So in what has become the status-quo following any update from WHI, I watched and waited for information to be confirmed via various media sources. In this case, that wait was a short one – within hours of receiving the latest WHI update, MSNBC and then other Obama-friendly media gave concrete proof of much of what Insider warned of.
______________________________
First, a recap of some of the information shared by White House Insider yesterday: (download the entire update HERE )
White House Insider: 2014
“…Organizing for Action is the post 2012 kick the shit out of traditional America program that is meant to be in place long after Obama has gone into his version of political retirement. It’s global. It’s tied in with the U.N., climate change, gun control, healthcare, taxation, global taxation, currency, education, poverty, hunger, they got every big name item involved and it is what was intended all along. All they need to finish it up is to clear the runway for Barack Obama in 2014. That’s what this sequestration is all about, what it intended to do the whole damn time. Mr. Republican Insider called it right from the very beginning. I wasn’t so sure at first but then I got word from one of my media contacts, one of the few who still talk to me, that the White House and NBC/MSNBC were working together on a big post election campaign to pummel Republicans. This was going to be not only news coverage, but a film tied into it, millions and millions in advertising, the whole kitchen sink. And it was gonna be linking up to some of the 99% framework that is still left, the unions are going to be involved of course, all the players who gave us Obama version 2008 and 2012 are now gunning for the 2014 Midterm. They have to remove Republicans from power. Take 2014 and then take 2016 and hold for another eight years. Game over.
…So if you want to try and stop this mess then y’all better stand up and be counted. Call bullshit if that media campaign hits. Call bullshit because that’s what it is. And it means the news agency that’s putting it out there is in on it. And the business buying up ad time is in on it. And any politician who was part of the filming is in on it and all down the line. ” -WHI: LINK
_____________________________
And what headline do I see from NBC/MSNBC just a few hours after posting the latest White House Insider update but this one:
WATCH: Putting a face on food insecurity in America
On the very day the sequester is set to take effect, the documentary film “A Place At the Table” will enter theaters–attempting to give Americans an idea of the widespread problem of food insecurity.
Right now, 50 million Americans are food insecure. And when the cuts kick in at the end of the week, it’s expected that 600,000 women and children will be dropped from the Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. Many public officials have tried to live by the food stamp program, including Newark Mayor Cory Booker and Rep. James McGovern, who said after a week-long trial: “You really can’t” live on the $3-per-day allocated by food stamp programs. LINK
A bit more investigating uncovered that the filmmakers were scheduled that evening to appear on the Daily Show after also appearing on Chris Mathews MSNBC show Hardball as well – and to be a focus of media attention for the remainder of the week with the film’s release scheduled this Friday – Sequestration Day. Coincidence? No way.
So then I did a bit more investigating into the forces behind the film itself. The production company is called Participant Media, responsible for other such notable documentaries as:
99%: The Occupy Wall Street Collaborative Film
Chavez
Climate of Change (Pro climate change agenda film)
An Inconvenient Truth (Al Gore’s Climate Change film)
See a bit of a pattern here?
Now check out this recent quote from a story on Participant Media’s CEO Jim Berk:
Participant Media says it only makes a certain type of film. Only ones that “invoke social change,” as Participant Media CEO Jim Berk says. LINK
And here is another excerpt from a story on Participant Media’s release of a film titled Countdown to Zero:
Countdown to Zero makes a compelling case for worldwide nuclear disarmament, an issue more topical than ever with the Obama administration working to revive this goal today. LINK
So we dug a bit further, and lo and behold, look at this announcement from August of last year:
Closed-press event features Participant Media, and is designed to create a unified national action coalition
The White House Office of Public Engagement on Tuesday will host 96 activists and advocates–and leaders of the film companyParticipant Media–for a forum designed to identify how to best create a unified national coalition to raise public and Congressional awareness about combating hunger and boosting food security, and the dire need to prevent budget cuts to the federal nutrition safety net.
…Participant Media CEO Jim Berk and EVP for Social Action Chad Boettcher will speak, as will Kristi Jacobson and Lori Silverbush, co-directors of the company’s hunger documentary A Place at the Table. The Participant representatives will discuss the documentary and “The Power of Media and Storytelling for Social Change.” LINK
THE FIX IS IN – AND CLEARLY HAS BEEN FOR SOME TIME.
IF WHI IS RIGHT, AND GIVEN THEIR RECORD OF CONSISTENT ACCURACY REGARDING THE GOINGS ON OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION I HAVE LITTLE REASON TO DOUBT THEM NOW – THE SEQUESTER “CRISIS” WILL BE FOLLOWED UP WITH THE GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN “CRISIS” AND A MEDIA ANTI-REPUBLICAN ONSLAUGHT WILL BE PROVIDED TO TEAR ALL REPUBLICANS DOWN (BE THEY GOOD OR BAD) TO CLEAR THE WAY FOR THE ATTEMPTED TAKE BACK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND “CLEAR THE RUNWAY” FOR BARACK OBAMA TO FINALIZE THE AGENDA AFTER 2014.
PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD – DON’T LET PEOPLE FALL FOR THIS. HELP TO TRAP THESE DEMOCRATS IN THEIR OWN DECEPTION.
-UM
_______________________
Now this is journalism. Great job UM!
So if I’m getting this right the Obama people have been prepping this sequester crisis for about the last six months at least. And didn’t the House pass two budget deals that didn’t even get a look in the Senate and the Harry Reid Senate has passed NO budget deals? Yup. We are all being played big time here by these scumbag Demonrats.
UM, something is bothering me about WHI’s posts. He has used “good ON you” a few times and that is the British (Aussie, Irish, etc.) way of saying “good FOR you.” Any comment?
I guess I better tell my dad to stop saying it then. He’s been using good on you for as long as I can remember and he’s about as good old boy as it gets!
Except when he says it it’s all drawn out with lots of sarcasm. “Weeeellllll goooooood oooooooon yoooouuuuuuu!” LOL.
Also, what makes anyone think that there won’t be voter fraud in the midterms? Obama’s got it down to a science by this time. The only thing that will make the midterms legit is paper ballots that are hand counted. It’s the ONLY thing. We’re so f**ked.
Look at the trail you uncovered UM. All leading back to that sneaky Obama. Time for Texas to just go its own way if you ask me. We didn’t vote for this asshole! Not by a long shot.
The fix is in as suspected and to make matters worse both parties are complacent in the installation of Agenda 21, then add in the Pope resigning and the big picture is very disturbing.
Even Rand Paul voted to confirm Hagal all in the name of preserving his political future instead of thinking of the people whom he is suppose to serve.
Drudge Report “GOP ponders ceding power to Obama”.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/senate-gop-ponders-shifting-power-to-obama-88149.html?hp=l1
WTF??????? Idiots!!
Yet another piece of the puzzle that fits in with the NDAA, Agenda 21, and the diabolical plans of the global Monsters to condition us into surrender and death.
Maybe the rumors of foreign troops being amassed for takeover are also true which explains why they want disarm us.
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2013/02/27/chemtrails-and-depopulation-an-insider-speaks-out/
Regarding the sequestration crisis, of course Barry has been lying and misleading all along, saying in the final debate, wanting to brush the topic temporarily aside (saving it for post-election operations) that,”First of all, the sequester is not something I proposed, it’s something that Congress proposed. It will not happen.”
http://indiancountrytodaymedianetwork.com/article/elections-2012%3A-obama-says-massive-january-budget-cuts-%E2%80%98will-not-happen%E2%80%99-141559
Barry is all about the crises, which are all about “the plan.”
Active measures: Demoralization, Destabilization, Crisis, Normalization
“Then my masters,” says Barry, “can, dare I say it, ‘Rule the World!’ Bwahahaha. Bow down to them with me, American fools!”
http://www.businessinsider.com/bob-woodward-obama-sequester-white-house-reporting-price-politics-2013
BOB WOODWARD: A ‘Very Senior’ White House Person Warned Me I’d ‘Regret’ What I’m Doing.
Even Bob Woodward has been threatened. I predict he will be Breitbarted soon…He’d better get a bodyguard.
http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-lays-framework-for-purge-of-online-opponents
Obama lays framework for purge of online opponents:
Under the guise of curbing the “radicalization” of U.S. citizens and identifying and purging potentially violent persons from the Internet, the White House has initiated the creation of a new interagency working group to address what it calls a growing problem.
The White House issued a fact sheet delineating the broad objectives of the plan.
The interagency group will be headed by Quintan Wiktorowicz, the current White House senior director for community partnerships on the national security staff. The new group will be called The Interagency Working Group to Counter Online Radicalization and will be charged with the implementation of an Internet safety program to address online violent extremism.
Wiktorowiczs stated,
“Violent extremist groups ─ like Al Qaeda and its affiliates and adherents, violent supremacist groups, and violent “sovereign citizens” ─ are leveraging online tools and resources to propagate messages of violence and division. These groups use the Internet to disseminate propaganda, identify and groom potential recruits, and supplement their real-world recruitment efforts. Some members and supporters of these groups visit mainstream fora to see whether individuals might be recruited or encouraged to commit acts of violence, look for opportunities to draw targets into private exchanges, and exploit popular media like music videos and online video games. Although the Internet offers countless opportunities for Americans to connect, it has also provided violent extremists with access to new audiences and instruments for radicalization.”
If Wiktorowics were referring exclusively to terrorist groups such as al Qaeda, then no red flags would be raised whatsoever concerning the new program. But he never specified nor defined terms such as “violent supremacist groups” or “violent sovereign citizens.”
The Obama Administration has already caused the alarm bells to ring on several occasions as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released several internal memos referring to conservative Christians who believe the Bible, pro-life citizens who are against abortion, Tea Party activists, and political conservatives who believe in a strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution as “potential homegrown terrorists.”
And in the current gun rights debate, sovereign citizens have gone on the record to oppose the Obama administration’s all-out assault on the Second Amendment, vowing to disobey any law that would violate their unfettered rights to keep and bear firearms.
It would be difficult to imagine this administration, with its radical leftwing mindset and agenda, viewing such widespread displays of defiance as anything other than a direct threat to its power, and thus, a perfect motivation for declaring such citizens to be potentially “violent sovereign citizens.”
Citizen militias that are formed to counter the administration’s push to negate Second Amendment protections of unfettered gun rights would also potentially come under the umbrella of “violent extremist groups,” given that these citizens have openly stated that while they would never start a civil war by opening fire on federal agents, they would, in fact, return fire if fired upon first by government forces or law enforcement.
Although the United States itself was born directly from armed and “violent” resistance to government tyranny as represented by the British empire at the time, in today’s climate such ideas are viewed by elitist educators, historians, and politicians as dangerous extremism.
Thomas Jefferson, the nation’s third president, would more than likely be deemed a homegrown terrorist in modern America with his well-publicized view that the federal government needs to be purged every generation or so with an armed insurrection aimed at ridding the government of anyone who undermines individual liberty and the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
Modern patriots who adhere to the philosophy of Jefferson represent a clear, direct threat to many within government who view the Constitution and the Bill of Rights as irritating roadblocks to their plans for complete government power over every sector of life.
America, thus, enters into a very dangerous phase of our history as increasingly it is becoming clear that our own government has set its sights against its own citizens.
(Hat tip to Mike Vanderboegh).
Lanny Davis says he was threatened too.
http://www.examiner.com/article/white-house-threats-democrat-lanny-davis-says-he-was-threatened-too