Americans Demanding Obamacare GO AWAY

It was the most divisive and potentially longest lasting legislative legacy of the Obama years – and a new poll shows Americans overwhelmingly want it GONE…

(The Mainstream Media has worked very hard to convince Americans that government knows best how you should live – and how you should die…) 

_________________________________

(via Fox News)

A Fox News poll released Wednesday finds that while 26 percent of voters say their health care situation will be better under the new law, twice as many — 53 percent — say it will be worse.  Another 13 percent say it won’t make a difference.

…Young voters and seniors are pessimistic about ObamaCare.  Majorities of those under age 35 and those 65+ think things will be worse under the 2010 health care law.

That helps explains why a 56-percent majority wants to go back to the health care system that was in place in 2009.  Some 34 percent would stick with the new law.    LINK

____________________________

To have TWICE as many Americans wanting Obamacare to go away than want it to stay is a stunning number – even for legislation as divisive as Obamacare has always been.

Just last week we discovered that the IRS employees union – the very same organization mandated to force Americans to comply with Obamacare and levy fines and possible jail time against those who don’t, moved to exempt itself from Obamacare.  IRS workers don’t want to have to use the same healthcare system they are to be forcing the rest of us to use.  That kind of Big Government arrogance is simply that status quo in the Age of Obama…  -UM

___________________________

READ THIS BOOK!!  FIVE STARS

Consider the updated and relevant new version of “1984″. OMG, if this book doesn’t send chills up your spine then you need to go back and re-learn the Constitution and the Bill of Rights! Consider this your final warning!!   -Dawn Mau “dawnmms”    LINK

The United States is no more…and hidden away within the isolated wilderness of Alaska’s interior resides the tiny community of Dominatus. There lives a small but diverse group of people seeking out simple lives of personal liberty and freedom, but who now face termination under the oppressive and deadly regime of the New United Nations. They will fight and if need be, die for an America that once was. An America before being swallowed up by the monster of tyrannical global governance. An America before the mandates. An America before the government drone killings. An America before Obama…   LINK

“I LOVED THIS STORY!”   -SHARON INGRAM

“Once you pick it up you will not be able to put it down. Read it soon, then every news story you read will make you think of this book, and wonder, hmmmmm……”   -JoJo

PAPERBACK VERSION   HERE

KINDLE VERSION   HERE

NOOK AND OTHER VERSIONS HERE

BARNES & NOBLE  HERE

____________________________________________

COMING SOON – THE SEQUEL TO DOMINATUS:

“TUMULTUS”

335 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

23 Comments to Americans Demanding Obamacare GO AWAY
    • ebysan
    • Did the Obama administration “plant a heckler” like they planted a questioner to break the “IRS scandal”?

      WHO INVITED CODE PINK’S MEDEA BENJAMIN TO OBAMA’S SPEECH?

      Excerpts:

      However, Benjamin and Code Pink have also worked with President Obama at the same time to accomplish some of the same goals–beginning in early 2007 when Obama tapped Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans as a fundraising host and then as a fundraising bundler for his nascent presidential campaign. Code Pink has even acted, at times, as a messenger between terrorists and Obama.

      Like Code Pink, Obama has worked to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without U.S. victories.
      Like Code Pink, Obama has worked to close the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Like Code Pink, Obama worked with the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the Egyptian government of staunch U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak.
      Like Code Pink, Obama worked to overthrow Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, even after he gave up his nuclear weapons program and allied with the U.S. against al Qaeda.
      Like Code Pink, Obama ignored Iran’s Green Revolution and threw in with the mullahs and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
      And, like Code Pink, Obama ‘palled around’ with Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn (Code Pink palled around with Cathie Wilkerson as well.)

      Given her background, Benjamin’s submission to be cleared by the Secret Service for the event, even as press, would have lit up the protective agency’s computer screens like a Christmas tree.

      Her ties to Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iraqi ‘resistance’, Iran and Cuba, etc., would raise red flags that would likely have to be overridden by someone in the Obama administration’s press or public engagement office.

      The questions arise as to who invited Benjamin in the first place and who cleared her?
      Was it someone in the Obama administration, or was it someone on the faculty at NDU? Either way, it raises troubling scenarios.

      Did the Obama administration “plant a heckler” like they planted a questioner to break the “IRS scandal”?

      Or did someone at the National Defense University commit an act of gross insubordination to embarrass their commander-in-chief on national television?

      Barack Obama says terrorist supporter

      “Medea Benjamin is a voice worth paying attention to.”

      [ When will someone in the mainstream media challenge Obama on his ties to Code Pink?]

      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/24/who-invited-Medea-Benjamin

    • ebysan
    • IRS & Obama very entwined!!

      Did the Obama administration “plant a heckler” like they planted a questioner to break the “IRS scandal”?

      WHO INVITED CODE PINK’S MEDEA BENJAMIN TO OBAMA’S SPEECH?

      Excerpts:

      However, Benjamin and Code Pink have also worked with President Obama at the same time to accomplish some of the same goals–beginning in early 2007 when Obama tapped Code Pink co-founder Jodie Evans as a fundraising host and then as a fundraising bundler for his nascent presidential campaign. Code Pink has even acted, at times, as a messenger between terrorists and Obama.

      Like Code Pink, Obama has worked to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without U.S. victories.
      Like Code Pink, Obama has worked to close the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Like Code Pink, Obama worked with the Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the Egyptian government of staunch U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak.
      Like Code Pink, Obama worked to overthrow Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, even after he gave up his nuclear weapons program and allied with the U.S. against al Qaeda.
      Like Code Pink, Obama ignored Iran’s Green Revolution and threw in with the mullahs and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
      And, like Code Pink, Obama ‘palled around’ with Weather Underground terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn (Code Pink palled around with Cathie Wilkerson as well.)

      Given her background, Benjamin’s submission to be cleared by the Secret Service for the event, even as press, would have lit up the protective agency’s computer screens like a Christmas tree.

      Her ties to Hamas, Hezbollah, the Iraqi ‘resistance’, Iran and Cuba, etc., would raise red flags that would likely have to be overridden by someone in the Obama administration’s press or public engagement office.

      The questions arise as to who invited Benjamin in the first place and who cleared her?
      Was it someone in the Obama administration, or was it someone on the faculty at NDU? Either way, it raises troubling scenarios.

      Did the Obama administration “plant a heckler” like they planted a questioner to break the “IRS scandal”?

      Or did someone at the National Defense University commit an act of gross insubordination to embarrass their commander-in-chief on national television?

      Barack Obama says terrorist supporter

      “Medea Benjamin is a voice worth paying attention to.”

      [ When will someone in the mainstream media challenge Obama on his ties to Code Pink?]

      http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/05/24/who-invited-Medea-Benjamin

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Why would Obamacare be any different than any of Obama’s other initiatives …
      Benghazi…Fast and Furious I and Fast and Furious II, Fort Hood –no prosecution of the Muslim Killer-He may have received a medal for all the American people know. ..Americans die, are threatened and blackmailed, spied upon…And he wants our guns …
      When the IRS will manage Obamacare…and they are now the blackmailing Gestapo arm of the Obama Administration …home of the comfortable communist…who in God’s name is crazy enough to want Obamacare..how about some electric shock? Cattle prod ? Sharp kick in the teeth?

      Give us liberty..,or we shall take it.

      From the American Thinker

      Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General.

      There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it’s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama’s oddities — including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up.

      But first — why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

      1. Obama’s unbounded ego.

      In three and a half years, Obama will be out of a job. He is 50 now and wants to soar to greater heights, because that’s what matters more than anything else in his life.

      What’s better to Obama’s Napoleonic self than being U.N. Sec Gen? He is a man who wants to be worshiped by the world, and the path to that goal is clear. It is also an opportunity to carry out his internationalist and pro-Muslim convictions.

      Personalities like his need the excitement of taking big risks for big gains. Obama’s slogan “the audacity of hope” comes from Napoleon’s general, who described his war strategy as “Audacity, audacity, always audacity!” Alinsky’s Rules advise: “Always act outside of the experience of the enemy.” It now looks like Obama has never won a single clean election, because he has always violated the rules. He always gambles, and as long as his opponents play by the rules, he wins.

      Mitt Romney is a good and decent man, and IRS intimidation of political enemies is just not his way. Knowing that, the Obama campaign violated the rules deliberately, cynically, and with malice aforethought. It worked.

      2. Obama’s internationalist ideology.

      The Communist anthem is The Internationale. When Obama gave his big speech in Berlin even before the first inauguration, his first words were “Citizens of the world!” That was meant as Marxist symbolism. All the leftists in the world cheered themselves hoarse.

      Berlin was Marx’s city, the capital of the Prussian Empire that was the model for the Communist Worker’s Paradise, to be guided by the new Prussian Junkers, the Communist Party. “Citizens of the world!” was an echo of “Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains!”

      The American media didn’t bother to tell us that, but they knew. They knew.

      Obama constantly pulls stunts with obvious Marxist overtones. His inner circle laughs at his audacity, and he likes to clown it up for Valerie Jarrett, Michelle, Ayers, and Axelrod.

      Obama is a trickster, power-hungry, insatiable, and sociopathic. His enemy is us, or what Jeremiah Wright would call “middleclassness,” the values that most of us try to live by.

      As a European Socialist, Obama does not believe in the U.S. Constitution. His appointees have no conscience about violating the Constitution, as is obvious from today’s news about fundamental IRS violations, fundamental invasion of news reporters’ privileges under the First Amendment, and fundamental violations of the ethics of combat commanders — leaving soldiers under fire to the tender mercies of a vicious enemy.

      Obama is audacity man — violating decent values is his specialty. Bill and Hillary found that out when he played the race card against them at the 2008 Democratic Convention. Democrats always play the race card, but never against each other. In 2008, Obama violated that rule, and he got away with it.

      3. Butt-kissing tyrants.

      If Obama wants to run for U.N. SecGen after 2016, he needs two things: a U.S. nomination by a Democratic president and a majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly.

      Let’s say Hillary gets elected in 2016, as Democrats now are hoping. She nominates Obama to be U.N. SecGen, to rousing cheers from the New York Times and Washington Post, the U.K. Guardian, and Workers’ World.

      Now Obama needs a majority of U.N. General Assembly votes.

      By butt-kissing every throwback tyrant in sight, Obama is buying U.N. votes for himself. Obama’s public bows to throwbacks like Saudi’s King Abdullah and the emperor of Japan are not just another weird thing about this guy. They are strategic, with the purpose of lining up support for the future.

      There are 57 Muslim states. (Remember Obama’s slip of the tongue when he talked about “all 57 states”? He wasn’t thinking about Heinz 57 flavors. He was thinking about Muslim states.)

      Europe is the home of imperialist socialism. The European Union is the successor to the Soviet Union, run by an appointed political machine just like the USSR. Obama is a EuroSoc, and he will get enthusiastic support from there.

      South America will vote for him, because he is actively supporting leftist regimes below the border. Obama’s recent trip to Mexico was full of bowing and scraping to Mexico’s tender feelings about losing Texas and California in the 19th century. Blowing open the border is just another favor Obama is doing for Latin America.

      If you combine his unbounded ego with his penchant for audacious trickery, it becomes clear why Obama would want to be U.N. Secretary General. To U.N.-worshipers, the SecGen is the basis for a world presidency. Even if it remains a weak position, it could be a wonderful bully pulpit for Obama’s endless speech habit. It would crown Obama’s life achievements and allow him to crow over the United States with its old-fashioned constitution designed to limit the powers of such as The Trickster.

      President Obama could have used the Benghazi attack on 9/11 last year to look like the commander in chief, a role he loves to play. He could have allowed Air Force jets to strafe and bomb the gaggle of Ansar al Shari’a gunmen who overran the compound and killed what are now admitted to be six Americans, including Ambassador Stevens.

      This might have been Obama’s Heroic Capture of bin Laden, part 2.

      When Obama skips a chance to boast and strut on the stage just before an election, we have to wonder why. He is not usually shy about putting himself in the limelight.

      Michael Barone and Charles Krauthammer believe that Benghazi was covered up because Obama and Hillary were afraid to admit that al-Qaeda wasn’t dead — that AQ is very much alive, and dangerous as a snake.

      On 9/11 last year, there were not one, but two simultaneous assaults on American targets: the Cairo Embassy and the Benghazi compound. The front pages that day showed the black AQ flag flying over a burned part of the U.S. Embassy. Double-simultaneous assaults are an al-Qaeda signature, as we know from 9/11/01, when the Pentagon was assaulted simultaneously with the Twin Towers. Double-bomb attacks spell AL-QAEDA.

      Everybody in the Muslim world understood that on the eleventh anniversary of 9/11/01, AQ was telling the world it could strike us at any place and time. Bin Laden may be dead, but jihad keeps marchin’ on.

      Benghazi was a secret CIA operation to smuggle arms from Libya to the “Free Syrian Army,” consisting of radical Islamists. Stevens was at the arms compound in Benghazi to direct a large arms shipment. He was the Libya expert who helped to overthrow Gaddafi in the first place. Now he was shipping Gaddafi’s armaments to overthrow Bashir Assad in Syria.

      The United States was apparently acting in collusion with radical Muslim factions, probably including al-Qaeda in the Maghreb (the Mediterranean coast of North Africa). We know that Stevens even hired another jihadist faction to guard the CIA compound. Early Benghazi reports showed that they magically disappeared on the day of the attack, as did the Libyan police. Our loyal Libyan allies.

      Obama was therefore directly colluding with al-Qaeda, the enemy that destroyed the Twin Towers on 9/11/01. AQ is a big part of the “Free” Syrian Army that is trying to destroy Assad, because Assad is a Shi’ite who runs a secular Baathist regime. One of our friendly radical Islamist groups, Ansar al Shari’a, simply decided to send a bloody message to America that day by killing Stevens and burning the annex.

      The strategic purpose of the “Free Syrian Army” is to cut the Shi’ite Crescent running from Iran through Syria to Lebanon. We are involved in a proxy war between Iran and the Sunni Arabs. We are now supporting the Sunni maniacs against Iran’s maniacs. That is what Benghazi was about.

      One can make a case for pitting Sunnis against Shi’ites. But Obama knows perfectly well that after Assad, Syria will be run by another set of murderous fanatics.

      Collusion with radical Muslims is standard in this administration. That is completely, profoundly cynical, or it is simply aiding the enemy.

      There are many reasons for that collusion, but protecting the United States is not one of them. The policy of appeasement and treachery protects radical Islam and endangers the West.

      However, if Obama wants to be SecGen of the United Nations in four years, there is an extra reason to buy votes in the Middle East.

      None of this should ever become public knowledge, as far as Obama and Hillary are concerned. Benghazi therefore had to be covered up at any price.

      With Obama, personal ambition and political moves always go together.

      Conservatives, beware.

    • VTX
    • This is the difference between Rational Care (what I call it) and Ocrapocare (AKA Obamacare):

      Rational Care: Mid-to-high deductable catastrophic health insurance policies (the kind Joe Bitin’ calls “mortgage protection insurance”) with rollover-allowable Medical Savings plans. People have an incentive to stay healthy, and most such catastrophic plans still offer wellness checks.

      Ocrapocare: plenty of grub-level treatments, with no allowances for catastrophic illness, hospitalization or extended medical treatment. Basically, you get a lot of crap, but when you get really sick, you die and your family goes bankrupt. Most hypochondriacs love this kind of insurance, because they get to go to the doctor for every damn hangnail and every minor headache. But your abortion will be paid for! And birth control! Whoopee!

      The unions are beginning to recognize that companies will have no choice but to offer the crummy policies, which will satisfy their baby-killing advocates, but will not do a thing to help families with serious illness.
      Wait until you can’t buy affordable catastrophic coverage, thanks to Comrade Odumbo.

      They won’t call toilets “Johns” anymore – they’ll call ‘em “Obamapots.” Because Americans won’t have a pot left to piss in.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Unless the press mans up…and Americans start shouting the truth about this homosexual communist fraud…He will destroy destroy destroy America…in league with our enemies

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • The Betrayal

      Mark Steyn: Bystanders in their own fate

      By MARK STEYN

      On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed “Allahu Akbar!” as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill.
      As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling. The perpetrators did not, as the Tsarnaev brothers did in Boston, attempt to escape. Instead, they held court in the street, gloating over their trophy, and flagged down a London bus to demand the passengers record their triumph on film. As the crowd of bystanders swelled, the remarkably urbane savages posed for photographs with the remains of their victim while discoursing on the iniquities of Britain toward the Muslim world. Having killed Drummer Rigby, they were killing time: it took 20 minutes for the somnolent British constabulary to show up. And so television viewers were treated to the spectacle of a young man, speaking in the vowels of south London, chatting calmly with his “fellow Britons” about his geopolitical grievances and apologizing to the ladies present for any discomfort his beheading of Drummer Rigby might have caused them, all while drenched in blood and still wielding his cleaver.

      If you’re thinking of getting steamed over all that, don’t. Simon Jenkins, the former editor of The Times of London, cautioned against “mass hysteria” over “mundane acts of violence.”
      That’s easy for him to say. Woolwich is an unfashionable part of town, and Sir Simon is unlikely to find himself there on an afternoon stroll. Drummer Rigby had less choice in the matter. Being jumped by barbarians with machetes is certainly “mundane” in Somalia and Sudan, but it’s the sort of thing that would once have been considered somewhat unusual on a sunny afternoon in south London – at least as unusual as, say, blowing up 8-year-old boys at the Boston Marathon. It was “mundane” only in the sense that, as at weddings and kindergarten concerts, the reflexive reaction of everybody present was to get out their cellphones and start filming.
      Once, long ago, I was in an altercation where someone pulled a switchblade, and ever since have been mindful of Jimmy Hoffa’s observation that he’d rather jump a gun than a knife. Nevertheless, there is a disturbing passivity to this scene: a street full of able-bodied citizens being lectured to by blood-soaked murderers who have no fear that anyone will be minded to interrupt their diatribes. In fairness to the people of Boston, they were ordered to “shelter in place” by the Governor of Massachusetts. In Woolwich, a large crowd of Londoners apparently volunteered to “shelter in place,” instinctively. Consider how that will play when these guys’ jihadist snuff video is being hawked around the bazaars of the Muslim world. Behold the infidels, content to be bystanders in their own fate.
      This passivity set the tone for what followed. In London as in Boston, the politico-media class immediately lapsed into the pneumatic multiculti Tourette’s that seems to be a chronic side-effect of excess diversity-celebrating: No Islam to see here, nothing to do with Islam, all these body parts in the street are a deplorable misinterpretation of Islam. The BBC’s Nick Robinson accidentally described the men as being “of Muslim appearance,” but quickly walked it back lest impressionable types get the idea that there’s anything “of Muslim appearance” about a guy waving a machete and saying “Allahu Akbar.” A man is on TV, dripping blood in front of a dead British soldier and swearing “by Almighty Allah we will never stop fighting you,” yet it’s the BBC reporter who’s apologizing for “causing offence.” To David Cameron, Drummer Rigby’s horrific end was “not just an attack on Britain and on the British way of life, it was also a betrayal of Islam. … There is nothing in Islam that justifies this truly dreadful act.”
      How does he know? He doesn’t seem the most-likely Koranic scholar. Appearing on David Letterman’s show a while back, Cameron was unable to translate into English the words “Magna Carta,” which has quite a bit to do with that “British way of life” he’s so keen on. But apparently it’s because he’s been up to his neck in suras and hadiths every night, sweating for Shariah 101. So has Scotland Yard’s Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Brian Paddick, who reassured us after the London Tube bombings that “Islam and terrorism don’t go together,” and the Mayor of Toronto, David Miller, telling NPR listeners after 19 Muslims were arrested for plotting to behead the Canadian Prime Minister: “You know, in Islam, if you kill one person you kill everybody,” he said in a somewhat loose paraphrase of Koran 5:32 that manages to leave out some important loopholes. “It’s a very peaceful religion.”
      That’s why it fits so harmoniously into famously peaceful societies like, say, Sweden. For the past week, Stockholm has been ablaze every night with hundreds of burning cars set alight by “youths.” Any particular kind of “youth”? The Swedish Prime Minister declined to identify them any more precisely than as “hooligans.” But don’t worry: The “hooligans” and “youths” and men of no Muslim appearance whatsoever can never win because, as David Cameron ringingly declared, “they can never beat the values we hold dear, the belief in freedom, in democracy, in free speech, in our British values, Western values.” Actually, they’ve already gone quite a way toward eroding free speech, as both Prime Ministers demonstrate. The short version of what happened in Woolwich is that two Muslims butchered a British soldier in the name of Islam and helpfully explained, “The only reason we have done this is because Muslims are dying every day.” But what do they know? They’re only Muslims, not Diversity Outreach Coordinators. So the BBC, in its so-called “Key Points,” declined to mention the “Allahu Akbar” bit or the “I-word” at all: Allah who?
      Not a lot of Muslims want to go to the trouble of chopping your head off, but when so many Western leaders have so little rattling around up there, they don’t have to. And, as we know from the sob-sister Tsarnaev profiles, most of these excitable lads are perfectly affable, or at least no more than mildly alienated, until the day they set a hundred cars alight, or blow up a schoolboy, or decapitate some guy. And, if you’re lucky, it’s not you they behead, or your kid they kill, or even your Honda Civic they light up. And so life goes on, and it’s all so “mundane,” in Simon Jenkins’ word, that you barely notice when the Jewish school shuts up, and the gay bar, and the uncovered women no longer take a stroll too late in the day, and the publishing house that gets sent the manuscript for the next “Satanic Verses” decides it’s not worth the trouble. But don’t worry, they’ll never defeat our “free speech” and our “way of life.”
      One in 10 Britons under 25 now is Muslim. That number will increase, through immigration, disparate birth rates, and conversions like those of the Woolwich killers, British born and bred. Metternich liked to say the Balkans began in the Landstrasse, in south-east Vienna. Today, the dar al-Islam begins in Wellington Street, in southeast London. That’s a “betrayal” all right, but not of Islam.

    • truthandjustice
    • They need to be demanding that the whole rotten Admin. go away!!!! ATB (and RI, UM, all) – might want to add another that we never hear of — on purpose…(by Walid Shoebat)—-

      Obama’s aiding his half brother with HIS own atrocities, which by the way is allegedly connected to our other wonderful now famous traitor in the IRS scandal, Lois Lerner.
      Guys – check all this out at his website (wonder if Michelle Bachmann, other Repubs. know about this too? Hmmmm?????)
      ——————————————
      IRS’ Lois Lerner Aiding Obamas’ Wahhabist Fundraising Empire – excerpts

      Since the IRS scam has become the most momentous topic of the day, we now know, thanks to my father, that Obama’s brother, Malik Obama, is deeply associated with Omar al-Bashir, the one who was behind the attack on the US embassy in Khartoum, Sudan, which occurred at around the same time as the Benghazi attack. ..

      Obama’s brother is working with an enemy to the United States. Is it any wonder, then, as to why he has been so pompous toward American liberty, and yet so helpful to Bashir?

      http://shoebat.com/2013/05/24/obamas-brother-works-with-man-who-attacked-us-embassy/

    • truthandjustice
    • RI – are you paying attention????!!!!!!

      New IRS Scandal: Islamic Extremism and Sex Slaves

      In research conducted for the Forum For Middle East Understanding (FFMU) by former Muslim Brotherhood activist and current Arab analyst Walid Shoebat, it has been learned that when the IRS’ Lois Lerner approved the tax-exempt status of the Barack H. Obama Foundation, she may have facilitated a major scandal that includes alleged polygamy, statutory rape, assault, and terror recruitment.

      The favorable treatment received by the Foundation headed by Malik Obama – President Obama’s half-brother – from the IRS, as reported by the Daily Caller, is part of a much larger story involving the Barack H. Obama Foundation, which has been identified by the New York Post as a ‘questionable charity’.

      This 22-page investigative report is breathtaking and further questions the integrity of the Obama administration.

      The Arabic Alriyadh reported that Malik has participated in meetings of the Islamic Da’wa Organization in Khartoum with Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir – who is wanted for crimes against humanity by the International Criminal Court (ICC) – in attendance.

      “The primary objective of the Islamic Da’wa Organization,” Shoebat says, “is the spread of Wahhabist Islam across Africa.”

      According to the U.K. Daily Mail, Abdul Malik is on extremely friendly terms with his half-brother. Each was the best man at the other’s wedding and according to Abdul Malik, he has “regular contact with the president,” according to another Daily Mail article.

      Malik’s dealings make the Mama Sarah Obama Foundation (MSOF), founded and led by President Obama’s step-grandmother, Mama Sarah, even more relevant. Last year, Shoebat translated an interview Al-Jazeera did with the President’s first cousin – Musa Ismail Obama.

      In that interview, Musa boasted that most of the funds from MSOF goes to fund Wahhabist Madrassa Scholarships and not the orphans. He also admitted that 90% of the Foundation’s funds come from America. Funds to MSOF go through a tax-exempt, U.S. Charitable conduit identified as the California Community Foundation (CCF). Entities that have contributed to MSOF through CCF include major charities like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation and Catholic Relief Charities, as reported by the American Spectator’s Jeffrey Lord.

      Investigative Report compiled by Forum for Middle East Understanding researched by Walid Shoebat. Full report can be viewed here.

      When we asked PRWeb for an example of a third party source that they consider to be reputable or acceptable (in order to issue the Press Release), we were told…

      …wait for it…

      The New York Times.

      http://shoebat.com/2013/05/23/prweb-censors-shoebat-rejects-press-release-implicating-irs-lois-lerner-in-aiding-obamas-wahhabist-fundraising-empire/

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Thank you Truth and Justice…I wasn’t aware of the Malik Obama story. Shoebat is well worth following.

      Big Government’s Abuses of Power

      Monitoring AP but not detaining Tamerlan Tsarnaev–there is a common theme.

      by Victor Davis Hanson

      National Review Online

      Government is now so huge, powerful, and callous that citizens risk becoming virtual serfs, lacking the freedoms guaranteed by the Founders.

      Is that perennial fear an exaggeration? Survey the current news.

      We have just learned that the Internal Revenue Service before the 2012 election predicated its tax-exemption policies on politics. It inordinately denied tax exemption to groups considered conservative or otherwise antagonistic to the president’s agenda.

      If the supposedly nonpartisan IRS is perceived as skewing our taxes on the basis of our politics, then the entire system of trust in self-reporting is rendered null and void. Worse still, the bureaucratic overseer at the center of the controversy, Sarah Hall Ingram, now runs the IRS division charged with enforcing compliance with the new Obamacare requirements.

      It was also before the 2012 election that some reporters at the Associated Press had their private and work phone records monitored by the government, supposedly because of fear about national-security leaks. The Justice Department gave the AP no chance, as it usually would, first to question its own journalists. The AP had run a story in May 2012 about the success of a double agent working in Yemen before the administration itself could brag about it.

      In fact, the Obama White House has been accused of leaking classified information favorable to the administration — top-secret details concerning the Stuxnet computer virus used against Iran, the specifics of the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound, and the decision-making behind the drone program — often to favored journalists. The message is clear: A reporter may have his most intimate work and private correspondence turned over to the government — Fox News’s James Rosen had his e-mail account tapped into — on the mere allegation that he might have tried to do what his own government had in fact already done.

      Now the civil-rights divisions of the Department of Education and the Department of Justice have issued new speech codes for campuses, focusing on supposed gender insensitivities. The result is that federal bureaucrats can restrict the constitutionally protected rights of free speech for millions of American college students — including during routine classroom discussions.

      Eight months after the Benghazi mess, Americans only now are discovering that the Obama administration, for political reasons, failed to beef up security at our Libyan consulate or send it help when under attack. It also lied in blaming the violence on a spontaneous demonstration prompted by an Internet video. That pre-election narrative was known to be untrue when the president, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, and White House Press Secretary Jay Carney all peddled it.

      The problem with a powerful rogue government is not just that it becomes quite adept at doing what it should not. Increasingly, it also cannot even do what it should.

      Philadelphia abortionist Dr. Kermit Gosnell may well turn out to be the most lethal serial killer in U.S. history. His recent murder conviction gave only a glimpse of his carnage at the end of a career that spanned more than three decades. Yet Gosnell operated with impunity right under the noses of Pennsylvania health and legal authorities for years, without routine government health-code and licensing oversight.

      In the case of Boston terrorist bomber Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his loud jihadist activity had earned him a visit from the FBI and the attention of both the CIA and the Department of Homeland Security. But all that government monitoring was for naught. Tsarnaev was not detained, but allowed to visit Dagestan and Chechnya — both located in the supposedly dangerous region that prompted his family’s flight to the U.S. in the first place.

      In all of these abuses and laxities there is one common theme. Bureaucrats, political appointees, regulators, intelligence officials, and law-enforcement personnel wanted to fall in line with the perceived politically correct agenda of the day. Right now, that party line seems to include protecting the progressive interests of the Obama administration, going after its critics, turning a blind eye toward illegal abortions, ignoring warnings about radical Islam, and restricting the right to free speech in order to curtail language declared potentially hurtful.

      Conspiracists, left and right, are sometimes understandably derided as paranoids for alleging that Big Government steadily absorbs the private sector, violates private communications, targets tax filers it doesn’t like, and lies to the people about what it is up to. The only missing theme of such classic paranoia is the perennial worry over the right to bear arms.

      I went to several sporting-goods stores recently to buy commonplace rifle shells. For the first time in my life, there were none to be found. Can widespread shortages of ammunition be attributed to panic buying or to production shortfalls caused by inexplicably massive purchases by the Department of Homeland Security at a time of acrimonious debate over the Second Amendment?

      Who knows, but yesterday’s wacky conspiracist may become today’s Nostradamus.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Obama called out again…be it for his ignorance, his lies…or his propaganda….

      Experts contradict Obama on Islamic terror threat

      Obama’s drone speech welcomed by Pakistan, Yemen and the U.N.
      Obama: Al Qaeda is on ‘a path to defeat’; calls for resetting terror policy
      STORY TOPICS
      Politics
      War_Conflict
      Steven Emerson
      The Heritage
      Heritage Foundation

      Terrorism analysts are rebutting President Obama’s assertion that the “scale of the threat” from Islamic terrorists has reverted to pre-Sept. 11, 2001, levels.

      “This is a total fabrication,” said Steven Emerson, whose Investigative Project on Terrorism tracks radical Islam. “The ‘scale of this threat’ in the 1990s never closely resembled the terrorist attacks post 9/11. This is an outright lie.”

      SEE RELATED: Obama’s drone speech welcomed by Pakistan, Yemen and the U.N.
      The Heritage Foundation has been cataloguing foiled terror attacks post-9/11 by Islamic groups. The number: 54.

      James Carafano, a military analyst at Heritage, said the 1990s’ numbers “were a fraction of that.”

      Mr. Obama on Thursday delivered a speech at the National Defense University that came close to declaring victory over al Qaeda, saying it is now operating franchise groups.

      He also declared an end to the global campaign against terrorism, saying the U.S. would focus on individual cells.

      “As we shape our response, we have to recognize that the scale of this threat closely resembles the types of attacks we faced before 9/11,” the president said.

      Before the Boston Marathon bombing, allegedly conducted by two jihadists, the U.S. was the target of at least five Muslim attacks since 2009 (two of which succeeded) whose plots went undetected by the FBI or CIA:

      SEE RELATED: Obama: Al Qaeda is on ‘a path to defeat’; calls for resetting terror policy
      • Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad opened fire at a military recruiting office in Little Rock, Ark., in June 2009, killing one soldier.

      • Najibullah Zazi, who said he was a member of al Qaeda, tried to detonate bombs in New York City’s subway in September 2009.

      • Army Maj. Nadal Malik Hassan opened fire at a soldier processing center at Fort Hood, Texas, killing 13.

      • Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab tried to explode a bomb hidden in his underwear onboard a flight to Detroit in December 2009.

      • Faisal Shahzad attempted to detonate a car bomb in Times Square in May 2010.

      Mr. Emerson said the U.S. homeland faced no such consistent Islamic plots in the 1990s.

      “In terms of the number of attacks, it’s like a 100-to-1 what has happened post-9/11 compared with pre-9/11,” he said.

      Said the Heritage report: “The long war on terrorism is far from over.”

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • Even for liberals, Obama has crossed a line

      How much of the recent scandals can actually be nailed to the White House door? Is there a ‘smoking gun’ Obama email that says: go and get those guys who are giving me a hard time? Almost certainly not. But there was no need for one.

      Telegraph [UK]

      Those who have spoken out against the President’s expansion of government power have been investigated and intimidated

      By Janet Daley

      Barack Obama announced an end to America’s war on terror last week. In future, he declared, he would restrict the unmanned drone attacks that had been his own signature anti-terrorist initiative, and he would really, really make an effort to shut down the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay – as he had promised to do way back when he was running for president the first time.

      Presumably, this pronouncement was designed to win back the favour of the liberal media, which has been energetically disowning him ever since his administration staggered into the most spectacular series of Washington scandals since Watergate. This suspicion is reinforced by the fact that buried in that War on Terror (End Of) speech was an almost subliminal attempt to address one of the most damaging of the White House embarrassments.

      But we must begin at the beginning, since the President’s tribulations – which are infamous by now in the United States – have received little coverage in the British press. The most serious of them was almost too shocking to be credible, but it had to be believed because the officials in charge made a point (indeed, contrived an opportunity) to apologise for it publicly.

      It seemed that the Internal Revenue Service – the US equivalent of the UK’s HM Revenue and Customs – had been deliberately discriminating against organisations with the words “Tea Party” or “patriot” in their titles. In other words, they had been singling out for high pressure audits and super-scrutiny, groups that were thought to be critical of the Obama administration. Those who had spoken out against the President’s expansion of government power, or in favour of tax-cutting, or even those who sought to educate public opinion in what they believed to be the meaning of the Constitution, were interrogated and intimidated in a way that Lois Lerner, the head of the tax division responsible, admitted was “absolutely inappropriate”.
      Inappropriate? The only word that would suffice here would be “outrageous”, or maybe “illegal”. The IRS is one of the mightiest federal government agencies. It has terrifying powers over ordinary citizens that our own dear HMRC would die for. And, by its own admission, it had been carrying out a politically targeted vendetta against organisations that were simply exercising the right, guaranteed to them by the First Amendment to the Constitution, to free speech and assembly. (This would be roughly the equivalent to HMRC engaging in a concerted campaign of harassment designed to put Ukip out of business.)

      Scarcely anything could be more antithetical to the principles on which America was founded than this abuse of federal government power to suppress dissident opinion. With apparently unconscious irony, Ms Lerner has now invoked her Fifth Amendment right to refuse to testify about these matters before a congressional committee. “Pleading the Fifth”, as it is known, permits a witness to refuse to give evidence under oath that may incriminate him. (Back in the day, it was regarded by McCarthyites as the traditional recourse of the Commie scoundrel unwilling to answer questions about his political affiliations.)

      But the IRS farrago – still happily bubbling away – was then overtaken by some breathtaking revelations about the administration’s infringements on the freedom of the press. First there was the matter of the Associated Press agency, whose phone records were seized on an industrial scale – without any of the legally required warrants or warnings – on what turned out to be a false allegation that it was breaching national security.

      The charge was shown to be completely baseless, and the procurement of all the phone records of AP’s Washington bureau was unlawful. But the incident left a lasting effect: AP’s reporters say that confidential sources are now reluctant to talk to them for fear that their phone details will be captured by surveillance. So their ability to carry out investigative journalism has been seriously damaged. That was when the faith of the mainstream media – which had been in Obama’s pocket from the earliest days – began to crumble.

      But the best was yet to come. The world was well and truly turned upside down when it was revealed that James Rosen, a reporter from Fox News – the Right-of-centre cable news channel that causes the President and his allies to rail and rend their garments in fury – was investigated, under the Espionage Act no less, for soliciting information that was labelled classified. (Note: it is not illegal – or even particularly out of the ordinary – for a journalist to make such a request.)

      This investigation involved commandeering not only Mr Rosen’s phone records and those of his parents, but his private emails, as well as his movements into and out of government buildings as recorded on his press security pass. And that – it turned out – was a bridge too far.

      The liberal media were suddenly outdoing each other in their Constitutional outrage. The New York Times (which has been the quasi-official Obama fanzine) went into overdrive. In an editorial board statement, it said, with that traditional Times air of ponderous self-importance: “With the decision to label a Fox News television reporter a possible ‘co-conspirator’… the administration has moved beyond protecting government secrets to threatening fundamental freedoms of the press to gather news.”

      What is startling about this is not just the paper’s declamatory judgment on the White House that it once unreservedly adored, but its remarkable willingness to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with Fox News, which it generally loathes. And that brings us to Mr Obama’s throwaway line in the “War on Terror” speech. Seemingly a propos of nothing, the President said: “Journalists should not be at risk for doing their jobs.” He had, therefore, asked the Attorney General, Eric Holder, to investigate and review the existing guidelines “governing investigations that involve reporters”. As it was Mr Holder who signed off on the search warrant for James Rosen’s private emails, this presumably means that the Attorney General will be investigating himself.

      But how much of this can actually be nailed to the White House door? Is there a “smoking gun” Obama email that says: go and get those guys who are giving me a hard time? Almost certainly not. But there was no need for one: he and his official spokesman had been banging on openly about the threat from Tea Party fanatics and the obstacle that Fox News presented to their virtuous reforms, for as long as they had been in power.

      When you cast your opponents as the personification of evil – when you cease to see them as simply fellow countrymen who have different values and contrary views to your own, then this is where it ends.

      Who, they implicitly demanded, would rid them of these turbulent enemies? Clearly, there were plenty of eager officials ready to try.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • If you read or watch one thing honoring our military this weekend..this is it.

      http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/55097#at_pco=cfd-1.0

      Demanding the truth about Extortion 17
      Destroying our country, our military and our very existence

      By Paula Helton

      How many Americans have heard of Extortion 17? Extortion 17 was the call sign for the Chinook helicopter shot down in Afghanistan on the night of August 6, 2011. Killed in that crash were 25 special ops forces, including 15 members of Seal Team 6, 5 national Guard troops and 8 Afghans.

      Today, the families of the military killed in that crash held a press conference to lay out the coverup by Obama and the military that has gone on since that crash. The video of the press conference can be found here

      I watched the live stream of the press conference, admittedly crying throughout. Then the point came that the tears turned into white hot anger. Every American citizen must watch this video. The major Obama regime coverups did not occur only in Fast and Furious, the New Black Panther voter intimidation case and Benghazi. The man sitting in OUR White house is methodically destroying our country, our military and our very existence.

      Islamist Imam praying over our soldiers at Bagram Air Base
      At the beginning of the video is footage of the Islamist Imam praying over our soldiers at Bagram Air Base. Of course he prays in Arabic, but in the English translation he sent our heroes into eternal hell as infidels while praising the Islamist relationship with our country. You read that right, and our Government and our military let that happen.

      This operation reads like a set up from the beginning. All the Special Ops forces were packed into one National Guard Chinook. There was no escort for the Seals that night, no pathfinder, and conveniently the “eye in the sky” (drone) didn’t work. The seven members of the Afghan military that were to accompany our service members were switched out just prior to take off. The names of the seven Afghans appearing on the flight manifesto were not the seven that boarded that helicopter on the night of August 6, 2011.

      Apparently the call to switch out these seven Afghans was made by an “out of theater” commander. To this day, no one has come forward identifying that commander. America needs to demand an answer to that question. Remember, prior to this crash, Barack Obama and Joe Biden had identified Seal Team 6 as the forces that killed Osama Bin Laden. One has to ask, “were they a trade off for Bin Laden?”

      In October 2011, US Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that an investigation carried out following the shoot down concluded “that all operational decisions, linked to the incident, were deemed tactically sound” and the helicopter crashed after a RPG round impacted the aft rotor assembly.

      While the Obama administration was busy spinning the coverup, other reports were surfacing that the Taliban had laid an elaborate trap for U.S. special operations forces, luring them in with false information. A senior Afghan government official, speaking anonymously, said that Taliban commander Qari Tahir had fed U.S. forces false information about a meeting of insurgent leaders and fighters waited for the helicopter from both sides of a steep valley: “The Taliban knew which route the helicopter would take. That’s the only route, so they took position on either side of the valley on mountains and as the helicopter approached, they attacked it with rockets and other modern weapons. It was brought down by multiple shots.”

      It was heart wrenching listening to Karen Vaughn, a mother who lost her only son. He was a proud member of Seal Team 6. She is angry that current rules of engagement put her son’s life, and that of every son and daughter serving in the military today in grave danger. She demanded to know if reaching the hearts and minds of Muslim extremists is more important than her son’s life. She also expressed anger at the form letters the President keeps sending out when our children are killed.

      Her husband, Billy Vaughn, recounted the visit they received from Admiral William McRaven, who was apparently sent to put a lid on their inquiries. The Admiral was the head of the Joint Strategic Objectives Plan (JSOP), as well as runner up for Time’s Man of the Year in 2011.

      As the Vaughns are residents of Florida, they also approached Sen. Marco Rubio to enlist his assistance in their quest for answers. Sen. Rubio told him he would talk to his new BFF, John McCain, and see what they could do. Mr. Vaughn’s response was “No, thank you, I’ll do it myself, I don’t trust John McCain or the GOP establishment to pursue this.

      Doug Hamburger, another grieving father has questioned why no interviews were done with Afghan Command or military in compiling the 1,250 page official report.

      Charles and MaryAnn Strange lost their 25-year-old son, who had been a Navy Seal for 6 years. Mr. Strange made inquiries as to the whereabouts of the black box. He was told it washed away in a flood. His response was, “in Afghanistan?” After repeated questions, Mr. Strange was told everything was in “the book”. After requesting a copy of said book, he was presented with a book with no ink in it. When he questioned this and requested a true copy, he was told the original had been burned. They were then given a disk. Unfortunately for Mr. and Mrs. Strange, the disk was full of white outs.

      Also present at the press conference was retired Admiral James Lyons. Admiral Lyons has a distinguished 36-year Naval career, mot recently as Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet. Admiral Lyons has also called for an answer to the question, “who made the decision to put them all on one helicopter”? He stated emphatically that this mission was compromised as the Taliban knew we were coming. The Admiral stated emphatically this was a dereliction of duty just like Benghazi; not to come to the aid of our people is unconscionable.

      Joining the press conference were Army Major General Paul Vallely, General Tom MacInerney, Lt. Colonel Allen West, former Seals, Benjamin Smith and Larry Bailey and Act for America’s Brigitte Gabriel. From all of them came an admonition and dire warning that the American people must wake up and realize who the true enemy is: Islamist Jihadists. They are all unanimous in the belief we are being destroyed from within. Former Seal Benjamin Smith went so far as to say he believes Barack Obama is guilty of treason. I share that belief.

      A recurring theme during this press conference was that we, the American people, must stand together and demand a Congressional hearing into Extortion 17. To date, only three of our House Representatives, Michelle Bachman, Louis Gohmert and Trent Franks have been actively working to assist the family members. Unfortunately, the same Congress that held a hearing to address drug usage in the NFL, has no interest in holding hearings to get to the bottom of what actually happened on the night of August 6, 2011 and the ensuing cover up.

      It’s up to “We the People” to demand a hearing and help the families of our fallen heroes get the answers they rightfully deserve. Please not only watch this video, but make sure it goes viral. Then pick up the phone and call your Representative in Congress and demand a Congressional hearing. Keep calling until that hearing is scheduled. We’ve kept up the pressure on Benghazi. These families deserve no less from us.

    • Chris
    • The American people that were for this monstrosity at any time are in for a rude (and expensive) awakening, as are the rest of us.

      They are about to understand why preventing such a bill ever becomes law is of utmost importance because once it gets voted in, getting rid of it is ten times harder.

      They are also about to understand that this bill was not about healthcare as much as it was government control, and their socialist utopia dream of everyone getting the basic level of care they want will not be achieved, but they will be paying a lot more for an impossible to attain perfection.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • EXCLUSIVE — PALIN: GOING ROGUE IN THE WRONG DIRECTION

      by SARAH PALIN

      As more information about the IRS scandal trickles out daily, the White House’s involvement is becoming clearer. Those of us who’ve been warning about the demise of freedom with Barack Obama’s efforts to “fundamentally transform” our great nation are about to witness some sad vindication. Will awakened Americans finally join us in saying “enough is enough”?

      The president would like us to believe that he only learned about the IRS corruption from watching the news. But we recently learned that the White House was actively working with the IRS on how to roll out the story of this scandal. So, Mr. President, how can you have your staff work on the roll out of the biggest controversy since Watergate, and yet claim that you only heard about it by watching the news with the rest of us?

      For the president to deny any knowledge of what was brewing and to claim to know nothing about the Benghazi cover-up or anything about anything White House-related lately, he’s either a liar or a hugely incompetent CEO. You decide.

      Yesterday, we also learned that the top IRS official involved in the targeting scandal is planning on pleading the Fifth during her Congressional hearings. That’s keen – she’ll be able to enjoy her Fifth Amendment rights in a hearing about how her intimidating organization denied Americans the ability to fully exercise their First Amendment rights.
      Keep in mind that the IRS considers you guilty until proven innocent when they audit you. The Fifth Amendment doesn’t apply.

      This scandal is not just about the IRS targeting Americans to deny them tax-exempt status or subjecting them to harassing retaliatory audits. The IRS also leaked to left-wing reporters the confidential application information submitted by conservative groups.

      The IRS claims that their leaking of information was “inadvertent and unintentional disclosures by the employees involved.” They at first blamed the entire IRS scandal on a couple of employees who “went rogue,” but we soon found out that this was just more malarkey coming from the president’s spokesman. But even if these were “inadvertent and unintentional disclosures,” is that supposed to make us feel better? With the IRS running Obamacare, what are the chances that our confidential information and medical records will “inadvertently” and “unintentionally” be disclosed? Please remember that some of us warned America about the dangers of having the IRS play such a big role with the administration of Obamacare. We were laughed at and mocked relentlessly back then. It sure doesn’t seem funny now, does it?

      This IRS scandal is especially terrible because Americans live in fear of the IRS like no other entity because this monstrous bureaucracy has the power to take your hard-earned money. Your wages are the sum of your labors; hence, the IRS has the power to steal the fruits of your labors. Average Americans live in fear of making an error on their tax returns that could cost them massive amounts of money, plus their reputation and good name. If a small business makes a mistake, the IRS can shut them down and send them to jail.

      The IRS has always been the face of intimidating and controlling big government. Now it’s the face of corrupt big government that actively attacks the people it is supposed to serve. This isn’t the change America was hoping for, Mr. President, but it certainly is transformative.

      Average everyday Americans like my dad and his non-political buddies are outraged by this IRS scandal, perhaps more so than all the other White House fiascos that are making the radical Left’s intentions crystal clear. It’s because this IRS cluster hits close to home for everyone. It’s tangible proof of how a corrupt government can intimidate and target a person’s record, reputation, and life, and make them feel helpless.

      These Obama administration scandals are a sad and stark reminder that only limited government can ensure liberty. At our core, we Americans just want to be left alone to live freely, peacefully, and productively.

      Last year the Obama campaign told us that government is something we all “belong” to. I guess they’re right because when the government is powerful enough to target, intimidate, and harass us, we do “belong” to them. The real question is: Will we stand for this?

      These atrocious government actions are bigger, uglier, and much more dangerous than “a few rogue employees.” It’s time for all Americans to stand together and join in the growing outraged chorus that looks at our out-of-control government and says, “Enough is enough.”

    • Francesca
    • Why are my posts never showing up? All I get is the spinning circle. I am giving up on this site.

      • AmericaTheBeautiful
      • Does anyone have a full list of Obama’s transformation? We need to review and attach the changes to the corruption…

        GM TRAP was about theft…..Stealing car dealerships/agencies from their rightful owners through closings and redistribution at GM ….and union pension bailouts ….TARP was the deceitful use of taxpayer dollars to bailout union pensions while punishing stockholders and transferring their shares to particular unions ….and redistributing dealerships to Dems…Can you say Mac Mclarty and Vernon Jarrett 6 dealerships that we know of? while Conservatives? Rich GOP lost multigenerational dealerships in the government redistribution scheme and punishment scheme?

        Medicare Fraud charges for any mistake..where prominent docs had the justice department go through every surgery, or script …where even a mistake in an operative report where Medicare was not cheated or defrauded landed them in prison…this extended to pharmacists and others (see Redstate.com Patrick Millsap)…are these people being punished all white??

        Military careers ruined—lives impacted negatively and permanently for service to their country…and our great military being dessimated on purpose…including the high rate of looses in the Seals and Special Ops…and 25% increase in being dishonourably discharged among general population and on bases with combat personell a 67% increase of those dishonourably discharged…This means they do not get pensions, it’s almost impossible to get a job..and they’re being discharged for minor infractions on a basis and at a rate never seen before…including for speaking of their Christian faith…all since 2009…Military that is retired have said they have Never seen anything like this dismantling and destruction of the military…

        Benghazi

        Obamacare -Gestapho care..pay for your neighbours birth control or her bloody violent abortion…Planned Parenthood and their creepy abortions is now a tax..regardless if its against another’s rights to religious freedom

        AP scandal wiretapping spying on the press as a way to threaten and manage compliance in the news..all the Obama regime deems fit to tell

        NewsCorp and James Rosen Scandal…where a reporter is charged with espionage in an attempt to silence and threaten FoxNews as Obama has done since day 1 … Citing “they are not a Real news outlet”
        Barring Foxnews from News Pools and Conference Calls…wiretapping parents of Rosen…and who knows who else..and the warrant they claim was served–never was.

        IRS threatening and blackmailing Conservatives across the board…sending out the threat…you oppose Obama-you will pay…with your business, your reputation, your life
        Making sure people afraid to support Romney in order to steal an election for the Communist thugs

        Gun Control…ammo control

        Homeland Security…the government can put their hands on you and your children, like it or not

        Education..where Common Core is being shoved down America’s children’s throats to teach the finer points of Bill Ayers communist propaganda while ignoring America’s founders and her founding under and dedication to God.

        Voting…where the military was kept from voting as it was all but impossible …hell, they crashed a plane carrying their votes. No ID’s required and electronic, non-traceable voting implemented wherever they could…
        Swing states that had 140% of the vote in certain districts…and 100% voted for Obama in certain areas as well …where statistically that is not possible

        EPA, who had fake illegal email addresses..while they plotted and planned using In Terrorum..a policy to terrorize a few to get the masses to comply. Lisa Jackson simply gets to walk away when caught breaking laws and having her multiple illegal email addresses…

        A Justice Department where voter intimidation is dismissed against the New Black Panthers, where the AG refers to them as “my people” and minorities can claim a hate crime but no such thing exists says our AG if one is white… as majorities are not covered.

        More free housing, more free phones, more free and illegally proffered Food Stamps, Disability, Unemployment, and scholarships than the corrupt accountants at the IRS could ever see at the end of the mass of red ink that has become America and Americans debt for generations to come….

Leave A Response

* Required

-->