HEADS UP! -Barack Obama’s 2014 Election Theft Commission Report

Barack Obama is attending a little meeting this morning at the White House that will likely be all but ignored by both media and pundits.  It’s with a group his White House, under the direction of Valerie Jarrett, initiated last year involving the election process.  Now tell me reader, how comfortable are you with the idea of THIS White House, working extra hard to influence the upcoming election process?  Yeah, me neither…

What Barack Obama did for 2012, he hopes to do again for the 2014 Midterms.

_______________________________________________

Check out this portion of the president’s White House schedule for today:

10:45 am || Meets with the President’s Commission on Election Administration on voter access

Just what is the “President’s Commission on Election Administration on voter access”?

Here’s an official blurb on the newly formed group, from May of 2013:

Presidential Commission on Election Administration Launched

WASHINGTON, May 21, 2013 — The Presidential Commission on Election Administration was officially launched today, following President Barack Obama’s State of the Union pledge to identify non-partisan ways to shorten lines at polling places, promote the efficient conduct of elections, and provide better access to the polls for all voters.  LINK

_______________

Now check out this public statement given TODAY by this same organization:

Presidential Commission on Election Administration Presents Recommendations to President Obama

WASHINGTON, Jan. 22, 2014 – The Presidential Commission on Election Administration today presented President Obama with a series of recommendations designed to help local and state elections officials improve all voters’ experience in casting their ballots. The Report is based on a six-month study conducted by the 10-Member Commission of the problems that have plagued voting in the past and the issues that will confront the American voter in the future.

The Commission concluded unanimously that the “problems that hinder the efficient administration of elections are both identifiable and solvable.” The Report offers certain key recommendations and numerous administrative best practices to improve the problem areas identified in the President’s Executive Order charging the Commission. In formulating these recommendations, the Commission heard testimony from around the country and received and evaluated the results of a survey of thousands of state and local administrators.  LINK

________________

Ah yes, the use of Executive Order.  It is no accident that Barack Obama so recently came out declaring himself ready to expand his use of Executive Power even further in 2014 – just as it is no accident Executive Power is a foundational component of this newly formed Election Commission.

The Obama White House has attempted to claim this commission is “bi-partisan”.  Let’s delve into the truth behind this lie:

It is chaired by Robert F. Bauer, Barack Obama’s personal attorney and adviser going back several years.  Served as White House counsel until 2011 and is still actively involved with the DNC.

Another member is Trey Grayson, an Obama-approved Republican.  Grayson was once a registered Democrat who supported Bill Clinton, who, upon wanting to run for office in Kentucky, changed his affiliation to Republican.  He ran against Rand Paul for Kentucky Senator, and upon losing by a wide margin, accepted his current position at director of the Institute of Politics at Harvard Kennedy School.  Oh, and he also slammed Sarah Palin for being “unfit for office”.

Larry Lomax is Nevada’s Clark County Registrar.  The same Clark County that has delivered Election Day victories to Barack Obama and Harry Reid.  Remember that odd voting machine black out when Harry Reid was scrambling to win re-election in 2010?  That was Clark County folks, and THAT is why the Obama White House wants Clark County to bring its particular brand of “expertise” to elections all across the nation in 2014.

This is no non-partisan commission.  The Republicans are Big Government statists, the Democrats are far left-socialists, and the entire process is being overseen by an Obama White House working diligently to deliver victory for itself in 2014.

Rest assured though, there is push back.  2014 will not go the way of the statists, and Barack Obama WILL be sent to the trash-heap of history…

 

(Thank you to R.I. for pointing me in the direction of today’s meeting.)

__________________________________

IN WASHINGTON D.C., FRANK BENNINGTON KNOWS WHERE THE BODIES ARE BURIED,

AND HE’S DETERMINED NOT TO BE COUNTED AMONG THEM.

EBOOK:  HERE

PAPERBACK:  HERE

93 days ago by in News | You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About the

Be courteous to all, but intimate with few, and let those few be well tried before you give them your confidence. -G. Washington

7 Comments to HEADS UP! -Barack Obama’s 2014 Election Theft Commission Report
    • VTX
    • The election theft was aided and abetted by the information that Maxine Waters spoke of – NSA data that was purloined before or during the Snowden episode. The false-flags in this instance are being promoted by a “Republican,” and here is what he’s saying:

      “On NBC’s “Meet The Press,” Mike Rogers, a Republican congressman from Michigan who is the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, described Snowden as a “thief, who we believe had some help.” The show’s host, David Gregory, interjected, “You think the Russians helped Ed Snowden?” Rogers replied that he believed it was neither “coincidence” nor “a gee-whiz luck event that he ended up in Moscow under the handling of the F.S.B.”’

      http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2014/01/snowden-calls-russian-spy-story-absurd.html

      Snowden’s response to Rogers’ imaginary story shows that he Snowden was unaware that others were duplicating his efforts (or perhaps even made his efforts easier – leaving the door open behind them.)

      Perhaps Maxine Waters should be sent to Guantanamo and waterboarded – until she gives up the sources of her information. (Or maybe sent on a trip to the western mountains of Pakistan, and treated to a drone strike, which seems to be the MO of this Presidunce? Hey, Princess: you can even use the X-Box again!) Just kidding. But where are the questions? Who is asking them?

      Waters stated openly that data Obama had – which could not be garnered from Census info) would be used to skew elections. Why isn’t Rogers interested in that? Maybe that’s a sign that he’s working on the other side – on the side of the Constitution-wreckers? Either that, or he’s a one-dimensional dope (very possible) who is easily led down false trails by enemy noncombatants working on the inside of the US government?

      People don’t trust the government – and with good reason: most people are just beginning to doubt the 9/11 story, particularly with the strike on the Pentagon, but also beginning with Building 7. It’s not hard to construct a scenario where the Sauds had inside help – not like the fat Canadian suggests, but definitely an Intel-driven op by rogue agents collaborating with Salafists and others. Just as Obama was against the war because he was under the influence of people who were profiting mightily from the leaking sanctions!

      Americans as a rule are pro-Intel, but not when the Intel is used against us, or when the information is used by politicians in order to further their private agendas. The meeting the Princess is holding on elections is surely utilizing purloined data.

      Meanwhile, people are being misdirected – against Snowden – when the real danger is coming from the subversion of all of our systems of government and the Constitution itself by the misuse of Intel data. Add to that the theft of American votes, including the deliberate interference with military ballots, and there is no such thing as Constitutional government; we’ve already passed the point where the Constitution is the Law of the Land.

      Evidence? How about the EPA redrawing state boundaries?

      We are in dark territory.

    • truthandjustice
    • When I read this, the name Pres. Commission on Election Admin. rung a bell – I vaguely remembered it from some research (I thought) I had done months back on voter fraud and Scytl. So I did a quick search and found it. Aha! Yes, it’s part of the voter fraud stuff — connected to SOE, a company of Scytl.

      “SOE, a Scytl company, to present views on the future of voting technology
      August 29, 2013 | Conferences & Events

      Following the Presidential Executive Order to research and recommend best practices to ensure all eligible voters have the opportunity to cast their ballots without undue delay, the Presidential Commission on Election Administration has invited SOE to present their views concerning the future of voting technology during a public meeting to be held September 19, 2013.

      With the goal of empowering all voters and removing obstacles that prevent groups of voters, such as members of the military, overseas voters, voters with disabilities, and voters with limited English proficiency, from casting their ballots, SOE will demonstrate early ballot delivery and online voting technologies. These tools are effective and efficient solutions to help enfranchise voters and create efficiencies across the entire electoral process (pre-election, Election Day, post-election) with innovative and proven election modernization strategies.”

      http://www.scytl.com/scytl-to-present-views-on-the-future-of-online-voting-technology/

      So yes, of course, just as we suspect – it is all about the “how’s” and “when’s” and “where’s” to best use their corrupt technologies and strategies for voter fraud.

    • VTX
    • The Obama meeting is a cover story for the subversion of the 2014 elections, because things are getting out that they don’t want to be known. Podesta will likely be giving a report on how much they’ve been able to hide.

      Here’s a summary of what has been seen so far, and what is to come:

      1. Maxine Waters blabs about personal data the President has on all Americans, stuff that is far beyond Census material. She indicates that this would further Obama’s election chances.

      2. Snowden steals NSA data at roughly the same time Waters is blabbing; he is not directly aided, but certain doors have been opened for him.

      3. NSA doesn’t know that either sets of information have been stolen – not until Snowden goes public.

      4. While many question Waters’ claims, few believe them; after she makes her claims, few connect them with Snowden or whomever came before him.

      5. The data Waters says was to be used for changing election outcomes is still in the hands of political operatives.

      6. A political cleanup crew is brought in to cover the tracks – (that would be the Weasel, John Podesta.)

      7. Congressman Rogers engages in misdirection, as was done in the Iran Contra hearings by Inouye.

      8. The press is uninterested in stolen elections because no one is getting a blow job.

      9. Military and Intel pros are being forced into early retirement or are being sacked.

      10. Preparations are being made to carry out a false flag event – larger than 9/11 – in time for the elections.

      11. Elections are put on hold, Continuity of Government statutes are enacted; martial law is the law of the land.

      Dark Territory. It ain’t just a movie.

    • Mark Anderson
    • Here is GA, We are a Republican state. In 2012,I was told by an officer in the Republican Party that some districts voted 300% of their registered voters.That’s right,300%. Guess what else? Those districts were predominately black. Nothing was done, no fuss was made. The books were closed and the results were certified by the attorney general. Those that questioned the results were told to, “Move along. You didn’t see what you saw here.” Why would they do that? What gives here?

      I am starting to believe that the problem really lies with rigged machines along with fake voters and ballot stuffing. I live in an ultra conservative Republican county. I can give personal testimony that when I voted in 2012 on a scytl machine, (thank you very much, Karen Handel. May you receive the reward you so richly deserve.)at the end of the ballot, which I checked over before finalizing, my vote had flipped from Romney to Obama (as default) except that I did not make a mistake on the first round. Before I left that first page, my OCD self checked my choice and it said Romney. So, how did the final tally go to Obama? For that matter, even though I corrected the entry,who knows what really happened once I cast my vote and removed the card? I’ve heard of rigging votes by ballot stuffing, changing the vote via electronic transfers at the state, local and national levels. How do we short circuit this thievery if we can’t get rid of the scytl machines before 2014?

      Could we publish the voting results v. the number of registered voters in every city and county newspaper? Discrepancies would be right there in print for all to see. I suspect that most of the voters in my district assumed that they were safe from tampering and were not very thorough in checking their choices. Yet, it is entirely possible their votes were changed back to default like mine was. They would be horrified to know that their vote was artificially cast for Obama. I have not seen the final results of voting in my area where dems are as rare as hen’s teeth. I wonder how many Obama votes came from here?

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • KILL SCTYL …register at True the Vote…Demand SCTYL and Diebald be dismantled…demand your state bars them and demand Voter ID..the purple thumb was good enough for valid elections in Iraq…why not here?

      This week we find:

      The Obama WH called Greta to deliver a threat for Jennifer Griffin to stop her Benghazi reporting.

      Obama’s lie regarding diminishing AlQaeda while they are actually wildly on the rise.

      The Pentagon and AfriCom Commander did not even know about the existence of the Benghazi Annex…tell us it was off the books to others in government. Obama and Brennan’s private war??

      http://www.wnd.com/2014/01/bombshell-pentagon-didnt-know-benghazi-annex-existed/

      BOMBSHELL: PENTAGON ‘DIDN’T KNOW’ BENGHAZI ANNEX EXISTED
      Raises major questions about what U.S. was doing in secretive facility

      AARON KLEIN About | Email | Archive

      The extensive Senate report on the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack dropped a major, unreported bombshell: The commander of U.S. forces in Africa was not aware of the existence of the besieged CIA annex.

      The staggering detail raises the question of what was transpiring at the fated annex and nearby U.S. special mission and why key members of the Defense Department, including those responsible for responding to emergency situations, were not aware of it.

      Questions now must be also raised as to why, on the night of attack, command of an elite unit known as C-110, or the EUCOM CIF, was reportedly transferred from the military’s European command to AFRICOM, or the United States Africa Command.

      Aaron Klein’s “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” is available, autographed, at WND’s Superstore

      Page 28 of the 85-page report states:

      “With respect to the role of DoD and AFRICOM in emergency evacuations and rescue operations in Benghazi, the Committee received conflicting information on the extent of the awareness within DoD of the Benghazi Annex. According to U.S. AFRICOM, neither the command nor its Commander were aware of an annex in Benghazi, Libya.

      “However, it is the Committee’s understanding that other DoD personnel were aware of the Benghazi Annex.”

      Page 77 of the report further divulges that Gen. Carter Ham, then-commander of U.S. Africa Command, “was not even aware there was a CIA annex in Benghazi at the time of the attacks.”

      Continued the Senate report: “We are puzzled as to how the military leadership expected to effectively respond and rescue Americans in the event of an emergency when it did not even know of the existence of one of the U.S. facilities.”

      On the night of the attack, Ham was placed in charge of the C-110, a 40-man Special Ops force maintained for rapid response to emergencies. The force was trained for deployment for events like the Benghazi attack. Command was transferred from the military’s European command to Ham in the middle of the attack.

      Ultimately, the C-110, which had reportedly been training in Croatia during the attack, was not deployed to respond in Benghazi. Instead it was ordered to return to its forward operating base in Italy.

    • AmericaTheBeautiful
    • We need a candidate who will fight…who can organize a campaign beyond these communist’s machine…and has the heart of an unapologetic winner.
      The Dems feared Christie for that reason.
      We’d better figure out who…Rino or not, who can win…or accept our lives as a slave.

      http://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/2014/01/21/willard-agonistes/?singlepage=true

      As the originator of Romneycare, Mitt was the single worst candidate the Republicans could nominate in an election that should have turned on the now-confirmed disaster of Obamacare, the one man who could not take on Obama’s “signature legislative accomplishment.” And, of course, he didn’t. Romney was despised even in his own “home” state of Massachusetts for trashing the state of which he was a one-term governor when it suited his larger political ambitions. Naturally, he lost it in a landslide, 61-38.

      But wait, it gets worse. After winning the first debate against a listless Obama, Romney still thought he hadn’t done well, that the president would do better next time, and that he didn’t really have much of a chance:

      Romney wasn’t buying it. Instead, he went into an extended monologue on how his father, former Michigan Gov. George Romney, was a better man than he will ever be. As he spoke, Romney held the notes he had made during the debate (candidates are not allowed to bring any notes with them to the stage, but are allowed to make them during the debate). Romney pointed out that in every debate he began by writing “Dad” at the top of the paper.

      “That’s what I start with: ‘Dad,’” Romney explained. “I always think about Dad and about I am standing on his shoulders. I would not be there, there’s no way I would be able to be running for president, if Dad hadn’t done what Dad did. He’s the real deal …”

      Good Lord.

      Over at Hot Air, Allahpundit has some trenchant thoughts:

      I think Romney lost for three reasons. One: He’s right that Obama isn’t an aberration. There’s a huge constituency for the European/blue-state model in the U.S., whether it’s fiscally sustainable or not, and demographic change is more likely to expand it than shrink it. I don’t think it’ll be many years before we see another Republican president but I do think it’ll be many years before we see another Republican landslide. Two: He got out-organized. The irony of the passages from the movie flagged by York is that Mitt was, understandably, worried about his obvious weaknesses (his ability to communicate with voters, his unjust image as a rich guy who’d inherited all his successes) but not worried about his supposed strengths, i.e. his managerial acumen and organizational efforts. He should have been. Obama’s data-crunchers and behavioral analysts evidently ran rings around Team “Project ORCA.” Oh well. Three: Romney suffered from the same problem McCain did, albeit to a lesser extent — there was no real point to his campaign.

      No point, that is, except a conflicting sense of entitlement (on display during the nomination fight) and a crippling lack of confidence that sought to atone for his privileged upbringing. It’s worth noting that that dear old dad, George Romney, was also a loser, who torpedoed his own presidential campaign in 1967 with his notorious “brainwashed” remark about Vietnam.

      The textbook definition of “empty suit.” And yet, for some reason perhaps even unknown to Mitt himself, Dad was his beau ideal. In this clip one can clearly see that the acorn didn’t fall very far from the tree: good old having-it-both ways Mitt, as adumbrated by his father. Romney’s refusal to admit that Romneycare was fatally flawed and conceptually harmful resulted in his pretzeling on the subject, which convinced a grand total of nobody that he would repeal Obamacare (because, let’s face it, the GOP doesn’t really want to repeal Obamacare) or could somehow make the gigantic kludge work.

      And that, in the end, was the story of the election. A man born to wealth who also made his own way in the world felt that he could not beat a man from nowhere of no accomplishment and no discernible skills other than the ability to read a TelePrompter. Only in America.

      • VTX
      • Mitt was not an ideal political candidate, but he has a gift of organization (all except for his own campaign, and more’s the pity.) Mitt won by votes cast; Obimbo won by votes counted -(there’s Scytl for ya) Even the program they used to watch the race was compromised! STUXNET, or a variation: that’s what it was.

        As far as Christie goes, he’s not a “Happy Warrior;” he’s a backstabbing, petulant puss, who was too afraid of losing a few points by helping Ken C in Va. That makes him a sissy and a traitor. And his first instincts are not Conservative, nor are his first instincts to help others: his first instinct is to help himself and punish his enemies. He is a small man in a huge body with a bad heart and a black soul. He’s a fat white version of Obama.

        So I don’t mind a RINO as much as I do a coward and a bully – which are always one and the same. (I figured that out long ago, and one way I measure it is this: a lot of people are afraid of snakes, and are not cowards, but I never met a bully who was not petrified of ‘em – proving that they aren’t as big as they make themselves out to be.)

        Everyone has a little coward in them in some way – (love can do that, as Judge Roberts has shown) – but some are, like Christy, arrogant and pussilanimous in the same package, too weak to stand up for others in the fear that they might lose a little support in their own personal quest for glory.

        What we need, RINO or not, is someone who is neither bully nor coward, but who is willing to fight to the finish, and to use every legal and moral weapon he has in his arsenal.

        Mitt was not a coward, nor was he a bully, but he was also not willing to use his weapons; he was fighting by rules set by people who shouldn’t be setting them and who have no right to set them.

        Fight fair, friends, but fight with determination and valor, so that no one thinks that the fight has been thrown, and that everyone can see that you’ve given it your last ounce of strength.

Leave A Response

* Required

-->