Have had a number of requests come in this week regarding where readers can find the White House Insider “epilogue” referenced both here and it would appear, elsewhere as well. This short commentary from Insider is found in The Man Who Calls Himself Obama: Collection One which is a full compilation published last month of nearly every Insider interview of the last three years . That epilogue was generously provided by WHI – and given some of the feedback from readers, has been well received. (Though a few have demanded to hear more from WHI – which at present I have very little control over. They have provided one brief public update since the epilogue though – so that is promising!)
White House Insider’s epilogue, as the word suggests, is found at the very end of the book, The Man Who Calls Himself Obama: Collection One
I thank those readers who forwarded the information of WHI’s words to others, and hope now this post will clarify for those who have not yet found where to locate the epilogue, on exactly how to do so. I apologize if I did not adequately explain there was a new update within the text from White House Insider beforehand, and as always, thank you for your continued support.
Cheers,
-UM
________________________
FREE Excerpt to the upcoming full novel “Dominatus” by D.W. Ulsterman
WHI
Something to get your interested again!!
Obama Accused Of Staging A Chemical Weapons Attack
FEBRUARY 1, 2013 BY KRIS ZANE
Excerpts:
January 28, it was revealed through a huge document dump from a hacker based in Malaysia that the UK-based mega defense contractor Britam was approached about lobbing a chemical weapon in Homs, “blaming” it on Assad, and scapegoating the Russians for delivering the canister.
The plan was “approved by Washington.”
Yes, that means Barack Obama was in on it.
Among the hacked Britam documents were copies of passports of the mercenaries who planned on carrying out the proposed attack; but the key document is an “email” between Britam director David Goulding and the company’s founder, Philip Doughty.
“Phil, We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again.
Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is “approved” by Washington.
We’ll have to deliver a CW [chemical weapon] to Homs [city in western Syria], a Soviet origin g-shell [gas shell] from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and “make a video record”.
Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous.
Your opinion? Kind regards-David.
It appears that the idiocy of lobbing an Obama-approved chemical weapon on the Syrian people was too much even for our Commander-in-Chief; and a “pseudo false flag” was instead devised,
HTTP://WWW.WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM/OBAMA-ACCUSED-OF-STAGING-A-CHEMICAL-WEAPONS-ATTACK/
Would this one be called: “GAS AND FURIOUS”? This BLOODY criminal MUST stand trail for WAR CRIMES including the CLINTON’S and the BUSHES!!! They are all the very worse kind!!!
Publisher of Blago book under fire
Chicago Review Press: Do they ignore the facts?
http://illinoispaytoplay.com/2013/02/02/chicago-review-press-do-they-ignore-the-facts/
When Senator Feinstein tells us from one side of her mouth they’ll let guns go away through attrition…and from the other side… she’d love to break down doors and simply come and take your guns….Those comments should put us on alert as these liars are up to something and Farah may or may not be correct…
Is the U.S. government getting ready for a war we don’t know about? By Joseph FARRAH
And, if that’s why Washington is stockpiling massive amounts of ammunition (hollow points, by the way), why is Homeland Security doing the buying instead of the Defense Department?
I have some theories.
Many of you will remember a story I broke a long time ago – about presidential candidate Barack Obama’s little-noticed announcement that, if elected in 2008, he wanted to create a “civilian national security force” as big, as strong and as well-funded as the Defense Department.
Here’s what he actually said at a campaign stop in Colorado July 2, 2008: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
Want to make sure you and your family are fully protected? Check out our self-defense section in WND’s Superstore.
Could what we see happening now in the Department of Homeland Security be the beginning of Obama’s dream and our constitutional nightmare?
We’ve learned more about Obama’s vision since then. Maybe it’s time for a review:
He made the campaign promise to build this $439 billion domestic army, but all references to the initiative were inexplicably deleted from the copy of his speech posted on his website while others mysteriously disappeared from transcripts of the speech distributed by the campaign. That was strange – and ominous.
At the time, I had never heard anyone use the phrase “civilian national security force” before. But I did a little homework and found out where it originated. It was first proposed by then Bush administration Defense Secretary Robert Gates. On that basis alone, I accurately predicted that, if elected, Obama would name Gates as his own defense secretary. Needless to say, when that appointment came to pass, no media outlet bothered to interview me about my foresight.
Still during the campaign of 2008, I suggested that what Obama had in mind might be something very sinister indeed – perhaps “some kind of domestic Big Brother program.”
We never heard another mention of Obama’s “civilian national security force” again. Not in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 or 2012.
But that brings us up to 2013 and the highly unusual stockpiling of firearms and ammo by Homeland Security – firearms and ammo that Obama would like to deny to ordinary citizens who are not members of his domestic army.
Well, I hate to say it, but I may have predicted this, too.
In a Halloween column last fall, I stated that, if re-elected, Obama would “declare a full-scale war on his domestic opposition.”
I wasn’t joking. I was deadly serious – so serious, in fact, that I did something I pledged I would never do: Vote for Mitt Romney. It was a matter of self-defense and self-preservation. I said then that a second term of Obama might mean we would never see another free and fair election in America. (I’m not even sure we saw one in 2012.) I suggested due process would go the way of the horse and buggy. I said I expected Obama would move to shut down or destroy all independent media. I even speculated that his biggest critics would eventually be rounded up in the name of national security.
Think about it.
Why does the civilian Department of Homeland Security need billions of rounds of ammunition?
This is the agency that is responsible for policing the border. But it doesn’t.
This is the agency that is responsible for catching terrorists. But it doesn’t.
So why does Homeland Security need so many weapons and enough hollow-point rounds to plug every American six times?
Maybe this is the “civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as the Defense Department.
These words – “civilian national security force” – have haunted me ever since I first read them.
Obama has never explained what he meant.
He’s never been called to account for that remark.
Doesn’t this sound like police-state talk to you?
The U.S. Army alone has nearly 500,000 troops. That doesn’t count reserves or National Guard. In 2007, the U.S. defense budget was $439 billion. No one knows what the budget is today because Congress stopped passing budgets when Obama took office.
Is Obama serious about creating some kind of domestic security force bigger and more expensive than that? Is this part of his second-term agenda?
He has also set up, as I have reported, a new homeland security bureaucracy to operate under his own direction.
I think it’s worth recalling here that just over a year ago both houses of Congress unwisely passed the defense reauthorization bill that killed the concept of habeas corpus – legislation that authorized the president to use the U.S. military to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens without charge or trial.
That legislation would empower a lame-duck Obama to use all of the power of the federal government – constitutional and unconstitutional – to target his political enemies.
If any Republican, conservative, independent journalist, pro-life activist, returning veteran, gun-rights activist, constitutionalist, Bible believer or critic of Obama thinks they will be safe in a second term under this would-be despot, they had better think again – real fast.
The “civilian national security force” is not here to protect any of them. It’s here to destroy the opposition. It’s here to destroy liberty. It’s here to destroy the Constitution.
Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2013/02/why-is-government-stockpiling-guns-ammo/#t6r3mF6TrEOtHBlP.99
Connect the dots…
Jesse Jackson calls for DHS to patrol the streets of Chicago.
“If any Republican, conservative, independent journalist, pro-life activist, returning veteran, gun-rights activist, constitutionalist, Bible believer or critic of Obama thinks they will be safe in a second term under this would-be despot, they had better think again – real fast.
“The “civilian national security force” is not here to protect any of them. It’s here to destroy the opposition. It’s here to destroy liberty. It’s here to destroy the Constitution.”
Destroy your opposition, Tool & The Gang? Over my dead body. Yeah, I know, that’s fine with you.
But… you know not what you do.
Meanwhile, patriots, let us pray the Holy Father, together with all the Church’s bishops, around the world, obey our Blessed Mother, (Fatima, Portugal, 1917) and consecrate Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary. *
Viva Cristo Rey!
* http://www.catholictradition.org/Mary/fatima46.htm