The True Face Of Obama’s America…

If you have not yet done so, please watch this video.  The footage is from earlier today in Michigan as pro-union thugs attack conservative personality Steven Crowder with one participant screaming he is willing to use his gun.  THIS is Obama’s America.  These are the unions he has given BILLIONS of dollars to in order to secure their support.  Pray for the politicians in Michigan, who, like their counterparts in Wisconsin last year, or literally putting their lives at risk in supporting right to work legislation.

499 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

13 Comments to The True Face Of Obama’s America…
      • Jules
      • L.c. displaying a bit of humor despite the eye affliction,. Show ‘em who’s the boss, gimpy cerise.

        Well, Hill. R. Alinsky is rolling out her campaign, so maybe the old gal’s being targeted. Or may Irondrawers Rodham doesn’t have a stomach of iron and is just really, innocently, ill or actually tried to bake those famous cookies to serve with tea.

        This could make the VIEWER ill, so don’t watch unless you have a strong stomach and a barf bag handy.

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgIK3LBc-GI&feature=player_embedded

        • bill o'rights
        • You have GOT to be kidding me.

          That video is like a Benny Hill sketch…one wouldn’t honestly believe it was intended for any other purpose than gratuitous, self-indulgent entertainment.

          Hillary Clinton belongs in a straightjacket. The fact that only she and Bill fail to recognize this fact is the glorious punchline.

    • Cindy
    • Makes one go hmmmm after reading the latest RI thread on the SC importance.

      http://www.nrtwc.org/hobbs-act-loophole-legitimizes-union-violence/

      Georgia Congressman Strives to Abolish ‘Union-Thug Exemption’

      (Source: January 2012 National Right to Work Committee Newsletter)

      In today’s America, prosecutions of Big Labor arson, assaults, death threats, and other serious crimes are extraordinarily difficult.

      Such prosecutions are frequently hindered because of a loophole in federal law that exempts extortionate violence from prosecution when it is committed pursuant to so-called “legitimate union objectives.”

      And one objective that federal law clearly deems to be “legitimate” is to expand the number of employees who are forced to accept union representation and pay union dues as a condition of employment.

      “Time and again, federal prosecutors have amassed extensive evidence that Big Labor bosses have orchestrated, authorized and/or ratified violence, vandalism and threats for union organizing purposes,” noted Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Committee.

      “Nevertheless, because of the pro-union violence loophole in the federal Hobbs Act, extortion prosecutions of the implicated union officials ultimately fail — or never even get off the ground.”

      In its controversial 1973 Enmons decision, Mr. Mix explained, a divided U.S. Supreme Court exempted threats, vandalism and violence perpetrated to secure “legitimate” union goals.

      • Jules
      • Hey, Cindy. Long time no see. Thank you for that information. Good luck to Mr. Broun.

        I love Steven Crowder by the way. And the above video ticks me off.

        • Cindy
        • Hi Jules. I wish I could remember who to thank on the link to the above union info. I was not aware of it.

          Mr. Broun is going to need a lot of good luck. He and his family and friends had best remain safe.

          Agree on the Crowder comments.

    • elspeth
    • Ulsterman,

      Please ask all the insiders why is it that our system is not working to rid ourselves of Obama. He clearly should not be in a position to do so much harm to our nation.

      It seems totally unreal that there are that many loopholes, that many corrupted officials, that many enemies for this situation to have reached the level of wrongness that is going on in our government. I don’t mean the things that RI mentioned started as far back as Kennedy and Nixon. I mean right now, the laws we have, the brave citizens who have stuck their necks out, all the attempts to uncover documents and find the truth on too many things.

      Thanks for all you do.

    • ebysan
    • @ UM

      You Posted this last night but it was removed this am….. These are facts!

      More on Benghazi
      http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51679 (Read complete story)

      Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in NorthAfrica, Middle East. We’re doing their work, pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China

      Benghazi explained: Interview with an “Intelligence Insider” (Part III)

      Doug Hagmann

      excerpts:

      The so-called “Arab Spring” is an initiative by Obama and his foreign policy advisers, Clinton in her capacity of Secretary of State, and others including some of the most powerful people in the world. Internationalbankers, the power brokers and string pullers. It is a plan to reshape the Middle East and North Africa, and change the geopolitical balance of power. It’s not about some feel good mission to free the oppressed. Never was. It’s about the U.S., through the CIA, using groups ideologically aligned to al Qaeda aligned to overthrow various Middle East nations to install regimes controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.
      ___________________________________________
      It’s a globalist agenda, using the blueprints and agenda created by Saudi Arabia
      __________________________________________
      With regard to Libya, it was in March of 2011 when the Clinton State Department, under orders of Obama, appointed Ambassador Stevens as the point man to the al Qaeda linked Libyan opposition forces to topple Qaddafi. Remember, Osama bin Laden was reportedly killed two months later and al Qaeda was supposedly out of existence, according to Obama. But think about this. Under direct orders of Obama, Clinton appointed Stevens to work with the very same people who reportedly killed 3000-plus Americans on September 11, 2001 for the purposes of overthrowing Qaddafi. It worked, and Qaddafi was deposed and murdered in October of 2011
      _____________________________________________
      Clinton announced that the U.S. was throwing $40 million into Libya to “secure” Qaddafi’s weapon arsenals. Oh, really? That’s what was being told to the public and to congress, but it’s not reality, certainly not from the inside. AsI’ve already explained, that money and our personnel were being used to collect the weapons to send them to Syria to topple Assad. Before getting to Syria, they were placed in staging areas in Turkey near the Syrian border, and other places, including Jordan. They were being collected and sent through northern Libya, and the CIA operations center was the headquarters for this operation. As I’ve said many times, there was no embassy or consulate in Benghazi. It was a covert CIA operations center.
      ____________________________________________
      OUR tax money in part that was used to arm Islamic groups ideologically aligned with al Qaeda. Imagine that. Eleven years after 9/11, we’re funding and assisting the very same terrorists who attacked our country to topple another country.
      __________________________________________________
      weapons everyone in government said that were “collected” and destroyed were pieces of junk that never worked. The working weapons, including an estimated 10-15,000 shoulder fired missiles were shipped out of Libya. Stevens was the head of logistics, coordinating this operation.
      ____________________________________________________
      attack was perpetuated by Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamic terrorist group backed by Iran. Also present were members of the terror group AQIM, or al Qaeda in Northern Africa. It was a coordinated attack for a purpose, and never, ever had anythig remotely to do with any internet video.

      _______________________________________________
      three “hit teams” were dispatched to Benghazi[iii]. Stevens was lured to the CIA compound to talk about Russia’s knowledge of what the U.S. was doing – running weapons to be used against Assad in Syria, which is Russia’s “red line.” They needed to talk and not at the embassy, but at this out of the way location. The weapons running operation, although it was winding down anyway, was compromised. Over. Done. It is likely that the Turkish consul general told Sevens that the Russians had evidence – proof, of weapons in Turkey, including chemical weapons. Turkey, a NATO ally being squeezed by Russia, wanted the weapons gone from their turf. We also had people up there training the “rebels” on how to use the weapons as well. You heard about training exercises in that area on or about September 11, 2012? Who do you think we were training? Right after the Turkish counsel general left, the attack against the CIA compound began.
      ________________________________________________

      Iranian Red Crescent workers being “snatched” from the streets of Benghazi late on July 31 or the early morning of August 1, 2012? This happened at the same time the CIA compound wall was hit by a mortar. These Red Crescent workers were spies
      ____________________________________________________
      The belief was that they were being held at the CIA compound. Iran wanted them back. So, in addition to everything else, Ansar al Shariah was looking for their people. AQIM were looking for their people too. This is the reason the compound was not immediately leveled by the weapons they had on sight. They were trying to find and free their people, who were not being held there, but elsewhere. They were trying to ‘smoke” the people out of the compound and rescue the “hostages.”

      Plus, a message had to be sent to Obama, Clinton and others that the weapons operation had to stop. The groups leading the attack, primarily Ansar al Sharia with an AQIM presence as well, were tools of Iran, Syria and of course, Russia.

      So there were two reasons for the attack: get their spies back, and expose this operation for what it was.

      _____________________________________________________

      The snatched Red Crescent Workers play prominently into exposing this operation.

      Yes, and here is where it gets interesting. They were released exactly 65 days after they were snatched. They were in good health and dropped off on the streets of Tripoli. But why then? This is where it get’s damning to Obama, Clinton, and Valerie Jarrett.

      What is not widely known to Americans is that Obama sent Iranian born Valerie Jarrett to Qatar for high level talks with the Iranians about coming to an agreement before the November elections. This, despite Jarrett not having the capacity as official of the U.S. government. She had no business doing what she was doing. That aside, the plan was that Jarrett would broker a deal, and Obama would announce to the world that he had succeeded in diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians where they would

      halt their nuclear weapons ambitions and Obama would officially live up to his title as savior of the world.

      _________________________________________
      Iranians told Jarrett that the Red Crescent workers had to be released before any talks could be done in earnest. Jarrett relayed that to Obama and Clinton, and then, out of nowhere, the missing workers were suddenly released.

      ___________________________________________
      Jarrett, Obama and Clinton were being played by the Iranians. It was to buy time, especially since the Obama agenda of arming the anti-Assad rebels was continuing. The Iranians are not stupid. They understood that Obama and Clinton were continuing to support the anti-Assad rebels, and with bipartisan support, STILL ARE!
      _________________________________________________
      chemical weapons planned for use by Assad. What’s the real story?

      The world is being set up for a false flag operation. Obama, Clinton and every supporter of the anti-Assad initiative are either lying to the American people or are “dupes.” The objective remains taking out Assad and replacing him with a Muslim Brotherhood-backed regime.

      There have been reports out of the U.S. and the UK that Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons against the rebels. Assad denies that he would ever use them, and there is a reason we should believe him in this case. The condemnation that would result is unnecessary and certainly unwarranted. There reports are to condition people to immediately suspect Assad when a chemical incident occurs. In this case, it’s the U.S., the UK and other Western backed countries constantly asserting that Assad will launch a chemical attack, and we’re getting ready just for that case.

      __________________________________________________
      the anti-Assad, Western backed forces that have taken possession of chemical storage areas.
      _______________________________________________
      It’s a set-up to topple Assad and put a Muslim brotherhood leader in his place.

      __________________________________
      a chemical weapon attack would justify U.S. and NATO intervention
      __________________________________
      Syria will not implode. It will EXPLODE, and we will be fighting Iranians as well. Russia has “advisers” in Syria as well. Are the American people ready and willing to square off against Iran AND Russia in a regional conflict that will likely turn into a global, full scale war?
      ______________________________________
      Russia deployed Iskander missiles into Syria, rendering the Patriot missiles ineffective. This move shows exactly how serious Russia is. They are not backing down.
      _______________________________________________________
      these missiles poses a grave threat to our aircraft carriers. Want to see how fast we can lose an aircraft carrier and the several thousand crew members on board? This is what we face.

      Russia is doubling down, Iran is doubling down. Assad is doubling down. Meanwhile, Obama and the U.S. State Department continue to lie to the American people. The lie continues, and the fuse to WW III is burning down while the Obama regime is heading full steam ahead toward regional and global war.

      __________________________________________
      we are still supporting the overthrow of Assad, despite Putin’s warnings. Obama, Clinton, the global leaders and their financiers are continuing to lead us into World War III.
      ________________________________________
      consequences of our actions will cause the death of an estimated FOUR MILLION in Syria alone, many Christians. When, not if the “conflict” escalates, we’ll see many millions dead. And for what?
      _____________________________________
      Behind the smoke and mirrors is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. It’s their agenda. We’re just providing the army, the training, performing the logistics and doing the heavy lifting. It’s the Saudi agenda, and it’s about power, control and oil. Who do you think controls the Muslim brotherhood? Has anyone asked why Obama, raised in a Muslim culture, is tied at the hip with the Muslim Brotherhood?
      ______________________________
      Why aren’t Americans angry that we are using our assets, our men and women to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia under the orders of Barack Hussein Obama?
      ____________________________________
      The agenda of Obama is so overt, so “in your face” yet not one member of congress, not one media outlet is calling him out on this.
      _________________________________________________
      One of the biggest threats to the United States right now is an attack on the U.S. Dollar. At this moment, the fate of the U.S. dollar hangs in the balance. What is the U.S. dollar backed by? Gold? Silver? Neither. Some say the dollar is not backed by anything, and although they might be technically accurate, it’s not entirely true. At this moment, the dollar is backed by one important thing, which is “OIL”. The stability of the dollar rests on the free and unimpeded flow of oil. Once that is interrupted or even threatened, there is a high degree of risk that the dollar will collapse.

      The “string pullers” are pulling us into a situation where our actions result in the disruption or the threat of disruption of the free flow of oil. Given the current state of our economy, how fast might this bring down the United States without a shot having to be fired?

Leave A Response

* Required

-->