Susan Rice, on the direction of the Obama White House, repeatedly lied to the American public regarding details of the Benghazi Massacre that left four Americans dead – including the first U.S. Ambassador to die on duty since the Carter administration. Following a closed door meeting between Rice and Congressional leaders, it appears concerns over why she said what she said are increasing.
&cropxunits=400&cropyunits=273&404=a404&maxwidth=600)
(Senator Kelly Ayotte, right, joined with Senators Graham and McCain in demanding real answers to the Benghazi Massacre and cover-up.)
_________________________
EXCERPT: (via USA Today)
U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice met Tuesday with GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill on the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Libya.
Rice’s meeting with Sens. John McCain, Lindsay Graham and Kelly Ayotte on Capitol Hill came as the White House signaled it may nominate Rice to replace Hillary Rodham Clinton as secretary of State.
“It is clear the information she gave the American people was incorrect when she said that it was a spontaneous demonstration triggered by a hateful video,” McCain told reporters after the meeting with Rice. “It was not, and there was compelling evidence at the time that that was certainly not the case.”
“The bottom line is that I’m more disturbed than I was before … about how four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya,” Graham said.
“I have many more questions that have to be answered,” Ayotte said. LINK
_____________________
I want readers to make note of Senator Kelly Ayotte in this article. Senator Ayotte joined both Senator McCain and Senator Graham during their news conference that demanded answers on Benghazi that took place two weeks ago – the same news conference the Mainstream Media and some within the Democratic Party cited as evidence of racism and gender bias against Susan Rice by older white male Republicans.
Kelly Ayotte is a 44 year old woman from New Hampshire, a former state Attorney General who received the support and endorsement of such prominent conservative figures as Sarah Palin when Ayotte ran and won her Senate seat in 2010.
Does that sound anything even remotely like an “older white male”?
NO – and that is why media reports purposely ignored Senator Ayotte’s participation in the group of Senators who are demanding more answers on the Benghazi Massacre and Susan Rice’s participation in what appears increasingly like an Obama administration cover up. Senator Ayotte’s concerns regarding Susan Rice have nothing to do with Rice being a woman – but rather with Susan Rice being a willing liar and accomplice in a cover up.
For that she should be congratulated – not ignored.
_____________________
Oh man…I wish I could see the world through your eyes for just a day…idealistic son-of-a-b-tch…No disrespect son…but you don’t know ME. You really don’t…you don’t know the things…you don’t know what I’m capable of…what…Jesus Lord…the things I’ve DONE.” -INSIDER
The Man Who Calls Himself OBAMA V
“THE INSIDER SERIES IS ABOUT AS GOOD AS IT GETS FOR FINDING THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA!!!” -MEL
Interesting interview on this with an “Intelligence Insider”:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51346
Thank you for the link to a detailed realistic article that explains a lot of what is going on and why other countries are reluctant to enter the fray.
Part 2 is now up: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51400
It’s not hard to disturb a RINO.
There will be some hand wringing and kabuki, but nothing will be done and O will get his way.
Since 2010, the impotent GOP House “leaders” and in-the-tank LSM have sent a clear signal — especially to the White House, that it can get away with anything including murder — by abdicating their oaths and responsibilities in failing to fully use all means at their disposal to investigate, find, and publish the truth about — along with hold responsible and punish for their participation in — numerous crimes committed by Obama, Holder, and others in this administration. [Short version: Don't hold your breath on Benghazi.]
Now, virtually anything goes. We have a de facto dictatorship comprised of and surrounded by willing traitors, supported by tens of millions of useful idiots. There will likely from now on be one-party rule until the inevitable economic collapse causes a crisis that leads to an “American Spring” …
Yes – think that’s about right unfortunately. Reminds me of my previous post on the other thread from a commenter on another site:
“The only society that the sociopathic psychotic Obama wants to create is one straight from the bowels of hell made in the warped image of the Marxist Socialist totalitarian State that Comrade Obama was weaned on by a litany of America-hating communists where only the ruling politburo flourish while the serf class that they demand to control is left to languish in misery as they laugh hysterically at the impotence of those who don’t have the guts to stop their willful destruction of a free America from within, or worse, couldn’t care less!”
Think it will have to take some drastic stuff that affects all of us nationally to finally wake up the “dead, deaf and dumb” in this country about the evils and truth of Obama & crew (and Repubs. that are complicit, etc.) So drastic that we will almost hit “bottom” of no return and hopelessness, fear, shock — but then I pray God will see fit to intervene and help and then finally get back on the road to restoration. But, as I always say – it will take Divine intervention in my opinion. In the meanwhile, the rest of us need to carry on anyway and do what we can until that time…….I still have real hope this will happen. Perhaps we will establish a new party that will WIN then.
And, unfortunately, a lot of people are likely going to die.
While we cannot count on Congress to get anything done because of the games they play and the political posturing they engage in, we can however, continue to spread the word in regard to the contingency plans the NWO has in place in the event Americans refuse to comply at the conclusion of the slow motion financial collapse that will surely result in bank holidays and much worse.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2012/11/list-of-all-fema-concentration-camps-in-america-make-viral-2502768.html
For those needing a wake-up call, send this along.
It can’t be said any plainer: http://bit.ly/V0d2rq
IF Obama did give the order to save the Ambassador and military attache and Seals there MUST be a written order…SHOW IT…Just SHOW THE ORDER…LIAR
Report exactly WHERE was Obama at the time of the attack???…7 hours…
Why was Obama running missiles and armaments through Turkey as a conduit and into Syria ???
Why was the Turkish counsel there in Benghazi???
30,000 Missing missiles and Manpads launchers,,,WHY??? Is this Fast and Furious II Missile Running??? Why was the KNOWN Arms Dealer ship at Benghazi’s port??? This is traitorous SEDITION is the president is arms running…And if to as thought an enemy, Al Qaeda, of the USA?? We have a traitor in the WH…
Ambassador Stevens was raped as reported because the USA stood by and let our supported rebel forces rape Kaddaffi…PAYBACK by Russia…
Is this a proxy war with Russia…it would seem so, as Russia is angered with our turn over of their allies Libya and now in process Syria, to the Muslim Brotherhood…
Was Russia sending us a message on Election Day with RUSSIAN NUCLEAR SUBMARINES off our East Coast.???
Who told those Seals to light themselves up with Laser…they would Only have done that if told the Drone above would give them cover and use that light up to draw out and kill the enemy…not to draw fire to out their position and get themselves murdered
Thank you, UM, for highlighting the scurrilous, woman-hating nature of this president and the political thugs around him. When Obama ranted in his press conference against Sens. McCain, Graham “and others,” he was deliberately dismissive of Sen. Ayotte, a woman who had appeared with the other two at their press conference questioning Rice’s credentials for SecState.
This is the same “war against women” president who never includes women in his golf foursomes (except when media mentioned his boys’ club, and he invited one to play once). The same one who had 2 senior female aides resign within his first year because they said his White House was run like a locker room, and was a hostile work environment for women (Christina Roemer and Anita Dunn). The same guy who ran such a vicious, misogynistic campaign against Hillary Clinton and her supporters 4 years ago that 2 female filmmakers interviewed dozens of outraged Democratic women for a documentary they could not get distributed (“We Will Not Be Silenced 2008″).
Sen. Ayotte missed a golden opportunity when she was asked by media, after her meeting with Rice, about the Congressional Black Caucus charge that she and her colleagues are targeting Rice because she is a black woman. Ayotte should have expressed outrage (in words and demeanor) about any such notion because it cheapens the dialogue about serious issues in Washington.
It is well past time for a prominent Republican to show some righteous anger in hitting back against this despicable tactic of the race industry. As a young(ish) woman in the Senate from the northeast, Ayotte could do herself (and the country) a world of good by going ballistic next time that charge is raised with her again – as it certainly will be. She is, after all, a woman close to Rice in age.
Perhaps Ayotte could quote Sojourner Truth when one of the Sunday morning Bozos mentions Rice’s black womanhood: “Well – Ain’t I a woman?!”
Oh – and if you plan on leaving the U.S., might want to read this:
“Senator Charles Schumer has recently proposed a new law to tax Americans heavily for leaving the United States. It was in reaction to the news that Eduardo Saverin, co-founder of Facebook, had renounced his American Citizenship and was taking his $2 billion dollars in capital gains with him.
Schumer proposed to tax him 30%. Sadly John Boehner, Republican, Speaker of the House (I still think he’s a disguised Democrat), said he would support the measure.
Schumer must thank Adolph Hitler for this idea. The Fuehrer instituted the Reichsfluchsteuer tax of 25% on Jews leaving the Fatherland in the 1930s. So Herr Schumer has merely taken the basic idea and upped it by 5%.
Richard Samuelson, history professor at California State University, San Bernardino, quoted by National Review points to the historical significance of Schumer’s bill.
“Schumer’s attack is fundamentally misguided, and reveals a disturbing attitude toward private property. Should it impose such a tax, the American government would be saying that property is no longer truly private.”
He goes on to point out that George Washington, in January 1777 made the heart-rending decision to allow his followers to cross to the English side and take all of their property and savings with them if they felt they would be better off under the rule of the King. This was one of the darkest periods of American history, but Washington knew that liberty was of paramount importance and felt he had no right to impound the property of the settlers. His followers were fighting for the liberty to live where they pleased and to be free of arbitrary taxation. Why should it be different now?
It is my opinion (and only my opinion at this point) that starting very soon the IRS will begin collecting an exit tax of up to 30% on any of your savings leaving the country. The first stage would be to tax only very large assets but later I believe the ceiling will come down to cover even modest nest eggs because this government is in deep financial trouble. Obama and the Congress continue to spend money at an alarming rate and only your savings can pay the bills.
But you still have time to avoid it.
During the 2007 legislative year of the US Congress, a bill entitled “Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007” almost became law. This bill sought to impose an exit tax on all persons leaving the USA to take up residence abroad and thereby renouncing permanent resident status in the US, or people who renounced their US citizenship.
It was introduced by Rep Charles Rangel (Harlem NY), and co-sponsored by Representatives Earl Blumenauer, Joseph Crowley, John Larson, Sander Levin, John Lewis, Jim McDermott, Kendrick Meek, Earl Pomeroy and Chris Van Hollen. You will be amazed to learn that all of these Congressmen are Democrats. Not one Republican sponsored this bill.
As an Independent Republican who thinks that most Democrats are 100% wrong about practically everything, I almost hesitate to mention that I actually liked some things about Charlie Rangel. Of course there were many things I did not like about him too. I saw him as a Democrat who always stood up for his constituents (even if they were wrong). He was a flamboyant, charming, extrovert; a showman who loved publicity. I used to think of him almost as a later version of W.C Fields; a character you love, but you know you should hate. He was a Democrat with a sense of humor and probably the only one unless you count Biden and his humor is singularly unintentional.
Charlie distinguished himself in the U.S. Army. He was, in fact, a hero with a Purple Heart and a bronze Star. After leaving the army he attended University and became a lawyer (always a suspicious move in my opinion). In 1971 Charlie won a seat in Congress representing the heavily Democrat district of Harlem. In 2007 he became chairman of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee. And that was probably the turning point at which Charlie went bad. He wasn’t really bad – bad, like some other Congressmen, Senators, and Presidents. He fudged his taxes and flirted with the finer points of the law. But, he was bad enough to be forced to resign when, on December 2, 2010; the full House approved a sanction of censure against him. Anyway, Charlie was the sponsor of that tax collection bill because Charlie wanted to keep the money close to home where he could keep an eye on it.
Similar bills were put forward many times. None of them passed.
Don’t hold your breath citizens. It will come up again soon. So, if you have any plans for leaving the country with your hard-earned savings you had better do it very soon.
30% tax on all assets above $600,000. This included the cash value of property and bank accounts
The general idea of the “Tax Collection Responsibility Act of 2007” was to discourage people from leaving the United States and taking their savings with them. In essence, it imposed a 30% tax on all assets above $600,000. This included the cash value of property and bank accounts
While similar bills have failed, and Schumer’s may also fail, how long do you think it will be before some of Obama’s thugs bring up a version that will pass? And, how long would it take the next Congress to vote that bill into law?
Most people do not have $600,000 anyway, but I’m sure this dedicated President will get to them eventually.
Let’s face it people—-the government is in trouble. They have a President who spends money like water. He can’t get his hands on enough of it and he will find many ways to tax you out of all of your savings until he has brought you down to the financial level of his half-brother in his native Kenya. In fact, his avowed aim is to make all men in the world equal in poverty, except for himself, of course. In his philosophy all men are equal except that some are more equal than others.
Even before I researched this bill, I knew that Obama would be coming after those who leave the country to live in other lands early on. Few of those who remain in the United States would care about the fate of those who want to leave. Most Americans would not be able to leave anyway and they certainly would want your hard earned savings to be available for their use in the form of welfare. They would be horrified to think someone like you who wants to leave the Obama Utopia would be allowed to take their savings with them.
My wife Marcia and I saw this coming ten years ago and that is one of the reasons we felt compelled to find a home in another country. We were never rich. But we took what little we had and invested it in land and real estate seven years ago. We have never regretted that wise move.
We pay taxes to the IRS just as we did when living in the United States. The little we owe on our Social Security payments is not worth worrying about. We have not renounced our citizenship and have no plans to do so in the future. We are simply Americans living abroad.
This bill may never affect you as long as you move before it becomes law. In past versions it was not retroactive.
So, if you buy property abroad before the bill becomes law you should not have to worry. How long this will be I can’t say. But I would suggest that if you plan to move anyway, do it as soon as possible.
This message is for those who want to leave and have the means to do so.
Do it NOW. A year from now it may be too late.”
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51367