A brief message from our Republican Insider detailing a recent Iowa Caucus survey shows an interesting mix of GOP-hopefuls vying for the 2016 nomination.
(The road for the Clintons to return to the White House has been paved by whatever deal they struck between themselves and the Obama people.)
_____________________________________
RI: Hope you’re doing ok. While most people were enjoying the game yesterday I spent the weekend pouring over election/issues-related data and came across the recent poll by Harper that outlined some of the more prominent Republican possibilities for 2016. Now I want to make sure you know that almost all of my energy right now is preparing for 2014, but I am also very concerned that the party lacks a real unifying conservative voice right now, and this kind of data gives a glimpse into the process of how we might be able to make that happen. You said you wanted to further understand how party politics works, and for people like me, this is how it’s done. From the ground up starting with issues connecting to support for a specific potential candidate that might resonate with other voters across party lines across the nation.
So, in case you missed it, here is the Harper poll results of the following possible Republican candidates in the order that they polled:
Rubio
Ryan
Santorum
Paul
Christie
Among all voters, Rubio came in as the favorite at 27%. This puts him with an almost 10% lead over second in the poll and that was Paul Ryan. That’s a great showing for Rubio if you factor in Paul Ryan’s name recognition coming off the 2012 campaign. My own research shows Rubio playing well among both the Tea Party and social conservatives and his media-friendly personality makes him a potentially formidable candidate. I was also told he’s about 80% certain to run for the nomination.
Now I want to actually jump down to the guy who came in at 4th and that is Rand Paul. He finished 4th overall but among voters aged 18-35 Paul received 24% of the vote. His own name recognition among the younger voters is pretty strong likely tied to former campaigns of his father that resonated so well with that age group. Senator Paul is by far the least favored among the GOP establishment though, which might make early fundraising an issue for him.
The last one I will comment on is Governor Chris Christie. There is word Christie and Romney had a falling out weeks before the 2012 GOP convention when Christie learned he was not being seriously considered for the VP position. Governor Christie had no intention of accepting an offer to run as Romney’s Vice President, but was personally offended that no offer was ever even considered by the Romney camp. Not sure if that explains his odd and very pro-Obama public statements in the days before the election, but it likely explains some of it. Of these five potential Republican candidates, I consider Governor Christie my least favorite, but he has some significant support among some East Coast donors, and some of his operatives are doing a hard push to convince the party his crossover appeal makes him the superior choice. I don’t wish to talk negatively about another Republican but really hope the party does not take a Governor Christie presidential campaign seriously. He has done a more than reasonable job as governor of New Jersey but simply does not offer what conservatives need to push back against the big government globalist jackboots we’ve had to put up with the last five years of Barack Obama.
Oh, and I also want to point out another part of that poll. Currently there are two top potential Democratic Party candidates, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. Clinton has 65% of the support of Democratic voters according to this Harper poll. That means the nomination, at least at this point, is hers if she wants it. The road for the Clintons to return to the White House has been paved by whatever deal they struck between themselves and the Obama people. That part is just my own hunch, but after watching her performance in the Benghazi hearings followed by her nationally televised interview with the president it seemed very clear there was some serious dealing going on between them.
Hoping we can make time for an in person sit down if it works for you. Just let me know.
-RI
____________________
NOTE: Link to most recent Harper Iowa Caucus poll found HERE
The Republican party is dead to me. Get the RHINOs out and you just might get the thousands upon thousands of conservatives like me back into the fold. Until then? The old guard elitest Republicans are just pissing in the wind.
KNUCKLE IS RIGHT ON . BOTH THE RINO AND THE DEMONRAT PARTIES MUST BE ABOLISHED AND ” WE THE PEOPLE ” MUST ESTABLISH ” THE CONSTITUTION PARTY “.
WAKE UP PEOPLE AND REALIZE THAT RUBIO IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT ANY MORE THAN obummer .
The three I would vote for are Paul, Ryan, Rubio, in that order. Santorum has already failed and Christie is a sh*t. If Christie were to be nominated I would not vote. I’ve voted in every election for the last 20 years so for me to say that is serious.
On Clinton, now is the time for the people who know things to spill the beans and turn her into political poison. WHI is probably the person who knows best how to do that. I have a feeling he knows where the bodies are buried.
Santorum failed? Not in my book. The man did something many couldn’t do on a shoestring budget. He wasn’t expected to last half as long as he did. Yet he came in second place. I’d say, weighing the money spent for the votes received, Santorum was the biggest winner in the Republican Primary. Romney was able to hold out solely due to all the money backing him. He really didn’t deserve the win.
Again, this is my opinion only. The guy (Santorum) really wasn’t expected to go any where and yet he rose to the top of the pack.
The GOP is dead.
About the names listed:
Rand YES
Ryan not enough reasons to vote for
Rubio his latest amnesty push left him badly damaged
Santorum failed already and has no support
Christie under no circumstances.
Even if the GOP would not be dead, my list should tell, you, the RI, that the bench flawed.
The solution?
Go libertarian and more conservative.
Boot the RINOs out the party, especially ROVE and BUSHES.
The GOP is dead.
@ RI
Marco Rubio is a good man & a conservative; but ….He is “NOT” a “Natural Born Citizen”!!
His parents were “NOT” Citizens of the United States of America when Marco Rubio was born….. That makes him a US Citizen ; but
“Not” a “Natural Born Citizen” as required by the Constitution!!
Rubio’s parents also waited 19 years – and 4 years after his birth – before finally deciding to become US citizens. But hey – what’s the rush?
Rubio also initially embellished the story of his parents coming here, claiming they were fleeing Castro. But they came here in 1956, while Castro came to power in 1959.
Read more at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/marco-rubios-compelling-family-story-embellishes-facts-documents-show/2011/10/20/gIQAaVHD1L_story.html
Previous comments on Rubio not being elligible have been deleted from this site.
But hey, nominating Rubio as a candidate would just be in line with what Republicans have done quite well under Bush and since, ignoring the Constitution.
And I would not vote for the guy just for that. When you put someone in the WH in spite of his constitutionality, you put the guy above the Law. Very dangerous situation as we are living it now.
And I would not vote for Christie either. Noway.
Rand Paul is my favorite. I like Ryan but the guy is BORING. Sorry to say but no charisma there. And who ever is going to court the lofos has to have at least some charisma.
I agree! As a naturalized citizen, I know Rubio doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen. Federal judges, who perform the swearing in ceremony when US resident aliens become citizens, know the laws pertaining to this matter. Because the know the laws, they should rule on Obama fairly, but they will not ever rule against a president. They fear they’d be DEAD within days of making the ruling. Not only do they want to live another day, they want better pay, promotions and so on.
Get rid of the Rinos..Elitists including Rove and the Bushes.
Rubio has had issues brought up in the past..Of those mentioned I agree with others here..I would consider Rand Paul..Santorum whines too much..and as for Christie he is a loud mouth, egotist, boor..does fine as Governor..handling the Sandy storm….if he ran T would not vote…he’s appointed at least one Muslim to the bench in NJ..is not tough on immigration…another Rino as far as I can tell.
I was told that Marco Rubio was eligible to run for president. Also read that in one of the conservative news magazines too. Is the whole natural born thing more of a red herring to discredit people? Rubio was born in the United States right? So he is eligible to run for president. That is what the article I read said anyways. I like some of what Rand Paul is saying too but hope some of the more shall we say crazy fans of his dad don’t pull him down. He seems a lot more mature and TV friendly than his dsd. Christie lost me when he basically campaigned for Obama. Santorum does not have national appeal and Paul Ryan seems solid too but not sure if he comes off strong enough to take on Hillary. So far Rubio does seem to be the smartest candidate but theres a long way to go!
Yes Rubio is eligible to run for president. And frankly people how know about the Cuban American experience and how much they value democracy he is more welcome to run than some 4th generation welfare grabbing asshat that seems to make up about 50% of the country now. I’m still waiting for some more contenders. I do agree with the article saying how its Hillarys if she wants it on the Democrat side. The media is already ramping up for 2016/Hillary. Republicans need to stop shooting inside our own tent and let the process happen and then support the nominee. PS I also think nobody could have beaten Obama last year. Not even Reagan could have done it. Media too corrupt and American too stupid.
“Republicans need to stop shooting inside our own tent and let the process happen and then support the nominee”
You seem to have forgotten the new rules put into place at last fall’s convention. From now on, the establishment’s “candidate” can reject the credentials of any other candidate’s delegates and replace them with their own. Thus ensuring the look of 100% unity behind the establishment front runner.
If we don’t clean up the GOP, we’re going to have more rigged primaries, caucuses and conventions like we just saw.
And massive fraud.
And no Stan, Rubio is not elligible. See my explanation above.
The reason the founders narrowed the elligibility for the President and the Vice President is that coming out of the Revolutionary war, they had experienced first hand the loyalty resulting from being born of a nationality or an other.
They had fought brothers against brother, most of them fighting for a King they had never seen, a country they had never put a foot on, simply for the fact that by birth they were subjects of the English Crown.
When the founders wrote the Constitution, they gave the President the role of Commander-in-chief. Such is not the case in every Republic. So they wanted to make sure the Commander-in-chief did not have any divided loyalties (like having had allegiance to another country by the circonstances of his/her birth), but more importantly, they wanted to make sure that the Armed Forces would not have any reason to question the undivided loyalty to the US of the Commander-in-chief.
Rubio is an American and I believe is loyalty to the US is total. But what if as President he had to take the decision to level CUBA? Would the situation of the land of his parents, of some far cousins still living there not intervene in his decision process? Even for a second?
This is exactly why the Constitution restrict the Presidency and Vice Presidency to Natural Born American Citizens. Undivided Loyalty.
No, Stan. Rubio does not qualify because he is not a natural born citizen. He has the legal right to dual citizenship from CUBA or he had it when he reached age 18. For this reason he can not be a natural born citizen. Sorry to inform you that the US Constitution was well thought out by some not so dumb men.
I don’t see the issue some of you are trying to contend regarding Rubio. He was born in the U.S. He is not a naturalized citizen, thus he’s a natural-born one, regardless of whether his parents were citizens when he was born. Parents’ citizenship is an issue if the person was born outside the U.S. THEN he/she needs to have parents who are American citizens in order to him-/herself be a citizen. (The exception, of course, was the founding generation. They could be foreign-born and still eligible to be president as along as they were citizens when the Constitution was adopted.
A 2011 Congressional Research Service report states, “The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term ‘natural born’ citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship ‘by birth’ or ‘at birth,’ either by being born ‘in’ the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth”. Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an ‘alien’ required to go through the legal process of ‘naturalization’ to become a U.S. citizen.”
I just don’t get the animus some of you have against Rubio. I entirely understand why he came out on the top of that caucus poll.
Wrong. Whoever told you that is misinformed.
Rubio’s father did not gain his U.S. citizenship until little Marco was 4 years old. Ineligible.
Santorum is in the same boat. Ineligible.
Let’s not make the same mistake again: Just because you’re born in the U.S. does NOT make you an NBC. Your source, Kat, needs to revisit their Civics 101 course.
@ Sue~ Well said!
A person simply born in the US is a NATIVE Born citizen. A person born in the US *AND* whose parents are also US citizens at the time of the birth is a NATURAL Born citizen. And NATURAL Born is what is spelled out in the Constitution.
The Founding Fathers did not define what a Natural Born citizen was because they never envisioned the dumbing down of America. At the time this nation was founded, people were well versed in the concept of Natural Law, on which much of Constitution and the Rights we have were based.
Definition of a Natural Born Citizen: A child born in the country to citizen parentS. ParentS. That’s plural.
SueK, Santorum isn’t eligible? Are you thinking of Bobby Jindal?
I have a feeling that the Dems would LOVE to have us run Marco Rubio and then, scream from the rooftops that he isn’t eligible to run. Too late to snag the OOOOOOOOOOOO’s on that one.
No, Oust, Santorum.
Cdr. Charles Kerchner explains Santorum’s ineligibility in his blog. His father has the same issue as Rubio’s, i.e., not becoming a Naturalized citizen until after his son was born.
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/100-proof-rick-santorum-not-a-natural-born-citizen-father-naturalized-3-yrs-after-rick-was-born-foia-response-re-aldo-santorum/
Christie is a fatter, louder, more socialist, more moslem-loving version of Romney.
And remember, Romney pushed Romneycare, so he was pretty socialist to begin with.
Nobody wanted Romney to run except Obama.
If Christie gets the nomination, expect McCainRomney part 3. With extra lard.
Stop the natural born crap…it’s a red
Herring and You’re fools to start
That crap again…have you learned Nothing!?
Get the Communists out…and if Lucky enough to cast a Vote That will count while we’re on Life
Support…then wildly endorse the non communist Candidate …keep Cruz in mind
Are You WH trolls? Stuck on stupid ! Learning curve issues?
AtB,
No need for name calling here.
The issue is not just a Communist in the White House, but an ineligible one, at that. The Founders fashioned the Constitution in that manner for a very good reason: The POTUS cannot have any foreign allegiances.
You say ‘Cruz;’ do you mean Ted Cruz from TX? The same Ted Cruz who was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada?
If so, same issue, different guy…..
A Rubio, Santorum, Jindal or Cruz candidacy for POTUS will cause me and many others to sit out the next election. If this travesty happens yet again, there’s no hope for America; we’ve been defeated.
Is a Natural Born Communist better!..Obama played, disheartened and divided
his opposition last election …enough to keep voters Home… to Win…
Learn from the Dems ..no matter what …agree to nothing negative about your own team…
. Say nothing negative about your own team…you hear that crap
You get so far down who ever says that …down their throat and demand their racist garbage stop
Reagan’s first commandment….
You want to talk trash??? Talk about Hillary.
Rubio is eligible to run for president. I am starting to think like one of the other replies in here that a lot of the NBC stuff is actually coming from Obama plants. Stir people up, tear down enthusiasm that kind of thing. There was just a court case not too long ago about Obama where the judge said the following:
“The Indiana Court rejected the argument that Mr. Obama was\ ineligible, stating that children born within the United States are natural born citizens, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Id. at 688. This Court finds the decision and analysis of Arkeny persuasive”
There are either a lot of very stupid people out there or some people intentionally trying to keep the Birther stuff alive to kill the Republican party.
The Indiana Court passed one of the most legaly stupid and convoluted judgment ever. It was all about keeping Obama on the ballot, no matter what.
No troll here.
As nuch as the Republican Party would like to ignore the issue, the best way for a lot of Conservative/Constitutionalists to stay home is to ask them to vote for a not elligible candidate.
Good post. I agree. Rubio is totally eligible. If he is the nominee I will vote for him. And yes it seems Clinton 2.0 is starting back up. Wonder if that is why WHI is not so willing to talk to UM anymore? Maybe he was promised back in the WH too?
Great point on WHI……he was a Clinton member. Can’t speak for him / her but WHI might be thinking that getting Hillary elected will take the country “back” to where he thinks we need to be. Looks like RI is the main man / woman now.
Lame Cherry had writen a post stating that the Ulsterman Insiders were an intelligence op being run out of Obama White House. Interesting take.
The shear fact that most of the posts today are about the elligibility of Rubio is telling all we need to know about this candidacy.
To me his stand on the immigation issues is the perfect illustration that he should not be President.
The circonstances of his birth are making him biais towards immigration. He thinks in terms of relating to his People (the hispanic immigrants), rather than in terms of the American people at large.
The hispanic immigration en masse over the last 30 years is reagarded by a large majority of the American People as an invasion. He would never relate to the issue in such terms. His loyaly to the American Nation and Culture is flawed and he does not even know it. What makes him a terrific Senator wold make him a bad President.
Wrong. Rubio was stepping up to push the stupid immigration issue off the table before 2014. Nobody else was willing to do it. He is requiring a closed border as part of the deal. Beyond that he is a Tea Party politician who if he runs has my vote. And he is eligible to run. People saying he’s not are just not being honest or too dumb to look at the facts or as other people say, are playing for the demonrats and helping to make republicans fight each other. The courts looked at the Obama issue and said he was eligible. That if you are born in America you are eligible. All the other talk is speculation but the legal case shows he is eligible. So I hope some of you are getting paid enough $$$ by the demonrats to spreading your birther garbage so you can sleep at night.
That’s where the birthers totally lose it. They have to believe that so many people are in on the conspiracy. Congress, the Supreme Court, the Indiana and Georgia judges, it just gets so ridiculous. These people have to be working for the demonrats. That’s the only real explanation that makes any sense.
I’m not impressed with any of these names. I’m 76 years old and I’ve always felt save in this country even in war time but not now. We now have many enemies who want to kill us. In the last four years I feel we have been set up. I liked Christie for his stern words and told it straight but now, I’m disappointed with him. We need someone who is strong, with common sense and with a good military background. A person who will appoint the right people to get the economy going and jobs back. Safety has got to be a big concern for everyone or we won’t be able to get our country going in the right direction.
I’m not impressed with any of these names. I’m 76 years old and I’ve always felt save in this country even in war time but not now. We now have many enemies who want to kill us. In the last four years I feel we have been set up. I liked Christie for his stern words and told it straight but now, I’m disappointed with him. We need someone who is strong, with common sense and with a good military background. A person who will appoint the right people to get the economy going and jobs back. Safety has got to be a big concern for everyone or we won’t be able to get our country going in the right direction.
Sorry for the double post
Please…lets not coninue to fall into the same trap as usual. These names are being thrown at us from top down. None of them are desireable candidates until we hear what their positions are and discover who is backing them.
Santorum and Rubio are neocons. Christie is from a blue state BUT…and I emphasize BUT….he has had to deal with an extremely pro union, very liberal state political apparatus and only got the seat because of the fact that Corzine had screwed the state up so badly, NJ was facing the most dire of consequences if he wasn’t elected. NJ conservatives do appreciate his ability to be forthright and not sugarcoat his message.
Rand Paul seemed to be poised to carry the torch from his father…he then proceeded to align with Mitch McConnell and has recently taken on necon positions with his trip to the middle east, and his stance on illegal immigration is weak. Still if he can make a strong argument to the public about ending the Federal Reserve, repeal NDAA, Patriot Act etc….he’ll be a decent candidate. So far he seems to be speaking out less against these issues and sounding more like an establishment.
It’s early for 2016….lets wait and see if anyone else happens to catch fire.
Marco Rubio: My top choice.
Paul Ryan: Failed against Biden, where Romney needed him most. Not interested in supporting him again.
Rick Santorum: I like him. He would make a good President if he can win. The fact that Libertarians hate him is a plus. But the media would dump on him like nothing we’ve ever seen before.
Rand Paul: I don’t trust him. I think his embracing sanity is more of an act than anything else. He’s still his father’s son, and his father is not on our side.
Chris Christie: Backstabber. Will never trust him again.
Scott Walker (was in the poll but omitted by RI): I could strongly support him too. I’d have a hard time choosing between him and Rubio.
And my thoughts on a few others that weren’t on the poll…
Mike Huckabee: Never liked him, never will. I’d vote for him against a Democrat, though.
Jeb Bush: I like him, and I think he’d make a good President. I’m not allergic to the name “Bush” like some others here are, but I do worry that his family name is still too toxic with independents for him to win.
Bobby Jindal: Kind of soured on him lately. I’d take him over a Democrat, though.
Rick Perry: I still like him and I’d vote for him in a heartbeat. He’ll need some serious image rehabilitation to win, though.
Condi Rice: I don’t think she was as good a Secretary of State as many people think. Literally none of her few accomplishments stand a mere four years later. Also, I’m not in the habit of trusting diplomats.
Sarah Palin: Sick of her. Next…
In any case, let’s remember one thing: Iowa is literally the WORST state at predicting who will eventually win the Republican nomination, let alone who will win the White House.
Whoever wins the Iowa caucuses is highly unlikely to be nominated, and even less likely to be President.
Makes we wonder why Iowa always votes first, actually…
If Rubio gets his way on immigration then it doesn’t matter who is nominated really…..neocon, paleo, liberty candidate…it won’t matter. We won’t have the votes combined to beat Hillary if she is given 11 million potential new voters. Even if only 5 or 6 million of them vote…it’s still game over.
Obama – Biden ticket won with 5 million votes to spare. Lets say they can turn out the same as in 2012 and then only 4 million of the 11 million legal illegals vote for them we’re looking at a 9-10 million vote deficit.
In a fantasy world where one of the above mentioned nominees were able to unite the neocons, liberty, paleo, and regular everyday Republican……you have a mighty steep climb to beat a 10 million vote deficit.
Only thing that stops the Dems is a major scandal or embarrasment….woops…they have those currently and have still prevailed.
Rubio’s immigration madness must be stopped in it’s tracks. It is a matter of simple math now.
It appears that a lot of people here still have no grasp of Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution.
For them I suggest getting a copy of Jerome Corsi’s book “Where’s the Birth Certificate”. Forget that it is focused on Obama. Instead, pay attention to a good portion of the beginning of the boo, which is a detailed legal and historical analysis of that section of the Constitution. It’ll clear things up as to who is and isn’t eligible and why it was put in place.
One thing I am taken with is that, despite all of the tech toys we have nowadays, it is obvious that the average citizen in the late 1700s was a whole lot smarter that today’s average person. There was a much better understanding of history, philosophy and the concept of Natural Law.
MJM…I don’t doubt you one bit and agree with everything you posted on Natural Born Citizen legality. The problem is that as someone else pointed out…the courts have ruled in favor of Obama’s eligibility based on the claim of his being born in the US.
Legal precedent has now been set. Only the Supreme Court can overturn an appelate ruling. Supreme Court has so far refused to hear arguments on this issue.
No, Mark, the courts have not ‘ruled’ in favor of Obama’s eligibility in fact, there has not been one case that’s been heard on its MERITS!
The cases are dismissed one after one; do you think that perhaps the judges have been threatened if they hear the cases before them on their merits? They always seem to be dismissed on some asinine technicality. The Chicago thugocracy is alive, well, and operating in Washington, D.C.
The evidence is overwhelming that Obama is not an NBC in fact, he may not even be a U.S. citizen; a 100% forged ‘birth certificate,’ stolen Social Security number, a doctored Selective Service registration and all his records sealed tight as a drum.
WHY???
We have a corrupt judiciary in addition to a corrupt administration. If you don’t realize it, the coup has already taken place.
And if Obama simply calls himself Obama …yet is born of a legal US citizen….the son of …say Frank Marshall Davis …a well known communist subversive…then you are spinning your wheels…and he can call himself whatever he likes…Didn’t you appreciate all the makeup he used for four years and now reveals his true face with all those inherited moles he now shows
If he IS legal, then why all the secrecy? Why are al his documents sealed, including his college records? Could it be that perhaps he attended college as a *foreign* student? That seems to be the most logical conclusion one can draw.
If FMD (or Malcolm X, as some have suggested) is his real father, then what’s he hiding? Why the forgeries?
The issue, AtB, is that we really don’t know who the hell he is and what was behind his meteoric rise to the Presidency from virtual obscurity.
I don’t think that anyone seeking the truth is ‘spinning their wheels;’ we just want to know who this person in the White House really is, and does he have the Constitutional right to be there?
That’s all.
He”s there and unless impeached …he will remain for the next 4 years…
FMD and Malcolm X were both US citizens…Ford and Clinton both changed their names……Want to argue, go to law school…
This discussion is nothing but a red herring…a fallacy… the Dems, communists and progressives would love nothing better than to distract you with this nonsense…chase your tail..remain distracted…LOOSE AGAIN
Focus on the 2014 Senate races, focus on the House…OBAMA IS…….
Better get your ground game on…He wins the House… We are cooked…He can then change the constitution … to run again…
Cut the crap ….and focus…work locally…get your talking points down…get tough..no more meek and weak …look pleasant and stay on target…save your energy to dismantle the Communist regime.
I could’ve sworn that there were court judgements favoring Obama’s eligibility that I had read. If there were none then I stand corrected.
Mark, if you do a little research into the cases that have been filed and adjudicated, you’ll see dismissals due to ‘lack of standing’ or ‘inconclusive evidence’ galore. Even when it looks as if a judge will rule in the Plaintiff’s favor all of a sudden, they’re again shot down for one stupid reason or another.
Have ‘they’ gotten to the judges, too? It sure looks that way; Obama continues to be protected by the puppy press and the judiciary. I’m really sorry to have to say that.
I’m afraid that neither the Congress not the courts will do anything about this matter; they’re all complicit. We are under one party rule, now. I think it’s up to We the People to do what they won’t do: Arrest the perpetrators and bring them to justice. WE need to bring America back to her former glory; it’s in OUR hands.
The Scotus has ruled on the “natural born” citizen question.See Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162. Neither Rubio or Obama are eligible to be president under the ruling. We have an unconstitutional president now. We do not want another one. No matter how smart or attractive he is.