL OF YOU KNEW THIS!

      Given that you have, already, made such a grievous error, please consider giving your seat to Mr. Ryan so that we can right our Ship, as it were.

      I pray to God that you take this seriously.

      • ginghamturtle
      • All of these campaign strategist know each other and cheat .. they don’t care about the people or the party they care about the money…

        I hope this RI isn’t yanking everyone’s chain…

      • CHHR, VA
      • like you, I don’t trust anyone labled first with an “R” and I damn sure have come to despise those “Ds” which gives rise to the question… just who is out there to live up their oaths and do right by America anyway?

        To many actions labled as “suspicious” at best and not even questioned. If FOX is “in the tank” for the Republican party, then why haven’t these issues been raised at least there? With more viewers than the other cable shows combined, someting just doesn’t add up.

        Funny thing happens when folks are elected and make their way to “The Hill.” You quickly find out just how homogeneous it is around there. All one has to do is stand on the corner across from Capital Hill to see the noon dance… they all come out of the government building, remove their party affiliation, head to the restaurant across the street, and have a wonderful time patting each other on the back over drinks.

        Oh yea, and Patraeus is a threat to all of them… one only has to turn on any “news” channel to see that the effort over the weekend served only one purpose… funny how all those “lovers” are suddenly coming out of the woodwork, even given public forum to speak… and the dance continues.

    • Francesca
    • OT. Where does Obama have the power to cancel oil leases that have already been granted? Isn’t he accountable to anyone? Does Congress have to give approval to any of this? Isn’t O already in contempt of court over oil leases in the Gulf? I don’t know the answers to the above, but if it requires seeking relief through the courts, we must band together and get that process started. Are there any attorneys here?

    • Jules
    • How long before the one our E.A.B. calls a “deluded rambler,” our AtB calls “a national treasure,” and I think is much like Oscar Levant in that he has erased that fine line between genius and insanity, complains that if only RI had donated, things would have been different – how if only he would donate now, “exclusive” insights could save the day?

    • Essa
    • I believe this list of communist goals is worth posting to remind all of us what we are up against.

      The Communist Takeover Of
      America – 45 Declared Goals
      From Greg Swank

      Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record–Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963


      Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

      At Mrs. Nordman’s request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following “Current Communist Goals,” which she identifies as an excerpt from “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen:

      [From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

      1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

      2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

      3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

      4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

      5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

      6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

      7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

      8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

      9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

      10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

      11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

      12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

      13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

      14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

      15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

      16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

      17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

      18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

      19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

      20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

      21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

      22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

      23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

      24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

      25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

      26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

      27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

      28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

      29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

      30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

      31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

      32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

      33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

      34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

      35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

      36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

      37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

      38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

      39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

      40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

      41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

      42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

      43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

      44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

      45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

      Note by Webmaster: The Congressional Record back this far has not be digitized and posted on the Internet.

      It will probably be available at your nearest library that is a federal repository. Call them and ask them. Your college library is probably a repository. This is an excellent source of government records. Another source are your Congress Critters. They should be more than happy to help you in this matter. You will find the Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto interesting at this point.

      Webmaster Forest Glen Durland found the document in the library.

      Sources are listed below.

      Microfilm: California State University at San Jose Clark Library, Government Floor Phone (408)924-2770 Microfilm Call Number: J 11.R5

      Congressional Record, Vol. 109 88th Congress, 1st Session Appendix Pages A1-A2842 Jan. 9-May 7, 1963 Reel 12

      1963- The Year That Changed America

    • VTX
    • You know, I was considering how easy it was for an election to be stolen; it went off with barely a shrug from even the most Conservative of columnists, and is denied by all the usual suspects. Of course. It was so cleverly done, I believe it has other applications, which are just as admirable as subverting the US Constitution and all remaining election laws. I have a tongue-in-cheek suggestion for all those who wish to redistribute wealth, for their families and friends and even distant relatives (as long as they hold redistributionist mindsets):

      Hackers? Isn’t it past time to do a massive wealth-transfer to federal coffers from liberal hypocrites. (Since it will go to the government, it won’t really bother them right? It’ll go to good causes, like kids whose mommies call them “Payckeck” and union thugs)

      Start with these accounts – but don’t stop there!
      Debbie W.
      Warren Buffet
      Bill Ayers
      Bill Clinton
      Mayor Bloomberg
      Patty Murray
      Barney Frank
      Chris Dodd
      Nancy Pelosi
      Harry Reid
      Howard Dean
      The Walmart heir who donated to Obama’s campaign
      SCYTL owner
      George Soros
      Part owner of the NY Times, Carlos Slim
      Peter B. Lewis
      Ret.General Colin Powell
      Paul Krugman
      Barbara Streisand
      Pere Valles
      Bill and Melinda Gates
      Mark Zucekrberg
      Oprah Winfrey
      Harvey Weinstein
      Ted Turner
      Steven Spielberg
      Jon Stewart
      Jerry Springer

      Forgive me if I missed those many billionaires who want “rich people and billionaires” to pay more taxes, but since they probably will never get around to making personal donations and since they have accountants to keep them from actually doing what they prescribe, this is a far more direct route to property management i.e. wealth redistribution.

      So perhaps – seeing how easy it is to subvert an American election, a program could be designed to make all these monies disappear – whoof – (like a vote for Mitt Romney) and end up in the National Treasury. There will be an obligatory thank-you note, of course. Like the notes to the parents of departed SEALs, it will be a copy, electronically signed by the one in the Oval Office.

      There’s an entity called “Anonymous” that might be capable, but I’m thinking that there are better hackers available.

      And besides, to quote one of Obama’s favorite character’s most cherished lines from Billy Ray Valente in Trading Places: “It occurs to me that the best way to hurt rich people is to turn them into poor people.”

      I know that Barry would approve – I mean, really: he secretly hates all you rich liberals, unless you drool on him; after you’ve finished slobbering, he’ll enjoy your tears, too, which he’ll drink from a chalice formed from your personal selection of gold and rubies and diamonds and whatnot – maybe he’ll mix in your children’s blood? He doesn’t seem too opposed to that sort of thing, given his Illinois voting/speaking record.

      Oh, but I kid. This is satire. Right?

      • Randall
      • If there were in fact electronic voter fraud then the NSA will find out. There are lots and lots of Mormons in the NSA. They won’t drop that ball.

        Anonymous is primarily not hackers… they’re punks. The ones who are hackers are probably working with the Russians, so not a good match.

        Nah, these tactics aren’t necessary. As usual, it’s a matter of good men doing nothing. I’d say this makes them not such good men. Answer? Replace them with better men, with competent men. Infiltrate the political system ourselves and replace the losers.

        Any and all politicians, consultants, and lobbyists guilty of crimes should be punished to the full extent of the law. Clean up Washington through better law enforcement. Reclaim the FBI for national security, away from Holder’s thugs.

        These are some places to start. It will take time and millions of us. Let’s get working.

    • ebysan

      Exclusive: Joseph Farah presents evidence of illegal voting, contributions, intimidation
      Published: 3 hours ago

      YES!!! Farah explains & how it was done ( they are getting away with it!!/ebysan)


      I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement represented so ably today by Obama is this:

      “By any means necessary …” (Remember WHI told us this was going to happen/ebysan)

      It was first articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, “Dirty Hands.” But it became popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.

      What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means. It means violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying, stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie “sins” are appropriate means of furthering the cause.

      Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the reigning ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?

      There is no doubt in my mind.

    • Anonymouse
    • If we peons could choose our Speaker of the House, I would cast all 10,000 of my votes for Trey Gowdy.  Formerly, Gowdy was a prosecutor, and he keeps his skill honed!

    • ShainS
    • “As promised, this individual has already proven in our first interview to be incredibly insightful, honest, and ultimately optimistic for the future of the United States. They made it very clear the Republican Party has a great deal of work to do – but that work is already underway, and the battle against progressive socialism in the United States must never end.”

      Ultimately optimistic for the future of the U.S.? I already don’t like the RI. Is he aware that our actual national debt, when unfunded liabilities are properly included, is over $200 trillion? It will NEVER be paid off, even with hyperinflation. We are insolvent.

      The battle against progressive socialism needs to be won first within the Republican Party. Out with the RINOs and in with the Tea Party …

      • VTX
      • Yeah, it does sort of ring out like a cheerleader’s rah-rah, doesn’t it? I hadn’t looked at that with clear eyes – as you did. Optimistic? As I’ve posted more than once, I figured Romney gave us a 30 percent chance of retaining out national identity, and with Comrade Zero, a negative appraisal in the negative number, that is – (meaning that there is a minus 30 percent chance of staying united.)

        So I’m with you: why should anyone be optimistic when we’ve lost control of one of our biggest rights in the Constitution: the right to cast a free and fair ballot? If not that Constitutional right, what else fails? Everything!

        But that’s what Comrade Zero wants, after all, eh? Failure is his only option and intention; it is his MO and his desire; if not for failure, Comrade Zero would have nothing.

        So I’ll get out my pom-poms when RI talks about removing Comrade Zero, prosecuting him and his henchmen, taking out all his well-placed aparatchiks, reversing his dictates, reducing the size of the EPA, ATF and a hundred other federal organizations and organelles, and cleaning house of the evil thugs from the Muslim Bros and CAIR that’ve infiltrated the government.

        I thought Mitt was overly rosy, but I knew that it was him or nothing. It was easy to cheer when the alternative was something from the bottom of a portapotty.

      • truthandjustice
      • Yes, that was my first thoughts – see my post. Actually my rant was longer on that subject. How could he be optimistic if he truly knows what’s really going on????? Something wrong…..but we…shall…see…..

        • VTX
        • Yours was better.

          Just saw Dark Knight Rises the other day.
          It got into my head, because I’ve been waiting for the moment to pick the fight – as Alfred said, it only ends one way.

          Ever since I was small, I knew there would be a battle between good and evil, and I’d be fighting. I only prayed that I wouldn’t be a coward, more afraid of being a coward than losing everything. Nothing’s changed.

          Let them bring it on. It’s a good day for a fight.

    • Rurik
    • All these suggestions seem to me essential items to pursue.But there is something else I consider the very mostest essential basic item of them all. Extra-constitutional rule by executive decree, with the assistance of appointed, unelected, and unaccountable “czars”. Birth certificate, SSN, budgeting, insane foreign policy, congressional leadership and investigations, and more. NONE of that matters, so long as The King of Clubs feels free to continue ignoring Congress and getting by Executive Order whatever Congress refuses. Right there, that is a severly impeachable offense. Or series of offenses. Until we solve this, nothing else matters, he’ll fart in our general direction, solve it and we will find everything else follows.

    • PatinGA
    • Im sure Republican Insider is a nice person but personally, I’m sick of republicans and their mealy-mouth, play nice and don’t offend anyone attitude. They caved in and conceded to obama without a word or a fight. Without even questioning the obvious voter fraud and they are still not showing any signs of questioning it.(except for Congressman West)
      And right off the bat, they start talking about the next election in 4 years with Rubio and G.Bush and will Hillary run…. and what the republicans can do to pander to illegal immigrants and the “lady parts” women.
      Well, we are burnt out! Or I am, anyway. We need the current election made right. FIRST! Wishful thinking, I’m sure.

      Thanks for letting me rant..

    • VTX
    • Listening to old tunes on a sleepless night, I ran across In the Court of the Crimson King, a video and with the lyrics – the last lyrics remind me of this great hoax we call an “election:”

      “On soft gray mornings widows cry
      The wise men share a joke;
      I run to grasp divining signs
      To satisfy the hoax.
      The yellow jester does not play
      But gentle pulls the strings
      And smiles as the puppets dance
      In the court of the crimson king.”

      In the court of the crimson king, quite right; we labor to understand what is happening, and it’s been fixed – the puppets dance, we do – and we’ve satisfied the hoax. The devil has enjoyed this spectacle, the lies flowing so freely and easily – his power has never been more transparent than in this administration that boasts of transparency. When lies are swallowed by so many, and told by so many, how can anyone be happy but the Adversary?

      The tune is medeival – and so is this presidency.
      Here’s the tune in it’s whole:

      Have we struggled in vain to see who is behind this presidency? Don’t we know already?

    • Shane
    • “American First. Conservative second. Republican third”

      That’s what I want to hear! And I’m optimistic about America too. People forget how bad things were in the 70s. We all thought the Soviets were on the brink of taking over. Economy sucked. Then Reagan came along and things got better real fast. And I was one of those Reagan Democrats that knew he was the right guy for the job. I read some of the comments in here and it sounds like a bunch of shit in my pants talk. You people are part of the reason the pubs party is seen as so stupid and out of touch these days. Conspiracy this and conspiracy that and I’m ready to shoot my guns and I hate everything now bullshit talk. I voted for Mitt Romney because Obama sucks. Big time. But I guess some of you didn’t bother to vote. At least that what the #s say. Or you voted for Libertarian or some other goofy shit. Sorry but you are idiots.

      • VTX
      • Giving up? No, we’re not.
        Optimistic? No, you’re stupid and delusional if you’re optimistic, and you are obviously both.

        Did we sit at home and not vote? Eff you if you say that! The crowds proved otherwise. Idiots? This is the best educated group of posters I’ve posted with – maybe you are used to sites where you can see who has the most clever retort. But you’re not half clever.

        In the 70s, the Soviets WERE on the brink of taking over – because James Earl Carter was surrendering, just like Comrade Zero is doing. Carter just didn’t have the apparatus nor the people behind him to complete the job.

        In case you haven’t noticed, the Bat Faced One and Zeero are increasing the rates of regulation, taxing us with Obamacrap and stopping the prospects for domestic energy production. What are you proposing we do about that? Smile and make happy faces?

        We have real enemies, you Democrat-dud. “Reagan democrat,” my ass! You aren’t worthy for the battle – you should just go home and play happy-happy songs and forget that we have a determined enemy, since you won’t fight them anyway – not in truth nor in actual battle. You have to know their means and methods to fight them – and the best way to defeat them is to expose them first.

        But not you! No! You’re a Reagan democrat. which means you’re still a democrat. May pizz be on you.

      • lovelypeace
      • A lot of voters weren’t alive or aware in the 1970′s.

        A lot of us did vote for Romney because we understand how that Obama only presents us with illusion after illusion. However, a lot of people in my generation and younger really don’t understand that their secular utopia offers mostly false promises.

      • e. scott
      • Shane, SOME OF US DIDN’T VOTE??!!! You might be right, with your DemocRat logic…

        Case in point: One county in Fl., that had 147% voter participitation, amazingly enough, had 100% of the votes going to “The Won,” with zero votes going to Romney.

        Funny how that works, eh? Oh, BTW, you are too out of touch to call us idiots. THAT’S something YOU can believe in!

      • CHHR, VA
      • Petraeus has already testified…

        Beside the fact that the campaign to slander his character all weekend is for good reason, it was mentioned too that he “had already talked” to members on the hill.

        What you’re seeing is the dance, don’t get fooled. Petraeus may have done something “wrong” by having that affair, but trust me, that is not a “national security threat,” Clinton broke down that barrier.

        Petraeus enjoys bi-partisan support and respect… to hide the truth of his “discussions” behind closed doors, they have to get the American public to question his credibility…

        What I find funny is that for all the “wars” we’ve been subjected to, that an extra-marital affair would rise to the occassion to do the job.

      • Publius
      • Curiouser and curiouser. Now, reports indicate Gen. Allen, who succeeded Petraeus in Afghanistan, had been e-mailing Mrs. Kelly, woman in Tampa who started this whole thing rolling by going to the FBI to complain about “harassing” e-mails she was getting from Broadwell. And FBI agent originally assigned to investigate Mrs. Kelly’s allegations was removed from case after allegedly becoming obsessed with Mrs. Kelly and sending shirtless photos of himself to her??

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Jules, your “National Treasure” quote got me thinking about LC…and how something has been rattling around in the recesses of my mind…As I listened to our friend Senator Feinstein on Fox News Sunday speaking of Petraeus and his initial untrue remarks about the video, she mentioned that in closed session within three days he said it was in fact terrorism. Feinstein then spoke of the RPG’s stating when you see those RPG’s you know it’s one of two kinds of attack…”either a terrorists attack or a military attack”. Watching Feinstein there was a tell…she was twisting and gripping her hands a bit…

      Consider Benghazi was an attack on Ambassador Stevens…in a MILLITARY attack…The RPG’s and large armaments suggest that possibility…Ambassador Stevens was raped and defiled as a message to the USA…He was payback for the same treatment that was dished out to Kaddaffi…and a warning to the USA for the arms Stevens had being shipping into Syria to take down another friend of Russia’s, Assad. Russia set that Millitary attack on our compound into play…

      Lamecherry refers to the Benghazi fiasco as “Analgate” because in that rape and murder is the core message….From Russia—..You sanctioned a rape and muder of our friend, and we return the favor…Kaddaffi’s treatment brought about Stevens gtreatment…And as Obama watched what took place in real time in Benghazi he knew, he got that message…but he didn’t want the American people, the voter to understand what had taken place…or what it meant..

      Russia took that Millitary Action in Benghazi with their agents against Stevens …for retribution against the USA…Payback is a bitch…

      I extrapolate further…The person who called the FBI about threats being received from Paula Broadwell has been revealed to be a non government worker as reported tonight …this outsider, Ms. Kelly was threatened in emails and so contacted the FBI….Broadwell states she sent no such emails…so perhaps it’s a covert operation to bring Benghazi out of the closet and into the open …..and reveal what had actually taken place in Benghazi. Someone wants people to know Russia was behind the events of Benghazi….Someone wants us to know of our presidents actions…

      On Tuesday of this week, Election Day, a Russian nuclear sub was 275 miles off our East Coast, a very usual event….Was this a victory lap of sorts? Perhaps Russia wants Americans to pay attention….They don’t appreciate our President’s gun running and missile running into their friend Assad’s Syria…there will be retribution to the USA for mistreatment of Russia’s friends (Kaddaffi begets Stevens…) America had better handle it’s rogue president…Attention was cast on Petraeus though the threatening emails, to bring attention to a rogue presidents illegal arms dealings…with a warning is delivered with the presence of a nuclear sub off our coast…

      Don’t we long for the simple days of Goodnight Oscar Levant wherever you are…

      I googled Benghazi + attack + Millitary + Russia ….the post below is what came up:

      As the presidential election nears its conclusion, the current Commander-in-Chief, Barack Obama, is finally facing media scrutiny surrounding his handling of the 9/11 attack in Libya that took the life of U.S. Ambassador, Chris Stevens, and three others.

      As the layers of spin are pulled back, information reveals that the U.S. may have been trafficking weapons under Ambassador Steven’s watch and Russia didn’t like it.

      It is indisputable that the U.S. government was aware the Benghazi mission was under attack based on real-time drone surveillance video feeds from Libya to the Department of Defense, the U.S. State Department, Central Intelligence Agency, and the White House Situation Room. What is also now known is that the mission was under surveillance before the Benghazi attack by the very Libyan security forces charged with protecting the U.S. consulate and numerous requests for additional security went unanswered by U.S. officials.

      It’s also been reported that Ambassador Stevens had been meeting with multiple terrorist representatives in Benghazi. According to a Washington Times story, “The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group… It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria.

      Just one hour before the fateful attack that cost Steven’s his life, Obama administration officials say Stevens met with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin. This acknowledgement opens the door to arms trafficking. Prior to the Benghazi attack Stevens was warned about a ship sent from Libya and docked in Turkey loaded with arms intended for the anti-Assad rebels that may actually be destined for al-Qaeda fighters in the region. Apparently, after the meeting between Stevens and Ali Sait Akin did not result in an agreement to end the U.S. lead anti-Assad arms shipments, the Turk abruptly left the meeting and the U.S. Benghazi consulate was attacked an hour later.

      In an interview with this reporter in San Diego, retired CIA/NSA Director Michael Hayden (General, USAF ret) said the Libya incident “was predictable.”

      So why leave Benghazi open? Hayden said, “I can’t explain that.” However, he concedes the most plausible explanation for the Benghazi incident centers on the CIA’s efforts to move weapons from Libya through Turkey and to the Syrian rebels in order to overthrow Syrian Dictator Bashar Assad.

      “I think the story is that this (moving arms) was going to go to the Sunnis that opposed Assad. And Assad is Russia’s friend,” Hayden said.

      “I don’t know the specifics of attack, but the question I asked is what was the plan? What did you have on the shelf because this could not have been so unexpected given the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi? What was the concept for defending people? It’s kind of alone, small and isolated in (Benghazi),” Hayden explained. “I’m more concerned about the thinking that went on before the attack began and tend to be less critical of what happened seven hours after the attack.”

      Another curious piece to this puzzle is Russia. Did they have a part to play inside Benghazi and was presidential contender, Mitt Romney right that Russia remains a threat to the U.S.?

      The Russian response, under former KGB Cold War foe Valdimir Putin, who was visibly incensed last fall when a jubilant crowd of rebels murdered his ally, Muammar Qaddafi, has described the event as “repulsive and disgusting.”

      Shortly after the death of U.S. ambassador in Libya, numerous Russian commentators used social media to describe their position on the destabilization in Libya.

      “The democratized residents of Libya thanked the staff of the American Embassy for its support,” one Tweet read. “This is what you call exporting democracy, it seems. America gives Libya a revolution, and Libyans, in return, kill the ambassador.”

      Aleksei K. Pushkov, the head of Russia’s parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, wrote via Twitter: “Under Qaddafi they didn’t kill diplomats. Obama and Clinton are in shock? What did they expect – ‘Democracy?’ Even bigger surprises await them in Syria,” a New York Times story read in September.

      It is no secret that Putin disagreed with the West’s view of Syrian ruler Assad. When Putin was Prime Minister, he delivered a scathing criticism of the Libya bombing by NATO and left the impression that under his leadership it would have never happened.

      It’s also worth pointing out that Russia and China have consistently opposed any military intervention in Syria. Russia and its allies have repeatedly warned the West that efforts to aid Syrian rebels would only bring more bloodshed to an already embattled region. Also, the Russians have been demanding a cessation of U.S. aid to the Syrian rebels fighting President Assad, again noting that any military aid would destabilizes the entire region, and could have serious economic consequences for Russia.

      Even Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov cautioned the West against arming the Syrian rebels. However, the Arab Times news agency said, “Western officials say that Russia’s vetoes have abetted the Syrian violence by encouraging Assad to pursue an offensive with his Russian-supplied armed forces to crush the popular revolt. Saudi Arabia and Qatar are believed to have funded arms shipments.”

      Case in point, in late August Russia said there was increasing evidence that Syrian rebels were procuring large numbers of Western-made weapons. They even suggested that America and other EU countries were spurring the violence in Syria.

      So was Benghazi a message delivered by the Russians to end U.S. gun-running by executing Ambassador Stevens, the kingpin between the armed groups, the Libya stockpiles, and the shipments to Turkey?

      Did this American meddling in Syria unhinge Russia’s patience? And is it possible that Russians or their surrogates assisted al-Qaeda in the Benghazi consulate attack?

      “Moving (weapons) from Libya to Turkey to Syria or to Lebanon to Syria is completely plausible. I don’t know about the Russian part, but the trafficking piece is a yes,” Hayden concluded.

      Read yesterday’s story in the Washington Guardian:

        • charlotte

          Mrs Broadwell’s father said his daughter was the victim of an attempt to hide “something else entirely”, while friends of Gen Petraeus suggested a link between the resignation and his scheduled appearance later this week before a Congressional committee investigating the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi.

          According to the Wall Street Journal, Mr Holder was told of the investigation into Gen Petraeus several months ago but it was not until Nov 6 that officials informed James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, who immediately urged Gen Petraeus to resign.

          Paul Kranz, Mrs Broadwell’s father, suggested that his daughter was being targeted as part as part of a broader cover-up.

          “This is about something else entirely, and the truth will come out,” he told the New York Daily News outside the family home in North Dakota.

          A friend of Gen Petraeus questioned the “very suspicious” timing of the resignation, less than a week before the Benghazi hearings. “A lot of very senior people in the administration did not want him to give that evidence,” the friend said.

      • VTX
      • ATB,
        Russia is still smarting over Assghanistan.

        Good links. We shouldn’t let posters like Shane shine happy-thoughts up our rear ends. Never interefere with an investigator while they’re investigating, unless you have better evidence.

        I think you’ve demonstrated better evidence.

      • CHHR, VA
      • In early reporting by FOX, the meeing between Stevens and the Turkish emmissary was because Russia was “in the know” about American gun-running through Turkey to Syria… Russia issued a warning and when the meeting “failed” the attack was initiated.

        My only question is how Russia would have known, within minutes, that the “meeting failed” to end the operation in Libya.

        Seems that there are still some players that have yet to surface in this evil game of cat and mouse.

        Has anyone looked up the significance of 9/11/1683 yet?

        Russia would not be down with that either.

      • ebysan
      • @ AmericaTheBeautiful

        Outstanding article!!…… Makes a lot of sense!!

        This should have been an “ACT of War”!! But, Russia knows Obama is weak & would not react to their attack.

        Perhaps this exposure of Petraeus’s affair was his way to expose Obama’s gun running to Syria & Russian Involvement…… If so he is sacrificing his career for our Country??

        I took the liberty to send this on to Greta tonight.

        Thank You, for the Info.

      • bill o'rights
      • ATB,

        One of our readers tried responding to this comment, but was unable.

        Reply from Clarity:

        “Regarding the Dvorak article:
        “So was Benghazi a message delivered by the Russians to end U.S. gun-running by executing Ambassador Stevens, the kingpin between the armed groups, the Libya stockpiles, and the shipments to Turkey”

        “Message delivered” made me remember BO with a bat while on the phone this summer with a Turkish official- I think Erdogan. A WH picture of him sitting at the desk in the Oval Office holding the baseball bat in his right hand while on the phone was released to the press that caused some to ask, was a message being sent to Turkey? Play ball or else?

        I also read something a few weeks back where an article quoted Erodogan or some official from Turkey saying that maybe Assad could stay (meaning as head of Syria). Maybe the Dvorak article is on to something and Russia has persuaded Turkey to align with their agenda over BO’s and the Muslim Brotherhood.

        Also remember the new Russian military plane that was on its first test run that crashed(I think late Spring) and Putin stated that someone may have hacked the automatic pilot controls thru a “backdoor” and overtaken it? He seemed to be blaming the US.

        On another topic, how many more military leaders with the “goods” on this administration are going to be sidelined before there is a nationwide outcry? This is massive effort to divert from the benghazi hearings and the election fraud, to keep those topics in the background. What can the citizens do to help the military get this info out since congress and the media will not?”

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Was Broadwell a spy? Was she a spy for the Millitary arm of our government to ascertain what Obama is up to ?

      The FBI Found Classified Documents On Paula Broadwell’s Computer
      Kim Bhasin | Nov. 11, 2012, 9:03 PM | 5,896 | 23


      CSM Marvin L. Hill
      See Also

      The Daily Show Interview With David Petraeus’ Biographer Is Extremely Awkward In Hindsight

      The FBI Has Been Investigating Petraeus’ Biographer (And Reported Mistress) Over Access To Classified Info

      Petraeus’ Resignation Will Stop Him From Testifying About Benghazi
      The FBI has been investigating Paula Broadwell, former CIA director David Petraeus’ biographer and reported mistress, for months, citing concerns about classified information and a potential national security breach.
      Well, it turns out that during the FBI’s investigation, the bureau did find classified documents on Broadwell’s computer, reports the Wall Street Journal.
      In September, the FBI began to do a legal analysis to see if there were any charges that could be brought. They decided to interview Broadwell.
      During her first interview, she admitted that she was having an affair with Petraeus and gave up her computer to the investigators.
      On it, they found classified documents.
      Petraeus was interviewed too, and he admitted to the affair as well. However, he said that he did not provide Broadwell with those classified documents. Broadwell echoed Petraeus’ claims in her next interview with investigators in early November.
      The source of the classified documents remains unclear.

    • PerpWalkThemThruTheRoseGarden
    • 1) Nixon resigned in the face of overwhelming evidence. Senate naction was not necessary.

      2) What do you think about this: 

      Article 2 Section 1 Clause 6
      “In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.”

      Is it possible the above can be interpreted to mean removal due to “disability” as in ineligibility? So if Biden committed fraud by signing off on Obama’s lies, the presidency would devolve to the person who is not involved or “disabled” (eliminating as potential president all Dems & Repubs who had knowledge of the fraud Obama was perpetuating on the American people)?

      Why did my post appear twice (between AmericaTheBeautiful’s 2 posts & then disappear? Did it hit a nerve? If so, then I have my answer. Will begin posting elsewhere & sending emails to that effect.

      • VTX
      • Perpwalk,

        I like your thinking, that’s what I think!

        Biden could be declared unfit with a psych exam (so could The Fraud, for that matter.) But putting Beaner in their places is like giving the bandleader on the Titanic the helm – after the iceberg.

        • PerpWalkThemThruTheRoseGarden
        • VTX, L on the visual of Barry & Joey sharing a straitjacket! I was thinking the removal from office would be due to fraud re BarryO’s self-admitted dual citizenship at birth making him ineligible. Therefore, he was never POTUS & all those in Dem party whose responsibility it was to vet him will be guilty as well (“known or should have known”). This eliminates Biden, Pelosi, etc. & presidency would devolve to Speaker of the House. In my version/dream it would be Rep. Paul Ryan (not John TinyTears Boehner) as Ryan has been vetted & his policies are known & fresh in our minds. President Ryan picks Mitt for V.P. & the REAL work to restore our Constitutional Republic would begin.

    • PerpWalkThemThruTheRoseGarden
    • My last post was in response to VTX, luxuryoption, Rurik, Libertylady & others who replied to my original post yesterday. (this site is acting a bit hinky- reply button issues & posts disappearing… Sorry for personalizing it. 

    • obxpatriot
    • I, for one, am sick of these so-called”Insiders”! With all the information and power they supposedly had, when it came down to it they did nothing. I don’t expect this one to be any different.

      • Obeline
      • At the risk of alienating a lot of good people I must agree.

        After countless posts and discussions, insights, revelations, discoveries, and research, GIVEN WHAT HAPPENED ON NOVEMBER 6 NOTHING HERE AMOUNTED TO A HILL OF BEANS.

        Nothing. Zip. Zilch.
        Not one iota of anything.

        Albert Einstein: “Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results”

        While I’ve advocated for petitions re: voter fraud, that is as futile as Insiders’ ‘insights’.
        Congress is impotent. Americans have the gimmies. GOP is clueless.

        Perhaps this site is simply therapy.

        • truthandjustice
        • Yes – sadly agree. I sent the petition link to my son and before coming here I got his reply:
          “But if you sign these I’m afraid it will only make it easier for them to know who send to the re-education camps or add to the no fly list. I just don’t trust the white house, aka devil’s lair.”
          I raised ‘em right, huh????!!!!!!
          I replied back I assume they already have me on their list – to come visit me sometime (if he wasn’t there too). He replied he didn’t think they’d allow visitors.
          Funny, if it wasn’t so…..tragic.

          • Jules
          • Bless your heart.

            Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
            And never brought to mind?
            Should auld acquaintance be forgot,
            And auld lang syne!

            Chorus.-For auld lang syne, my dear,
            For auld lang syne.
            We’ll tak a cup o’ kindness yet,
            For auld lang syne.

            And surely ye’ll be your pint stowp!
            And surely I’ll be mine!
            And we’ll tak a cup o’kindness yet,
            For auld lang syne.
            For auld, &c.

            We twa hae run about the braes,
            And pou’d the gowans fine;
            But we’ve wander’d mony a weary fit,
            Sin’ auld lang syne.
            For auld, &c.

            We twa hae paidl’d in the burn,
            Frae morning sun till dine;
            But seas between us braid hae roar’d
            Sin’ auld lang syne.
            For auld, &c.

            And there’s a hand, my trusty fere!
            And gie’s a hand o’ thine!
            And we’ll tak a right gude-willie waught,
            For auld lang syne.
            For auld, &c.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Obeline, sadly agree…..see my post a couple days after the stolen election…where I offer the same supposition…Was this simply a Cass Sunstein re- education Center ??? To manage us into the election? Where all insiders then wafted quietly away?? Best be considered…when people tell you who they are…believe them…WHI I’ve done things in my life….”
      WSI same short hurried goodbye….And don’t let the door hit you the ass suckers…

    • CHHR, VA
    • Paul M. Abbate Named Special Agent in Charge of the Counterterrorism Division, Washington Field Office

      Director Robert S. Mueller, III has named Paul M. Abbate special agent in charge of the Counterterrorism Division at the Washington Field Office. He most recently served as chief of International Terrorism Operations Section II at FBI Headquarters, where he had oversight of all FBI extraterritorial international terrorism investigations.


      Oh yeah weren’t they supposed to investigate what happened in Benghazi? And now Mueller is supposed to “stand in” for Petraeus next week in those “closed hearings” on the Hill?

      Doesn’t this all serve to define the word incest?

    • CHHR, VA
    • Press Release from October:

      Paul M. Abbate Named Special Agent in Charge of the Counterterrorism Division, Washington Field Office

      Director Robert S. Mueller, III has named Paul M. Abbate special agent in charge of the Counterterrorism Division at the Washington Field Office. He most recently served as chief of International Terrorism Operations Section II at FBI Headquarters, where he had oversight of all FBI extraterritorial international terrorism investigations.


      Oh yeah weren’t they supposed to investigate what happened in Benghazi? And now Mueller is supposed to “stand in” for Petraeus next week in those “closed hearings” on the Hill? With whom? Oh yea, REPUBLICANS…

      Doesn’t this all serve to define the word incest? So much for our new “insider.”

      • SallyAl
      • No, Acting CIA Director Michael Morrell will be testifying in Petraeus’ place. Name is very similar though.

        I am still questioning why and how it was that Mueller was given a 2 year extension of his mandatory 10 year limit on FBI directors. His extended time is up in early 2013 but why did jugears want to extend it? (the REAL reason, not the continuity crap). This is very suspicious to me. Of course all the congridiots approved it. (morons).

    • Randall
    • Therapy is supposed to empower or alleviate. Endless chatter concerning the impending doom is not therapy… it’s distraction.
      There’s only one way out – involving yourselves politically, and not just online. Join an organization and work with others to take it over for the conservative movement.
      Or, start a blog, conduct independent original research, offer new ideas, hold Democrats responsible.
      I’d say we’re 75% lost. That’s not horrible, but if we don’t start soon the American dream will end within our lifetimes.

      • CHHR, VA
      • Randall, please… there go those assumptions… do you really think we aren’t active? Really?

        I personally belong to FOUR groups, am very active, besides countless hours for the party to get Romney elected, I’ve also spent over 4 years in endless research AND talked to many about ideas… I do believe I did more than one would think for a non-political person. One thing is for sure, there are countless issues with this election and I personally saw quite a bit. So much for “True The Vote” either.

        Quite honestly, had it not been for folks like us, 2010 would have never happened, and the crazed effort to slander our voices would have been unnecessary. We were just told a “new insider” is about to grace us on this blog and few of us believe he/she is even credible. I mean, for a “Republican” that just had the race stolen from them, there’s been crickets from those wonderful “powers that be.” Give us a break, something’s wrong and voicing our concerns here does not mean all we do is whine and for heaven’s sake, I didn’t see a whole lot that signifies that any of us are “giving up.”

        • Randall
        • Relax, I’m not accusing YOU of anything. I’m sure your head of your town Rotary Club.
          There are many people here who are despairing. Alright, I understand.
          Still there’s much they can do. If not from the top down, from the bottom up. My intention was to kick them in the ass and into gear.

            • Randall
            • I was responding to you, who said:

              “I vote for the therapy… it’s either that or the straight jackets, cause we simply know to much now and being deemed a wing-nut leaves us no other place to go.”

    • truthandjustice
    • Yeah, as I’ve said before, I wish I didn’t know so much. After you learn how much (or almost how much) manipulation, evil, deceit is done & the true, pathetic history of our political parties – who knows. We know their general agenda, goal – and they have to keep the masses from revolting before they get it completed and to be able to control any revolt, etc. So then you get suspicious of everyone, no matter how sincere they may sound.
      As someone else mentioned – the “silence” of the Repub. party re the cause of loss being massive fraud is deafening and telling. Along with their rush to say we need to compromise more, blah blah. More than just sickening. To me, it confirms what we’ve disucssed here about the Repub. Establishment. Got this today:


      Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way that you can quickly understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic . Someone over there has it figured out. It was translated into English from an article in the Prague newspaper, “Prager Zeitungon”.

      “The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America . Blaming the prince of fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their President.”

      Question is what are those numbers now? Don’t think we can know if we don’t ever find out about the amount of fraud done.

          • truthandjustice
          • Well, to show you the depth of my cynicism – while I’m thrilled they may actually do something about this if it is true – I’m thinking probably b/c they want to get rid of him for their own benefit. Maybe he’s one of those that aren’t as radical – doesn’t go along with Obama? Seems to me the ones they want to keep get away with “murder”. Looks like they’ve been culling the herd — getting rid of certain Generals (I posted on another thread) that don’t agree, aren’t helpful — replacing with their “own” real co-conspirators/Communists/globalists. Isn’t that what you need to do when planning a takeover and controlling? Don’t know – just seems like that’s what you’d do as much as possible.

        • CHHR, VA
        • My first thought was “yea right.” Interestingly though, ethics may still matter after all… at least a wee little bit anyway.

          “In total, 11 of the lawmakers included in the “Most Corrupt” report over the last two years, out of a total 31 featured, have been defeated or are retiring, including New Hampshire’s only two House members: Representatives Charles Bass, a Republican, and Frank Guinta, a Republican.”

          “For lawmakers facing Congressional ethics inquiries, there is at least one advantage to a political career cut short: the House and Senate ethics committees lose jurisdiction over them once they leave office, so no charges can be brought.”

          Then it goes on to talk about how Jesse Jackson Jr. won, evidently he has a plea deal in the works.

    • VTX
    • ATB,
      Good post – the Dvorak commentary. The possible Russian connection to Benghazi has me thinking – and thinking.

      It isn’t the first time payback has happened internationally. The Chinese shot down our spy plane early in the Bush administration, partly because they were testing Dubya and partly for payback of their embassy. There is such a thing as payback, and usually in-kind. Probably a whole lot more common than we would know or discern.

      We helped UBL drive the Soviets out of Assghanistan, and then what? They didn’t stop 9/11 – and I suspect they had sufficient knowledge and resources to do so if they chose. We had warnings from all over – (no, I’m not a 9/11 Truther) – but we also had a weakened CIA as a result of Clinton’s machinations. We can’t do more with less and expect to get away with it. But it’s probable that the Russians could have stopped it if they wanted to – but they weren’t happy with our Balkan campaign, either, taking out their boy Slobodan Milosevic. We wanted to rescue Moozies? In the Balkans and in Assghanistan? Fine. Enjoy their treachery.

      Ghaddafi was also a reliable source of intel for us – and he dropped his WMDs as soon as we did something about Iraq and caught a Korean shipload en route to Libya; he because very useful after that. It proved the war in Iraq to be something that paid off, at least in his case. To Obama and his handlers, that was too much. They didn’t want the Iraq war to enjoy any success, not even as judged by history. We’d already taken out Saddam – the other Hussein – and I expect that we’ll see worse, eventually.

      We shouldn’t have done anything to harm either Ghaddafi or Mubarak – Russians in or out. But the Russians – no, I don’t believe that they wanted Stevens dead as much as they wanted us humiliated; I’m guessing it was more than a signal: they likely send a dire warning not to commit a rescue operation – or else. Or else?

      They know that the Fraud is perfectly capable of surrendering – and Mitt reminded them too much of Ronnie. They didn’t wiggle their butts in the endzone – like the Fraud did with UBL – because they wanted a wimp in the whitehouse. Just a theory.

      • CHHR, VA
      • VTX, What if, as you say, Stevens was not supposed to die… not to solve the Russian problem, but to allow Obama a turn around the victory bush once he went in to rescue him from the very same folks he was supplying arms to?

        Russia told Obama the gig was up, Turkey reiterates said fact in a meeting the night of the attack… the Turkish diplomat (or whatever he was left) and one hour later the attack begins? Sorry, that just doesn’t work…

        We were supplying arms through Turkey to Syria… Turkey may have warned Stevens, but how would terrorists have known that the meeting failed?

        Less than an hour later, the attack begins.

        Stevens and two others go into the “safe room” – then into the bathroom. The guard pushes out the window… goes back in to get Smith, already dead and “can’t find Stevens?!?!?!” In a bathroom? Really?

        Stevens is recovered by the terrorists and taken to the hospital?!?!?!? Really?

        They shout “God is Good” in Arabic of course when it’s reported to the crowd that he’s alive?!?!?!?

        And through all of this we find our military chomping at the bit to go in and told to stand down… which, I might add, there STILL is only ONE person with the authority to do that.

        Now we have Ham on ice for disobeying orders and scrambling support (that’s how Woods was painting targets) an Admiral “relieved of duty” and three timelines that just do not match or add up.

        Victory dance plot foiled… Stevens is dead. All just before an election, at a time when Romney was gaining momentum of course.

        Of course, I’m a “wing nut” conspiracy theorist… or at least that’s how I’ve been painted. But something just does not add up! We’ve proven we had the resources, the military protocol worked, we scrambled and we didn’t go in… we watched them die instead. With what? Oh yea, an effing drone!

        Like I said earlier, Russia would not be down with supplying terrorists that are hell bent on taking over the world through a Caliphate, they’ve been fighting extremests for years in all of the “Stans” and I can only imagine they’d be do all they could to protect Assad from falling as a last ditch effort to keep extremists in their part of the world… and we wonder why America has such a bad rep around the world… this whole mess is not only pathetic, it’s sick.

        • VTX
        • Yeah, I still have thoughts about the “rescue mission” theory. It could work, even with the Russians involved.

          The Russians, knowing about the arming of the terrorists – yes, terrorists – managed to convince the same terrorists (by subterfuge) that we were going to betray them. So when the two would-be rescuers showed up and started firing, the terrorists believed the Russians – there was the evidence.

          That’s why everybody was so hot to keep these two guys from making it into a battle – there was the illusion that the terrorists were still involved in the show. The terrorists had long since abandoned those plans, though, and weren’t going to play let’s make a movie.” The Russians had gotten into their heads. But we didn’t know that. I suspect that people in the whithouse were eating popcorn – why else didn’t they convene the security council?

          Finally, there was a communique from the Russions: “cease and desist; we have men.” In other words, you will NOT use your airships or cruise missiles or anything else – or there will be consequences.

          That’s how these overlap.

    • Justawhoaman
    • Thank you regular UM posters, (VTX,AtB, CHHR, truth, Charlotte, et al) for being such patriots and Intrlligent communicators. I truly come to UM to read the comments and learn incredible links, facts, concepts. I guess I have to give UM credit for the early I intrigue to get us here but you contributors have done the most to make this such a vital focus. Great daily read.
      What I am not looking for is Puffy Lips Rove telling me what I know is propaganda/garbage.

    • CHHR, VA
    • Well what do you know!

      Gen. John Allen under investigation for alleged ‘inappropriate communications’

      Obama’s taking no prisoners in this war! But does he have to try yet another failed triangle plot? It’s getting so very old. Besides what does Obama, or Panetta for that matter, have against Jill Kelly? or… Why, if there was nothing illegal found, did the FBI suddenly raid Paula Broadwell’s home last night.

      Too many character assinations all of the sudden… what’s wrong, is the Administration actually scared or something?

      Guess this proves Obama’s words “when you have nothing to run on, paint your opponent as someone to run from” What’s Obama running from?

      Hey Ulsterman… help, I can’t find the insider post about the “scandal rocking the White House” sometime late summer, early fall… if I recall correctly, it included sex, lies, and all the usual players.

    • VTX
    • A note for RI,

      If they can hijack the voting machines – and it is clear that they did – next Congressional election we could see a 100% Dem route, except in places where Dems aren’t running.

      Think about that for moment – don’t just pass it up and ignore it: if they aren’t exposed now, when will they be exposed? After they hold all seats?

      One party system, far worse than what we have now; are you and REAL Conservatives ready to step up to the plate, or will you preside over the second part of the coup? (the first was the Fraud who now sits in the whithouse.)

    • VTX
    • As for the talk of seccession: after the fall of the Soviet Union, I figured we were gonna break up into between six and nine regional governments/countries, meaning the end of the USA.

      I wasn’t alone; a Russian history prof. claimed the same thing later, and one of those regions (Alaska) would be taken back by Russia – (and don’t fail for a moment to understand that they don’t want it back.) What Russia and China both want is to remove American hegemony – and Hillary is as much a part of that plot as Obama. She and Bill spent way too much time in Moscow.

      Rather than split, we’d be better advised to recapture what is ours by Constitutional right, and to remove the traitors by any means neccessary. I am now looking with some sympathy at North’s work at the NSA and REX 84.

    • Justawhoaman
    • Amen, VTX.

      And then there is this possibility as support to the treason that has befallen us. We must “remove the traitors by any means necessary”. We have enough evidence to get rid of the entire tumor that is eating away at our God-given freedom that we call the United States of America.

      [quote]Sex, trysts and indiscretions.

      Nothing more effectively diverts the public’s attention away from emerging critical truths better than the time-tested template of salacious headlines. It hijacks people’s attention away from far more critical matters that threaten the positions and agendas of the most powerful people engaged in even more immoral acts. It must be recognized for what it is: a tactic of diversion.

      The alleged trysts of powerbrokers are a component to the story of Benghazi, but they are not the story. They provide convenient cover for emerging revelations. Like arrows in a quiver of those in positions of power, they exist as leverage to be used to neutralize existing or potential threats at the precise moment they are needed, without the untidiness and inconvenient inquiries that tend to accompany dead bodies. They are also powerful weapons that control the perception of a voyeuristic public, which is dutifully fed the salacious details by a complicit media.

      Longing for the days of Watergate
      America has never been in greater need of a “Woodward and Bernstein” effort than today. We are witnessing a cover-up of monumental proportions, with all roads leading directly to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. We’ve already seen the modern day equivalent of the infamous Saturday night massacre in the form of resignations of senior officers and officials, with more to certainly follow. It’s all about the cover-up, and always about the cover-up. Yet, such an effort will not be made by a media compromised by years of infiltration, having evolved into its present incarnation as a ministry of propaganda.

      When one begins pulling on the thread of Benghazi, the entire fabric covering Barack Hussein Obama, from his earliest political activities to the current operations in play begin to unravel. By pulling on this one thread, his associates and associations, compatriots and coconspirators, alliances, plans and agendas become exposed for all to see in the proper context.

      Benghazi, by a thread
      The reason full disclosure about Benghazi is needed is that it will expose an agenda much larger, much deeper, and much more nefarious than any extra-judicial operation we have seen in recent history. It will reveal Obama’s contempt for the United States Congress and the rule of law. It will also reveal Obama’s ugly contempt for human life, as there are not only four Americans dead from his operational objectives, but forty thousand dead in Syria – and counting.

      Consistent with his modus operandi, Barack Hussein Obama has made congress and the oversight it provides irrelevant, and committed America to a proxy war without the approval of its citizens. If this were a play, North Africa, the Middle East and that entire region would be Obama’s theater. If allowed to continue on this path, the proxy war being directed by Obama will turn into another military engagement in Syria, with American troops and equipment, in costumes supplied by NATO at the forefront of a war to which Americans never agreed.

      Pulling the thread of Benghazi will reveal that yes, the CIA under the direction of Barack Hussein Obama, was engaged in an arms running operation from Libya to Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey. It was and continues to be the Obama plan to overthrow Syrian President Assad and install a regime backed by the Muslim Brotherhood. Why? For humanitarian reasons? The families of forty thousand dead in Syria would likely disagree, as most were killed at the hands of U.S. backed, trained and armed “rebels.”

      The western headquarters of the Muslim Brotherhood, the location of the casting couch for this Shakespearian tragedy, has a prominent address of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. The visitor logs show an interesting flow of representatives into the house once owned by the people, as do the various appointments made by Obama over the years. No one should be surprised at this casting call, as Obama’s past reveals an association that far preceded the plans we see being implemented. That is, as much of his past as we have been permitted to know, or have fought to see.

      Pulling on the Benghazi thread will expose the money trail from Saudi Arabia. It will show that the Royal family has their own personal army and intelligence agency. It’s the U.S. military and Obama’s CIA. We’re doing the heavy lifting and dirty work for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, by a captured operative we know as Barack Hussein Obama.

      We are in a proxy war with Iran and by extension, with Russia, with Saudi Arabia picking up much of the tab for the venue and props. Syria is just the theater, and Libya was the opening act. The attack at Benghazi was an unscheduled act in the play, but one that provided us with the program.

      When the frenzy of headlines about sex and lies gradually abates, will we refocus on the events obscured by our thirst for salaciousness, or will it be too late? Perhaps we can do so now by understanding that the headlines are being written by the operatives themselves. Let’s not be derailed. Let’s look at the program, and understand the plot of the play before the final curtain call. {end quote]

    • Randall
    • The Democrat party, it seems to be, in unsalvagable. Not only do they act unconstitutionally whenever they wish; not only do they play dirty politics as par for the course; but they are so deeply infested with moles and criminal agents that when exposed, they’ll almost certainly disintegrate. Note that I say “when,” not if.

      The reason why the nation is such a mess, on the other hand, is that the Republican party is full of snake oil salesmen, losers, sad sacks, and compromised degenerates. See Rove and Boehner. Personally I know several degenerates who are buddy buddy with the local party, and they barely rise above pond scum.

      What’s coming down the pike, besides a Republican “civil war,” is a Democrat implosion. Their policies cannot defy gravity forever, and the way Barry treats his colleagues they’re going to turn on him sooner or later. I and others will do my best to expose the rotten, putrid, and criminal underbelly of the Dems and their allies.

      What this country is gonna need are people ready to rise to the occasion who can once again unite us for the common good, without sounding kooky and without a lust for vengeance.

      If the Libertines take over the Republican party, it’s going to be much harder to maintain a semblance of normalcy.

Leave A Response

* Required