Mitch McConnel Signals To Other Republicans – Shut Up About New Taxes!

Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell sent what appears to be a counter-message to earlier statements by some Congressional republicans that tax increases were “on the table” to combat the looming fiscal cliff that is now just a few weeks away.  Is this an example of actual in-house fighting among Republicans, or some version of Good Cop – Bad Cop as negotiations between Democrats and Republicans begin in earnest regarding what to do with tax rates and out of control government spending?

(Mitch McConnell has this much respect for Democrats’ ever-present willingness to raise taxes on Americans) 


EXCERPT (via The Hill)

McConnell slams the door on raising tax rates in deficit deal

…“We’re insisting on keeping tax rates where they are, first and foremost, to protect jobs and because we don’t think government needs the money in the first place,” McConnell said on the Senate floor.

…The fate of the Bush-era tax rates — which will expire for all income levels in January — has dominated the debate over the slew of tax increases and spending cuts that are set to begin next year.

“The longer Democrats keep saying it, the longer it’s going to take to come up with an agreement,” he said. “The only reason Democrats are insisting on raising rates is because raising rates on the so-called rich is the holy grail of liberalism.

Their aim isn’t job creation, they’re interested in wealth destruction,” he said.

He noted Republicans have proposed capping tax deductions by reforming the tax code and argued that would be a better path because it would broaden the tax base.

McConnell said restructuring tax deductions would “probably have a smaller negative effect or even a positive effect on the amount of labor supply.”



Somewhat topic-related is how strongly McConnell has come out swinging on this.  He was the one our Republican Insider singled out earlier this week as having done some “heavy lifting” regarding the Benghazi issue.  McConnell is not known to be so publicly forceful in his statements, so his use of the term “wealth destruction” in relation to policies of Barack Obama and the Democrats is doubly interesting given RI’s very recent context.   -UM


506 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

21 Comments to Mitch McConnel Signals To Other Republicans – Shut Up About New Taxes!
    • ShainS
    • Can you imagine — given how much we sane observers generally hate Harry Reid — how painful it must be for McConnell to have to be his counterpart and have it lorded over him by that moron?

      The general statements are a good start, Mitch … but why don’t you give the American people a simple and clear explanation of the specific consequences of the two differing approaches, as well as explain the dire overall context and repercussions of our present financial insolvency (i.e. face reality, and demonstrate that you are), instead of simple talking points?

      There are only two ways to rule: by persuasion and by coercion. Aren’t you, as a leader of “leaders”, capable of the former? What a way to undermine the LSM — bypassing them and their spin — and going straight to the American people … and what a breath of fresh air that would be!

      • RyanMN
      • “but why don’t you give the American people a simple and clear explanation of the specific consequences of the two differing approaches”

        Well said, Shane. The Democrats seem to have mastered the art of reducing their policies down to a sound bite that typically appeals to people’s worst instincts. Why can’t we find ANYONE in the Republican leadership that can hold a press conference and explain to people in clear, adult terms what the conservative stance is on critical issues? RI, are you listening?

    • truthandjustice
    • No doubt McConnell knows the truth of Obama Admin. and all about the KABUKI played to appear to be “tough”, knowing no justice will get done (even if he wants it) b/c HIS hands are tied also by them – like Issa & the rest. He knows the unpopularity of GOP now. Just sayin’….
      For all those who think Rubio would be a good GOP candidate, check this out: Excerpts

      “Why does Marco Rubio say he admires rappers who embrace and promote cop-killing, Jew-hatred, and gang-raping little sisters? And why are conservatives giving him a free pass on it?

      I’ve always thought Marco Rubio was an oily, slippery guy and should probably be behind bars for using tens of thousands of dollars of Florida Republican Party dollars (via a credit card) for personal use. It’s called embezzlement and conversion, and he’ll never live it down, if and when he runs for President. But, now, he’s added to his sleaze profile with what he told GQ about his admiration for the “depth” of Eminem (who rapped about gang-raping his kid sister on her birthday and killing his wife and dumping her body–and killing his mother and police, too) and how he also respects the “transformative” Public Enemy, you know–the openly anti-Semitic group.

      And that’s aside from the blatant racism of Public Enemy and the other rappers he loves, NWA (which stands for “N-ggaz Wit Attitudes”) and Tupac Shakur. Barf. In case you don’t remember, NWA’s claim to fame is its pro-cop killing rap song, “F–k Tha Police,” and the group is credited with creating “gangsta rap.” Many of its rap songs are openly racist against White people. Do Republicans really wanna win that badly that they will pick this moron Rubio in 2016?

      Why do so-called “social conservatives” give this guy, Rubio, a pass on the same stuff they rightly criticize Obama for–hanging out with and promoting hip-hop filth? I’m the only conservative calling him out on this. The only one. It’s a sign of the decline not just of America, but of the Republican Party and so-called conservative movement along with it.

      The rappers Marco Rubio likes aren’t just racist bigots whose raps promote and delight in brutal horrors and murder. They’ve contributed to the irreparable cultural and social downfall of America.

      That Marco Rubio admires this means that Marco Rubio shouldn’t ever be President. And he probably shouldn’t be a U.S. Senator either.

      Whenever I hear the name, “Marco Rubio,” I think I’m playing the game, “Marco Polo,” instead. And trying to find where the heck the conservative is.”

    • JoleneAL
    • I heartly agree that GOP needs to get out the true message about what will happen if taxes are increased — but honestly — who is listening?

      The voters that BHo back in office are now more worried about who Kim is dating, if Kourtney is getting married and if Lyndsy will go to jail.

      They don’t care … we are the only ones listening.

      Lord what has happened to the country my great-grandparents came to from Austria in the late 1800′s?

      • Justawhoaman
      • I regret to say that those of us in the 60′s listened to the likes of Bill Ayers and thought he would eventually grow up. Little did we know, as we graduated from these places of “higher learning” and went off to get married, have children, work our way up the ladder, and so on, that he was working the education system to “transform America”: ie, convert the youth to socialism. We will soon be under Communism… socialism enforced with a gun.

        We are down to the last possible moments. We can no longer be complacent but need to be screaming about the fraudulent election. We can’t CONTINUE to sit in the pot and wait for it to boil! These republicans need to know that we can no longer tolerate them, that they don’t represent us anymore.

        In the near future, we DO need to start a third party, the CONSERVATIVE party. It is time to make the Tea Party a viable option and not try to work with a corrupt system that will continue to denigrate our efforts to save this country. Too bad that Allen West could not prevail… at least we have Ted Cruz from Texas.

        • truthandjustice
        • Amen. I’m noticing the Third Party idea is growing and I really do think it may happen. It reminds me of how & when the Tea Party started. Those of us who knew the truth re Obama were scared to death and woke up. We got educated about that for the first time. BAM! 2010 unprecedented wins! Now we got educated about just how horrible BOTH parties are and what the GOP is all about – how hopeless it is with them. They will NEVER allow a Consv. to be nominated for Pres. or in Leadership & fight them in Primaries. And they have the tools to control the elections to turn out how they want.
          This last election was the straw that broke the camel’s back & is not like the past and not like how it used to be about Third parties. This time it is much different with more than half I’d guess that would be for that kind of party. We never had the technology with corrupt software to flip votes like they have now. We all need to wake up to that new reality. We MUST fix that in order to keep our Republic & get good people in. Repubs. will not touch that as we’ve discussed before b/c of their “consent” to not help prevent voter fraud in 1982 b/c of their own fraud, etc.
          Therefore, you need a Third Party in order to get out from under the corrupt GOP “rules” and deceit, opposition, etc. & check into the voter fraud. For the most part, they are anti-Constitution, which was another eye opener.
          We now know more how they “operate” and it seems their next RINO’s to be offered are Jeb Bush and Rubio. No thanks. They are part of the Establishment.
          Just like the Tea Party, they probably think there is ZERO chance of a successful Third Party with someone like Sarah Palin running. Wrong again.
          Yes, either the Conservative or Constitution or Liberty party since we DON’T HAVE ONE !

          • red923
          • At this point, I would definitely consider voting for a conservative candidate from a third party. We’re definitely not winning with the out of touch Republican establishment so we’ve got nothing to lose.

          • SenDA
          • Excellent article about the real economic state of the Union, and how both parties has responsibility for it:

            The Governing Class and the Decline of America
            By Steve McCann

            “As of today, the nation’s true indebtedness (promises that have been made for spending obligations, less all the taxes the Treasury expects to collect) exceeds $222,000 Billion. The indebtedness to Gross Domestic Product ($16,100 Billion) is a staggering 13.8 to 1. The United States is not facing bankruptcy, it is bankrupt.

            Yet there is no sense of urgency or desire on the part of the governing class to level with the American people. This nation is living on the residue of the economic growth begun in the 1950′s and accelerated in the 1980′s. That tidal wave of prosperity has ebbed. The United States has entered into a death spiral of unrestrained spending, excessive taxation, printing near worthless money, and stagnant economic activity. Rather than be straightforward with the populace, the governing class is content to paper over the problem by the usual shell games of phony long-term spending cuts, more borrowing, and prevarications about the efficacy of raising taxes on “the rich.” ”

            Read more:

        • SallyAl
        • Ditto. How utterly gracious of jugeared jackass to invite Mitt to OUR home for lunch on OUR dime. That he gave up a whole hour for. Bet it made him late for tee time (or bathhouse time).

    • SheilaK
    • Their ‘aim’ is trying to legislate ‘fairness’ (as they define it) because they just cannot stand to see someone with what they perceive as ‘more than their fair share. Honest to god it makes me puke

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • What we ave been waiting for, the rest of the story…and if true, which I believe it is….IMPEACH…Our Military should not be waiting…I ask, For What? What more do you need? Petraeus speak up

      Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM
      Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

      - Doug Hagmann (Bio and Archives) Thursday, November 29, 2012
      (15) Comments | Print friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

      Author’s note: This is part two of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. In this part, the insider provides information about the events of the attack and the continuation of the cover-up at the highest levels of our government. (For Part I, please click here).

      We’ve heard different accounts and different timelines concerning the attack at Benghazi. What exactly happened?

      First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was situated in a somewhat rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa, or a residential structure. The residence was the primary building, and what has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away as the crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security was not present as the compound was the headquarters for a covert operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what was taking place at this location.

      The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours before the first shot was even fired. One of the men at the compound observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking photographs outside of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to meet with the Turkish consul general at this location. The meeting was deliberately planned for dinner time, toward evening, when the events that happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness.

      It’s also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of power in Libya, and a genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have been conducted there, at the embassy. Also, what most people don’t know is that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the wall. The eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same group that controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not just with Stevens but with other factions involved in this covert operation.

      Now I’ll digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish consul general was setting Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit. First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance done at 6:30 a.m. and intermittently throughout the day. Next, consider that three hours before the first shot was fired, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were observed taking place near the compound. Military type vehiclesbegan closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber guns mounted on them. Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed off around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes. Anyone walking in the area got off the streets, like a scene from a movie in the Godfather series. It was obvious that the stage was being set for a strike against the compound. This alone reveals preplanning and coordination.

      It’s also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely passed through one or more of these checkpoints, or at least would have noticed that things were not right in the area. You must remember that just as Stevens was previously CIA working under diplomatic cover, the Turkish counsel general was his counterpart. It’s typical spy versus spy stuff.

      Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British national, left the compound at about 9:20 p.m., reportedly to get more phone cards. That’s right, phone cards, like you would buy at Walmart. Why? Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think they were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you think they needed them at that exact time?

      They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of communications to provide assessments of the strange things going on earlier. They knew that something was being planned and they were conveying that information – their observations to those who could assist them, in Tripoli and DC.

      Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected that they were in trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. They were calling anyone who would listen, or who should have listened. We knew trouble was brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way.

      Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what was about to take place?

      Well, it’s possible, but there is no indication of that.

      Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up?

      Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered to interviewhim? What did he say? Don’t forget, this administration decided to handle this attack as a crime and not a terrorist attack. How long did it take for the FBI to be able to access the ‘crime scene’ after the attack? More importantly, what was left at the ‘crime scene’ to examine by the FBI due to this delay? Do you think the delay was accidental?

      Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting between Stevens and the Turkish consul general?

      Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running operation was all about. It was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that.

      However, Assad is no Gaddafi, and there is no comparison between Assad’s army and the Libyan army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria to topple Assad. There is no way on earth that the Syrian rebels, or Free Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It required U.S. assistance, arms and training.

      Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi plan to funnel weapons ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian border. Visual surveillance by Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic documentation of the U.S. assisting the ‘anti-Assad rebels’ inside Turkey. They developed evidence of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into Syria to fight against Assad.

      Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels being trained to handle and mount chemical weapons – gas shells – onto rockets? The process would be apparent and would obviously be detected by a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop. By extension, so did Russia.

      One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad ‘gassed’ his own people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to openly intervene. Don’t forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a ‘CYA, clean-up’ mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for Turkey.

      It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation was just about finished. An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were already shipped from Libya, and things were winding down.

      There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one. Seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched from the streets of Benghazi on or about July 31, 2012. Again you must understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various covers. From all nations.

      Along with the message that the weapons running operation was compromised, the Iranians had good reason to suspect that the ‘Red Crescent workers’ were snatched by the CIA or with their assistance. Iran wanted them back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of the meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a wavering Turkey to switch sides. Anyway, you’ll see how this ties in to the way the actual attack was executed.

      Please continue.

      So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms fire. Based on all reports I’ve reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other sophisticated military style weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military issued type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned attack.

      Eyes on the area [author’s note: satellites, surveillance drones] confirmed that two of these teams surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams began their assault on the compound where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish counsel general left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep that in mind.

      Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted nearly nine hours during which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were killed. And of course that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the attack.

      Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed ‘hit teams’ had the capability to reduce the compound and annex to rubble quickly. Why a protracted firefight? There are a couple of reasons.

      First, what was the makeup of the ‘hit teams,’ or who were the attackers? We have verified that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and funding from Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications here. IRAN. It’s the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk about.

      The attack on our ambassador and our people – Americans – was an attack by Iran. It was an attack at a nation-state level.

      AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely dangerous. AQIM is a very ‘elite’ and extremely well-funded group, and very limited in number. Our last assessment suggests that there are only 400 or so members, but they are very influential across Africa and into South and Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will become evident shortly.

      The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and everyone in it is that they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They suspected that they might be held at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want to risk killing them.

      Oh, and there were others ‘missing’ as well. AQIM members. These were terrorists involved in drug running operations from the Tri-border (TBA) areas of South America through North Africa and into Western Europe. By the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher profits in Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem is that some of them got caught—snatched up in Benghazi and northeastern Libya.

      Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America, but also to Mexico and Mexican drug gangs. You think that what’s going on in Libya is just ‘over there,’ and far away from the U.S. and has nothing to do with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit.

      There’s also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from the U.S. to be dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out. By waiting for the back-up or rescue forces, a surprise assault by the other ‘hit team’ team would have exposed our forces to possible causalities and turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the operation could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for which they have yet to be held accountable, it would have been an international incident that would have exposed the entire affair.

      So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted assault on the compound. Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never expected team Obama would leave our people twisting in the wind, fighting for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American.

      As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear under the cover of darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this administration, did form in the area as the attack progressed, much like a growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that permitted the attackers to escape amid the crowd.

      You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and members of AQIM. Were they ever released or found?

      Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches into the highest levels of our government. This is so very important that it must be addressed separately.

      So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the administration said that there were protests going on at the Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it to Benghazi.

      Yes, that’s their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no comparison. This is one huge lie that is easily addressed and put out of its misery.

      How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible for the attack?

      Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area is under active aerial surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or communication intercepts at the time of the attack. Then, there was even an admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew. Everyone knew, expect the American people. And you know what? The American media knew as well.

      I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid alerting the perpetrators.

      Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the ‘bad guys’ or tip their hand or some such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for example, had to appear on national television and lie to every one of us, to the country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of propaganda minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future.

      You are painting quite a dire picture.

      It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and even to us here in the United States. But it’s all because of our actions, the covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by way of Turkey at the direction of Barack Obama and his Saudi ‘handlers.’

      FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct result of this attempt at nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are four dead Americans. We are arming some of the very people who are killing our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively pushing the world to the precipice of World War III.

      We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with Russia and China. And we are being lied to about it every step of the way. And the lies are getting worse, but so are the attempts to stop the truth from getting out.

      What do you mean?

      What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote about ‘insider threats,’ is all about? Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what is going on. He’s doubled down to stop leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because we’re not done here. I’m not done talking, and there’s much more that needs to be exposed.

      • ebysan
      • @ AmericaTheBeautiful

        Thanks again for Posting Doug Hagmann’s….Benghazi: Behind the Benghazi Scenes (Part II)

        ***”Obama-Sanctioned Weapons Running Operation”*** “Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”

        I took the liberty of taking ‘excerpts’ & Faxing them to:

        Congressman Darrell Issa; Congressman Trey Gowdy & Senator Kelly Ayotte

        I sent them (part I ) yesterday.

        • SallyAl
        • Sorry ATB, gotta go with Charlotte on this one. Rubio is not who the R’s want us to believe. Just listening to him lately it is becoming more clear that he is dangerously close to becoming a Scott Brown. Sure for the most part he does seem to be more conservative than most but I believe that is just politics and that he is being groomed for a #1 or #2 spot in 2014. And he is NOT eligible!

    • ebysan
    • @ AmericaTheBeautiful

      Thanks for Posting Doug Hagmann’s Benghazi’s Behind the Benghazi Scenes (Part II)

      “Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation”…..Interview with an “Intelligence Insider”

      I took the liberty of taking excerpts & Faxing them to:

      Congressman Darrell Issa; Congressman Trey Gowdy & Senator Kelly Ayotte

      I sent them (part I ) yesterday.

    • Jules
    • It is a bit of exaggeration to describe Lifestyle Lift McConnel’s speachifying as his coming “swinging.” He might swing, but it ain’t with his dukes.

Leave A Response

* Required