Following an earlier and quite negative update from WHI regarding Hillary Clinton’s Senate testimony on the Benghazi Massacre, a Republican insider working to unite the party under its more traditional conservative values, responds with the following message:
(What are Barack Obama’s plans beyond 2016? R.I. warns the Obama nightmare may not end for America then…)
____________________________________
RI: I understand (WHI’s) frustration but I completely and 100% disagree with its basic premise regarding the Clinton hearing this morning. People cannot expect a red meat fireworks show when the Senate is involved. It just doesn’t work that way. That kind of thing might happen very soon in the House, but the Senate has almost always functioned much more low key. The fact Hillary Clinton was challenged as strongly as she was by certain Senators leads was actually very encouraging and it is my understanding the Hillary people are scrambling to try and avoid headlines being created later during her visit to the House. That is a very positive outcome.
I see you already posted the Rand Paul video of his remarks to Mrs. Clinton. How great was that? And when Senator Johnson was able to get her to yell out “What does it matter?” that was one of the more remarkable moments I’ve seen happen in a Senate testimony environment in some time. That soundbite will come back to hurt her if she chooses to continue her political career.
The real downside of course is that once again little blame was placed at the feet of Barack Obama and was clearly a main priority for Mrs. Clinton today and so far she is holding up her end of that agreement between herself and the White House. I really believe that is what is the main reason for WHI’s tone in their update to you this morning and I can’t blame them for that. I’m just as frustrated. But maybe some of that will be lessened after the House hearings.
Now there was something (WHI) mentioned that might have been missed by most of your readers. It touched on something the media has hinted at, but behind the scenes has a lot of us scrambling to prepare for and that is Barack Obama’s campaign machine being kept in place and even strengthened to not only be used as powerful political leverage for the 2014 midterms and then during and after the 2016 election, but well beyond that time frame as well. I think the phrase was “community organizing on a global scale”. I will confirm that (WHI) is 100% correct about that. It’s called Organizing for Action and it’s actually bypassing the traditional DNC and its goal, if what I’m told is correct, is to raise hundreds of millions of dollars and utilize “issue bombing” to exert tremendous pressure on politicians to vote as Barack Obama/Valerie Jarrett would want them to vote or face further damaging public relations courtesy of the Organizing for Action machine. This also means the current Obama team thinks they are capable of choosing Obama’s 2016 successor and make no mistake, that also means then that the same agenda that has so many of us frustrated and fearful now will NOT stop after 2016. It really will be the total globalization of the Obama presidency. He will extend his influence well beyond just eight years in the White House. Now let that sink in. The possible ramifications of that scenario should scare the heck out of all of us who already recognize just how bad things are going now.
If they pull it off, it would basically mean a way to effectively secure a third term and more for Barack Obama, but on an even more global scale than the traditional role of American president that Obama already feels he’s much too important to be constrained by.
As bad as the 2012 election outcome was, people need to understand they could still get much-much worse. I’m not about to give up and I hope I can count on you and all the other alternative media and true patriots to help fight back. You can do better. I can do better. We all can do better. I still believe there is a lot more of ”us” than “them”. We just need to re-organize. It’s the future and the future is now.
-RI
_______________________________
Read the WHI update RI is referencing here:
WHITE HOUSE INSIDER: Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi Testimony – “Complete Bullsh-t”
_______________________________
The Man Who Calls Himself Obama: Collection One: Volumes 1-6
D.W. Ulsterman is now offering readers the first six volumes of the bestselling Insider interview series in one complete collection with never before available commentary by White House Insider. Here is the true and shocking tale of the Obama White House as told by those simply known as The Insiders.
Well my day is ruined now
That makes two of us!
Nobody gives up power freely.
It is always taken.
I feel for WHI. I even feel for RI.
Rand Paul and Sen. Johnston this morning laid the ground work.
But who is going to TAKE this to the next level?
Who?
Who is going to take it from them?
And while we wait and are complaisant to this theft of Liberty, further and further we sink to watch the US become a Monarchy again.
Then the work needed to lift it out becomes so enormous that it will never happen.
I am with WHI.
Sen. Rand Paul questioned Hillary Clinton about the Movement of guns from Benghazi….. Her response was like a ‘nervous’ Laugh.
JERUSALEM – During the Senate hearing on Benghazi yesterday, outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton claimed:
she did not know whether the U.S. special mission attacked on Sept. 11 was involved in ‘gun-running”.
The remarks were perhaps the most important and telling of the entire hearing since they address a possible motive behind the jihadist attacks.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/media-ignore-hillarys-bombshell-benghazi-claim/#DDwzidutsLum20ST.99
Good question Canadian Conservative about who will take it to the next level. There just aren’t enough honest people in politics today to stop the complete takeover of our country.
The battle is lost at the national and most state levels. All that remains is the grassroots level. The Globalists know it and have started the fight with Organizing for Action.
So I think the WHO is US.
Welcome to the amerikan bolshevik revolution…
Obama 2016 (doesn’t matter who: Barry, Moochelle, Malia, Sasha, Bo [my favorite], Aunt Sarah, the dozen or so half-siblings)!
/Obama
voter messiah worshipperFunny that RI would try to paint the butt kissing of Clinton today as anything positive. You wanna know who’s going to have to take the power back from these people? It’s YOU! Stop waiting on these politicians. Things are so far gone we are all going to have to be willing to give up our comfort and our things if we are ever going to take the power back from these people. Do you understand this?
Yes, I understand.
The only hope….
Please post the images UM…let the people see what Obama and Hillary ignored
Congressman Duncan has a set…..and he delivered to Hillary …as he accused her of National Security Malpractice…
Congressman Marino of PA showing pictures of AlQaeda flying their black flag at our embassies Tunisia, Cairo, Jordan, Bahrain, Kuawait, Benghai in August of 2012…yet Obama stated he had destroyed Al Qaeda in the run up to his re-election…lying about AlQaeda..lying to the American people …lying so his coup of freedom continues under a totalitarian racist regime….
UM, .please post those images that Congressman Marino help up… The AlQaeda flag flying with the AlQaeda protestors…at our embassies before they slaughtered our people…it was humiliation for a weak America….
RI has it wrong. It is not the Obams Presidency which is intented to get global, it is the globalization movement which has intended the Obama Presidency.
The radical transfornation of America to just another player on the world stage, aiming at ending the American exceptionalism, aiming at reducing the Western Civilization produtivity and preeminence, is not an Obama driven phemomenon. Obama is a mere instrument and symptom of this movement.
The enemny is personified by Obama/Jarred for the moment, but it is really the Globalization crowd. Probably 4000 people extremely well positionned in the world in diverse International Organizations, be it Press, Finances, Banks, and all UN closely or not affiliated groups.
Their number one enemy is the American Constitution, because it is the last obstacle to their one mind global thinking, the last refuge for individualism and individual freedoms.
NameBM
You are right on target, and to many people are focused on Zero. Focus on the career players in Washington and around the globe.
You hit the nail on the head. And it’s called Agenda 21.
BULLSEYE….. … It is not the mere mortal Obama we face, but the WEIGHT of an EMPIRE….We would all do better to remember that, and plan accordingly…
The real issue is the lack of an effective opposition party.
The repubics are a disgrace…
I think they are a dead party and don’t know it (yet).
They are complicit.
Agreed.
There would have been a case to be made for the Republicans being an opposition party if they actually opposed anything.
Fiscal Cliff – Capitulation
Debt Ceiling – Announced capitulation
The only two effective weapons remaining in the arsenal remained on the shelf and in the case of debt ceiling all it took was Obama to announce he wasn’t going to negotiate. Republicans then had their 3 day retreat to formulate strategy……the capitulation strategy. I shudder to think that if the republicans refused to hold the line on these issues, what will they fold on next? Immigration, welfare programs, education grants, gun control, increased domestic surveillance programs ie; enhanced security. These are additional battleground areas in the next 4 years. I used to think if Dems win house back in 2014 then kiss lame duck status goodbye…Obama will remain relevant throughout his entire term. Now it appears that establishment / neoconservative Republicans have shown themselves to be fellow travelers of their liberal marxist / progressive companions.
Republicans guilty of treason / dereliction of duty – Boehner, Cantor, McConnell, McCain, Graham. All neoconservatives, each of them.
Agree that Obama is just the personification of the global agenda, yet the cult of personality gives him the support of the American people. So it’s not him but it’s him. Zombie madness.
Republicans have already been beaten. Their natural allies are the people who have been the targets of government. Gays, dopers, etc. Where do the Republicans stand on those issues? Continue the repression.
You have been divided. You will be conquered.
If you want to see what the CommuCrats battle-plans are, here’s a peek. Doesn’t it oddly resemble how Authoritarian/Totalitarian/Communistic regimes infiltrated-marginalized-destroy their opposition? Textbook Alinsky-style tactics:
http://the-reaction.blogspot.com/2013/01/war-on-republican-party.html
Breitbart TVBig HollywoodBreitbart SportsBig GovernmentBig JournalismBig PeaceThe Wires
JOHN BRENNAN: OBAMA’S PUPPET TO HEAD THE CIA
by ALFRED S. REGNERY 24 Jan 2013, 9:16 AM PDT 9 POST A COMMENT
The President’s ill-starred and abysmal choices for his second-term national security team aren’t much more of a surprise than the rhetoric he used in his acceptance speech earlier this week. They won’t do much more for the reputation, standing, and security of the United States than his choices for other cabinet posts will do for domestic policy.
Republicans, and even a few Democrats, have thus far reserved their ire for the president’s nominees for Secretaries of State and Defense, but his equally dubious choice of John Brennan to head the Central Intelligence Agency invites scrutiny. Given Brennan’s performance as National Security Adviser over the past four years, conservatives have every reason to believe he will join Chuck Hagel and Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) to form a veritable leftist dream team, determined to transform American foreign policy according to Obama’s deepest desires.
Nearly nominated for CIA Director in 2008, Brennan withdrew his name after apoplectic liberal Democrats squawked at his hawkish record on enhanced interrogation, extraordinary rendition, and the U.S. drone program. Against the left’s protestations, Brennan still landed a post within the Obama administration as head of counter-terrorism at the National Security Council; his advice helped the White House flounder and flail through the ill-begotten Arab Spring revolution in Egypt, the Mavi Marmara flotilla incident off Israel’s coast, and the terror attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya—among other debacles.
Indeed, Brennan has been behind the scenes for all of Obama’s most miserable foreign policy failures, particularly in the Middle East, but apart from the litany of intelligence fiascoes manifested under his watch, the greatest problem with Brennan is that his views on national defense, intelligence gathering, and the modern terrorist threat are grounded not in objective facts, but in whatever will curry favor with the powers that be.
Since 2008, Brennan’s pursuit of prestige has caused him not to advise the White House, but to align with it. The past four years have seen this career intelligence hand adopt both the priorities and the philosophy of the Obama administration.
Brennan has, for example, assisted Obama with many public relations efforts, arguing for the closure of Guantanamo Bay and defending the ill-advised attempt to try terrorists in civilian courts. Rather than combat jihadists who hate us, Brennan, like Obama, would have us believe that Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and other Islamic terrorists are merely misunderstood extremists.
One senior intelligence official I spoke with said Brennan has been at the forefront of the Administration’s campaign to impose this multiculturalist understanding of terrorism—that is, Obama’s understanding of terrorism—upon the intelligence and defense communities, often with perilous consequence.
“Brennan has the most uninformed, self-deceptive views on Islam that I’ve seen among senior government officials in all my years in this business,” said the official, who specializes in Russia and the Middle East. And, according to my source, Brennan has been instrumental in imposing such studied ignorance on the rest of the intelligence and defense communities.
The source said lectures at the FBI, War Colleges, and elsewhere are censored and careers are threatened for violations of the new speech codes. Our potential CIA director, it seems, has been a powerful proponent of the Administration’s New McCarthyism.
Brennan’s willingness to go along to get along was most apparent in the months before Obama’s reelection, when he became vocal about the need for legal restraints in targeted drone killings. Many critics at the time, especially on the left, saw this as a political ploy designed to revitalize anti-war liberals’ zeal for Obama’s reelection.
That the Administration has gone silent on its drone policy reform in post-election months supports this view. Regardless of the actions the president is taking—or claims to be taking—to restrain the targeted killings he commands, the fact remains that Brennan was complicit in his effort to use counter-terrorism policy as a political tool.
Now, after four years doing the White House’s bidding behind the scenes and in public, Brennan is to be rewarded for his loyalty with the nation’s top intelligence post. So what might we expect from a Director Brennan?
I asked that question of my friend Kenneth deGraffenreid, former senior director of intelligence programs for the Reagan National Security Council, deputy undersecretary of defense for policy, and deputy counterintelligence executive, who gave nothing if not a spirited response:
At a time when America desperately needs an intelligence leader of substance, accomplishment, strategic sophistication, and integrity (think e.g., Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, Bill Casey), Barack Obama has nominated (not surprisingly) the quintessential politicized bureaucrat–a big-government partisan of the Administrative State applied to national security (with all the danger such unconstrained power portends).
John Brennan is skilled not in the gathering and understanding of secrets about the nature and malevolence of our foreign enemies, but rather in coming out on top of the incessant (and pointless) squabbles that define the over-bloated up-scale welfare bureaucracies of the ironically named intelligence “community”.
A senior CIA officer I spoke with (who asked to remain anonymous) doubted Brennan’s ability to be an independent advisor because he is so beholden to the Obama administration. “George Tenet’s mortal sin in the lead up to Iraq was that he got too close to his president,” he said; “Can there be any space at all between Brennan and Obama?”
Another former intelligence officer now working in the private sector expressed similar concerns over Brennan’s relationship with the White House. “The essence of concern is that he is far too close to his President,” he said. “George Tenet made this mistake.”
According to my source at the CIA, “the Republic needs a CIA Director who maintains distance from the Administration so that he can bring the bad news when necessary, so that there is no hint of political slant in the institution’s estimates and analysis and so that he can offer himself as an objective voice at the table when the tough decisions need to be made.”
Most insiders agree that the intelligence community, to be effective, must be truly clandestine (and therefore silent) and capable of penetrating to the core to steal the secrets of the growing range of our adversaries, including Islamic terrorists, the Muslim Brotherhood, the military government of Red China, and Russian, among others. What the Republic needs, according to deGraffenreid:
…is a properly organized analytic capability consisting of imaginative skeptics steeped in history, language, and culture (not today’s armies of bewildered young college graduates supplied by unscrupulous beltway bandits), and a serious refocusing on counterintelligence and foreign deception (the salient hallmark of our adversaries). What we don’t need is crude political censorship, group-think, and the corruption that comes from allowing politicians to demand and pick the answers they prefer from our intelligence officers.”
In other words, what we do not need as the Director of Central Intelligence is John Brennan who, judging from his performance these past four years, will be incapable of placing the nation’s security interests before the president’s political interests. What will happen when the leader of the single most powerful intelligence agency in the world is merely the president’s hand-picked puppet? In this era of relentlessly expanding executive power, I shudder at the thought.
JACKARU
8 HOURS AGO
So, Brennan is too close to Obama so he cannot head the CIA? I guess we have to have an Al Qaeda nominee in order to make Regnery happy!
(Edited by author 8 hours ago)
hide 2 replies reply
SORENK
7 HOURS AGO
You have a point, except it’s more likely BHO is Brennan’s puppet. But for the fancy footwork by Brennan’s employees in the passport office, BHO would not be living in the WH. If you read the story, not saying you didn’t, you’ll find that was to be Brennan’s post four years ago; well deserved for a job well done.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-to-top-brass-will-you-fire-on-american-citizens/ 21 minute video
You do understand the consequences of this “if” it is true, right?
If so, Obama is asking to be assassinated “if” this is true. How do I come up with such a crazy theory? Simple. There will always be moles who wouldn’t want to fire on citizens of this country. Instead they’d pick off an evil president.
Dems ech communist castro of 1959…
http://www.radioshownotes.com/2013/01/castro-cuba-government-and-guns.html
How many of us are just resigned to the fact that things are going to get a lot worse before they get better? I love my country, but I have to wonder if the people who represent me do. That’s just sick. I’m sick of lip service and the BS.
We need to stop looking for someone else to lead and be the leader we are looking for. Even if we are just the leader of our block or our subdivision – it’s a start. We have to stop counting on other people to show up when it’s obvious that we are the ones who are called to care.
So what’s the next step, if it’s just us? I’m tired of talk. We are good at talk, but talk isn’t going to save our country. What can we practically do – against a cheat and a liar who has the media and establishment class on his side? In this moment, I don’t see how we overcome these obstacles. I see how we can overcome these things in our own lives, but on a grander scale…..
I need to brainstorm.
Lovelypeace…..the next step will be building regional / county alliances & militias where like minded people can start to take control over their lives at a local level. Freestate projects are an idea whose time has come, and I imagine them doing nothing but gaining popularity amongst conservatives who finally come to the conclusion that the fight for control of Federal Govt has been lost.
Check out Freestate project or start talking to your neighbors about forming a countywide militia as they did during the Revolution.
The fight is going to be won or lost just as it was in 1700′s…from the ground up.